What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (10 Viewers)

Native's post sent me to Wikipedia to look at CL winners again. If you were picking a year as a cutoff for the "modern" era... what would you choose?

1996/97 (post Bosman and roughly when English clubs became competitive again after the ban)?

1983 (year subsequent to the last time clubs from a single nation claimed 3 straight titles - happened a lot prior)

1956 (when England joined)?

1955 (when it started)?

Other?
probably 10 years is a good cutoff?

 
Native's post sent me to Wikipedia to look at CL winners again. If you were picking a year as a cutoff for the "modern" era... what would you choose?

1996/97 (post Bosman and roughly when English clubs became competitive again after the ban)?

1983 (year subsequent to the last time clubs from a single nation claimed 3 straight titles - happened a lot prior)

1956 (when England joined)?

1955 (when it started)?

Other?
I think the year it changed from the Champions Cup to the Champions League is a good spot since the two were so dramatically different in format.

So I would say 1992 is a good spot.

 
Completely spaced on that -- but it's perfect.

ETA... 1997/1998 is even better since that's the year runners-up were allowed to join the competition as well. Plus you get around the whole English ban and are post-Bosman by then as well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Native's post sent me to Wikipedia to look at CL winners again. If you were picking a year as a cutoff for the "modern" era... what would you choose?

1996/97 (post Bosman and roughly when English clubs became competitive again after the ban)?

1983 (year subsequent to the last time clubs from a single nation claimed 3 straight titles - happened a lot prior)

1956 (when England joined)?

1955 (when it started)?

Other?
Whenever it went from champions to champions plus others. 1997, I believe.

 
Since the changes to the CL for 1997/1998...

By club (wins/runners-up):

Barcelona (4/0)

Real Madrid (4/0)

Bayern Munich (2/3)

Manchester United (2/2)

AC Milan (2/1)

Chelsea (1/1)

Liverpool (1/1)

Inter Milan (1/0)

Porto (1/0)

Juventus (0/3)

Valencia (0/2)

Arsenal (0/1)

Atletico Madrid (0/1)

Dortmund (0/1)

Leverkusen (0/1)

Monoco (0/1)

By nation (unique teams appearing in final - wins/runners-up):

Spain (4 - 8/3)

England (4 - 4/5)

Italy (3 - 3/4)

Germany (3 - 2/5)

Portugal (1 - 1/0)

France (1 - 0/1)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you faced Barca in 2009, there's a good chance this was the attacking team they rolled out against you.

Zlatan Henry

Messi

Iniesta Xavi

Yaya

Can you imagine?
The front three is better now, IMO. Henry was a tad past his born-on date. Zlatan had a bit of trouble fitting in (as most central strikers until Suarez did). Both had decent enough stats, but neither were as prolific as Suarez and Neymar are now. Toure's offensive qualities weren't really utilized in that team. Busquets is just a better fit as a holding mid (not surprising as he's the best holding mid in the world). Obviously a good thought experiment might be to wonder how good the current team would be with peak Xavi and Iniesta (and near peak Puyol/Pique) for that matter. I don't think any team, even Bayern, could put up a "team of the decade" that would really compete.
I don't think Yaya and Zlatan overlapped. The 08-09 season with Eto'o/Henry/Messi was the best until recently.

 
Mourinho has been given a stadium ban.

A decent chance he never coaches Chelsea again - assuming a managerial change heading into the international break...

 
Completely spaced on that -- but it's perfect.

ETA... 1997/1998 is even better since that's the year runners-up were allowed to join the competition as well. Plus you get around the whole English ban and are post-Bosman by then as well.
This has me musing about a "modern era" Best XI.

Figure that Messi, both Ronaldos, and Zizou are locks.

After that, there are some really tough decisions.

Holding midfielder (Busquets, Makelele)?

A partner for Zizou (Schweinsteiger, Xavi, Scholes, Viera)

Center back (Puyol, Sergio Ramos, Cannavarro, Thuram, Desailles).

Fullbacks (Cafu, Roberto Carlos, Maldini, Thuram again).

Goalkeeper (Buffon, Iker, Oliver Kahn, Van Der Sar)

 
Chelsea manager Jose Mourinho has been given a one-match stadium ban with immediate effect and fined £40,000 by the Football Association.

