Borbely & HermanHow was it wrong? You can't judge a simulation by one team's result. Just because there was one team given a 10% chance of survival and it survived, doesn't mean it was wrong. There will probably nine other teams in the same circumstance that did not survive. Overall, i am impressed with just how accurate the simulation has been. That said, as we get fewer teams, the results may not be so good because random variations have a bigger effect. Say there are 5 teams with a 20% chance of survival, 0 or 2 of them could survive instead of one and it would make it look like a bad result percentagewise eventhough it was just off by 1.currently about 2 points under the projected cut with New Orleans D going (-2).i think i will be ok.week 8 simulator. you were wrong again!
This contest needs a terrible week from Rodgers. I think he is still on 1500+ rosters.
No....No, we don't.I'll take a terrible week from Rodgers one week...if Matt Ryan lights it up to replace those points on my roster!This contest needs a terrible week from Rodgers. I think he is still on 1500+ rosters.
i was here to post the same thought, except I would need old Hass to get it going.I'll take a terrible week from Rodgers one week...if Matt Ryan lights it up to replace those points on my roster!This contest needs a terrible week from Rodgers. I think he is still on 1500+ rosters.
dittoi was here to post the same thought, except I would need old Hass to get it going.I'll take a terrible week from Rodgers one week...if Matt Ryan lights it up to replace those points on my roster!This contest needs a terrible week from Rodgers. I think he is still on 1500+ rosters.
Kind of surprised you are at 79.9% and the guy above you is at 100%. I guess Elam is almost guarenteed getting some points. If Turner can add even 2 points to your score you should be a lock.79.9% chance according to the sim. I have Turner left (-6.6) and am currently sitting at 128.25. Thats too damn close!
Agreed, especially since I need less than a point over the 6.60 from Turner, oh well, cant' go against the computer!Kind of surprised you are at 79.9% and the guy above you is at 100%. I guess Elam is almost guarenteed getting some points. If Turner can add even 2 points to your score you should be a lock.79.9% chance according to the sim. I have Turner left (-6.6) and am currently sitting at 128.25. Thats too damn close!
When my QB2 put up 30+ in the 1:00 time slot, I was kind of hoping this was going to be the week for a Rogers clunker.At this point, I really wonder if Rogers performance is going to matter. He's going to be one of the highest owned players in the final 250 anyway. Maybe if you have a strong QB2, you'd really want Rogers to get knocked out for a couple games in the Final 250. That would really put the "Rogers/Leftwich" type owners in a pretty big hole.This contest needs a terrible week from Rodgers. I think he is still on 1500+ rosters.
I'm ok with Rodgers having a bad game as long as Flacco has a good game. I've actually used other QB's 4 of the 8 weeks. The Rodgers, Flacco, Leftwich QB was one of my best ideas in this contest.When my QB2 put up 30+ in the 1:00 time slot, I was kind of hoping this was going to be the week for a Rogers clunker.At this point, I really wonder if Rogers performance is going to matter. He's going to be one of the highest owned players in the final 250 anyway. Maybe if you have a strong QB2, you'd really want Rogers to get knocked out for a couple games in the Final 250. That would really put the "Rogers/Leftwich" type owners in a pretty big hole.This contest needs a terrible week from Rodgers. I think he is still on 1500+ rosters.
Um, why is Chicago considered a "tough" game? A quick glance at FP allowed shows Chicago (before this week) as 8th worst. Seattle is actually a tougher game at this point.They have a tough final stretch. GB:14-At Chicago15-At Pittsburgh16- Seattle (easy game)I still like my Big Ben/Hass combo.
That first drive just put you at 100%79.9% chance according to the sim. I have Turner left (-6.6) and am currently sitting at 128.25. Thats too damn close!
Was just about to come in here and say the same thing.That first drive just put you at 100%79.9% chance according to the sim. I have Turner left (-6.6) and am currently sitting at 128.25. Thats too damn close!

