What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (4 Viewers)

So, if the Bale to Real transfer falls through....are Spurs ####ed?

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/soccer-real-admit-problems-sealing-bale-deal-162144675--sow.html

I mean, they've spent so much money in transfers, presuming they would be getting money for Bale, but what happens if at the last moment Real fails to secure financing to send back to London?

I read that Real still owe Spurs most of the money from the Modric deal too.

Probably will not be an issue, but would make me laugh if something happened.

 
Capital One Cup Question: Do teams field their best lineups for this, or do they send out the b-team or something like that?
Not a full B-team, but most of the top clubs will use this to start at least a couple of squad players and at least one promising reserve team player. This is often even done in the latter round matches. Much depends upon opposition though. If you're up against a League 2 side, you'll usually start more "lesser" players; if you're up against a tough PL opponent then the opposite is true.

It's definitely the least important competition for most PL teams though.

 
So, if the Bale to Real transfer falls through....are Spurs ####ed?

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/soccer-real-admit-problems-sealing-bale-deal-162144675--sow.html

I mean, they've spent so much money in transfers, presuming they would be getting money for Bale, but what happens if at the last moment Real fails to secure financing to send back to London?

I read that Real still owe Spurs most of the money from the Modric deal too.

Probably will not be an issue, but would make me laugh if something happened.
Besides the added TV money this year, Spurs are backed by a billionaire. He just doesn't throw his money around like the rest of them. They're fine either way.

 
I'm gonna be in Munich later this month. I'm definitely going to see a match, unfortunately Bayern won't be in town while I'm there though. Closest options are Dortmund @ Nuremberg or Frankfurt @ Stuttgart. Any thoughts on which would be better? Anyone been to either of those stadiums? Leaning towards Dortmund @ Nuremberg, I think that'd be a fun city to spend a day in plus Dortmund are obviously the best side of the four.
Dortmund's home matches are not to be missed. I'd probably want to catch a game in that stadium more than any other in the Bundesliga just because of the fan atmosphere.

 
RIP arsenal
It's not as Deathly as previous Groups of Death. If you consider Dortmund the clear favorite, I'd still put Arsenal as a narrow favorite over Arsenal er, Napoli for the second spot with OM really being just spoilers, IMO.

At the very least, the potential is there for some tasty football. I'm looking forward to it.
:goodposting:

Arsenal can advance, but they need to play well to do so, that's for sure. I'm looking forward to six great matches though. That's what the CL is all about. :)

 
I'm gonna be in Munich later this month. I'm definitely going to see a match, unfortunately Bayern won't be in town while I'm there though. Closest options are Dortmund @ Nuremberg or Frankfurt @ Stuttgart. Any thoughts on which would be better? Anyone been to either of those stadiums? Leaning towards Dortmund @ Nuremberg, I think that'd be a fun city to spend a day in plus Dortmund are obviously the best side of the four.
Dortmund's home matches are not to be missed. I'd probably want to catch a game in that stadium more than any other in the Bundesliga just because of the fan atmosphere.
Agreed, unfortunately that match is at Nuremberg. I guess I should have followed Euro convention and listed the home team first.

 
Eephus and his ongoing Dons love made me look up the '88 FA Cup Final just now. Only 25 years ago, but it reads like ancient history.

--The bench was only three deep

--Teams only got two subs

--The entire game replayed in event of tie on 120 minutes

--And the starters for the two teams combined featured...

13 English

3 Scots

3 Irish

2 Welsh

1 Zimbabwe (Grobbelaar)
The influx of foreigners started in earnest during the 90s. I remember an old issue of Goal (or 4-4-2) with Zola on the cover that ranked the top 100 foreign born players in England. As I recall, the list dipped into the lower divisions. A similar list today would be five times longer.

The last Wimbledon top level side in 1999-2000 was mostly from the British Isles. There were some English born players who played their international football abroad (including future talking heads Efan Ekoku and Robbie Earle) and a handful of Scandinavians who Drillo brought in with little effect. This was more the rule than the exception in those days. Chelsea was about the only team that was predominantly foreign.

 
USMNT qualifiers roster:

GK: Howard, Guzan, Rimando

Def: Beasley, Besler, Brooks, Cameron, Castillo, Evans, Gonzo, Orozco

Mids: Beckerman, Bedoya, Bradley, Mix, Fab Johnson, Jones, Zusi

FWDs: Jozy, Donovan, Deuce, Bacon, EJ

Most surprising inclusions are probably Beckerman and Castillo. Most surprising exclusion is Goodson (Brooks is only available for Costa Rica, though, so maybe Goodson comes in for the second game).

 
I would just like to take this moment and point out.............this thread is rapidly becoming the only thread worth even coming to this board for anymore. :grouphug:

 
USMNT qualifiers roster:

GK: Howard, Guzan, Rimando

Def: Beasley, Besler, Brooks, Cameron, Castillo, Evans, Gonzo, Orozco

Mids: Beckerman, Bedoya, Bradley, Mix, Fab Johnson, Jones, Zusi

FWDs: Jozy, Donovan, Deuce, Bacon, EJ

Most surprising inclusions are probably Beckerman and Castillo. Most surprising exclusion is Goodson (Brooks is only available for Costa Rica, though, so maybe Goodson comes in for the second game).
Deuce picking up his 100th cap here.