The punishment comes after Mourinho admitted a misconduct charge over his language and behaviour in a defeat by West Ham on 24 October.

Mourinho was sent to the stands after going to speak to referee Jon Moss in his room at half-time.

He will now miss Chelsea's next league game, which is at Stoke on Saturday.

The stadium ban is separate to the suspended one he received, along with a £50,000 fine, for comments he made after a defeat by Southampton on 3 October.
 
lol - oops.

P.S. current rumor is that he is getting sacked after that game anyway. Banned, Sued, and Sacked in a week has to be a record, right?

 
Vieira was one of the first that came to mind for me.

-------------------Buffon

Thuram, Ramos, Cannavaro, Roberto Carlos

------------------Busquets

------------Zidane--------Vieira

------Messi--------------------Ronaldo

------------------Ronaldo

 
lol - oops.

P.S. current rumor is that he is getting sacked after that game anyway. Banned, Sued, and Sacked in a week has to be a record, right?
:confused: that was 2 games ago, not this past weekends loss to Liverpool. No way he gets sacked with them still in a decent spot in the Champions league.

 
lol - oops.

P.S. current rumor is that he is getting sacked after that game anyway. Banned, Sued, and Sacked in a week has to be a record, right?
:confused: that was 2 games ago, not this past weekends loss to Liverpool. No way he gets sacked with them still in a decent spot in the Champions league.
I think he is fast wearing out his welcome. From a timing perspective, after the Stoke match makes sense as it leads into the international break - gives the new manager maximum time to prepare for the next match.

 
I think the back four presents the toughest decisions.

Cafu won two World Cups and was runner-up in another. But he only won the Champions League once.

Roberto Carlos won three Champions League trophies. But he only won the World Cup once. And if you care about actual balance it would be hard to pair him with a best XI left wing.

Thuram won a World Cup, and European Championship, a World Cup runners up medal and a bunch of (revoked) Scudettos. But he was equally a CB and a RB. And he only has one Champions League runners up honor. Thuram is my favorite defender of all-time, so I'm biased.

Ramos is also split between RB and CB. He only has one Champions League trophy. But he has a World Cup and two European Championships.

Maldini is split between the pre-modern era (which was probably his prime) and the modern era. He also split between CB and LB. He doesn't have the World Cup. But he's probably the best pure defensive left back of all time and has five Champions League trophies.

Puyols has three Champions League trophies, a World Cup, and European Championship. He has more La Liga titles than I care to count.

But Cannavaro won the Ballon D'Or. He was player of the tournament in World Cup 06. No Champions League titles, though.

 
Toby and Jan, with Dier sitting in front of them have arguably been the best pairing in the league this season - joint low goals conceded.

This is the 2nd new-manager bounce Spurs have faced this season - not sure the new guy is actually on the bench for AV today.

 
Toby and Jan, with Dier sitting in front of them have arguably been the best pairing in the league this season - joint low goals conceded.

This is the 2nd new-manager bounce Spurs have faced this season - not sure the new guy is actually on the bench for AV today.
Dier is the Portuguese kid, right?

Or the English kid who trained in Portugal and isn't considered English anymore?

 
Good point about RC and the lack of balance, but this selection isn't about balance but rather smoking all others, and I think that I'd like to have RC's ridiculous left foot in play for my squad whenever possible.

 
I think the back four presents the toughest decisions.

Cafu won two World Cups and was runner-up in another. But he only won the Champions League once.

Roberto Carlos won three Champions League trophies. But he only won the World Cup once. And if you care about actual balance it would be hard to pair him with a best XI left wing.

Thuram won a World Cup, and European Championship, a World Cup runners up medal and a bunch of (revoked) Scudettos. But he was equally a CB and a RB. And he only has one Champions League runners up honor. Thuram is my favorite defender of all-time, so I'm biased.

Ramos is also split between RB and CB. He only has one Champions League trophy. But he has a World Cup and two European Championships.

Maldini is split between the pre-modern era (which was probably his prime) and the modern era. He also split between CB and LB. He doesn't have the World Cup. But he's probably the best pure defensive left back of all time and has five Champions League trophies.

