What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (4 Viewers)

I hate that rule but if Bale is not there, Cech is sent off yeah? Then shouldn't he be sent off anyway?
He went for the ball and Abedyor went over the core of his body - IMO if the arm went out to get him then yes - but Cech looked like he went straight for the ball - and actually got part of it.
sorry, specifically meant last man rule. He was last man. He clearly committed a foul. It wasn't a bad foul but if the ball doesn't fall to Bale, the ref has no discretion but to send him off. It's not optional. Apparently because Bale was there it went from straight red to nothing.
 
I hate that rule but if Bale is not there, Cech is sent off yeah? Then shouldn't he be sent off anyway?
There is no rule. He can let the play continue and still give Cech the card. It happens all the time with tackles.
But it would still just be a yellow rather than red because a red is warranted only if the attacking team is denied a goal or obvious goal scoring opportunity.
That makes sense.
 
Almost certainly didn't go in.
That one did, though. I do hate Spurs, but they don't deserve to be losing this game after that phantom goal.
It's not Chelsea's fault that the ref has made a mess of this, but I do find myself rooting for Spurs now (plus always want an epic match)
Yeah, me too. I was ambivalent before, but no team deserves to potentially lose a game on that crap.
 
Apparently the linesman didn't give the second goal. Atkinson gave it from a position he clearly couldn't see it. How the hell does that happen? How does a referee award a goal he can't see?

 
Well, there goes that. I doubt Spurs even get an apology from the FA. I don't understand the protection of referees in the EPL. I fully expect the media to come out with "Atkinson awards a controversial goal" when it should read "Atkinson makes a guess at a goal he can't see and gets it completely wrong".

 
'Steve Tasker said:
'NewlyRetired said:
US Final 23 and stand by speculation

<removed for space>
I pretty much agree with all of this, my only real question is why Rimando ahead of Hamid? Hamid is the first potential successor to Howard that we've seen emerge, I think - why not bring him in for some experience? Is it because he looked poor in the Olympic qualifying? Is he still hurt from that injury (I don't actually know, though I'm guessing it's not serious cause you have him in the stand-by list)?I don't have a problem with Rimando, but he's a known commodity at this point and he's 32. If I were selecting a team to take to the World Cup today, I'd agree that Rimando should be in it. Just wondering your thoughts...

Also, I think it says a lot about the overall quality (which is to say - not very high quality at this point at the international level) of the USMNT strikers if you consider the volatility in the position. Altidore is and should be the top guy, and I'd think that Agudelo stays in the picture if healthy. But consider that 2 of the 4 strikers that the USMNT took to the 2010 Cup have barely featured at all for the USMNT since then (Findley, Buddle....Buddle has made some appearances, but has Findley? I honestly can't recall any caps for him since the Cup), and the 3rd (Gomez) was on the absolute fringe of the squad until going on a tear. Just a few months ago we were lamenting the lack of really ANY good strikers for the USMNT, and now heading into qualifying, the USMNT has 4 of the strikers in the best form that I can ever recall a group of strikers having at the same time (Altidore, Gomez, Cooper, Wondo). And after all that, you've got the ultimate wildcard in Boyd, who hasn't even featured for his club at the senior level yet might bump one of the 4 listed above.
I bumped Hamid to stand by for the two reasons you mentioned. 1) He looked poor when the semi bright lights came on during Olympic Qualifying, and 2) he is not yet back from injury, at least enough to play. He is suppose to be 100% back but he was not chosen to start last night against the Revs. I believe Klinsmann really likes Hamid though so it would not shock me even a second to see him be the 3rd keeper, and might even make some sense just for the general experience level seeing as the 3rd keeper is never going to play anyway.

As for Agudelo, I like him, but his recent injury coupled with the fact he is likely to get no time with Cooper and Henry clicking so well once he gets back is going to keep him off my US radar for a while, at least until he forces his way back on. And this is a good thing because we have finally have multiple strikers all clicking at the same time allowing the ability to actually have to make some hard choices for once.

