What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (1 Viewer)

I guess it was so great I missed it. I don't remember the announcer calling his name until the middle of the second half.
Did you watch it on GolTV or was their some other feed? Because the announcer was all over Bradley's nuts in the first half. And the pass was pretty nice (it was also a fantastic run by Reus). He was pretty blah in the 2nd half but the game was pretty boring in general.
 
I guess it was so great I missed it. I don't remember the announcer calling his name until the middle of the second half.
Did you watch it on GolTV or was their some other feed? Because the announcer was all over Bradley's nuts in the first half. And the pass was pretty nice (it was also a fantastic run by Reus). He was pretty blah in the 2nd half but the game was pretty boring in general.
GolTV
 
What I don't like about the situation is that Donavon resigned with the Galaxy to begin with. He should have just stayed a FA. I don't know if he just wanted to make sure the Galaxy got paid, or if he didn't think he'd impress enough to sign elsewhere for better money. I don't like either theory so I would love to believe another.
MLS had two option years on the contract. So he couldn't have gone at the end of the season anyway. If he didn't sign an extension, they wouldn't have let him go on loan this winter. He wanted to A)prove himself and B) stay sharp and in form leading up to the World Cup.It's not like he had much leverage. This way he got a raise and got to go on loan. MLS will have to decide how they want to value him in the summer. I'm on record in saying that MLS should worry about growing soccer in America first and growing MLS second. So I wouldn't hold out for too much money. But that's easy for me to say as a soccer fan who doesn't enjoy watching a lot of MLS.
Thanks. I was misinformed on Donovan's deal.
I think the implication would be that Holden would play on the right, Landycakes on the left, with Dempsey pushed up.
dude
I'm like Kanye dropping the N-word here. We're taking it back.
:goodposting:
 
Can someone explain to me the FA cup?

I am watching this Birmingham City/Derby match...what a shot by Savage and an even better save in the 94th minute :goodposting:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone explain to me the FA cup?I am watching this Birmingham City/Derby match...what a shot by Savage and an even better save in the 94th minute :bowtie:
Just a tournament for all English clubs.Picture the EPL as MLB, Championship as AAA, League One as AA, League Two as A...all teams get thrown into a pool and play a yearly tournament. Lots of history, mostly for prestige. The top teams take it as a chance to rest most of their starters and give their lesser players some play time. Lower league teams go all out for glory, and it seems most every year a team out of a lower league makes it deep into the tournament and knocks off a few top teams.Pretty neat format, gives a team like the Durham Bulls a chance to knock off the NY Yankees in front of the whole country.
 
Can someone explain to me the FA cup?

I am watching this Birmingham City/Derby match...what a shot by Savage and an even better save in the 94th minute :bowtie:
Snippets from Wiki:The FA Cup is a knockout cup competition in English football. The competition is a knockout tournament with pairings for each round drawn at random – there are no seeds, and the draw for each round is not made until after the scheduled dates for the previous round. The draw also determines which teams will play at home.

All clubs in the Premier League and Football League are automatically eligible, and clubs in the next six levels of the English football league system are also eligible provided they have played in either the FA Cup, FA Trophy or FA Vase competitions in the previous season. The number of entrants has increased greatly in recent years. In the 2004–05 season, 660 clubs entered the competition, beating the long-standing record of 656 from the 1921–22 season. In 2005–06 this increased to 674 entrants, in 2006–07 to 687, in 2007–08 to 731 clubs, and for the 2008–09 and 2009–10 competitions it reached 762.

Explanation of the English Soccer League Hierarchy

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can someone explain to me the FA cup?I am watching this Birmingham City/Derby match...what a shot by Savage and an even better save in the 94th minute :bowtie:
Just a tournament for all English clubs.Picture the EPL as MLB, Championship as AAA, League One as AA, League Two as A...all teams get thrown into a pool and play a yearly tournament. Lots of history, mostly for prestige. The top teams take it as a chance to rest most of their starters and give their lesser players some play time. Lower league teams go all out for glory, and it seems most every year a team out of a lower league makes it deep into the tournament and knocks off a few top teams.Pretty neat format, gives a team like the Durham Bulls a chance to knock off the NY Yankees in front of the whole country.
ThanksWhat is the format? Is it like group play then single elimination or something?I saw Native posted it was a knockout tournament, but I dont really know what that means...I was looking on ESPN for the brackets or something. All I could find was 5 rounds then a quarter final, semi final, then final...
 
knockout tournament

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitio...tes2008-09.aspx

Basically after each round, all the teams remaining are thrown into a hopper and they pull a home team and an away side. It's conceivable Arsenal and Chelsea play in round one or Preston North End draws Liverpool. I believe the top teams are given byes in the early early rounds, but after that, it's all fair.
Think of it as a Baseball tournament where all MLB teams are in the same competition as teams from AAA, AA, A and about 20 other lower level semi-pro leagues. Theres like 800 teams in the FA Cup, everyone from the biggest teams in England (Manchester United, Chelsea) to small, local football teams whose players hold other jobs in the offseason. The top 40 or so teams (all the teams in the top two Leagues) have byes in the early rounds. Teams are drawn to play each other randomly. After each round, all the remaining teams are thrown back into a hat and the next round of games are determined.

