NewlyRetired
Footballguy
http://www.talk-sports.net/pl/sucks.aspx/Glen_JohnsonI
And Glen Johnson...I've watched him play two games and haven't seen him do a single positive thing. I'm still learning the game, but my opinion so far is that he sucks.
http://www.talk-sports.net/pl/sucks.aspx/Glen_JohnsonI
And Glen Johnson...I've watched him play two games and haven't seen him do a single positive thing. I'm still learning the game, but my opinion so far is that he sucks.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
The EPL is not the most popular league in the US based on TV ratings. Liga MX still holds that title as of last year/season.Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US,It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Right. Liga MX has plenty of diehard immigrant/recent immigrant fans. Among "noob" fans, I think the EPL is a much more visible league and much more easily-accessible league than Liga MX. That's what I was getting at.The EPL is not the most popular league in the US based on TV ratings. Liga MX still holds that title as of last year/season.Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US,It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
What league is that?The EPL is not the most popular league in the US based on TV ratings. Liga MX still holds that title as of last year/season.Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US,It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Mexican First Division. Their top games can get 3 times the numbers that the top EPL games get.What league is that?The EPL is not the most popular league in the US based on TV ratings. Liga MX still holds that title as of last year/season.Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US,It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
I am unsure how much more they can do.I think teams in the EPL need to be trying hard to make bigtime inroads in the US. Myself and two good friends knew little about the EPL 12 months ago. After the World Cup we are all fans and watching it religiously.
I'm not sure here. I thought he did well last season when he finally got a run of games. He was brought in by Rodgers, so Sakho is his transfer. He's just turned 24 this year, so he might just not quite be ready.What's the deal with Sakho? Isn't he one of the best defenders? Where has he been?
Old and doesn't have the speed/energy to play an attacking WB role. It was a run..And Glen Johnson...I've watched him play two games and haven't seen him do a single positive thing. I'm still learning the game, but my opinion so far is that he sucks.
Coutinho's best role imo is an 8ish spot, but sometimes he's played out wide and cuts in often. He needs to be played centrally and ahead of Gerrard and Henderson but not quite a true #10. He needs to work on his shooting before he can be trusted with a true #10 role imo.Coutinho...does he play the same position as Markovic? Does anyone expect the two to play at the same time, or is going to be one or the other?
Joe Allen and I think in a few weeks you'll see this lineupLastly, who do we expect Balotelli to replace in the starting lineup?
Soccer Insider: Do you think the Galaxy is beginning to hit its stride at the right time?
Bruce Arena: “We’ll see.”
It’s a forgiving league because you can start slowly and turn it on before the playoffs, right?
“That has often been the case.”
Do you plan to make any significant roster moves before the Sept. 15 deadline?
“No, we are fine. I don’t know what you can do at this point — even though, the way things have been happening [in MLS] lately, God knows what could possibly happen.”
What happened with the possible Kljestan deal from Anderlecht? You seemed all set to sign him.
“We had a trade in place. We had budget room and space to be able to do it. We had all of our ducks in a row. We were positioned to sign a player. I won’t go into detail and just say forces within the league worked real hard to make sure that didn’t happen.”
Why?
“Because they are children and there have to be adults in the process, and we didn’t have enough of them. I think we are back into the old days in the league when the rules are somewhat arbitrary. Hopefully we will get that straightened out in the offseason.”
You traded defender Kofi Opare to D.C. for a high position in the allocation order with the intent to sign Kljestan, right?
“We were going to add a player.”
It didn’t work out, so you probably will not be able to exercise that allocation slot before the deadline, correct?
“Right. But we did end up adding a player without the allocation slot: Alan Gordon.”
So what do you make of the blind draw that delivered Jones to New England instead of Chicago, his preferred destination?
“Interesting.”
Had you heard of an MLS blind draw before?
