So you’re thinking of participating in Scooby’s All-Time Footy (or Soccer if you prefer) Draft. Welcome! While I wish I didn’t have to do so, we’re going to have to institute some rules. Before we go over them, however, I thought I’d start by stating what the rules are (and are not) designed to accomplish. They most certainly are not designed to provide a framework by which we can all determine who drafted the best all-time soccer team. I wouldn’t know how to ensure that. And isn’t that kind of a boring question anyway? It is nearly certain that nobody who didn’t land one of the three or four top picks in the draft could ever win a competition where the FFA is voting on rosters. You’re not going to win without Pele, Maradonna, or Messi on your team. Sorry, them’s the breaks. Well, **** ‘em, I say. We’re in this to have fun. To amuse one another. And to prove absolutely nothing other than to show that a draft based upon a sport that 60% of the FFA hates can provide an entertaining FFA spectacle. I envision this as a “narrative draft” where we work together to craft entertaining matchup threads that voters and viewers in the FFA will enjoy following. Sublime goals. Ridiculous howlers. Red cards. Injuries. Impact substitutions. Crazy pitch invasions. Joey Barton tweeting commentary. You name it. The emphasis is upon the presentation of the competition. Now, because I recognize that this isn’t everybody’s cup of tea, keep in mind that owners can be as involved or uninvolved in the narrative as they want. Entertaining stuff will happen in the game. While I’d love for the owners to generate ideas for that, I’m happy to do it myself if need be. Just don’t be too disappointed when John Terry is suspended for abuse for calling Paul Scholes a “Ginger ****.” (and it goes without saying that if you draft Scholes, you better hope you win every vote because otherwise that sucker is getting a red card for a late tackle at some time.) With that said, I do want the draft to be a little educational and to at least pay lip service to the history of the game. So, here are the rules.Each team will select a starting XI and ??? (more on that later) substitutes, comprising a “game day roster.” Each roster must have at least 3 players from before 1971, and at least six players from before 1991. Yes, players that satisfy the “before 1971” category will also qualify as one of the players from “before 1991.” You can have Pele, Garrincha, Just Fontaine, Di Stefano, Puskas, and Gordon Banks and never pick a player from 1971-1990. Or you can have Pele, Di Stefano, Puskas, Ruemi######, Hugo Sanchez, and Dino Zoff. The goal of this requirement was to have some form of diversity in the sides considering that most sides would probably have a recency bias otherwise. In other words, if Rio Ferdinand were picked ahead of Franco Baresi, I might have cried. But I resisted the tempation to have too many requirments, such as African or Asian players. Whatever you feel about VBD, George Weah shouldn’t go before Michel Platini in an all-time draft just because he occupies a position of scarcity.Obviously, some players “straddle” eras. I tried to choose logical end points (it’s clear that Pele should be considered mostly on his 1958-1970 career and not on his NASL title with the Cosmos), but there are players who might prompt arguments. For instance, Beckenbauer is probably best known for his 70s body of work (a European Championship, a World Cup, three straight European Club titles, another European Championship final), but he also had signature moments from 1966-1970 (a great World Cup showing in England, the “Game of the Century” in 1970, several German cup titles). To avoid too much argument, the rule is that any leeway will be construed in favor of the player unless it just makes no sense to do so. If you can point to a major title (where the player was an actual contributor, not like Ronaldo in the 94 World Cup), then the player can qualify for that era. But please don’t point to Maradonna’s career in Argentina in the late 70s or in the 90s when the guy was winning World Cup, Serie A, and European Club Cup titles in the 80s. So those are the guidlines. Beckenbauer as a pre-71 is OK. Maradonna isn’t (nor is he a post-91). Now let’s talk about the size of the draft and the organization of the tournament. I’m of two minds about this. I would really like to structure the tournament like a major soccer tournament. With a group round followed by knock out rounds. The reason is simple. In a “narrative draft”, I want to be able to play with home/away fixtures, hostile/racist crowds, big comebacks, sackings etc. With that said, I recognize that every draft can begin to feel like a slog by the end of the draft. If we have 16 teams in the draft, that’s 176 players drafted if we only did starting rosters. 224 players if teams need only select 3 “game day” subs. That’s 288 players if we did full 18 rosters. Of course, we could also have fewer teams (and may be forced to as we’re nowhere close to 16 participants yet). With as few as eight, I could do two groups, a semi, and a final. With 10 – 14 teams, I’d have to tweak the setup a bit. So it’s up to you guys. I’m interested in hearing how deep in a player pool we should go and how you’d like to get there? No subs? Just three? Only attacking subs? How many teams?