Puyols has three Champions League trophies, a World Cup, and European Championship. He has more La Liga titles than I care to count.

But Cannavaro won the Ballon D'Or. He was player of the tournament in World Cup 06. No Champions League titles, though.
If this is the CL era then world cups wouldnt really matter. Its about who was best in the CL correct?

 
Toby and Jan, with Dier sitting in front of them have arguably been the best pairing in the league this season - joint low goals conceded.

This is the 2nd new-manager bounce Spurs have faced this season - not sure the new guy is actually on the bench for AV today.
Dier is the Portuguese kid, right?

Or the English kid who trained in Portugal and isn't considered English anymore?
English kid - moved to Portugal as a young kid - signed to Sporting's academy - plays for England's U21, but does not count as a home-grown player in EPL.

 
I think the back four presents the toughest decisions.

Cafu won two World Cups and was runner-up in another. But he only won the Champions League once.

Roberto Carlos won three Champions League trophies. But he only won the World Cup once. And if you care about actual balance it would be hard to pair him with a best XI left wing.

Thuram won a World Cup, and European Championship, a World Cup runners up medal and a bunch of (revoked) Scudettos. But he was equally a CB and a RB. And he only has one Champions League runners up honor. Thuram is my favorite defender of all-time, so I'm biased.

Ramos is also split between RB and CB. He only has one Champions League trophy. But he has a World Cup and two European Championships.

Maldini is split between the pre-modern era (which was probably his prime) and the modern era. He also split between CB and LB. He doesn't have the World Cup. But he's probably the best pure defensive left back of all time and has five Champions League trophies.

Puyols has three Champions League trophies, a World Cup, and European Championship. He has more La Liga titles than I care to count.

But Cannavaro won the Ballon D'Or. He was player of the tournament in World Cup 06. No Champions League titles, though.
One CL trophy, but he was absolutely massive in the run to La Decima both on defense and scoring.

 
B Maverick said:
Ramsay Hunt Experience said:
I think the back four presents the toughest decisions.

Cafu won two World Cups and was runner-up in another. But he only won the Champions League once.

Roberto Carlos won three Champions League trophies. But he only won the World Cup once. And if you care about actual balance it would be hard to pair him with a best XI left wing.

Thuram won a World Cup, and European Championship, a World Cup runners up medal and a bunch of (revoked) Scudettos. But he was equally a CB and a RB. And he only has one Champions League runners up honor. Thuram is my favorite defender of all-time, so I'm biased.

Ramos is also split between RB and CB. He only has one Champions League trophy. But he has a World Cup and two European Championships.

Maldini is split between the pre-modern era (which was probably his prime) and the modern era. He also split between CB and LB. He doesn't have the World Cup. But he's probably the best pure defensive left back of all time and has five Champions League trophies.

Puyols has three Champions League trophies, a World Cup, and European Championship. He has more La Liga titles than I care to count.

But Cannavaro won the Ballon D'Or. He was player of the tournament in World Cup 06. No Champions League titles, though.
If this is the CL era then world cups wouldnt really matter. Its about who was best in the CL correct?
Not in my exercise. Just the best players of this "era."

 
Sinn Fein said:
The Gator said:
Toby and Jan, with Dier sitting in front of them have arguably been the best pairing in the league this season - joint low goals conceded.

This is the 2nd new-manager bounce Spurs have faced this season - not sure the new guy is actually on the bench for AV today.
Of the four key defenders Soton lost during transfer season or to injury, Toby's departure may have been the biggest loss. Virgil has plugged the gap to a large extent in a way that Yoshida couldn't but Toby was incredibly versatile and valuable for them last season. Heck, he played attacking midfield for a game or two when all the mids were hurt and he at least wasn't a Christiano Zouma Delofeu.

 
RIP Brian Lomax, an unsung hero of the modern game. Bournemouth, Swansea, FC United and the Dons among others, owe him a great debt.