“Never heard of it. They could have made life easier for everyone by making it public, I guess. That [mechanism] would be like the NBA draft lottery being a blind draw. We have seen a lot of blind draws in U.S. soccer over the years with the Open Cup. They have made it more transparent, but there are still a lot of clouds there.”
In the big picture, given your experiences trying to acquire Kljestan and what unfolded with Jones, does it trouble you that, here in Year 19, MLS is still using these peculiar mechanisms for player signings?
“It’s troubling for everyone. Everyone is involved in the process. There is no finger-pointing at any particular person because ownership is involved in all of this stuff. They allow it and they participate. This is all attributed to ownership; it’s not attributed to the commissioner or the people in that [New York] office. It may not be fully supported by ownership, but there is a participation level by ownership that says: ‘This is the way we want to do things.’ ”
Going forward, I imagine you would like to see changes …
“Owners can run the league any way they want to run it. If they want it to be transparent, not transparent, have rules that are arbitrary – that is all their business. They are allowed to do those things.”
What are your observations about the quality of the league this year?
“I think it is better from top to bottom. There are emerging styles of play that differ, which is good. Teams definitely have their own way of doing business, on and off the field, which is good. Until we have other ways to do your business, we are never going to produce great teams. For a couple of years, someone is good, and then they go down a little bit.”
Would it be better if there were villains, so to speak, and matchups that created greater upset possibilities?
“Parity translates to mediocrity. It doesn’t translate to excellence. You do want to have cycles where there are more dominant teams. It’s impossible to do in our league because of the rules, the financial restrictions, and the way of doing things that are sometimes apparent and sometimes not apparent. It makes it difficult to produce a really good team over time.”
The argument over the years was that financial rules were a necessity to ensure the league’s long-term sustainability …
“That problem has been solved. I don’t think there is any question about the fact this league is going to be around. We have very strong ownership, so now the next challenge is whether we can make it into a league of more quality.”
So you would advocate lifting the financial constraints …
“Adjusting.”
From a distance, what are you observations of D.C. Coach Ben Olsen, your former player?
“He has done a real good job. When you are at the bottom and your ownership makes it known they are going to work hard to make it better, on and off the field, there was no question there was going to be a strong emphasis on improving the team and maybe spending a few dollars. Sticking all of the pieces together is never easy, but I do think you have some advantages when you come off a poor season and you get in line for a variety of possibilities [such as the first pick in various player acquisitions]. Having said that, it’s not easy. Teams in the same situations over the years have not managed as well as they have.
At this point, they get high marks.”
You have known Ben a long time. To see him now coaching a contending team …
“To see him now stressed out like everyone else is very rewarding!”
Did you see coaching qualities in him long ago?
“He is far from a finished product. He didn’t know what he was getting into, and at this point, he probably doesn’t know where he is headed, but in time, all of that stuff will take care of itself.”
What were your impressions of the U.S. team at the World Cup?
“It was great that they got through group play. I don’t think there was anything on the playing side that you can point at that was really notable. The fight, the desire is there, the goalkeeping was excellent. The inability to pass with any kind of quality was a glaring weakness. Producing chances, having any kind of possession was really a knock against the team. They were poor in those areas. Having said that, they managed to get a win and a draw out of four games – that’s pretty remarkable. We are not in position to play against top teams. We can give it a good effort, a good fight.”
In many ways, despite the stated ambitions, the characteristics of the U.S. team have remained the same over the years …
“I would argue maybe that isn’t so. Our team in 2002 played pretty well.”
What have you observed about Landon Donovan since his announcement a few weeks ago that he will retire after this season?
“He is at peace with everything. He’s happy. He’s playing well. It’s all good. He is pleased he arrived at a decision he feels good about. I encouraged it. I felt it was a good move for him.”
Why?
“He was ready to retire. This has been going on for years, so it’s good to reach a conclusion. I should be so lucky to go out like that.”
You could if you want!
“Yeah, I guess so.”
So you are saying you might be done after this year?
“I’m not saying anything. I might become a writer.”
You don’t want to do that.
