Raider Nation
Devil's Advocate
There weren't many office supplies to critique in this episode. :(
"The Man"Who is he selling his soul too? He'd be joining a major firm that's not his brother's as the fruits of his hard, honest, and good work. It's not like he's being played, tricked, or has to give in to anyone or anything.Another good point.I took it as a realization that going out like Marco did would be more true to himself than selling his soul to become part of a club made up of people like Howard and Chuck.Ok, then who cares about Chuck? Take the job and pull in legit big bucks, which is what you were trying to do all along.I think that is why he suddenly backed out.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
It Doned on him that he would never succeed on any level to prove his worth to chuck.
Is the argument that the ONLY reason he tried to walk the straight and narrow to prove himself to his brother, and once he realized that it was never going to happen, in a split second, he chose the path of the morally bankrupt man his brother always presumed he was?
He didn't enjoy the legit life as much as a criminal one. He was not working for a decade because it was his dream to be legit - it was his dream to earn his brother's respect.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
Ned, I take it you don't have a criminal bone in your body. If you don't then you'll never understand.Ok, then who cares about Chuck? Take the job and pull in legit big bucks, which is what you were trying to do all along.
Is the argument that the ONLY reason he tried to walk the straight and narrow to prove himself to his brother, and once he realized that it was never going to happen, in a split second, he chose the path of the morally bankrupt man his brother always presumed he was?
It would, however, be boring.Who is he selling his soul too? He'd be joining a major firm that's not his brother's as the fruits of his hard, honest, and good work. It's not like he's being played, tricked, or has to give in to anyone or anything.
Sign me up. Sounds like a can't miss deal. How many racks you need?I know how to get some easy money, all we have to do is put up some "tarrif fees" to get access to a fortune that the Nigerian royal family can't right now, because they are in exile... They looted $400 million, conservatively estimated.Your secret is safe with me.Can you keep a secret? Because I really shouldn't be telling you this.I loved how they gave us the background of Jimmy's arrest at the Bingo Breakdown. Also the touch at the funeral where Jimmy shows the other guy outside his ring and the guy talks about it being worth some money to hock it. All those little things like bumming a cigarette add to the flavor of the time and the environment that Jimmy lived in. I also thought that the scam montage was gold.
Was a very good episode but as I'm not a subtle person, I thought they could have worked his turnover to Saul a little better. Jimmy had gone through the crisis brought on by his brother's betrayal and had already resigned himself to going back to Albuquerque. The job waiting for him was above and beyond what he envisioned himself having going back to Alb. I felt like something more cataclysmic was necessary for the ending.
The montage was one of the best I've ever seen, a tour-de-force.![]()
No, but I think that's mostly because the gas masks and tighty whities made it more plausible.Jimmy turning his back on "the straight life" is a lot more plausible than a guy like Walter White "breaking bad" IMO.
Did you guys have a hard time with that?
Not at all. I just don't call that "selling his soul" or "selling out" or anything like that.Jimmy turning his back on "the straight life" is a lot more plausible than a guy like Walter White "breaking bad" IMO.
Did you guys have a hard time with that?
I never did.Not at all. I just don't call that "selling his soul" or "selling out" or anything like that.Jimmy turning his back on "the straight life" is a lot more plausible than a guy like Walter White "breaking bad" IMO.
Did you guys have a hard time with that?
Yes. And I think that Ernesto guy is up to something. Who in their right mind would make someone eat granny smith apples?They keep putting that damned gas lantern in the foreground of shots.
Chuck's going to die in a house fire. Just you watch.They keep putting that damned gas lantern in the foreground of shots.
Betrayal by your bother isn't enough for you guys?I think for his brother and people like Kim he tried to be legit. But he's finally admitted to himself he's great at being a scammer, that's what he really enjoys, and it's possible he could make more money more easily as a sleazy lawyer/con artist. For the sake of storytelling it probably could have been a bit more convincing of a turn had they had an extra 15 minutes and an additional final straw scene, but I think they've earned this conclusion over the course of the season regardless.Ok, then who cares about Chuck? Take the job and pull in legit big bucks, which is what you were trying to do all along.I think that is why he suddenly backed out.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
It Doned on him that he would never succeed on any level to prove his worth to chuck.
