What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (4 Viewers)

It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.

 
Also, this is what I get for laughing at the scousers today. Atlético drew 0-0 and looked more or less toothless at Rayo. With Simeone off the sideline for an extended amount of time, I can only hope that a) Arda gets healthy, b) Griezmann finds his place, and c) Mandzukic finds his scoring groove. The defense and midfield are solid (unlike some English teams I've seen...), but lord there needs to be some more work put in up front.

 
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.

I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.

 
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US,
The EPL is not the most popular league in the US based on TV ratings. Liga MX still holds that title as of last year/season.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US,
The EPL is not the most popular league in the US based on TV ratings. Liga MX still holds that title as of last year/season.
Right. Liga MX has plenty of diehard immigrant/recent immigrant fans. Among "noob" fans, I think the EPL is a much more visible league and much more easily-accessible league than Liga MX. That's what I was getting at.

 
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US,
The EPL is not the most popular league in the US based on TV ratings. Liga MX still holds that title as of last year/season.
What league is that?

 
I think teams in the EPL need to be trying hard to make bigtime inroads in the US. Myself and two good friends knew little about the EPL 12 months ago. After the World Cup we are all fans and watching it religiously.

The US is a gold mine as obviously it's the richest country.

 
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US,
The EPL is not the most popular league in the US based on TV ratings. Liga MX still holds that title as of last year/season.
What league is that?
Mexican First Division. Their top games can get 3 times the numbers that the top EPL games get.

But the EPL has made nice inroads since moving to NBC and is trending up. The next TV contract will be key to their future growth in the US

 
I think teams in the EPL need to be trying hard to make bigtime inroads in the US. Myself and two good friends knew little about the EPL 12 months ago. After the World Cup we are all fans and watching it religiously.
I am unsure how much more they can do.

They already play a ton of games every summer here, much to the chagrin of some of the managers who hate it. Man City went as far to plunk a $100M into buying an MLS expansion team and will likely spend hundreds of millions more building a stadium and running the team.

The TV coverage is fantastic for the league, giving it really good exposure on relatively easy to acquire channels.

 
What's the deal with Sakho? Isn't he one of the best defenders? Where has he been?
I'm not sure here. I thought he did well last season when he finally got a run of games. He was brought in by Rodgers, so Sakho is his transfer. He's just turned 24 this year, so he might just not quite be ready.

And Glen Johnson...I've watched him play two games and haven't seen him do a single positive thing. I'm still learning the game, but my opinion so far is that he sucks.
Old and doesn't have the speed/energy to play an attacking WB role. It was a run..

Coutinho...does he play the same position as Markovic? Does anyone expect the two to play at the same time, or is going to be one or the other?
Coutinho's best role imo is an 8ish spot, but sometimes he's played out wide and cuts in often. He needs to be played centrally and ahead of Gerrard and Henderson but not quite a true #10. He needs to work on his shooting before he can be trusted with a true #10 role imo.

Lastly, who do we expect Balotelli to replace in the starting lineup?
Joe Allen and I think in a few weeks you'll see this lineup

 
Bruce Arena: :wub: :wub:

Soccer Insider: Do you think the Galaxy is beginning to hit its stride at the right time?

Bruce Arena: “We’ll see.”

It’s a forgiving league because you can start slowly and turn it on before the playoffs, right?

“That has often been the case.”

Do you plan to make any significant roster moves before the Sept. 15 deadline?

“No, we are fine. I don’t know what you can do at this point — even though, the way things have been happening [in MLS] lately, God knows what could possibly happen.”

What happened with the possible Kljestan deal from Anderlecht? You seemed all set to sign him.

“We had a trade in place. We had budget room and space to be able to do it. We had all of our ducks in a row. We were positioned to sign a player. I won’t go into detail and just say forces within the league worked real hard to make sure that didn’t happen.”

Why?

“Because they are children and there have to be adults in the process, and we didn’t have enough of them. I think we are back into the old days in the league when the rules are somewhat arbitrary. Hopefully we will get that straightened out in the offseason.”