Lets face it, this may be the first time in three years that Jozy is going to actually earn the starting slot based on his club play instead of it just being preordained and if he gets a strike partner, it is going to be real fun to see who gets paired with him.

Also, we you consider that the midfielders are relatively deep, that also may free up Dempsey to play closer to goal if Klinsmann wants to use him as a with drawn striker giving the US another inform goal scorer.

Also good to note that both Landon and Shea scored this weekend, first of the year for both.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Our normally civil conversation always gets waylay-ed with the diving talk :) It must be like our abortion topic or something. We may need to ban any mention of it lol :)

 
Our normally civil conversation always gets waylay-ed with the diving talk :) It must be like our abortion topic or something. We may need to ban any mention of it lol :)
It has nothing to do with diving. Most people here have teams, but are generally soccer fans first. There are a few that are team fans first and soccer fans second. When those two ideologies converge the conversation inevitably goes South. It doesn't happen very often, but it does happen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Our normally civil conversation always gets waylay-ed with the diving talk :) It must be like our abortion topic or something. We may need to ban any mention of it lol :)
It has nothing to do with diving. Most people here have teams, but are generally soccer fans first. There are a few that are team fans first and soccer fans second. When those two ideologies converge the conversation inevitably goes South. It doesn't happen very often, but it does happen.
I generally stay out of these conversations but it is pretty clear from reading them, it revolves around only one club team when the arguments start.
 
Drogba played his heart out today - it would be great if he gets the nod against Barca on Tuesday.

Giant win for Chelsea.

 
Our normally civil conversation always gets waylay-ed with the diving talk :) It must be like our abortion topic or something. We may need to ban any mention of it lol :)
It has nothing to do with diving. Most people here have teams, but are generally soccer fans first. There are a few that are team fans first and soccer fans second. When those two ideologies converge the conversation inevitably goes South. It doesn't happen very often, but it does happen.
I generally stay out of these conversations but it is pretty clear from reading them, it revolves around only one club team when the arguments start.
At this point in the season rooting against United is like rooting for City, which you would be hard-pressed to find anyone here do. I think most of the EPL fans just want to see it come down to the derby match and/or the best team win. The whole "ABU" thing is just silly, as is the "haters" label.Somehow I got the "ABU" label (which is something I have never even heard of before) when most people know I'm a Tottenham fan and I don't dislike United anymore than I dislike City, Chelsea, or Liverpool. To be honest, right now I do hate Chelsea and I've been called out as biased against Suarez, and I'm naturally supposed to dislike Arseanal so I'm really an "ABUCL". I think I'm going to start calling Tasker an "ABT" as opposed to an Arsenal fan too.Yeah, yeah, Chelsea won because the refs suck and you all are "ABT". Bale doesn't dive. I hate you all! Arggggghhhh!Edit: By the way, I actually like Maverick. Does that still make me "ABU"? I need some clarification.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drogba played his heart out today - it would be great if he gets the nod against Barca on Tuesday. Giant win for Chelsea.
Seems like if that was the case we really would have seen Torres start. I think Chelsea's lineup clearly hinted at winning this game over competing against Barca.
 
'Christo said:
Poor ManU. SAF went to the bench and all he had was Nani, Berbatov and Cleverly.Until they decide to implement a system where some of the talent is spread around, this game just will not be everything that it could be.
Socialist.
 
One of the few "justices" in the EPL that may come out of this season is QPR getting relegated. Hughes dumps Fulham to shoot for the Villa job, he doesn't get the job because Villa recognizes he is a dooch for dumping Fulham the way he did, he then moves to a team that ditched the manager that got them into the EPL, and they both get relegated together. Now that would be sweet justice.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
for those that missed it. Only United haters would call that a dive I'm sure....
Does he step on Young's right foot? I can't tell.
No. Young kicks out and hits the defender's ankle as he drags his foot (it's even debatable that contact is made). That's what the commentors are referring to when they say "he's looking for it". You can see it from the front angle (the one they showed most during the game).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One of the few "justices" in the EPL that may come out of this season is QPR getting relegated. Hughes dumps Fulham to shoot for the Villa job, he doesn't get the job because Villa recognizes he is a dooch for dumping Fulham the way he did, he then moves to a team that ditched the manager that got them into the EPL, and they both get relegated together. Now that would be sweet justice.
Hey now! :angry:
 