Is the argument that the ONLY reason he tried to walk the straight and narrow to prove himself to his brother, and once he realized that it was never going to happen, in a split second, he chose the path of the morally bankrupt man his brother always presumed he was?
Duuuude no book spoilers!!Chuck's going to die in a house fire. Just you watch.They keep putting that damned gas lantern in the foreground of shots.
"source material", NoobDuuuude no book spoilers!!Chuck's going to die in a house fire. Just you watch.They keep putting that damned gas lantern in the foreground of shots.
The Pulp Fiction quote came to mind:I really like Jimmy. What does that say for me? Guy is good but going of the cliff.
Last episode: 8/10
Jimmy tried being the righteous man but after being beset by the inequities of the selfish (his brother) he became weak. His shepherd (Kim) tried to help him but it wasn't enough and he became a lost child who falls into hands of evil men.The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children.
Great stuff.The Pulp Fiction quote came to mind:I really like Jimmy. What does that say for me? Guy is good but going of the cliff.
Last episode: 8/10
Jimmy tried being the righteous man but after being beset by the inequities of the selfish (his brother) he became weak. His shepherd (Kim) tried to help him but it wasn't enough and he became a lost child who falls into hands of evil men.The path of the righteous man is beset on all sides by the inequities of the selfish and the tyranny of evil men. Blessed is he who, in the name of charity and good will, shepherds the weak through the valley of the darkness, for he is truly his brother's keeper and the finder of lost children.
Notice in that last scene he's still wearing marco's pinky ringOfficer Pete Malloy said:Another good point.Thorn said:I took it as a realization that going out like Marco did would be more true to himself than selling his soul to become part of a club made up of people like Howard and Chuck.Ned Ryerson said:Ok, then who cares about Chuck? Take the job and pull in legit big bucks, which is what you were trying to do all along. Is the argument that the ONLY reason he tried to walk the straight and narrow to prove himself to his brother, and once he realized that it was never going to happen, in a split second, he chose the path of the morally bankrupt man his brother always presumed he was?comfortably numb said:I think that is why he suddenly backed out.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
It Doned on him that he would never succeed on any level to prove his worth to chuck.
The scam montage was one of my favorite parts of the season.I love the series and loved the season, but was a little underwhelmed by the finale.
If you need to copy and paste "Vorakapich" in order to be condescending about Vorkapich, then maybe condescension just isn't for you.If you need someone to tell you that he modeled the montage on Vorkapich, then maybe critical review just isn't for you.Sorry for the delay, Tanner.
There's a moment early in "Marco" where Jimmy and Kim walk past the dented trash can in the HHM parking garage — a reminder of so many of Jimmy's early frustrations with his brother's law firm — and he assures her that he's at peace with what he learned about Chuck. It seems, just then, that the "Better Call Saul" creative team — most of them (like co-creator Peter Gould, who wrote and directed the finale) veterans of "Breaking Bad," a show largely defined by the patient way it moved through its arcs — will be playing a particularly long game in getting us from Jimmy McGill to Saul Goodman. Chuck's betrayal was a brutal blow, but maybe it wouldn't be the one that knocked Jimmy over the edge.In the very next scene, though, Jimmy has a meltdown while calling out another bingo game at the senior center. As he flees Albuquerque for the friendly confines of Cicero and lets his old pal Marco talk him into running one last scam, and then another, and another... and another, it becomes clear that Saul Goodman is coming — even if he won't be called that at first — and Gould and company are just making sure they don't skip over any steps in that transformation, just as they didn't for that chemistry teacher who wound up employing Saul.
Though we had seen glimpses of Slippin' Jimmy in action, an episode largely comprised of his greatest hits — with Mike, Kim, Chuck and Howard left on the sidelines back in Albuquerque — felt like exactly what we needed before Jimmy's big declaration to Mike to end the season. The season to this point had done such a thorough and convincing job of presenting Jimmy as a good guy who had managed to rise above his worst impulses — a recovering addict who had managed to resist temptation far more often than even he might have expected — that we didn't need to just hear about the thrills of the Slippin' Jimmy days. We needed to see it for ourselves.
And boy, did we see it.