“I wrote a guest column for the L.A. Times during the World Cup.”
Top dollar?
“Top dollar.”
I'm re watching the game again tonight, but bookmarking to give my thoughts tomorrow at work.I DVR'd this game, got wings and went home to watch. The more I watch soccer the more I love it. Watching the first half was an awesome experience. I know it sounds corny, but after playing 'Pool in FM14 for 2 months and immersing myself in fan boards, I feel like this is my team. So I was naturally devastated at the result.
Weird thing was that it seemed like Liverpool controlled the game for the most part. But a few botched plays happened and it got out of control.
It seems to me that this is going to be a tough first few months. In every other sport I know, you can't just go get 8 or 9 players and have it click. So I don't see how it could happen in soccer either. I like Markovic. Man he looks good. I think there are going to be some times where Markovic/Sterling/Sturridge/Balotelli make magic happen. But the defense looks a bit shaky.
What's the deal with Sakho? Isn't he one of the best defenders? Where has he been?
And Glen Johnson...I've watched him play two games and haven't seen him do a single positive thing. I'm still learning the game, but my opinion so far is that he sucks.
Coutinho...does he play the same position as Markovic? Does anyone expect the two to play at the same time, or is going to be one or the other?
Lastly, who do we expect Balotelli to replace in the starting lineup?
I assume that's who he's talking aboutDid he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.
.
What was the setting?. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.
I figured he was talking about City - in general.I assume that's who he's talking aboutDid he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.
.
What was the setting?. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.
Yeah. Didn't want to make it soccer night. Kids and wives type of deal. I know I not breaking news here but basically the way city plans to gobble up a few more teams in other countries and move players in and out. Very interesting stuff. As I said nobody else in the EPL that I know is on this level. Can't even compare city vision to that of glazes. IMO I think just a matter of time before city is an annual top 5 club Maybe pool is closest but still far. Another friend of mine who was also there is part of the group that bought Roma. Lot of cool stuff but we only spent maybe twenty minutes talking about it.
Did he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.
.
What was the setting?. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.
My friends are all about SEC football.Yeah. Didn't want to make it soccer night. Kids and wives type of deal. I know I not breaking news here but basically the way city plans to gobble up a few more teams in other countries and move players in and out. Very interesting stuff. As I said nobody else in the EPL that I know is on this level. Can't even compare city vision to that of glazes. IMO I think just a matter of time before city is an annual top 5 club Maybe pool is closest but still far. Another friend of mine who was also there is part of the group that bought Roma. Lot of cool stuff but we only spent maybe twenty minutes talking about it.
Did he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.
.
What was the setting?. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.![]()
those are some cool friends.
Given the way United's been playing and buying- I figured it was just NYCFC.I figured he was talking about City - in general.I assume that's who he's talking aboutDid he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.
.
What was the setting?. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.
I know I'm forever the wild-eyed speculator here but I don't think the Abu Dhabians came to New York to **** around with salary caps and the 10th best league in the world for very long. There's money to be made here if the structure changes.Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.
Are you kidding, Townsend is the best player on Spurs, Saints are getting a steal - did you see his cracking goal for the English National team last year? You won't find a better young, English, LW player available in this market. Schneiderlin is clearly surplus to requirements under Koeman's new system, time to dump the dead weight on some unsuspecting team in north London before everyone realizes....I know I'm forever the wild-eyed speculator here but I don't think the Abu Dhabians came to New York to **** around with salary caps and the 10th best league in the world for very long. There's money to be made here if the structure changes.Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.
Southampton sniffing around Andros Townsend, maybe trying to work a swap with Spurs for Schneiderlin. I don't think that makes the Saints better.
Man, this thread is getting hard to keep up with. It moves fast.
doubt itCapital one cup today. Can Man U finally get a win?
The best part is that a new flow chart is created on almost every signage.