Awesome idea. We should do the same thing in American sports. :bowtie:

 
knockout tournament

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitio...tes2008-09.aspx

Basically after each round, all the teams remaining are thrown into a hopper and they pull a home team and an away side. It's conceivable Arsenal and Chelsea play in round one or Preston North End draws Liverpool. I believe the top teams are given byes in the early early rounds, but after that, it's all fair.
Think of it as a Baseball tournament where all MLB teams are in the same competition as teams from AAA, AA, A and about 20 other lower level semi-pro leagues. Theres like 800 teams in the FA Cup, everyone from the biggest teams in England (Manchester United, Chelsea) to small, local football teams whose players hold other jobs in the offseason. The top 40 or so teams (all the teams in the top two Leagues) have byes in the early rounds. Teams are drawn to play each other randomly. After each round, all the remaining teams are thrown back into a hat and the next round of games are determined.

Awesome idea. We should do the same thing in American sports. :)
That does sound cool...
 
Bayern defeat Werder Bremen 3-1 and Leverkusen beat Wolfsburg 2-1.

This keeps Bayern and Leverkusen tied on points for the league lead with Bayern inching one goal closer in the point differential.

Code:
Bayern Leverkusen 13-9-0 48  48:28 +30Bayern München	14-6-2 48  48:19 +29
Add that to the advancement to the DFB Pokal semifinal this past week and the Champions League match with Fiorentina this coming Wednesday and it is a big week in Munich.
 
Mjolnirs said:
derek245583 said:
That does sound cool...
It is pretty cool. Other countries have similar tournaments in soccer.The United States has the US Open Cup, Germany has the DFB Pokal and Spain has the Copa Del Ray, just to name a few.
:wall:I played in one of the many qualifying tournaments for the US Open Cup this past summer with my club team. I'm sure others here have as well.
 
And I gotta kinda disagree that the top teams always rest their good players in the FA Cup. In the League Cup, sure....but the prestige of the FA Cup kinda outweighs resting your players for league games. I was shocked (and I think I posted about it in here) when I found out that Arsenal fielded that crap lineup in the FA Cup when they got knocked out a few weeks ago.

 
Looks like I'm missing a solid 2-2 game between Villa and Crystal Palace because my Time Warner cable box has decided to #### out and stop airing FSC...

 
FYI with the win, Aris has moved into 4th place in the Greek league and are currently in one of the UEFA places for next year.

 
And for any who are interested, he's a very positive update on the team of 8 and 9-year olds that I coach.

After losing our first game 5-2 to a team of older kids, we rebounded with a draw in our second game. In our third, my only game thus far as solo head coach, we won 5-1 after going into halftime at 0-0. Then came the game this past Friday - against the best team in the league. A team of 9 and 10 year olds who had played travel soccer together this past summer and had done well. Last week, I caught the end of their game....they beat a team in our league literally 10-0. I was pretty scared.

The game kicks off at 6:50. I worked late and didn't get to the game until 6:39...and the other coach wasn't there. I look into the corner, where the teams warm up, and the other team is there, all organized, running drills. Our kids are scattered around...the arcade, the restaurant, etc. just running around. I round them up and go in for 5 minutes of warmup. The other team is decked out in their full uniform - blue shorts, yellow jerseys, matching socks. Their coaches have the emblazoned "Lockport Soccer Club" polo shirts, all matching. Our kids are wearing various red t-shirts, including one kid who wears a shirt that says "How do you keep an idiot busy for hours? See back." on the front and "How do you keep an idiot busy for hours? See front" on the back, and I have a red t-shirt on myself. I felt like the Bad News Bears.

Finally our coach shows up and the other game that's going on ends. The other team's coach blows his whistle and the kids all grab their matching soccer bags and run to the field where they start running more drills. It looks like we're gonna get murdered. Game starts and you can tell their kids are cocky....they're very good, and work well as a team. Within 5 minutes, it's 1-0. But we encourage our kids to be tough and play aggressive....and what they lack in skill, they make up in toughness. Half the team plays hockey, and they're fearless. They start going into challenges and pressuring the other team, and we somehow tie it 1-1. Then right before the half, a mad scramble in front of their net and we're up 2-1. Their coaches and players look stunned.

Halftime, and we just tell them to keep fighting, keep playing hard but fair....nothing dirty, but don't give them anything. Well, the other team comes out fired up and they score a quick 2 to go up 3-2. But our kids keep fighting, and we tie it with 6 minutes left. With about 2 minutes remaining, one of our kids actually tries to slide tackle and get the ball, and he completely misses. The kid is one of the most mild-mannered on our team, and I KNOW that it wasn't malicious. Plus, we'd never tell our kids to play dirty - sometimes they'll make comments like "I'm gonna elbow #14" and I have to calm them down and remind them that we're not playing hockey, no one has pads on, and that's not allowed. But regardless, the ref correctly calls a foul, and the other team's coach storms onto the field to stop play - he wants our kid kicked out of the game. Our player has no idea what's going on - he was going for the ball. The other team's coach is LIVID. The game ends in a 3-3 draw. Their players appear stunned, and their coaches are ridiculously pissed. In the handshake, they just go past us stonefaced. After the game, their coach pleads with the ref to get our player suspended, but the ref isn't having it. He explains to us what the other guy is saying, and he laughs that it was clearly not malicious - just a kid who doesn't really know what he's doing who's trying to get the ball.

For a team who's played 4 organized games ever to be 1-2-1 with 5 points from 4 games is pretty impressive, IMO.