The Cicero scenes get to play things both slow and fast, first giving us the entirety of the hustle with the Kennedy half-dollar, then giving us the rest of the week's worth of scams as a giddy, kaleidoscopic montage, scored with jazz sounding straight out of the Rat Pack era, so that we can appreciate how much fun Jimmy and Marco are having, and also how good they are at this. Jimmy has found the law much more satisfying than Marco finds standpipe work, but this is the quite obviously the true calling for both of them.
After a decade of being a good guy, Jimmy needed more than just Chuck's betrayal and harsh words to knock him off the wagon. He had to go on an epic bender back among his old haunts, to really soak in that life, so that even when the dream scenario of a large Santa Fe firm offering him a partnership track job presents itself, he won't take it. Without the trip to Cicero, I think Jimmy takes that job because he feels he's earned it, and to prove Chuck wrong for so smugly dismissing him. With it, and with Marco's ring on his pinky, giving in to all his most selfish criminal impulses becomes the easier way to go.
That's the ring Saul will wear throughout "Breaking Bad," and you can perhaps look at it like the Precious from "The Lord of the Rings," corrupting Jimmy and possessing him with the spirit of Marco. (As he peels out of the courthouse parking lot, he starts humming — just as Marco did while waiting for Jimmy to arrive in the alley for their final scam — the classic opening riff of Deep Purple's "Smoke on the Water," before the song itself comes on the soundtrack.) Or you can simply look at it as a reminder of who Jimmy/Saul wants to be, and how much he has to resist the temptation to do the right thing when it could cost him money. Ex-smokers are sometimes counseled to wear rubber bands around their wrists and snap them whenever they're tempted to smoke; this is like an addict wearing one to remind them why they'd be stupid to quit.
There's still a very long road between here and where Saul and Mike are when we meet them in "Breaking Bad," and I look forward to watching this show take us along all those steps (like the name change, whenever that comes), especially if it's done with all the craft and emotion that was so abundant throughout this debut season. But it feels like "Better Call Saul" is going to have to be a fundamentally different show in its second season. Not only does Jimmy no longer have aspirations of respectability, which could make it harder to work in the likes of Howard and Kim (even as it should lead to greater prominence for Nacho, who wound up appearing in only four of this season's episodes), but the emotional arc of the series would seem to be very different. Season 1 was about a man realizing that the universe didn't want him to be good; once he makes the decision to break bad, it either becomes a matter of degree going forward (much like with Mr. White, only with a less horrifying endpoint), or some other inner conflict has to take its place.
Whatever it is, I look forward to it. I came into this series with some trepidation — wondering if we needed a "Breaking Bad" spin-off at all, and whether Saul was a compelling enough character to carry one — but these 10 episodes swiftly convinced me that a very different, but entertaining and powerful in its own right, show could exist in this universe, and that Saul was far more complicated and interesting than he'd ever had the chance to show as Walter White's consiglieri. This was a fabulous debut season, in many ways better — or at least more consistent — than the first year of "Breaking Bad," because the creative team has worked together for so long and weren't interrupted by a guild strike this time. Of course, "Breaking Bad" didn't start turning into an all-time classic until its second and third seasons, and "Saul" has a long way before it achieves those heights. But this first year was far better than I think even the most optimistic Saul fanboy had a right to expect. To borrow the kind of pop culture analogy the show's hero loves to make, this could have been "AfterM*A*S*H," when for the moment it feels like it could be on its way to being "Frasier."
Some other thoughts:
* I'll be talking to Peter Gould tomorrow to discuss the season (look for that in the early-mid afternoon), but I did already email him one question about the finale: was there a specific film or filmmaker he used as a model for the montage of Jimmy and Marco's cons? Though the look and sound of them was very early '60s, he said the actual model was the '30s montages of Slavko Vorkapich.
* Gould and Vince Gilligan also noted that while many of this season's title sequences were randomly assigned to their episodes, the last two were deliberately chosen to reflect the tone of those episodes. Last week as a Saul Goodman matchbook in a urinal; tonight, it was a Saul coffee mug falling to the floor, shattering, and spilling its contents everywhere. That about sums up what our hero has gone through emotionally over the last couple of weeks, even though it's really Jimmy McGill who shatters into many pieces; Saul Goodman is how he reassembles himself.
* The mark runs off with the wallet when it seems like Marco is dead, which brings us back to our discussion about the potential pitfalls of that scam. I leave it to someone who understands grifting more than I do to defend this particular hustle, but it just seems like more trouble than it's worth to risk a thousand bucks in the hope of making a few additional hundred.