Are you kidding, Townsend is the best player on Spurs, Saints are getting a steal - did you see his cracking goal for the English National team last year? You won't find a better young, English, LW player available in this market. Schneiderlin is clearly surplus to requirements under Koeman's new system, time to dump the dead weight on some unsuspecting team in north London before everyone realizes....I know I'm forever the wild-eyed speculator here but I don't think the Abu Dhabians came to New York to **** around with salary caps and the 10th best league in the world for very long. There's money to be made here if the structure changes.Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.
Southampton sniffing around Andros Townsend, maybe trying to work a swap with Spurs for Schneiderlin. I don't think that makes the Saints better.
Man, this thread is getting hard to keep up with. It moves fast.
Take my LF, please....
I concur.Are you kidding, Townsend is the best player on Spurs, Saints are getting a steal - did you see his cracking goal for the English National team last year? You won't find a better young, English, LW player available in this market. Schneiderlin is clearly surplus to requirements under Koeman's new system, time to dump the dead weight on some unsuspecting team in north London before everyone realizes....I know I'm forever the wild-eyed speculator here but I don't think the Abu Dhabians came to New York to **** around with salary caps and the 10th best league in the world for very long. There's money to be made here if the structure changes.Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.
Southampton sniffing around Andros Townsend, maybe trying to work a swap with Spurs for Schneiderlin. I don't think that makes the Saints better.
Man, this thread is getting hard to keep up with. It moves fast.
Take my LF, please....
I know one person who'll be pulling for United today: Germany Jones.doubt itCapital one cup today. Can Man U finally get a win?
saw that Dons expecting a record crowd tonight, 29000+
United probably going to throw a #### lineup out there (what else could they) and lose 2-1
?I know one person who'll be pulling for United today: Germany Jones.doubt itsaw that Dons expecting a record crowd tonight, 29000+Capital one cup today. Can Man U finally get a win?
United probably going to throw a #### lineup out there (what else could they) and lose 2-1
And the worst part is that the CBA was going to be a nightmare already, having to waste time trying to figure out the rules for player acquisitions is just going to prolong the process. :(The best part is that a new flow chart is created on almost every signage.Finally, the MLS allocation system has been explained!http://i.imgur.com/UnDZ1kU.jpg![]()
Is there a sense on the number of "big" market (ie teams that want to spend more) v small market teams? In other sports that always seems to be the initial sticking point.And the worst part is that the CBA was going to be a nightmare already, having to waste time trying to figure out the rules for player acquisitions is just going to prolong the process. :(The best part is that a new flow chart is created on almost every signage.Finally, the MLS allocation system has been explained!http://i.imgur.com/UnDZ1kU.jpg![]()
In theory yes, but it more follows the owners than it does the markets since significant local TV money has not come in to the league outside of LA yet.Is there a sense on the number of "big" market (ie teams that want to spend more) v small market teams? In other sports that always seems to be the initial sticking point.And the worst part is that the CBA was going to be a nightmare already, having to waste time trying to figure out the rules for player acquisitions is just going to prolong the process. :(The best part is that a new flow chart is created on almost every signage.Finally, the MLS allocation system has been explained!http://i.imgur.com/UnDZ1kU.jpg![]()
Playing any team on FM really allows you to immerse in their players, culture, tactics and frustration. Good on you. Welcome to the club, YNWA.shader said:I DVR'd this game, got wings and went home to watch. The more I watch soccer the more I love it. Watching the first half was an awesome experience. I know it sounds corny, but after playing 'Pool in FM14 for 2 months and immersing myself in fan boards, I feel like this is my team. So I was naturally devastated at the result.