 
And for any who are interested, he's a very positive update on the team of 8 and 9-year olds that I coach.After losing our first game 5-2 to a team of older kids, we rebounded with a draw in our second game. In our third, my only game thus far as solo head coach, we won 5-1 after going into halftime at 0-0. Then came the game this past Friday - against the best team in the league. A team of 9 and 10 year olds who had played travel soccer together this past summer and had done well. Last week, I caught the end of their game....they beat a team in our league literally 10-0. I was pretty scared.The game kicks off at 6:50. I worked late and didn't get to the game until 6:39...and the other coach wasn't there. I look into the corner, where the teams warm up, and the other team is there, all organized, running drills. Our kids are scattered around...the arcade, the restaurant, etc. just running around. I round them up and go in for 5 minutes of warmup. The other team is decked out in their full uniform - blue shorts, yellow jerseys, matching socks. Their coaches have the emblazoned "Lockport Soccer Club" polo shirts, all matching. Our kids are wearing various red t-shirts, including one kid who wears a shirt that says "How do you keep an idiot busy for hours? See back." on the front and "How do you keep an idiot busy for hours? See front" on the back, and I have a red t-shirt on myself. I felt like the Bad News Bears.Finally our coach shows up and the other game that's going on ends. The other team's coach blows his whistle and the kids all grab their matching soccer bags and run to the field where they start running more drills. It looks like we're gonna get murdered. Game starts and you can tell their kids are cocky....they're very good, and work well as a team. Within 5 minutes, it's 1-0. But we encourage our kids to be tough and play aggressive....and what they lack in skill, they make up in toughness. Half the team plays hockey, and they're fearless. They start going into challenges and pressuring the other team, and we somehow tie it 1-1. Then right before the half, a mad scramble in front of their net and we're up 2-1. Their coaches and players look stunned.Halftime, and we just tell them to keep fighting, keep playing hard but fair....nothing dirty, but don't give them anything. Well, the other team comes out fired up and they score a quick 2 to go up 3-2. But our kids keep fighting, and we tie it with 6 minutes left. With about 2 minutes remaining, one of our kids actually tries to slide tackle and get the ball, and he completely misses. The kid is one of the most mild-mannered on our team, and I KNOW that it wasn't malicious. Plus, we'd never tell our kids to play dirty - sometimes they'll make comments like "I'm gonna elbow #14" and I have to calm them down and remind them that we're not playing hockey, no one has pads on, and that's not allowed. But regardless, the ref correctly calls a foul, and the other team's coach storms onto the field to stop play - he wants our kid kicked out of the game. Our player has no idea what's going on - he was going for the ball. The other team's coach is LIVID. The game ends in a 3-3 draw. Their players appear stunned, and their coaches are ridiculously pissed. In the handshake, they just go past us stonefaced. After the game, their coach pleads with the ref to get our player suspended, but the ref isn't having it. He explains to us what the other guy is saying, and he laughs that it was clearly not malicious - just a kid who doesn't really know what he's doing who's trying to get the ball.For a team who's played 4 organized games ever to be 1-2-1 with 5 points from 4 games is pretty impressive, IMO.
:goodposting:I was waiting to read "Do you believe in miracles?!?!"
 
And Barça takes their first loss all season at the hands of Atlético de Madrid.

I don´t know what happened through much of the second half as there was some sort of technical difficulty on ESPN Deportes.

 
And for any who are interested, he's a very positive update on the team of 8 and 9-year olds that I coach.After losing our first game 5-2 to a team of older kids, we rebounded with a draw in our second game. In our third, my only game thus far as solo head coach, we won 5-1 after going into halftime at 0-0. Then came the game this past Friday - against the best team in the league. A team of 9 and 10 year olds who had played travel soccer together this past summer and had done well. Last week, I caught the end of their game....they beat a team in our league literally 10-0. I was pretty scared.The game kicks off at 6:50. I worked late and didn't get to the game until 6:39...and the other coach wasn't there. I look into the corner, where the teams warm up, and the other team is there, all organized, running drills. Our kids are scattered around...the arcade, the restaurant, etc. just running around. I round them up and go in for 5 minutes of warmup. The other team is decked out in their full uniform - blue shorts, yellow jerseys, matching socks. Their coaches have the emblazoned "Lockport Soccer Club" polo shirts, all matching. Our kids are wearing various red t-shirts, including one kid who wears a shirt that says "How do you keep an idiot busy for hours? See back." on the front and "How do you keep an idiot busy for hours? See front" on the back, and I have a red t-shirt on myself. I felt like the Bad News Bears.Finally our coach shows up and the other game that's going on ends. The other team's coach blows his whistle and the kids all grab their matching soccer bags and run to the field where they start running more drills. It looks like we're gonna get murdered. Game starts and you can tell their kids are cocky....they're very good, and work well as a team. Within 5 minutes, it's 1-0. But we encourage our kids to be tough and play aggressive....and what they lack in skill, they make up in toughness. Half the team plays hockey, and they're fearless. They start going into challenges and pressuring the other team, and we somehow tie it 1-1. Then right before the half, a mad scramble in front of their net and we're up 2-1. Their coaches and players look stunned.Halftime, and we just tell them to keep fighting, keep playing hard but fair....nothing dirty, but don't give them anything. Well, the other team comes out fired up and they score a quick 2 to go up 3-2. But our kids keep fighting, and we tie it with 6 minutes left. With about 2 minutes remaining, one of our kids actually tries to slide tackle and get the ball, and he completely misses. The kid is one of the most mild-mannered on our team, and I KNOW that it wasn't malicious. Plus, we'd never tell our kids to play dirty - sometimes they'll make comments like "I'm gonna elbow #14" and I have to calm them down and remind them that we're not playing hockey, no one has pads on, and that's not allowed. But regardless, the ref correctly calls a foul, and the other team's coach storms onto the field to stop play - he wants our kid kicked out of the game. Our player has no idea what's going on - he was going for the ball. The other team's coach is LIVID. The game ends in a 3-3 draw. Their players appear stunned, and their coaches are ridiculously pissed. In the handshake, they just go past us stonefaced. After the game, their coach pleads with the ref to get our player suspended, but the ref isn't having it. He explains to us what the other guy is saying, and he laughs that it was clearly not malicious - just a kid who doesn't really know what he's doing who's trying to get the ball.For a team who's played 4 organized games ever to be 1-2-1 with 5 points from 4 games is pretty impressive, IMO.
:thumbup:I was waiting to read "Do you believe in miracles?!?!"
Good stuff ST. Way to coach em up!
 