* Mike's explanation for why he didn't just walk off with the money he stole from the Kettlemans speaks not only to the difference between the two men going forward, but to the reason why Jimmy, and later other people, will want to employ Mike Ehrmantraut. He, like so many of TV's most memorable criminals, has a code.
* AMC tends to allow its showrunners one F-bomb per season, which gets bleeped on air but often restored on DVD and other home video formats. Here, it's Jimmy apologizing to Howard for having called him a "pigf--ker."
* When I have time to revisit this season, I really want to focus on all the Howard scenes, knowing what we do now that he's basically a nice guy who was reluctantly doing Chuck's dirty work. The moment where Howard realizes how much Jimmy has done for Chuck over the last year was really nicely played by Patrick Fabian, and ditto on Odenkirk reacting to Howard's mention of the "Charlie Hustle" nickname. Once upon a time, he probably assumed this was a condescending reference to his former life, and while that may have been a part of it, it's clear now that the major idea was sincere praise of Jimmy's tenacity. As we see at several points in this episode, including Chuck coaching Ernesto (whom Jimmy knows well enough to know he prefers to be called Ernie) through the grocery list, Howard is a nice guy who sometimes comes across as a jerk, while Chuck is a jerk who thinks he's a nice guy.
* We learn that Jimmy has been in Albquerque for 10 years, which raises the question of whether Bob Odenkirk is more believable playing 16 years younger than when he first appeared on "Breaking Bad," or pretending to be Kevin Costner for an impressionable waitress.
* "Breaking Bad" in-joke: one of the many B-words Jimmy tries out for the bingo crowd is Belize.![]()
I think there was also an element of him "chickening out", perhaps believing that some of what Chuck said was true. His brash unrefined style, doesn't fit in with a white collar type firm. No one got his "Go Husker's" joke when he mentioned Nebraska at the negotiation table as an example.He didn't enjoy the legit life as much as a criminal one. He was not working for a decade because it was his dream to be legit - it was his dream to earn his brother's respect.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
It rang completely true to me - no offense to lawyers here - but IMO being an honest lawyer seems like it was suck as a profession.
It's OK. If you think Gilligan is the greatest writer ever and can do no wrong you will love it. If you go in with a completely open mind just looking for a good TV show, you'll probably think it's OK.Is this thing any good?
kutta's is a minority opinion. Most here think it is good or great.It's OK. If you think Gilligan is the greatest writer ever and can do no wrong you will love it. If you go in with a completely open mind just looking for a good TV show, you'll probably think it's OK.Is this thing any good?
Very good show. Definitely worth checking out.Is this thing any good?
obviously you didn't go in with an open mind.kutta's is a minority opinion. Most here think it is good or great.It's OK. If you think Gilligan is the greatest writer ever and can do no wrong you will love it. If you go in with a completely open mind just looking for a good TV show, you'll probably think it's OK.Is this thing any good?
obviously you didn't go in with an open mind.kutta's is a minority opinion. Most here think it is good or great.It's OK. If you think Gilligan is the greatest writer ever and can do no wrong you will love it. If you go in with a completely open mind just looking for a good TV show, you'll probably think it's OK.Is this thing any good?
I was glad Howard got a little bit of redemption. Chuck put him in a really tough position there.Not only is Slippin Jimmy showing his true colors so is Chuck. Marco, who hasn't seen Chuck in years, calls him a condescending dooshbag. Then we see Chuck treating Ernesto like a condescending dooshbag.
Well, he did have an Oedipus Complex. He was doomed when they named him Oedipus.I enjoy how Saul and BB work through the fatalism of the character. We watch as fate predetermines the outcome, even though outside forces offer what would appear to be clear ways out. White could have walked away. Saul could go legit. But fate sends them on a predetermined path to their end. The two series on the surface present the characters with what appear to be decision points where fate can be changed but we see that there are really no decisions that will alter where these characters are headed. The basic question presented is whether our status quo (Jimmy as the ethical lawyer or Walter as the teacher) is really just an artificial weigh station on the way to an outcome predetermined by who these people are. Although we fought the idea, we knew the entire time that Walter would end up bad, the name of the show told us that. We of couurse know how Saul ends up. Yet, in both cases there is part of us that identifies with the temptations to which the characters succumb, but we have this unrealistic hope that they will make differing choices. Mike and Chuck understand this linear progression while characters like Kim and Skyler ask the question on behalf of the audience--why not just make a different decision. But no matter what opportunities these characters may have and no matter what stasis they may achieve in the short term, their equilibrium will only be realized once they give in to their fate. For the viewer, we get to contemplate whether our current state is merely temporary.
