RnR
Footballguy
I know this is the Rangers thread, but seriously?Here are a few where you could have started: HR/9, K/BB, or even good old fashioned ERA. I'll give you a pass on the ERA, given it isn't particularly useful and assuming you were using normalized numbers to factor out your bandbox of a home park.Game 2
Lewis v Garcia: On any metric I can see this looks to be a huge advantage to Rangers here. Garcia is not in the same class as the 2-4 starters for the Tigers or Rays.
Also, Garcia is 9-4 with 2.55 ERA, 1.11 WHIP in 15 starts at home this season. I've looked a Lewis' numbers on the road and they're pretty good too, but that's another "metric" you could have tried. Garcia is also better than Scherzer or Porcello in almost every metric, so I'm not sure where you get off saying that about the Tigers starters.
Lohse had his best stuff years ago? Maybe. But this was far and away the best season of his 11-year career, so I'd bet he argues against that sentiment.
here. We found out before the last series that Scherzer was better than any pitcher not named Verlander or Fister. Now you are telling us Garcia is better than Scherzer?
Can't have it both ways. First line of the culdeus post you were responding to...
I'm just glad our "aren't that good" starting pitching staff is keeping us in the games.