And Barça takes their first loss all season at the hands of Atlético de Madrid.I don´t know what happened through much of the second half as there was some sort of technical difficulty on ESPN Deportes.
Props to Atletico - I was worried about this one given the injuries/suspensions at the back. I just want to know if Puyol managed to stay healthy walking to the team bus after the match - the Blaugrana can't afford another injured defender.
 
And for any who are interested, he's a very positive update on the team of 8 and 9-year olds that I coach.After losing our first game 5-2 to a team of older kids, we rebounded with a draw in our second game. In our third, my only game thus far as solo head coach, we won 5-1 after going into halftime at 0-0. Then came the game this past Friday - against the best team in the league. A team of 9 and 10 year olds who had played travel soccer together this past summer and had done well. Last week, I caught the end of their game....they beat a team in our league literally 10-0. I was pretty scared.The game kicks off at 6:50. I worked late and didn't get to the game until 6:39...and the other coach wasn't there. I look into the corner, where the teams warm up, and the other team is there, all organized, running drills. Our kids are scattered around...the arcade, the restaurant, etc. just running around. I round them up and go in for 5 minutes of warmup. The other team is decked out in their full uniform - blue shorts, yellow jerseys, matching socks. Their coaches have the emblazoned "Lockport Soccer Club" polo shirts, all matching. Our kids are wearing various red t-shirts, including one kid who wears a shirt that says "How do you keep an idiot busy for hours? See back." on the front and "How do you keep an idiot busy for hours? See front" on the back, and I have a red t-shirt on myself. I felt like the Bad News Bears.Finally our coach shows up and the other game that's going on ends. The other team's coach blows his whistle and the kids all grab their matching soccer bags and run to the field where they start running more drills. It looks like we're gonna get murdered. Game starts and you can tell their kids are cocky....they're very good, and work well as a team. Within 5 minutes, it's 1-0. But we encourage our kids to be tough and play aggressive....and what they lack in skill, they make up in toughness. Half the team plays hockey, and they're fearless. They start going into challenges and pressuring the other team, and we somehow tie it 1-1. Then right before the half, a mad scramble in front of their net and we're up 2-1. Their coaches and players look stunned.Halftime, and we just tell them to keep fighting, keep playing hard but fair....nothing dirty, but don't give them anything. Well, the other team comes out fired up and they score a quick 2 to go up 3-2. But our kids keep fighting, and we tie it with 6 minutes left. With about 2 minutes remaining, one of our kids actually tries to slide tackle and get the ball, and he completely misses. The kid is one of the most mild-mannered on our team, and I KNOW that it wasn't malicious. Plus, we'd never tell our kids to play dirty - sometimes they'll make comments like "I'm gonna elbow #14" and I have to calm them down and remind them that we're not playing hockey, no one has pads on, and that's not allowed. But regardless, the ref correctly calls a foul, and the other team's coach storms onto the field to stop play - he wants our kid kicked out of the game. Our player has no idea what's going on - he was going for the ball. The other team's coach is LIVID. The game ends in a 3-3 draw. Their players appear stunned, and their coaches are ridiculously pissed. In the handshake, they just go past us stonefaced. After the game, their coach pleads with the ref to get our player suspended, but the ref isn't having it. He explains to us what the other guy is saying, and he laughs that it was clearly not malicious - just a kid who doesn't really know what he's doing who's trying to get the ball.For a team who's played 4 organized games ever to be 1-2-1 with 5 points from 4 games is pretty impressive, IMO.
Good stuff.
 
does Bradley re-think his lineup for the WC now that Cole might be out?With LD playing on the the right for Everton, it might be wise to keep him out there to attack England's weakened left flank. Just kinda thinking out loud. I dont know much about Bridge. Is he strong enough to hold up that side or is it now a weakness for the Brits?
A lot might depend on DMB. If he comes back to some form, he could be used on the left and Landon on the right and push Dempsey up top.
is a healthy DMB really better than a healthy Holden? I'm not sure at this point. In fact, I kinda doubt it.
I was not aware that Holden could play on the left side. I don't think he plays there in MLS unless I am confusing him with someone else.
I think the implication would be that Holden would play on the right, Landycakes on the left, with Dempsey pushed up.
I thought the whole discussion was based on Landon on the right because of how well he was doing in England at that spot(see original quoted post here)? That is why I brought about DMB for the left side.
 
The Case for Freddy Adu

Let the in-fighting begin!
The key point in this article, and one that I've been making in this thread is the following:

The bottom line is, Freddy Adu brings a skill set to the roster that few others do (Landon, and maybe Benny Feilhaber being the only others in terms of creativity on the ball). And when on form, I don't know how many people would really pass over him in favor of Rogers, Beasley, or Castillo.
At least he brings a different skillset, that extra something that the South Americans have that everybody else wants.Put Adu on the squad!!