You traded defender Kofi Opare to D.C. for a high position in the allocation order with the intent to sign Kljestan, right?

“We were going to add a player.”

It didn’t work out, so you probably will not be able to exercise that allocation slot before the deadline, correct?

“Right. But we did end up adding a player without the allocation slot: Alan Gordon.”

So what do you make of the blind draw that delivered Jones to New England instead of Chicago, his preferred destination?

“Interesting.”

Had you heard of an MLS blind draw before?

“Never heard of it. They could have made life easier for everyone by making it public, I guess. That [mechanism] would be like the NBA draft lottery being a blind draw. We have seen a lot of blind draws in U.S. soccer over the years with the Open Cup. They have made it more transparent, but there are still a lot of clouds there.”

In the big picture, given your experiences trying to acquire Kljestan and what unfolded with Jones, does it trouble you that, here in Year 19, MLS is still using these peculiar mechanisms for player signings?

“It’s troubling for everyone. Everyone is involved in the process. There is no finger-pointing at any particular person because ownership is involved in all of this stuff. They allow it and they participate. This is all attributed to ownership; it’s not attributed to the commissioner or the people in that [New York] office. It may not be fully supported by ownership, but there is a participation level by ownership that says: ‘This is the way we want to do things.’ ”

Going forward, I imagine you would like to see changes …

“Owners can run the league any way they want to run it. If they want it to be transparent, not transparent, have rules that are arbitrary – that is all their business. They are allowed to do those things.”

What are your observations about the quality of the league this year?

“I think it is better from top to bottom. There are emerging styles of play that differ, which is good. Teams definitely have their own way of doing business, on and off the field, which is good. Until we have other ways to do your business, we are never going to produce great teams. For a couple of years, someone is good, and then they go down a little bit.”

Would it be better if there were villains, so to speak, and matchups that created greater upset possibilities?

“Parity translates to mediocrity. It doesn’t translate to excellence. You do want to have cycles where there are more dominant teams. It’s impossible to do in our league because of the rules, the financial restrictions, and the way of doing things that are sometimes apparent and sometimes not apparent. It makes it difficult to produce a really good team over time.”

The argument over the years was that financial rules were a necessity to ensure the league’s long-term sustainability …

“That problem has been solved. I don’t think there is any question about the fact this league is going to be around. We have very strong ownership, so now the next challenge is whether we can make it into a league of more quality.”

So you would advocate lifting the financial constraints …

“Adjusting.”

From a distance, what are you observations of D.C. Coach Ben Olsen, your former player?

“He has done a real good job. When you are at the bottom and your ownership makes it known they are going to work hard to make it better, on and off the field, there was no question there was going to be a strong emphasis on improving the team and maybe spending a few dollars. Sticking all of the pieces together is never easy, but I do think you have some advantages when you come off a poor season and you get in line for a variety of possibilities [such as the first pick in various player acquisitions]. Having said that, it’s not easy. Teams in the same situations over the years have not managed as well as they have.

At this point, they get high marks.”

You have known Ben a long time. To see him now coaching a contending team …

“To see him now stressed out like everyone else is very rewarding!”

Did you see coaching qualities in him long ago?

“He is far from a finished product. He didn’t know what he was getting into, and at this point, he probably doesn’t know where he is headed, but in time, all of that stuff will take care of itself.”

What were your impressions of the U.S. team at the World Cup?

“It was great that they got through group play. I don’t think there was anything on the playing side that you can point at that was really notable. The fight, the desire is there, the goalkeeping was excellent. The inability to pass with any kind of quality was a glaring weakness. Producing chances, having any kind of possession was really a knock against the team. They were poor in those areas. Having said that, they managed to get a win and a draw out of four games – that’s pretty remarkable. We are not in position to play against top teams. We can give it a good effort, a good fight.”

In many ways, despite the stated ambitions, the characteristics of the U.S. team have remained the same over the years …

“I would argue maybe that isn’t so. Our team in 2002 played pretty well.”