 
Well... I will say this about the upcoming international break. For the first time basically ever, I don't mind it so much as the USMNT has been an absolute joy to watch of late. Usually I just hate not having the PL games.

 
Lots of USMNT love in here... they haven't even qualified yet. I want them to hit their stride right around the second game of the Group stage of WC2014.

 
Spain has also not qualified. Those guys suck!
Look dude, all I'm saying is that I know better than to make claims about the quality of the USMNT during the interstitial phase of the world cup cycle. Time to prove it on the big stage.
I'm mostly just having fun with you.

But I still think your point is kind of silly. Other than Spain, no team in the world right now has "proven it" on the big stage. Italy will have Buffon and Pirlo and maybe another World Cup winner.

Even if we restrict our analysis to teams that we'd expect to have a deep cup run, we're left with a very small group of teams. Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, Brazil, Germany and Argentina.

Other hot teams that we might think are likely to advance are in the same boat as the US. I like Columbia and Belgium, but what have they proven on the big stage? Belgium will be in their first big tournament in a decade. Hell, Argentina hasn't won a Copa America since 93 and hasn't been past the quarterfinals in the World Cup since 1990.

People are excited about the US team because they've won a dozen games in a row. They can only play the games in front of them, and they've won them. Other US teams, even pretty good US teams, haven't been able to do that. If we can't be excited to watch the team or feel better about them in those circumstances, then only the fans of a handful of national teams can. And that would be stupid.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.

The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.

The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.

The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.

The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.

Ok, I'm convinced. How 'bout everyone else?

 
The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.The World Cup is a three-game tournament against other good teams -- anything can happen and you can't judge any team on three games. No matter what happens next year I'll be happy with the progress we've made in adding depth and the recent run of wins.Ok, I'm convinced. How 'bout everyone else?
Thumbs down. If the Frings handball is called and LaDon converts one of the opportunities he had in Korea 2002 we'd have played in the semi final round, with only South Korea to beat to reach the final. Two knock-out wins in the minimum for me, as unlikely as that is.

(Understanding, they have to qualify first)

 
Spain has also not qualified. Those guys suck!
Look dude, all I'm saying is that I know better than to make claims about the quality of the USMNT during the interstitial phase of the world cup cycle. Time to prove it on the big stage.
Coming out of exile for this one as it is too tasty to pass up :) Z, there appears to be a touch of hypocrisy in your statement.

You state that you basically don't care/can't enjoy how good the US is playing outside of 2 weeks every 4 years, but you are the very first person to complain about how bad the US is when they are playing poorly. If you don't care how good the US is in the "interstitial phase", why do you care how bad it is during that same time frame?

=====================

As a fan, I can never buy into the judging a team on 3 games every 4 years, if for nothing else, you are at the mercy of the draw. Just compare the last two draws for the US for example

2006: They were drawn with the eventual WC winners, a solid second tier Euro side and a top African side

2010: They were drawn with one of the weakest first seeds, one of weakest second tier Euro sides and arguably the weakest African side

The 2014 team might be better (much better) than the 2010 version but if 2014 version of US gets drawn into group of death (something like Argie, Belgium, US, Ivory Coast), they are not likely to get out alive.

===========

As for the 2002 side, I am still amazed to this day how they played against Germany in the quarterfinal, and they deserved that game to at least get into extra time. But I also recognize that that memory is a bit romantic. The US was a pubic hair(maybe thinner) away from being eliminated in the first round if this shot goes in very late in the Portugal-SK game (at the 4min 35 sec mark if the link does not time index)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mHR0IFyGD_Y&t=4m35s

For people setting a semi final appearance as the "bare minimum" for what they consider a success next summer, I would bet the under :)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, if the Bale to Real transfer falls through....are Spurs ####ed?

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/soccer-real-admit-problems-sealing-bale-deal-162144675--sow.html

I mean, they've spent so much money in transfers, presuming they would be getting money for Bale, but what happens if at the last moment Real fails to secure financing to send back to London?

I read that Real still owe Spurs most of the money from the Modric deal too.

Probably will not be an issue, but would make me laugh if something happened.
They are just over break-even in the transfer market over the last two years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@TaylorTwellman: Hearing @NERevolution have turned down close to 750k for Agudelo early release to @stokecity. Player wants to go now and will free in Jan.

Retweeted by Agudelo...

 
@TaylorTwellman: Hearing @NERevolution have turned down close to 750k for Agudelo early release to @stokecity. Player wants to go now and will free in Jan.

Retweeted by Agudelo...
So many teams still have pieces of Aguedelo, though. It just doesn't seem possible that any buyout will be accepted.

My favorite bit of transfer news is that Kaka, four days before the close of the window, has decided he'll move now. He's just teasing Madrid now.

 
Right, so Wenger today declared that he won't panic buy, and he held open the possibility that Bendtner might return to the squad and play. :wall:

 
Boateng to Schalke 04. Schalke's 01 through 03 come away empty-handed.

Matri to AC Milan.

Kaka wants out of RM.

ETA: #### Boateng

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Right, so Wenger today declared that he won't panic buy, and he held open the possibility that Bendtner might return to the squad and play. :wall:
He's just toying with the media at this point right? :oldunsure:

I'm pretty new to all this, if Arsenal doesn't sign someone who, you know, actually costs money will there be any real fan backlash or will people just grumble and keep showing up?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top