In the end Oedipus killed his father married his mother. That's just where he was headed and nothing was going to stop it.
Never saw BB, wouldn't know gilligan from the Skipper and look forward to the show every week.It's OK. If you think Gilligan is the greatest writer ever and can do no wrong you will love it. If you go in with a completely open mind just looking for a good TV show, you'll probably think it's OK.Is this thing any good?
What makes it great writing is that he's a complex character with a number of motivations. I agree that 'chickening out' was part of it.I think there was also an element of him "chickening out", perhaps believing that some of what Chuck said was true. His brash unrefined style, doesn't fit in with a white collar type firm. No one got his "Go Husker's" joke when he mentioned Nebraska at the negotiation table as an example.He didn't enjoy the legit life as much as a criminal one. He was not working for a decade because it was his dream to be legit - it was his dream to earn his brother's respect.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
It rang completely true to me - no offense to lawyers here - but IMO being an honest lawyer seems like it was suck as a profession.
Agree with this. Was expecting something "big" to break him bad, but instead he just has a case of the #### its.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
I enjoy how Saul and BB work through the fatalism of the character. We watch as fate predetermines the outcome, even though outside forces offer what would appear to be clear ways out. White could have walked away. Saul could go legit. But fate sends them on a predetermined path to their end. The two series on the surface present the characters with what appear to be decision points where fate can be changed but we see that there are really no decisions that will alter where these characters are headed. The basic question presented is whether our status quo (Jimmy as the ethical lawyer or Walter as the teacher) is really just an artificial weigh station on the way to an outcome predetermined by who these people are. Although we fought the idea, we knew the entire time that Walter would end up bad, the name of the show told us that. We of couurse know how Saul ends up. Yet, in both cases there is part of us that identifies with the temptations to which the characters succumb, but we have this unrealistic hope that they will make differing choices. Mike and Chuck understand this linear progression while characters like Kim and Skyler ask the question on behalf of the audience--why not just make a different decision. But no matter what opportunities these characters may have and no matter what stasis they may achieve in the short term, their equilibrium will only be realized once they give in to their fate. For the viewer, we get to contemplate whether our current state is merely temporary.
In the end Oedipus killed his father married his mother. That's just where he was headed and nothing was going to stop it.
It was big deal that the guy he admired his whole life who he spent 10 years trying to impress and the last year catering to his every whim utterly destroyed any sense of worth he had developed for himself.Agree with this. Was expecting something "big" to break him bad, but instead he just has a case of the #### its.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
There was. It just happened to occur in the episode before the finale.Agree with this. Was expecting something "big" to break him bad, but instead he just has a case of the #### its.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
Right, that happened the prior episode.It was big deal that the guy he admired his whole life who he spent 10 years trying to impress and the last year catering to his every whim utterly destroyed any sense of worth he had developed for himself.Agree with this. Was expecting something "big" to break him bad, but instead he just has a case of the #### its.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.
Exactly.There was. It just happened to occur in the episode before the finale.Agree with this. Was expecting something "big" to break him bad, but instead he just has a case of the #### its.If I had one quibble, it was the very last scene. I understood Jimmy's enjoyment of his time in Cicero. That said he came home to live the legit life. He had a golden opportunity presented to him allowing him to play with the big boys, which he had been working towards for years. He could succeed on this level to prove his worth to Chuck, or as a big middle finger to Chuck showing that he could swim in the same pond with the big boys without his help. He got dressed up in his best suit and everything, and then, without even taking the meeting, he just walks away to be Saul?
It just rang a bit false to me. It kind of reminded me when Anakin killed the young Paduan in SW III, almost completely out of the blue. Everyone knows what the destination is, so we may have to take some shortcuts to get to where we want to go.
I really loved the first season, but I feel as if they had a few more episodes, maybe they could have shown him "breaking bad", as it were, a bit more convincingly.