for those that missed it. Only United haters would call that a dive I'm sure....
Does he step on Young's right foot? I can't tell.
No. Young kicks out and hits the defender's ankle as he drags his foot (it's even debatable that contact is made). That's what the commentors are referring to when they say "he's looking for it". You can see it from the front angle (the one they showed most during the game).
I didn't see that angle....do you have a link to it?
 
for those that missed it. Only United haters would call that a dive I'm sure....
Does he step on Young's right foot? I can't tell.
Young kicks out and hits the defender's ankle as he drags his foot (it's even debatable that contact is made). That's what the commentors are referring to when they say "he's looking for it". You can see it from the front angle (the one they showed most during the game).
from looking at the angle they showed on tv, I honestly don't think there was any contact. It looked like Young kicked out for it and whiffed.
 
for those that missed it. Only United haters would call that a dive I'm sure....
Does he step on Young's right foot? I can't tell.
No. Young kicks out and hits the defender's ankle as he drags his foot (it's even debatable that contact is made). That's what the commentors are referring to when they say "he's looking for it". You can see it from the front angle (the one they showed most during the game).
I didn't see that angle....do you have a link to it?
No. It's the view they showed during the game. They actually didn't show this back view but once I think. They kept showing the front view. I imagine it's out there somewhere.Edit: This video seems to have the most views although the quality isn't that great

Link

 
Last edited by a moderator:
for those that missed it. Only United haters would call that a dive I'm sure....
Does he step on Young's right foot? I can't tell.
No. Young kicks out and hits the defender's ankle as he drags his foot (it's even debatable that contact is made). That's what the commentors are referring to when they say "he's looking for it". You can see it from the front angle (the one they showed most during the game).
I didn't see that angle....do you have a link to it?
No. It's the view they showed during the game. They actually didn't show this back view but once I think. They kept showing the front view. I imagine it's out there somewhere.Edit: This video seems to have the most views although the quality isn't that great

Link
Looks to me like Young's right foot trips over the defender's left foot and Young then hurls himself forward like he's been shot. If he just fell over, it's less likely there'd be diving claims. Whichever, I wouldn't say that was as bad as the previous week, which clearly was a dive. FWIW, it was me that posted the suggestion that the EPL review all games and retroactively punish diving. They could give a one match suspension for any dive, two if it got a penalty and/or a yellow card for the opponent, three if it got a penalty and/or a red card for the opponent.

There's only one way to stop this business and that's to deprive managers of their players. Because, like everything else, it all goes back to the manager.

 
Looks to me like Young instigated contact by continuing to kick his left leg toward the defender, while Young was cutting the other way. It looks like an unnatural move my Young - i.e he was trying to make contact with the defender. It was not a situation of the defender not getting out of the way of Young's cut-back.

 
IMO, diving has very little to do with the manager. Players dive because they want to earn fouls. Ashley Young goes to ground on that play even if I'm coaching Man U.

 
Looks to me like Young's right foot trips over the defender's left foot and Young then hurls himself forward like he's been shot. If he just fell over, it's less likely there'd be diving claims. Whichever, I wouldn't say that was as bad as the previous week, which clearly was a dive.
I honestly don't know how anyone can look at that and conclude it's anything but a dive
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IMO, diving has very little to do with the manager. Players dive because they want to earn fouls. Ashley Young goes to ground on that play even if I'm coaching Man U.
He doesn't if Ferguson knows he'll get suspended. My point is that managers can be made to enforce rules if the penalty for not doing so is sufficiently dire.
 
If I am correct, since beating Newcastle 5-0 Spurs have taken 5 points out of 24. I know this was a cup game, but it just adds to the fact.

I'm not sure nosedive is a strong enough term. Hindenburged?