Liverpool did play well in spurts, their high press worked well early, but City has such solid players that they managed to not make many mistakes, and generally did a great job of marking our offensive players out of the game. Unfortunately, some of our players didn't have the best outing IMO. I thought Coutinho fell short of expectations, as well as Sterling to some extent. I was also not too thrilled with Hendo, he looked a step behind throughout most of the game. It's tough playing against a star studded team though, especially one that's as tactically sound as City. I think the biggest issue is that we didn't have a right flank at all this game. Too often, if you look back on the tape, we lost momentum as soon as the ball came to Johnson. I know I rag on him a lot, but I don't think he is of premiership quality anymore. He looked a step or two off in defense, often caught out of position, and tried to compensate for lack of speed by leaving too much room on the flank. On offense he was just walking around, and that hurt Sterling IMO, and forced Sturridge off the middle, going wide to pick up the ball and make himself available.Weird thing was that it seemed like Liverpool controlled the game for the most part. But a few botched plays happened and it got out of control.
I think it's a little early to draw those conclusions, especially after playing City at the Ethiad. That is always going to be a tough away game, just look at their record at home. The manager has done a good job of rotating new players in, and it's not like he's fitting all 9 into the game at the same time. We have seen 8-9 players from last seasons squad on the field, and sprinkles of the new guys. I expect that to continue going forward, and I'm not too worried about it. BR won't let the new guys on the field until they understands his tactical vision.It seems to me that this is going to be a tough first few months. In every other sport I know, you can't just go get 8 or 9 players and have it click. So I don't see how it could happen in soccer either. I like Markovic. Man he looks good. I think there are going to be some times where Markovic/Sterling/Sturridge/Balotelli make magic happen. But the defense looks a bit shaky.
Part of Sakho's issue is playing in the same left central defender spot as Lovren, and Lovren is much more vocal and a leader, which is very much needed in the backline. I think we'll see Sakho taking a bigger role, maybe in pairing with Lovren on the right side of the central defense, especially if Skrtel is nursing an injury.What's the deal with Sakho? Isn't he one of the best defenders? Where has he been?
Pretty telling that you see it even after 2 games... Imagine watching him do the same crap day in and day out for years... :deadbanana: He shouldn't be first choice anymore, and should be behind both Manquillo and Flanno going forward IMO. If Flanno was 100%, he would've started yesterday's game IMO.And Glen Johnson...I've watched him play two games and haven't seen him do a single positive thing. I'm still learning the game, but my opinion so far is that he sucks.
Here's where it gets tactically tricky. BR doesn't want players for a specific position. He wants his players to be fluid, and change positions during play, and almost be interchangable. Think of the 3 midfield positions as holding midfielder, more defensive (like Gerrard), a workhorse working box-to-box (Hendo), and a creator (Allen yesterday), then you have 2 of the forwards (attacking midfielders) adding additional creativity (Coutinho/Sterling) yesterday. Markovic fits into that last role, and is interchangable with both Sterling and Coutinho (and Suso, Ibe, Sturridge, Balotelli). Can fits into the box-to-box role, but can also play holding.Coutinho...does he play the same position as Markovic? Does anyone expect the two to play at the same time, or is going to be one or the other?
As seen above, Balotelli can fit into either the attcking wide roles or the pure striker role, just like Sturridge (and Borini). The only pure player that I feel only fits in a striker role is Lambert (but in a pinch he can float wide too).These are only my thoughts, feel free to disagree and object.Lastly, who do we expect Balotelli to replace in the starting lineup?
I'm rooting for lightning strikes and sinkholesSteve Tasker said:I know one person who'll be pulling for United today: Germany Jones.guru_007 said:doubt itshader said:Capital one cup today. Can Man U finally get a win?
saw that Dons expecting a record crowd tonight, 29000+
United probably going to throw a #### lineup out there (what else could they) and lose 2-1
you are biased.What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.
no reason to be mean!!!What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.
I see Balo playing within the confines of the 18 yard box, traversing from side to side, with a stronger focus on the middle than Sturridge, but from what I have read from BR, he wants him to move around a lot more than what he has traditionally done.Extract from above link, spot on:Check out this analysis site: http://ohyoubeauty.blogspot.com/2014/08/visualized-liverpool-1-3-manchester-city.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
along with this: http://statsbomb.com/2014/08/player-positional-tracker-man-city-v-liverpool-250814/
Tons of fun, for us stats/tactics geeks.