 
CL matches coming up

Tomorrow of course is United @ AC Milan. Two clubs both playing at top form right now. United will be without Vidic and Giggs, both of which are pretty significant blows. Ferguson likes to play a more veteran lineup on the road against top clubs, but will probably be forced to play the likes of Scholes and Fletcher in the midfield, along with Wes Brown in the back with Rio. If I had my choice, I'd prefer to see Johnny Evans back there, but Brown has been playing decently enough. I can't see how he could sit Nani right now, I guess Rafael will get the other start at back. It's going to be a very tough matchup for ManU, as AC Milan has terrific talent to exploit a depleted United defense....but, United's offense is kicking in high gear right now too. Ferguson's mo is usually play a very conservative road leg, and try for the draw and go for the win at home. However, I don't think he'll be able to sit back tomorrow and I think we could see a very exciting (and high scoring game).

In the other game, Real travels to Lyon and it would be a huge upset if Real doesn't win this one, imo. Lyon is just a mediocre side, and Real is playing very well and is very deep. I think they are playing with a bit of a chip on their shoulders playing second fiddle to Barcelona, and want to show they are back to one of the best teams in the world.

For my money, I can only really see one of four teams winning the CL - Chelsea, ManU, Barcelona and Real. Two play tomorrow.

 
LHUCKS said:
Native said:
The Case for Freddy Adu

Let the in-fighting begin!
The key point in this article, and one that I've been making in this thread is the following:

The bottom line is, Freddy Adu brings a skill set to the roster that few others do (Landon, and maybe Benny Feilhaber being the only others in terms of creativity on the ball). And when on form, I don't know how many people would really pass over him in favor of Rogers, Beasley, or Castillo.
At least he brings a different skillset, that extra something that the South Americans have that everybody else wants.Put Adu on the squad!!
i thought Adu looked very good when he played in those friendlies a few summers ago. (i believe they were against England, Argentina and someone else). He looked dangerous on the ball and you could tell the other teams respected him enough to keep their distance. He'll never the superstar everyone expected and he's not that fast. But he's a creative MID presence and i think he can add something to the WC squad.

Unfortunatly, i think its a moot point. He's not gonna get a shot. He's behind too many guys.

 
Native said:
guru_007 said:
knockout tournament

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitio...tes2008-09.aspx

Basically after each round, all the teams remaining are thrown into a hopper and they pull a home team and an away side. It's conceivable Arsenal and Chelsea play in round one or Preston North End draws Liverpool. I believe the top teams are given byes in the early early rounds, but after that, it's all fair.
Think of it as a Baseball tournament where all MLB teams are in the same competition as teams from AAA, AA, A and about 20 other lower level semi-pro leagues. Theres like 800 teams in the FA Cup, everyone from the biggest teams in England (Manchester United, Chelsea) to small, local football teams whose players hold other jobs in the offseason. The top 40 or so teams (all the teams in the top two Leagues) have byes in the early rounds. Teams are drawn to play each other randomly. After each round, all the remaining teams are thrown back into a hat and the next round of games are determined.

Awesome idea. We should do the same thing in American sports. :goodposting:
A Brit I played college ball with had his Pub team make it to the knockout stages years ago. I don't fully understand how the early stages work, but I got/get the impression that the really small teams are going at it for a long while before the "League" teams show up. IIRC, prem teams don't show up until "round 3", but I don't think that includes all the prelim rounds that the non-pro teams are in. Or I've got it all wrong. :shrug: whatever... I freaking LOVE the FA cup. On top of all the random matchup factors, I love that if the teams draw, there's a replay at the visitor's pitch.

 
The Z Machine said:
And Barça takes their first loss all season at the hands of Atlético de Madrid.I don´t know what happened through much of the second half as there was some sort of technical difficulty on ESPN Deportes.
Was thinking about you when I saw this on FSC News. Congrats- could your Atleti be turning things around? So very strange that such a talented lineup could take such beatings this year.
 
Native said:
guru_007 said:
knockout tournament

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitio...tes2008-09.aspx

Basically after each round, all the teams remaining are thrown into a hopper and they pull a home team and an away side. It's conceivable Arsenal and Chelsea play in round one or Preston North End draws Liverpool. I believe the top teams are given byes in the early early rounds, but after that, it's all fair.
Think of it as a Baseball tournament where all MLB teams are in the same competition as teams from AAA, AA, A and about 20 other lower level semi-pro leagues. Theres like 800 teams in the FA Cup, everyone from the biggest teams in England (Manchester United, Chelsea) to small, local football teams whose players hold other jobs in the offseason. The top 40 or so teams (all the teams in the top two Leagues) have byes in the early rounds. Teams are drawn to play each other randomly. After each round, all the remaining teams are thrown back into a hat and the next round of games are determined.

Awesome idea. We should do the same thing in American sports. :doh:
A Brit I played college ball with had his Pub team make it to the knockout stages years ago. I don't fully understand how the early stages work, but I got/get the impression that the really small teams are going at it for a long while before the "League" teams show up. IIRC, prem teams don't show up until "round 3", but I don't think that includes all the prelim rounds that the non-pro teams are in. Or I've got it all wrong. :popcorn: whatever... I freaking LOVE the FA cup. On top of all the random matchup factors, I love that if the teams draw, there's a replay at the visitor's pitch.
You're right in that there's a number of qualifying rounds in the FA Cup before the league teams show up, guess it depends on the number of teams that enter.The "1st Round Proper" of the FA Cup includes the 32 clubs from the Conference Level down who got through qualifying along with the 48 clubs from Coca-Cola League 1 and 2. 80 gets pared down to 40 for the 2nd round, and 20 for the 3rd Round.

The 3rd round of the tournament includes the 20 winners of round 2, the 24 clubs in the Coca-Cola Championship and the 20 Premier League teams, then it's a straight 64-team elimination tournament, with each round drawn at random, which is the best part of the tournament IMO. No seeds. If Liverpool and United get drawn together in Round 3, so be it.