 
'Christo said:
Poor ManU. SAF went to the bench and all he had was Nani, Berbatov and Cleverly.Until they decide to implement a system where some of the talent is spread around, this game just will not be everything that it could be.
Socialist.
In soccer world Christo is a socialist and Spain is a capitalist country.
I much prefer soccer Christo to all other Christos.
 
Was sitting out on my front steps and saw a guy walking his dog in a Sounders shirt (I live in a Boston suburb).

I call out and ask if he is a Sounders fan and he laughs and says no, his brother is from Seattle but that he is a fan of the Revs.

He was telling me his brother was neither a soccer fan or really a sports fan but that he has really got caught up in the Sounders semi-mania out there. His brother said the atmosphere before (the whole march to the game from the city) and during the game is even better than what comes across on tv.

We then both lamented our sorry situation here with the Revs, both said our prayers to the "SSS in Boston" gods and went our seperate ways.

 
Our normally civil conversation always gets waylay-ed with the diving talk :) It must be like our abortion topic or something. We may need to ban any mention of it lol :)
It tips a lot of games. There were three iffy calls in the box alone during the Levante/Barca game the other day: two went Levante's way (Busquets handball, which pretty clearly lacked intent, Iniesta getting leveled by Ballesteros in the box), one went Barca's way (Cuenca dive ---> PK). Compare that to one goal during the run of play.The team I like most does it, and the team I like the least does it. Aside from any built-in prejudices, it's a systemic problem. But the powers that be can't even get goal-line technology right, so I don't think there's much hope to fixing diving. I think if you had a replay official that handed out cards for dives during the game (e.g. next stoppage in play), it would curtail it. But that will never happen. People are inevitably going to ##### when their team gets jobbed. :shrug:
 
Can't tell if this has been photoshopped but interesting if it hasn't.

Makes many people look a little silly...
That's not clearly over the line. And it doesn't address the Terry foul.
Lucky for all of us that Chels scored 3 more to make it irrelevant.
It didn't make it irrelevant at all. As the commentators pointed out, that goal completely changed the game. If that's not called there's no telling what happens the rest of the game.
 
Can't tell if this has been photoshopped but interesting if it hasn't.

Makes many people look a little silly...
That's not clearly over the line. And it doesn't address the Terry foul.
Lucky for all of us that Chels scored 3 more to make it irrelevant.
Ummmmm, no. Once Chelsea were given the goal Tottenham had to open up. There's no way to know what the real result would have been.
 
Can't tell if this has been photoshopped but interesting if it hasn't.

Makes many people look a little silly...
That's not clearly over the line. And it doesn't address the Terry foul.
It's photoshopped. The shots on the line during the game show it clearly didn't go over. It actually didn't even come very close. This has been universally acknowledged in the media, by the referee, and by every Chelsea player interviewed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can't tell if this has been photoshopped but interesting if it hasn't.

Makes many people look a little silly...
That's not clearly over the line. And it doesn't address the Terry foul.
Lucky for all of us that Chels scored 3 more to make it irrelevant.
It didn't make it irrelevant at all. As the commentators pointed out, that goal completely changed the game. If that's not called there's no telling what happens the rest of the game.
Of course it changed the game, and it would be a huge issue if the game ended 2-1 or 3-1. This game was 2-1 early in the second half so there really wasn't any great pressure on them to sell out for a goal. Bad calls happen all the time and good players learn to deal with that reality. After Bale's goal I was certain Spurs would draw or win, as Chelsea's late defending has been disastrous all season. But after the Ramires goal, Spurs seemed to give up. Just a couple weeks ago they outplayed Chelsea at Stamford Bridge in a huge league game, but today I don't think anyone can reasonably argue who the better side was.
 
Rafa Marquez once again showed his utter class as a player and human being in this play.

MLS uses a disciplinary commission that suspends players for plays the ref misses. It will be interesting to see what they do here.