What have you observed about Landon Donovan since his announcement a few weeks ago that he will retire after this season?

“He is at peace with everything. He’s happy. He’s playing well. It’s all good. He is pleased he arrived at a decision he feels good about. I encouraged it. I felt it was a good move for him.”

Why?

“He was ready to retire. This has been going on for years, so it’s good to reach a conclusion. I should be so lucky to go out like that.”

You could if you want!

“Yeah, I guess so.”

So you are saying you might be done after this year?

“I’m not saying anything. I might become a writer.”

You don’t want to do that.

“I wrote a guest column for the L.A. Times during the World Cup.”

Top dollar?

“Top dollar.”
 
I DVR'd this game, got wings and went home to watch. The more I watch soccer the more I love it. Watching the first half was an awesome experience. I know it sounds corny, but after playing 'Pool in FM14 for 2 months and immersing myself in fan boards, I feel like this is my team. So I was naturally devastated at the result.

Weird thing was that it seemed like Liverpool controlled the game for the most part. But a few botched plays happened and it got out of control.

It seems to me that this is going to be a tough first few months. In every other sport I know, you can't just go get 8 or 9 players and have it click. So I don't see how it could happen in soccer either. I like Markovic. Man he looks good. I think there are going to be some times where Markovic/Sterling/Sturridge/Balotelli make magic happen. But the defense looks a bit shaky.

What's the deal with Sakho? Isn't he one of the best defenders? Where has he been?

And Glen Johnson...I've watched him play two games and haven't seen him do a single positive thing. I'm still learning the game, but my opinion so far is that he sucks.

Coutinho...does he play the same position as Markovic? Does anyone expect the two to play at the same time, or is going to be one or the other?

Lastly, who do we expect Balotelli to replace in the starting lineup?
I'm re watching the game again tonight, but bookmarking to give my thoughts tomorrow at work.
 
Benatia for 30m Euros seems a pretty good price. Not that I'm familiar with the player, but just based on the numbers folks were throwing out earlier this summer. Bayern seems to have done well this window, more or less even transfer balance with Mandzukic and Kroos out, Bernat, Lewa and Benatia in.

 
Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.

.

. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.
What was the setting?
Did he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?
I assume that's who he's talking about
I figured he was talking about City - in general.

 
Yeah. Didn't want to make it soccer night. Kids and wives type of deal. I know I not breaking news here but basically the way city plans to gobble up a few more teams in other countries and move players in and out. Very interesting stuff. As I said nobody else in the EPL that I know is on this level. Can't even compare city vision to that of glazes. IMO I think just a matter of time before city is an annual top 5 club Maybe pool is closest but still far. Another friend of mine who was also there is part of the group that bought Roma. Lot of cool stuff but we only spent maybe twenty minutes talking about it.

Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.

.

. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.
What was the setting?
Did he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?
:thumbup:

those are some cool friends.

 
Yeah. Didn't want to make it soccer night. Kids and wives type of deal. I know I not breaking news here but basically the way city plans to gobble up a few more teams in other countries and move players in and out. Very interesting stuff. As I said nobody else in the EPL that I know is on this level. Can't even compare city vision to that of glazes. IMO I think just a matter of time before city is an annual top 5 club Maybe pool is closest but still far. Another friend of mine who was also there is part of the group that bought Roma. Lot of cool stuff but we only spent maybe twenty minutes talking about it.

Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.

.

. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.
What was the setting?
Did he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?
:thumbup:

those are some cool friends.
My friends are all about SEC football. :kicksrock:

 
Fun game yesterday.

City definitely came through with the goals, but Liverpool deserved to be there with them- seemed like two equal teams going at it. Both solid all the way through their lineup and tactically sound, regardless of who came in. Of course, when one team can sub in Aguero and the other counters with Lambert, it's clear there's a gap in depth. CL + EPL season should expose this gap, allowing City to rise to the top in the end, IMO.

Then I thought of United's performances so far... so clearly way off this level right now. In spite of having the horsepower up front to compete. until they get heir back line and MF spine figured out... let alone how to play that formation... they don't look like a team that's going to compete for top 4 at all... maybe not even top 6 (although again, the guys up front are certainly capable of turning up the gears).