There was a gentleman in Britain, Tony Kempster, who maintained a comprehensive website of non-league English football which also outlined every round of the FA Cup in painstaking detail. Unfortunately Tony passed away a few months ago. (ETA - Here's the website). His website even included even attendance at the matches where available. It was always amusing to see these really early FA Cup qualifying rounds with an attendance of like 34. I'm not even exaggerating.

RIP Tony

 
Last edited by a moderator:
LHUCKS said:
Native said:
The Case for Freddy Adu

Let the in-fighting begin!
The key point in this article, and one that I've been making in this thread is the following:

The bottom line is, Freddy Adu brings a skill set to the roster that few others do (Landon, and maybe Benny Feilhaber being the only others in terms of creativity on the ball). And when on form, I don't know how many people would really pass over him in favor of Rogers, Beasley, or Castillo.
At least he brings a different skillset, that extra something that the South Americans have that everybody else wants.Put Adu on the squad!!
i thought Adu looked very good when he played in those friendlies a few summers ago. (i believe they were against England, Argentina and someone else). He looked dangerous on the ball and you could tell the other teams respected him enough to keep their distance. He'll never the superstar everyone expected and he's not that fast. But he's a creative MID presence and i think he can add something to the WC squad.

Unfortunatly, i think its a moot point. He's not gonna get a shot. He's behind too many guys.
It was Spain, which was the team that Adu looked very good against for a half.I still don't think Adu adds much to the US unless Feilhaber continues to struggle. Holden can play in the center. Freddy still doesn't have the pace for the wing or the defensive chops to play a deep lying central role. About the only position that makes sense for him in the US setup is as a withdrawn striker. Possibly on the right if the US wants to play Dempsey up top (but Holden can play that position either on the touchline or more centrally so I'm not sure Freddy adds much there). I don't find his skillset so unique, but even if I granted that it were, its a complete luxury considering the way the US plays. The US isn't Spain. You need an entire midfield of tidy passers in order to really get the best out of a Xavi type.

We'll see how Freddy does with regular time. His pass to EJ a couple of games ago was very good. His goal Saturday was just a gimme considering the excellent through ball and subsequent cross. He did make the right run, so huzzah for that. Regular games in Denmark put Benny on form for the Confed Cup, so maybe the same can be true for Freddy.

 
Native said:
guru_007 said:
knockout tournament

http://www.thefa.com/TheFACup/FACompetitio...tes2008-09.aspx

Basically after each round, all the teams remaining are thrown into a hopper and they pull a home team and an away side. It's conceivable Arsenal and Chelsea play in round one or Preston North End draws Liverpool. I believe the top teams are given byes in the early early rounds, but after that, it's all fair.
Think of it as a Baseball tournament where all MLB teams are in the same competition as teams from AAA, AA, A and about 20 other lower level semi-pro leagues. Theres like 800 teams in the FA Cup, everyone from the biggest teams in England (Manchester United, Chelsea) to small, local football teams whose players hold other jobs in the offseason. The top 40 or so teams (all the teams in the top two Leagues) have byes in the early rounds. Teams are drawn to play each other randomly. After each round, all the remaining teams are thrown back into a hat and the next round of games are determined.

Awesome idea. We should do the same thing in American sports. :shrug:
A Brit I played college ball with had his Pub team make it to the knockout stages years ago. I don't fully understand how the early stages work, but I got/get the impression that the really small teams are going at it for a long while before the "League" teams show up. IIRC, prem teams don't show up until "round 3", but I don't think that includes all the prelim rounds that the non-pro teams are in. Or I've got it all wrong. :shrug: whatever... I freaking LOVE the FA cup. On top of all the random matchup factors, I love that if the teams draw, there's a replay at the visitor's pitch.
You're right in that there's a number of qualifying rounds in the FA Cup before the league teams show up, guess it depends on the number of teams that enter.The "1st Round Proper" of the FA Cup includes the 32 clubs from the Conference Level down who got through qualifying along with the 48 clubs from Coca-Cola League 1 and 2. 80 gets pared down to 40 for the 2nd round, and 20 for the 3rd Round.

The 3rd round of the tournament includes the 20 winners of round 2, the 24 clubs in the Coca-Cola Championship and the 20 Premier League teams, then it's a straight 64-team elimination tournament, with each round drawn at random, which is the best part of the tournament IMO. No seeds. If Liverpool and United get drawn together in Round 3, so be it.

There was a gentleman in Britain, Tony Kempster, who maintained a comprehensive website of non-league English football which also outlined every round of the FA Cup in painstaking detail. Unfortunately Tony passed away a few months ago. (ETA - Here's the website). His website even included even attendance at the matches where available. It was always amusing to see these really early FA Cup qualifying rounds with an attendance of like 34. I'm not even exaggerating.

RIP Tony
awesome. ;)

 
FA Cup's 6th round draw - for games March 6-7.

Chelsea v Manchester City or Stoke City

Fulham v Bolton Wanderers or Tottenham Hotspur

Reading or West Bromwich Albion v Crystal Palace or Aston Villa

Portsmouth v Birmingham City

Chelsea looks to be in a decent position to repeat. It seems to me they've had incredible luck with the draw in recent years in that they seem to always get the tough games at home.

I love this tournament - probably somewhat secondary to the league championship and the Champions League, but not by much, and probably only because they've never won the CL so its a bit more of an elusive goal.