I don't mind the cowardly tackle of Salinas so much as the ultra cheap and dirty kick after they went down. Salinas suffered a broken clavicle on the play.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Drogba played his heart out today - it would be great if he gets the nod against Barca on Tuesday. Giant win for Chelsea.
Seems like if that was the case we really would have seen Torres start. I think Chelsea's lineup clearly hinted at winning this game over competing against Barca.
I don't agree with the earlier comment that the CL trophy is most important of all for English fans. I think for english football fans, the league comes first, and the FA Cup and CL are both great, but secondary, achievements. As great as the Champions League is, the fact is that the home/away total goals knock-out format creates some bizarre tactical situations that, more often than not, lead to boring football.For me, given the present reality, I would want RDM to focus first on the FA Cup, second on the league - to gain 4th or at least hold 5th - and third on the CL. However, the CL title is the one trophy that Abramovich has never won, and his last two manager hires have clearly been focused on Europe, so its hard to say where the current manager's attention is, but I think you are probably correct with this statement. The other factor is that, of these 4 huge games (Spurs, Barca, Gunners, Barca), the game on Wednesday is the only one at Stamford Bridge, and he can't put a second rate team out there in front of the home fans. The good news is that the home crowd still loves Torres, and I think he loves to play against Barca, so I would not be surprised to see him starting on Wed.
 
'Ursa M said:
'Steve Tasker said:
'Ursa M said:
No, I'm at work, which is why I'm following two British commentaries from two independent agencies, both of whom say it was the right call. Perhaps I should just follow the commentary from an ABU like yourself for a completely unbiased opinion.
What's an "ABU"? :unsure:I didn't see the dive either, I was in the car. The Sirius/XM announcers didn't make it sound that bad, but they were pretty clearly biased in favor of United. I'll have to see it to judge for myself.
ABU = Anybody But United. Apart from being the best supported team in the world (with the exception of maybe Barca), they are also the most hated, by a country mile.
I find it odd how as this topic has reared it's head for the second time in a week, this is the defense of homerism both times. There's really not a lot of hate here for anyone. A dive by any other name is still a dive and it has nothing to do with what color shirt the diver is wearing.
I'm sure it's discussed more later in the thread (I haven't watched the 2nd half of the Spurs CHels FA cup, so I'm stopping reading right here), but replays pretty clearly show (to me, at least) that Young initiated contact and threw himself on the ground. Yeah, the defender's foot was there- but Young kicked it and then went down... not the other way around. It's sad how little shame such good athletes have- especially two weeks in a row.Signed,A neutral who enjoys watching United, and any team that plays quality soccer, play.
 
Honestly, it kinda looks to me like Young's right foot does make contact with the defender's left foot. Regardless, it appears that Young left his left leg out in an attempt to draw contact (which I don't even know if he did) and clearly embellished the dive.

 
Can't tell if this has been photoshopped but interesting if it hasn't.

Makes many people look a little silly...
That's not clearly over the line. And it doesn't address the Terry foul.
Lucky for all of us that Chels scored 3 more to make it irrelevant.
It didn't make it irrelevant at all. As the commentators pointed out, that goal completely changed the game. If that's not called there's no telling what happens the rest of the game.
Of course it changed the game, and it would be a huge issue if the game ended 2-1 or 3-1. This game was 2-1 early in the second half so there really wasn't any great pressure on them to sell out for a goal. Bad calls happen all the time and good players learn to deal with that reality. After Bale's goal I was certain Spurs would draw or win, as Chelsea's late defending has been disastrous all season. But after the Ramires goal, Spurs seemed to give up. Just a couple weeks ago they outplayed Chelsea at Stamford Bridge in a huge league game, but today I don't think anyone can reasonably argue who the better side was.
That's crap. If they aren't down 2-1 Defoe doesn't come on, Sandro comes on as a holding replacement for VdV. That creates an entirely different dynamic. Redknapp felt he had to gamble with 15 minutes remaining. That's when it fell apart for Spurs. Ramirez didn't score until the 77th minute.It's easy to say "bad calls happen" when your team is the beneficiary. That's the third goal Chelsea has been gifted in two weeks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top