 
Backyard BBQ. My buddy played at UVA with him and we all spend summer weekends in the same place.

.

. Was able to talk to Reyna a week or so ago and maybe he is just a good salesman but seems to me we are light years ahead of MU going forward.
What was the setting?
Did he give you any interesting info on NYCFC?
I assume that's who he's talking about
I figured he was talking about City - in general.
Given the way United's been playing and buying- I figured it was just NYCFC.

 
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.

I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.
I know I'm forever the wild-eyed speculator here but I don't think the Abu Dhabians came to New York to **** around with salary caps and the 10th best league in the world for very long. There's money to be made here if the structure changes.

Southampton sniffing around Andros Townsend, maybe trying to work a swap with Spurs for Schneiderlin. I don't think that makes the Saints better.

Man, this thread is getting hard to keep up with. It moves fast.

 
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.

I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.
I know I'm forever the wild-eyed speculator here but I don't think the Abu Dhabians came to New York to **** around with salary caps and the 10th best league in the world for very long. There's money to be made here if the structure changes.

Southampton sniffing around Andros Townsend, maybe trying to work a swap with Spurs for Schneiderlin. I don't think that makes the Saints better.

Man, this thread is getting hard to keep up with. It moves fast.
Are you kidding, Townsend is the best player on Spurs, Saints are getting a steal - did you see his cracking goal for the English National team last year? You won't find a better young, English, LW player available in this market. Schneiderlin is clearly surplus to requirements under Koeman's new system, time to dump the dead weight on some unsuspecting team in north London before everyone realizes....

Take my LF, please....

 
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.

I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.
I know I'm forever the wild-eyed speculator here but I don't think the Abu Dhabians came to New York to **** around with salary caps and the 10th best league in the world for very long. There's money to be made here if the structure changes.

Southampton sniffing around Andros Townsend, maybe trying to work a swap with Spurs for Schneiderlin. I don't think that makes the Saints better.

Man, this thread is getting hard to keep up with. It moves fast.
Are you kidding, Townsend is the best player on Spurs, Saints are getting a steal - did you see his cracking goal for the English National team last year? You won't find a better young, English, LW player available in this market. Schneiderlin is clearly surplus to requirements under Koeman's new system, time to dump the dead weight on some unsuspecting team in north London before everyone realizes....

Take my LF, please....
:fishing: :)

 
It'll be 5+ more years until City has revenues that are near the other global brands teams. Those teams are United, Bayern, Barça, and Real Madrid. They may be able to bring in players and move them around the world and do lots of other stuff that clubs with less deep pockets can't do, but they still won't have that brand reach that these other teams have for a little bit yet. Maybe United falls off if they hit a long stretch of mediocrity, but I don't see City reaching the heights of Bayern, Real, and Barça any time soon.
Worldwide, sure, but I wonder if they could have an exponential explosion of their brand in a relatively untamed soccer market like America. If professional soccer in America hits the tipping point, so to speak, Man City are currently the kings of the most popular league in the US, with a foothold in MLS, on television all the time. Whether or not it's true anymore, United are still viewed as the "Yankees of the EPL", and who's the Red Sox to their Yankees, to the average noob EPL fan? City.

I think they could do well here. Just speculating though.
I know I'm forever the wild-eyed speculator here but I don't think the Abu Dhabians came to New York to **** around with salary caps and the 10th best league in the world for very long. There's money to be made here if the structure changes.

Southampton sniffing around Andros Townsend, maybe trying to work a swap with Spurs for Schneiderlin. I don't think that makes the Saints better.

Man, this thread is getting hard to keep up with. It moves fast.
Are you kidding, Townsend is the best player on Spurs, Saints are getting a steal - did you see his cracking goal for the English National team last year? You won't find a better young, English, LW player available in this market. Schneiderlin is clearly surplus to requirements under Koeman's new system, time to dump the dead weight on some unsuspecting team in north London before everyone realizes....