 
I still don't think Adu adds much to the US unless Feilhaber continues to struggle. Holden can play in the center. Freddy still doesn't have the pace for the wing or the defensive chops to play a deep lying central role. About the only position that makes sense for him in the US setup is as a withdrawn striker. Possibly on the right if the US wants to play Dempsey up top (but Holden can play that position either on the touchline or more centrally so I'm not sure Freddy adds much there). I don't find his skillset so unique, but even if I granted that it were, its a complete luxury considering the way the US plays. The US isn't Spain. You need an entire midfield of tidy passers in order to really get the best out of a Xavi type.We'll see how Freddy does with regular time. His pass to EJ a couple of games ago was very good. His goal Saturday was just a gimme considering the excellent through ball and subsequent cross. He did make the right run, so huzzah for that. Regular games in Denmark put Benny on form for the Confed Cup, so maybe the same can be true for Freddy.
This is dead on. The article makes a really dumb comparison bc Adu simply isn't competing with Rogers (a left winger), Beasley (a left winger), or Castillo (a left fullback/winger) for a roster spot. Adu is a niche type player that in the right circumstances could have a vital place with our national team. However, right now is not at all the right circumstance bc our style highlights his weakest attributes. And we simply aren't going to change our tactics so drastically for this WC to make him remotely useful. He can't play either wing. He can't play centrally as we ask too much deep and defensive play from them without asking as much offensively and I don't see him playing as a target forward (nor has he played forward in years). So even on form, I have no idea where he fits even as a tactical sub. I'm all for Adu (and EJ) getting playing time and playing well. Good for them. But the fanboyism over this guy is comical.
 
I still don't think Adu adds much to the US unless Feilhaber continues to struggle. Holden can play in the center. Freddy still doesn't have the pace for the wing or the defensive chops to play a deep lying central role. About the only position that makes sense for him in the US setup is as a withdrawn striker. Possibly on the right if the US wants to play Dempsey up top (but Holden can play that position either on the touchline or more centrally so I'm not sure Freddy adds much there). I don't find his skillset so unique, but even if I granted that it were, its a complete luxury considering the way the US plays. The US isn't Spain. You need an entire midfield of tidy passers in order to really get the best out of a Xavi type.We'll see how Freddy does with regular time. His pass to EJ a couple of games ago was very good. His goal Saturday was just a gimme considering the excellent through ball and subsequent cross. He did make the right run, so huzzah for that. Regular games in Denmark put Benny on form for the Confed Cup, so maybe the same can be true for Freddy.
This is dead on. The article makes a really dumb comparison bc Adu simply isn't competing with Rogers (a left winger), Beasley (a left winger), or Castillo (a left fullback/winger) for a roster spot. Adu is a niche type player that in the right circumstances could have a vital place with our national team. However, right now is not at all the right circumstance bc our style highlights his weakest attributes. And we simply aren't going to change our tactics so drastically for this WC to make him remotely useful. He can't play either wing. He can't play centrally as we ask too much deep and defensive play from them without asking as much offensively and I don't see him playing as a target forward (nor has he played forward in years). So even on form, I have no idea where he fits even as a tactical sub. I'm all for Adu (and EJ) getting playing time and playing well. Good for them. But the fanboyism over this guy is comical.
How about when we are behind and the midfield needs to play up?What if if one of our wings gets injured?We're talking sub here not starter... and right now our subs suck balls...particularly on offense.Another reason to put him on the squad is to get him some experience practicing and playing with the team, he's still very young and could make vital contributions in 2014 unlike some of the sucky players currently vying for a roster spot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How about when we are behind and the midfield needs to play up?
Benny and Torres are both ahead of him here and I'd personally rather see Holden subbed in for more offense.
What if if one of our wings gets injured?
If all our wingers got injured he still is a liability out there. There are many guys that are better than he is as a winger that aren't even in the conversation. I mean, I'd rather see Bornstein on the wing than Adu. It's not his position.
We're talking sub here not starter... and right now our subs suck balls...particularly on offense.
Not at central midfield. It is our deepest pool of players: Bradley, Clark, (Edu), (Jones), Benny, Torres, plus Holden can all play here. Subs are for changing up the game. If ahead, we sub in a winger for a forward and move Dempsey up top. For offense, when behind, we have been bringing on Benny or Torres in the middle. Those are the two guys he has to pass on the depth chart.
Another reason to put him on the squad is to get him some experience practicing and playing with the team, he's still very young and could make vital contributions in 2014 unlike some of the sucky players currently vying for a roster spot.
Feel free to call out some of the sucky players currently vying for a roster spot that Adu should get preference over. The list of central mids is above. We probably only take 4 (not counting Holden who likely goes as a winger sub but can slide to the middle).
 
How about when we are behind and the midfield needs to play up?
Benny and Torres are both ahead of him here and I'd personally rather see Holden subbed in for more offense.
What if if one of our wings gets injured?
If all our wingers got injured he still is a liability out there. There are many guys that are better than he is as a winger that aren't even in the conversation. I mean, I'd rather see Bornstein on the wing than Adu. It's not his position.
We're talking sub here not starter... and right now our subs suck balls...particularly on offense.
Not at central midfield. It is our deepest pool of players: Bradley, Clark, (Edu), (Jones), Benny, Torres, plus Holden can all play here. Subs are for changing up the game. If ahead, we sub in a winger for a forward and move Dempsey up top. For offense, when behind, we have been bringing on Benny or Torres in the middle. Those are the two guys he has to pass on the depth chart.
Another reason to put him on the squad is to get him some experience practicing and playing with the team, he's still very young and could make vital contributions in 2014 unlike some of the sucky players currently vying for a roster spot.
Feel free to call out some of the sucky players currently vying for a roster spot that Adu should get preference over. The list of central mids is above. We probably only take 4 (not counting Holden who likely goes as a winger sub but can slide to the middle).
Hmmm...good responses. I'm gonna have to chew on this. Might rather have him than a Ching or Connor because we can always bump landon or Dempsey up.I guess I'm not as sold on Felihaber or Torres...Felihaber had that one great run and that's about it. Torres shows flashes. I'm convinced Bornstein is the most overrated player on the roster. When Adu plays at least he shows flashes, sure his defense is subpar at best, but we're talking about a sub strictly for when we're behind.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I get why people are dubious of Adu, but he's currently starting for a team battling for a UEFA spot in a league that is better than Feilhaber's and Holden may or may not get off the bench for Bolton. If he continues to play well, he's certainly in contention against those two guys especially since his offensive spark is something we currently lack off the bench.