Brian Lomax, who has died aged 67, was the visionary pioneer for the idea that football clubs rightfully belong to their supporters and he became the founding father of the modern movement to form supporters’ trusts at almost every club in Britain. Lomax inspired a generation of activism with his remarkably open and generous manner, and with practical expertise, having himself formed an original supporters’ trust at then troubled Northampton Town in 1992.
http://www.theguardian.com/football/blog/2015/nov/02/brian-lomax-death-supporters-direct-northampton-town

 
Guzan - oof
He is not the most popular guy with the fan base over there. And Howard isn't doing much better with Everton fans recently. I'm not sure either are long for this world as first choice EPL GKs.
interesting to hear.

Guzan has had some games where he's single handedly kept them around with crazy reflex saves.

but then a bit of not so much too.

Howard... don't see all the games, but I feel like he's not making as many of the tough saves the way he used to. Too many shots are going in- even though they're decent shots, IMO. I do feel like both have gotten tactically much better with age controlling the box, even if Guzan is still horrendous with distribution.

 
Guzan - oof
He is not the most popular guy with the fan base over there. And Howard isn't doing much better with Everton fans recently. I'm not sure either are long for this world as first choice EPL GKs.
interesting to hear.

Guzan has had some games where he's single handedly kept them around with crazy reflex saves.

but then a bit of not so much too.

Howard... don't see all the games, but I feel like he's not making as many of the tough saves the way he used to. Too many shots are going in- even though they're decent shots, IMO. I do feel like both have gotten tactically much better with age controlling the box, even if Guzan is still horrendous with distribution.
Shot stopping just isn't enough at the top level anymore.

Guzan's distribution has gotten him in trouble a lot recently. Its always been his Achilles heel, but it now seems to have reached a critical mass.

For Howard, the narrative is that he's as good a shot stopper as he's ever been, but that he's really stopped commanding his six yard box. Both goals against Arsenal could probably have been attributed to his timidity. I'm in the minority in that I think his shot stopping has declined. One thing I've noticed about Howard is a troubling tendency to commit to a save too early. He did it against Portugal in the World Cup where he went to ground before Nani even shot. I've seen it a few times this year. You have to stay big and not guess. Make the attacker beat you.

 
Not sure where Lothar Mattaus fits in- but that guy was a monster box-to-box MF, and should fit in somewhere, IMO. One of the best I've ever seen (Would love to see him and Zizou partner up... somehow... in a best 11.

 
I read this on BS. It relates to how Sepp can remain president with out even being on the ballot. It is frightening to think how easy this might be :)

================================

First, if no one gets over 50% of the vote then there is no winner. No winner = Sepp staying.

Second, the rules allow any single delegate to move from the floor that the election be cancelled. This will be followed by a secret ballot. If 50% of the delegates vote to cancel, the election will not go forward. No election = Sepp stays

There's actually a third trap door, which is that if there's only one candidate - ie if only one guy gets past the background check - then the vote will be a yes or no on that one person alone. No 50% or more and, yes Sepp stays.

In other words, Sepp can win without being on the ballot.

 
Not sure where Lothar Mattaus fits in- but that guy was a monster box-to-box MF, and should fit in somewhere, IMO. One of the best I've ever seen (Would love to see him and Zizou partner up... somehow... in a best 11.
If we're using the 97-98 season as the beginning of the modern era, not much of Lothar's CV qualifies. Even if we use the 92 season that Andy suggests we're cutting off his best year.

 
Guzan - oof
He is not the most popular guy with the fan base over there. And Howard isn't doing much better with Everton fans recently. I'm not sure either are long for this world as first choice EPL GKs.
interesting to hear.

Guzan has had some games where he's single handedly kept them around with crazy reflex saves.

but then a bit of not so much too.

Howard... don't see all the games, but I feel like he's not making as many of the tough saves the way he used to. Too many shots are going in- even though they're decent shots, IMO. I do feel like both have gotten tactically much better with age controlling the box, even if Guzan is still horrendous with distribution.
Shot stopping just isn't enough at the top level anymore.
I was just thinking Saturday how much Cech adds to Arsenal beyond stopping shots. I'm developing more of an appreciation for organizing the defense, providing a calming influence and not smoking during the game.

 
Alright, thanks for getting meout of a bind, Spurs.

Now #### back off down the table :gang2:

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top