Take my LF, please....
I concur. :coffee:

 
Finally, the MLS allocation system has been explained!http://i.imgur.com/UnDZ1kU.jpg
The best part is that a new flow chart is created on almost every signage. :)
And the worst part is that the CBA was going to be a nightmare already, having to waste time trying to figure out the rules for player acquisitions is just going to prolong the process. :(
Is there a sense on the number of "big" market (ie teams that want to spend more) v small market teams? In other sports that always seems to be the initial sticking point.

 
Finally, the MLS allocation system has been explained!http://i.imgur.com/UnDZ1kU.jpg
The best part is that a new flow chart is created on almost every signage. :)
And the worst part is that the CBA was going to be a nightmare already, having to waste time trying to figure out the rules for player acquisitions is just going to prolong the process. :(
Is there a sense on the number of "big" market (ie teams that want to spend more) v small market teams? In other sports that always seems to be the initial sticking point.
In theory yes, but it more follows the owners than it does the markets since significant local TV money has not come in to the league outside of LA yet.

Seattle for instance are no where near as big as LA, Chicago or NY but they most certainly want to spend as much or more than the bigger markets since they generate so much revenue.

You get the feeling that there is a divide amongst the owners themselves sometimes about what direction the league needs to head in.

Some want to protect the league from failing by being cautious and trying to have a rule for every situation (which leads to the cluster #### signings we have seen since you can't possibly predict every scenario) and then you have a bunch of newer owners that I think would not mind cutting the cord and letting the league grow more naturally.

In any case, the revenues are up across the board. The player bent over in 2010 and took one for the league under the guise of "we need to be conservative to survive". With stadiums selling out in numerous cities and the new TV deal bringing in a ton more than expected, I doubt the players will capitulate so easily this time.

The players also know the owners are not going to want the season to be delayed with 2 new expansion teams starting and a new stadium opening in SJ which will give them a foot hold to dig in.

This is easily the most important CBA in MLS history IMO. The good news is that they are trying to divide up a bigger pie. The bad news is that we know that is never easy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If I am not mistaken NY has their very first CCL group stage game ever tonight. It is almost a must win already for them since Montreal already has 6 points from 2 games and only one team advances in this format.

 
A lot of question, but that's all good. I will try to answer to the best of my understanding.

shader said:
I DVR'd this game, got wings and went home to watch. The more I watch soccer the more I love it. Watching the first half was an awesome experience. I know it sounds corny, but after playing 'Pool in FM14 for 2 months and immersing myself in fan boards, I feel like this is my team. So I was naturally devastated at the result.
Playing any team on FM really allows you to immerse in their players, culture, tactics and frustration. Good on you. Welcome to the club, YNWA.

Weird thing was that it seemed like Liverpool controlled the game for the most part. But a few botched plays happened and it got out of control.
Liverpool did play well in spurts, their high press worked well early, but City has such solid players that they managed to not make many mistakes, and generally did a great job of marking our offensive players out of the game. Unfortunately, some of our players didn't have the best outing IMO. I thought Coutinho fell short of expectations, as well as Sterling to some extent. I was also not too thrilled with Hendo, he looked a step behind throughout most of the game. It's tough playing against a star studded team though, especially one that's as tactically sound as City. I think the biggest issue is that we didn't have a right flank at all this game. Too often, if you look back on the tape, we lost momentum as soon as the ball came to Johnson. I know I rag on him a lot, but I don't think he is of premiership quality anymore. He looked a step or two off in defense, often caught out of position, and tried to compensate for lack of speed by leaving too much room on the flank. On offense he was just walking around, and that hurt Sterling IMO, and forced Sturridge off the middle, going wide to pick up the ball and make himself available.