 
I still don't think Adu adds much to the US unless Feilhaber continues to struggle. Holden can play in the center. Freddy still doesn't have the pace for the wing or the defensive chops to play a deep lying central role. About the only position that makes sense for him in the US setup is as a withdrawn striker. Possibly on the right if the US wants to play Dempsey up top (but Holden can play that position either on the touchline or more centrally so I'm not sure Freddy adds much there). I don't find his skillset so unique, but even if I granted that it were, its a complete luxury considering the way the US plays. The US isn't Spain. You need an entire midfield of tidy passers in order to really get the best out of a Xavi type.We'll see how Freddy does with regular time. His pass to EJ a couple of games ago was very good. His goal Saturday was just a gimme considering the excellent through ball and subsequent cross. He did make the right run, so huzzah for that. Regular games in Denmark put Benny on form for the Confed Cup, so maybe the same can be true for Freddy.
This is dead on. The article makes a really dumb comparison bc Adu simply isn't competing with Rogers (a left winger), Beasley (a left winger), or Castillo (a left fullback/winger) for a roster spot. Adu is a niche type player that in the right circumstances could have a vital place with our national team. However, right now is not at all the right circumstance bc our style highlights his weakest attributes. And we simply aren't going to change our tactics so drastically for this WC to make him remotely useful. He can't play either wing. He can't play centrally as we ask too much deep and defensive play from them without asking as much offensively and I don't see him playing as a target forward (nor has he played forward in years). So even on form, I have no idea where he fits even as a tactical sub. I'm all for Adu (and EJ) getting playing time and playing well. Good for them. But the fanboyism over this guy is comical.
How about when we are behind and the midfield needs to play up?What if if one of our wings gets injured?We're talking sub here not starter... and right now our subs suck balls...particularly on offense.Another reason to put him on the squad is to get him some experience practicing and playing with the team, he's still very young and could make vital contributions in 2014 unlike some of the sucky players currently vying for a roster spot.
What you are talking about is what should be happening at the club level, not the national level. You don't waste roster spots on a national team on players who don't fit the system just to give him experience.
 
I get why people are dubious of Adu, but he's currently starting for a team battling for a UEFA spot in a league that is better than Feilhaber's and Holden may or may not get off the bench for Bolton. If he continues to play well, he's certainly in contention against those two guys especially since his offensive spark is something we currently lack off the bench.
Really? He has had 1 start and apparently played well but he was subbed at 60 min. And sadly, that's pretty much the entirety of his resume over the last 2 years. If he is playing consistently well for a month or two he should get in the conversation but there is something seriously wrong with the idea that the guy plays 2 games and suddenly has articles being written about him and people clamoring for his inclusion on the national team.
 
I get why people are dubious of Adu, but he's currently starting for a team battling for a UEFA spot in a league that is better than Feilhaber's and Holden may or may not get off the bench for Bolton. If he continues to play well, he's certainly in contention against those two guys especially since his offensive spark is something we currently lack off the bench.
Is the Greek league really better or is it like the Scottish Premiere League. I concede that Panathanaikos and Olympiakos are likely better than any Danish team, but I'm not sure it's really a better league top to bottom. Just in the time that I've been scouring highlights since Freddy and EJ made their moves, I've seen a shocking number of goals attributable to goal keeper error. I'm certainly not an expert on the Greek league or any secondary European league for that matter. If Freddy gets minutes and produces he should be in the conversation for a reserve role. But he's in competition with a lot of players. Many of whom are more versatile. I can understand the idea that Adu has done as much as, say, Robbie Rogers. Rogers is also a pretty limited player without much of a national team resume. It's also weird that Jose Francisco Torres had a great goal this weekend for Pachuca and nobody's talking about it.
 
I get why people are dubious of Adu, but he's currently starting for a team battling for a UEFA spot in a league that is better than Feilhaber's and Holden may or may not get off the bench for Bolton. If he continues to play well, he's certainly in contention against those two guys especially since his offensive spark is something we currently lack off the bench.
Is the Greek league really better or is it like the Scottish Premiere League. I concede that Panathanaikos and Olympiakos are likely better than any Danish team, but I'm not sure it's really a better league top to bottom. Just in the time that I've been scouring highlights since Freddy and EJ made their moves, I've seen a shocking number of goals attributable to goal keeper error. I'm certainly not an expert on the Greek league or any secondary European league for that matter. If Freddy gets minutes and produces he should be in the conversation for a reserve role. But he's in competition with a lot of players. Many of whom are more versatile. I can understand the idea that Adu has done as much as, say, Robbie Rogers. Rogers is also a pretty limited player without much of a national team resume. It's also weird that Jose Francisco Torres had a great goal this weekend for Pachuca and nobody's talking about it.
For what it's worth, the current UEFA coefficients rank Greece as the 12th best league, Scotland 13th and Denmark 16th.The one nice thing about the Greek league is they have a four team playoff for the 2nd-5th place teams for UEFA qualifying places. Aris is currently 5th so that could be some great experience for Adu against the top tier of Greek football which is pretty decent.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top