That GIF from Statsbomb also demonstrates just how high each side's fullbacks played, as does Liverpool's average position in the above passing network. All four fullbacks' average position for the match was in the opposition's half. That's to be expected from City at home, but it was dangerous, almost to the point of arrogance, from Liverpool, putting a lot of pressure on the midfielders and center-backs. Especially when one of those fullbacks is a 22-year-old Spaniard making his debut, and the other is Glen Johnson. But that's Brendan Rodgers' Liverpool, at least last season's Liverpool. At the defending league champions? No matter. We're going to attack. And, yes, Liverpool paid for it. But at least they had the confidence to go for it. However, I suspect Manquillo will be more defensive-minded when he starts, as will Flanagan in his appearances.
What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.
What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.![]()
That positional tracker is hypnotizingExtract from above link, spot on:Check out this analysis site: http://ohyoubeauty.blogspot.com/2014/08/visualized-liverpool-1-3-manchester-city.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
along with this: http://statsbomb.com/2014/08/player-positional-tracker-man-city-v-liverpool-250814/
Tons of fun, for us stats/tactics geeks.
That GIF from Statsbomb also demonstrates just how high each side's fullbacks played, as does Liverpool's average position in the above passing network. All four fullbacks' average position for the match was in the opposition's half. That's to be expected from City at home, but it was dangerous, almost to the point of arrogance, from Liverpool, putting a lot of pressure on the midfielders and center-backs. Especially when one of those fullbacks is a 22-year-old Spaniard making his debut, and the other is Glen Johnson. But that's Brendan Rodgers' Liverpool, at least last season's Liverpool. At the defending league champions? No matter. We're going to attack. And, yes, Liverpool paid for it. But at least they had the confidence to go for it. However, I suspect Manquillo will be more defensive-minded when he starts, as will Flanagan in his appearances.
Yeah, I haven't seen that one before but I love it! I have probably seen the full game 4 times on that tracker, watching different players... I might have a problemThat positional tracker is hypnotizingExtract from above link, spot on:Check out this analysis site: http://ohyoubeauty.blogspot.com/2014/08/visualized-liverpool-1-3-manchester-city.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
along with this: http://statsbomb.com/2014/08/player-positional-tracker-man-city-v-liverpool-250814/
Tons of fun, for us stats/tactics geeks.
That GIF from Statsbomb also demonstrates just how high each side's fullbacks played, as does Liverpool's average position in the above passing network. All four fullbacks' average position for the match was in the opposition's half. That's to be expected from City at home, but it was dangerous, almost to the point of arrogance, from Liverpool, putting a lot of pressure on the midfielders and center-backs. Especially when one of those fullbacks is a 22-year-old Spaniard making his debut, and the other is Glen Johnson. But that's Brendan Rodgers' Liverpool, at least last season's Liverpool. At the defending league champions? No matter. We're going to attack. And, yes, Liverpool paid for it. But at least they had the confidence to go for it. However, I suspect Manquillo will be more defensive-minded when he starts, as will Flanagan in his appearances.![]()
What a fantastic tool for coaches to easily explain how a player needs to improve/alter his positioning with out having to watch 90 minutes of film.

Last year I forced myself not to watch fatboyz football. This year I can hardly stand watching it.Thanks to Gator and Charvik for their detailed responses!
I was watching that game yesterday and thinking about how engrossing a first half game it was. Compare that to the NFL. TV timeouts, replays and penalties. It's no wonder that the Redzone channel and 30 minute replays are gaining so much popularity. It can be painful to watch an NFL game at times.
It's not surprising that the NFL is struggling to catch on in London and Europe. It would be one thing if soccer had an off-season. Then maybe the NFL could catch on. But soccer goes from August to May. The NFL's new rules this preseason show that it clearly doesn't see the point. But as long as the ratings improve, nothing will be done.