It seems to me that this is going to be a tough first few months. In every other sport I know, you can't just go get 8 or 9 players and have it click. So I don't see how it could happen in soccer either. I like Markovic. Man he looks good. I think there are going to be some times where Markovic/Sterling/Sturridge/Balotelli make magic happen. But the defense looks a bit shaky.
I think it's a little early to draw those conclusions, especially after playing City at the Ethiad. That is always going to be a tough away game, just look at their record at home. The manager has done a good job of rotating new players in, and it's not like he's fitting all 9 into the game at the same time. We have seen 8-9 players from last seasons squad on the field, and sprinkles of the new guys. I expect that to continue going forward, and I'm not too worried about it. BR won't let the new guys on the field until they understands his tactical vision.

What's the deal with Sakho? Isn't he one of the best defenders? Where has he been?
Part of Sakho's issue is playing in the same left central defender spot as Lovren, and Lovren is much more vocal and a leader, which is very much needed in the backline. I think we'll see Sakho taking a bigger role, maybe in pairing with Lovren on the right side of the central defense, especially if Skrtel is nursing an injury.
And Glen Johnson...I've watched him play two games and haven't seen him do a single positive thing. I'm still learning the game, but my opinion so far is that he sucks.
Pretty telling that you see it even after 2 games... Imagine watching him do the same crap day in and day out for years... :deadbanana: He shouldn't be first choice anymore, and should be behind both Manquillo and Flanno going forward IMO. If Flanno was 100%, he would've started yesterday's game IMO.

ETA: BR also wants his full backs to join in the attack, while still remaining defensively responsible. He often asks the non attacking fullback to stay back to provide extra cover in defense to prevent fast counter. Johnson has failed on that task on numerous occasions IMO.

Coutinho...does he play the same position as Markovic? Does anyone expect the two to play at the same time, or is going to be one or the other?
Here's where it gets tactically tricky. BR doesn't want players for a specific position. He wants his players to be fluid, and change positions during play, and almost be interchangable. Think of the 3 midfield positions as holding midfielder, more defensive (like Gerrard), a workhorse working box-to-box (Hendo), and a creator (Allen yesterday), then you have 2 of the forwards (attacking midfielders) adding additional creativity (Coutinho/Sterling) yesterday. Markovic fits into that last role, and is interchangable with both Sterling and Coutinho (and Suso, Ibe, Sturridge, Balotelli). Can fits into the box-to-box role, but can also play holding.

Lastly, who do we expect Balotelli to replace in the starting lineup?
As seen above, Balotelli can fit into either the attcking wide roles or the pure striker role, just like Sturridge (and Borini). The only pure player that I feel only fits in a striker role is Lambert (but in a pinch he can float wide too).These are only my thoughts, feel free to disagree and object. ;)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks to Gator and Charvik for their detailed responses!

I was watching that game yesterday and thinking about how engrossing a first half game it was. Compare that to the NFL. TV timeouts, replays and penalties. It's no wonder that the Redzone channel and 30 minute replays are gaining so much popularity. It can be painful to watch an NFL game at times.

It's not surprising that the NFL is struggling to catch on in London and Europe. It would be one thing if soccer had an off-season. Then maybe the NFL could catch on. But soccer goes from August to May. The NFL's new rules this preseason show that it clearly doesn't see the point. But as long as the ratings improve, nothing will be done.

 
Steve Tasker said:
guru_007 said:
shader said:
Capital one cup today. Can Man U finally get a win?
doubt it

saw that Dons expecting a record crowd tonight, 29000+

United probably going to throw a #### lineup out there (what else could they) and lose 2-1
I know one person who'll be pulling for United today: Germany Jones.
I'm rooting for lightning strikes and sinkholes

 
What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.

 
What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.
you are biased.

but I agree with you.

 
What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.
no reason to be mean!!! :shock: I see Balo playing within the confines of the 18 yard box, traversing from side to side, with a stronger focus on the middle than Sturridge, but from what I have read from BR, he wants him to move around a lot more than what he has traditionally done.