Likely a cold weather game. My apologies if tough is not the correct word.Um, why is Chicago considered a "tough" game? A quick glance at FP allowed shows Chicago (before this week) as 8th worst. Seattle is actually a tougher game at this point.They have a tough final stretch. GB:14-At Chicago15-At Pittsburgh16- Seattle (easy game)I still like my Big Ben/Hass combo.
If this scoring keeps up, could push the 130 level.118ish at the end of q1
historically, 10 point moves are unusual. I agree with you and with tonight's teams and expect this to be close though.If this scoring keeps up, could push the 130 level.118ish at the end of q1
ctriopelle said:123.75 at the half...
My chances for points at the TE position are virtually identical to yours:OlsenFinleyBakerMy chances of hitting the big bucks just too a severe hit with Daniels going down. Just Baker and Finley left at TE. *sigh*

his TD jumped us to 125.45, but I think you're safe now...122.95 hoping Ryan gets it going in 2nd half...![]()
ctriopelle said:123.75 at the half...
Sorry, fell asleep and just made my final update. Shows 131.5 right now, wouldn't be surprised if it shifted .20 either way with the way the scoring looks.130.8 good enough to stay alive according to FS![]()
Sorry, fell asleep and just made my final update. Shows 131.5 right now, wouldn't be surprised if it shifted .20 either way with the way the scoring looks.130.8 good enough to stay alive according to FS![]()
Spoke too soon - oh well, the loss of Owen Daniels was going to kill me sooner or later anyways...prob # surv pct---------------------------95--99 525 518 98.790--94 730 682 93.485--89 608 547 90.080--84 469 388 82.775--79 359 272 75.870--74 268 203 75.765--69 219 141 64.460--64 169 99 58.655--59 147 85 57.850--54 122 57 46.745--49 67 36 53.740--44 69 27 39.135--39 57 19 33.330--34 56 17 30.425--29 44 10 22.720--24 30 3 10.015--19 27 3 11.110--14 20 1 5.0 5-- 9 16 1 6.2 0-- 4 12 0 0.0
+-------------+--------+-------+-----------+| roster_size | number | alive | pct_alive |+-------------+--------+-------+-----------+| 20 | 5181 | 835 | 0.1612 || 21 | 2032 | 383 | 0.1885 || 22 | 1445 | 379 | 0.2623 || 23 | 1291 | 363 | 0.2812 || 24 | 3328 | 1149 | 0.3453 || TOTAL | 13277 | 3109 | 0.2342 |+-------------+--------+-------+-----------+
And, the official "me, too" reply---155.5 as my lowest score so far other than that Week 4 fiasco.Now for the official QGpost of the week
My actual entry would be sweating a bit. I calculate the entry would've had 117.95. But Colston minus 1.3 would still be there for me.The Path Not Taken entry, which still woulda been alive, looks like it will be able to mock me for at least one more week, even with a trio of Garrard, S Hill, and Leftwich at QB. I calculate 128.35 with (Elam minus 16) and (Colston minus 9.3) to go.
Good luck to all you bubble hangers!-QG (Week 1 eliminatee who still hasn't quite gotten over it)

Without Shiancoe I would have made it by less than 1 point this week.274 of us Rodgers/Leftwich owners remaining - 38%1455 Rodgers owners overall - 35%Rodger/Leftwich owners are smarter than other Rodger owners! (so far......)Still wish I had pulled the trigger on Rodgers only and gotten a 3rd kickerWhen my QB2 put up 30+ in the 1:00 time slot, I was kind of hoping this was going to be the week for a Rogers clunker.At this point, I really wonder if Rogers performance is going to matter. He's going to be one of the highest owned players in the final 250 anyway. Maybe if you have a strong QB2, you'd really want Rogers to get knocked out for a couple games in the Final 250. That would really put the "Rogers/Leftwich" type owners in a pretty big hole.This contest needs a terrible week from Rodgers. I think he is still on 1500+ rosters.