 
Extract from above link, spot on:

That GIF from Statsbomb also demonstrates just how high each side's fullbacks played, as does Liverpool's average position in the above passing network. All four fullbacks' average position for the match was in the opposition's half. That's to be expected from City at home, but it was dangerous, almost to the point of arrogance, from Liverpool, putting a lot of pressure on the midfielders and center-backs. Especially when one of those fullbacks is a 22-year-old Spaniard making his debut, and the other is Glen Johnson. But that's Brendan Rodgers' Liverpool, at least last season's Liverpool. At the defending league champions? No matter. We're going to attack. And, yes, Liverpool paid for it. But at least they had the confidence to go for it. However, I suspect Manquillo will be more defensive-minded when he starts, as will Flanagan in his appearances.
 
What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.
:goodposting:

 
What do you mean by "attacking wide roles" for Balotelli? Seems to me he'd fit much better as an out-and-out striker...I'm not sure I've ever seen him on the wing, but I don't recall seeing many Milan games with him playing. Is this a common position for him? He's 6'2+" and a beast in the box. He should be in front of the net....he's got Andy Carroll's size with Torres' ability. He and Sturridge lining up together and running off one another should give every team fits defensively, especially with someone like Sterling stretching the defense. Perhaps I'm a little biased though.
:goodposting:
:lmao:

I ####### love that Balotelli av.

 
Extract from above link, spot on:

That GIF from Statsbomb also demonstrates just how high each side's fullbacks played, as does Liverpool's average position in the above passing network. All four fullbacks' average position for the match was in the opposition's half. That's to be expected from City at home, but it was dangerous, almost to the point of arrogance, from Liverpool, putting a lot of pressure on the midfielders and center-backs. Especially when one of those fullbacks is a 22-year-old Spaniard making his debut, and the other is Glen Johnson. But that's Brendan Rodgers' Liverpool, at least last season's Liverpool. At the defending league champions? No matter. We're going to attack. And, yes, Liverpool paid for it. But at least they had the confidence to go for it. However, I suspect Manquillo will be more defensive-minded when he starts, as will Flanagan in his appearances.
That positional tracker is hypnotizing :)

What a fantastic tool for coaches to easily explain how a player needs to improve/alter his positioning with out having to watch 90 minutes of film.

 
Extract from above link, spot on:

That GIF from Statsbomb also demonstrates just how high each side's fullbacks played, as does Liverpool's average position in the above passing network. All four fullbacks' average position for the match was in the opposition's half. That's to be expected from City at home, but it was dangerous, almost to the point of arrogance, from Liverpool, putting a lot of pressure on the midfielders and center-backs. Especially when one of those fullbacks is a 22-year-old Spaniard making his debut, and the other is Glen Johnson. But that's Brendan Rodgers' Liverpool, at least last season's Liverpool. At the defending league champions? No matter. We're going to attack. And, yes, Liverpool paid for it. But at least they had the confidence to go for it. However, I suspect Manquillo will be more defensive-minded when he starts, as will Flanagan in his appearances.
That positional tracker is hypnotizing :)

What a fantastic tool for coaches to easily explain how a player needs to improve/alter his positioning with out having to watch 90 minutes of film.
Yeah, I haven't seen that one before but I love it! I have probably seen the full game 4 times on that tracker, watching different players... I might have a problem :bag:
 
Thanks to Gator and Charvik for their detailed responses!

I was watching that game yesterday and thinking about how engrossing a first half game it was. Compare that to the NFL. TV timeouts, replays and penalties. It's no wonder that the Redzone channel and 30 minute replays are gaining so much popularity. It can be painful to watch an NFL game at times.

It's not surprising that the NFL is struggling to catch on in London and Europe. It would be one thing if soccer had an off-season. Then maybe the NFL could catch on. But soccer goes from August to May. The NFL's new rules this preseason show that it clearly doesn't see the point. But as long as the ratings improve, nothing will be done.
Last year I forced myself not to watch fatboyz football. This year I can hardly stand watching it.

They keep interrupting it. And they better do something about that or risk losing the next generation for whom it will be background noise at best while they're doing 10 other things on their smart phones.

 
In other news:

Uber Football Fact ‏@UberFootFact 49m

Manchester United have broken the British all-time transfer record by signing Angel Di Maria for £59.7m.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top