Really? I thought he looked mediocre at best.or a good game or 2? what other surprise qb or slow starting qbs do you expect to contribute?
i thought garrad looked good sunday night, it will be interesting to see what russell does with a new playcaller....anyone else?
You have to remember that this was only his 22nd or 23rd start, and that 11 (?) of those were 4 years ago in his rookie season. He is clearly a QB who is still developing, but he's improved every season he's played, and shows definite potential to be a better than average QB in this league. He's going to have some abysmal games, but he'll also have some excellent games. I expect his yardage per game to go up, as the Bears seem to be opening up the play calling as they gain confidence in him. I'm not sure I'd expect many mutli-TD games from him, but he will be a good FF #2 QB this year... maybe a #1 type FF QB next yearor a good game or 2?
You took that quote from before week 5's games clearly.. since it mentions the Bears are tied with the Packers at 2-2. If you are going to pull snippets and use them out of context, at least erase any signs that can date the article. You can't fool everyone.FantasyTrader said:Very good in Fantasy - but not reality. The following is a snippet from my newsletter last week:
The Diagnosis: ---but a closer look at Orton's overall stats reveals a muddier picture than I painted above. Yes, for fantasy purposes, Orton owners have to be pleased with the bottom line.
But he's only thrown one less pick (4) than TD's (5) and last week he coughed up two fumbles as well. Meaning Kyle's actually given the ball to the opponent more often this year, than he's burned them for 6. And his yds p.p.g. (191.5) probably isn't helping your cause.
The upside of all of this is that, in terms of pure games started, Orton is still early in his 2nd year with room to learn and improve. Matt Forte and the Bears D is helping to mask just how "iffy" this guy's been and at the end of the day, Chicago's probably happy to be tied with the Packers at 2-2 atop the NFC North.
For the immediate future, Orton remains a stock to "Hold" in my book rather than a "Buy" or a "Sell" for those of you in start 2QB formats, his stats are worthy of being your "other" QB for right now. The next three games @ Detroit, @ Atlanta and vs. Minnesota will tell us a lot. None of those three are currently higher than 13th vs. the pass.
If the Bears come away from those three with an overall record of 4-3 or better and Orton can limit the TO's to 1 or 2 a game at most, then he should cruise for the rest of the year as your #2. Otherwise, you should begin shopping.
For now - I think he's a very solid backup QB.
I can't fool everyone, but you sure can. I'm completely lost by your response. The first line of my reply indicates I pulled this from last week (aka: b-e-f-o-r-e week 5). But thanks for pointing out the obvious Sherlock.two_dollars said:You took that quote from before week 5's games clearly.. since it mentions the Bears are tied with the Packers at 2-2. If you are going to pull snippets and use them out of context, at least erase any signs that can date the article. You can't fool everyone.FantasyTrader said:Very good in Fantasy - but not reality. The following is a snippet from my newsletter last week:
The Diagnosis: ---but a closer look at Orton's overall stats reveals a muddier picture than I painted above. Yes, for fantasy purposes, Orton owners have to be pleased with the bottom line.
But he's only thrown one less pick (4) than TD's (5) and last week he coughed up two fumbles as well. Meaning Kyle's actually given the ball to the opponent more often this year, than he's burned them for 6. And his yds p.p.g. (191.5) probably isn't helping your cause.
The upside of all of this is that, in terms of pure games started, Orton is still early in his 2nd year with room to learn and improve. Matt Forte and the Bears D is helping to mask just how "iffy" this guy's been and at the end of the day, Chicago's probably happy to be tied with the Packers at 2-2 atop the NFC North.
For the immediate future, Orton remains a stock to "Hold" in my book rather than a "Buy" or a "Sell" for those of you in start 2QB formats, his stats are worthy of being your "other" QB for right now. The next three games @ Detroit, @ Atlanta and vs. Minnesota will tell us a lot. None of those three are currently higher than 13th vs. the pass.
If the Bears come away from those three with an overall record of 4-3 or better and Orton can limit the TO's to 1 or 2 a game at most, then he should cruise for the rest of the year as your #2. Otherwise, you should begin shopping.
For now - I think he's a very solid backup QB.
He throws a very nice long ball.
He throws a very nice long ball.
I'm a huge Bears fan and watch every game. If there's one thing Orton can't do consistently, it's throw the deep ball. I cringe every time I see him launch one. He's terribly inaccurate. Most of the good Lloyd and Booker catches were all due to their own adjustments. That's why they have him throwing mostly outs and dump offs. Just my opinion. I can't speak on the fantasy football side of thingsBy itself this quote might seem funny or painful but in the context of my post makes sense. Look at the amzing catches by Booker and Loyd this season although few and far between they were caught. Here is my supposition if Orton is reading defenses and routes correctly AND his line improves to give him time he MIGHT nicely improve his ypa. I also specified for this season he is on my desparation watch if another qb get's hurt and might be a nice DYNASTY option.
Oh yeah and Go Bears maybe it is wishful thinking but I am actally watching the Bears games and think some folks might enjoy the insight.
He throws a very nice long ball.
I'm a huge Bears fan and watch every game. If there's one thing Orton can't do consistently, it's throw the deep ball. I cringe every time I see him launch one. He's terribly inaccurate. Most of the good Lloyd and Booker catches were all due to their own adjustments. That's why they have him throwing mostly outs and dump offs. Just my opinion. I can't speak on the fantasy football side of things
Who would drop a QB before they were about to face Detroit twice in the next 4 weeks? Especially in a 2 QB dynasty- that's mid boggling.I picked him up AFTER week 4 off the wire in 3 leagues and started him all and it paid off. This week, he's only starting one. Orton is a great bye week filler with the cushy schedule. He also has a nice playoff matchup in week 15 vs. the Saints.He's been getting better every week. If he had an elite receiver to go along with the decent but not fantastic corps he's throwing to, he'd be great. I think the Bears need to start getting Earl Bennett involved- he could be a force next year but not getting any snaps...I play in a start 2 QB dynasty league and he was dropped after week 4. I grabbed him very quickly. He wont start for me behind Brees and Warner but there is no questioning his upside in this format.
I'm really surprised anyone could come to a strong conclusion in either direction given Orton's short history. While he's been in the league for 4 years, people seem to want to ignore that he only has started like 24 games now, which is less than two seasons. Most QBs take at least 2 seasons to really start putting things together. Add in that Orton was holding the clipboard for Rex Grossman, not exactly a stellar QB to learn from, and the Bears have no real QB coach, he is doing very well.He's no Peyton Manning or Matt Ryan, but could he develop into a Drew Brees? Why not?As a Bears fan, I do not think that Orton is very good.
At this point I almost think there's a stigma attached to all Bears QB's - after all Orton was holding a clipboard for Rex freaking Grossman, how good could he be right? But we need to remember he's still on the learning curve.I'm really surprised anyone could come to a strong conclusion in either direction given Orton's short history. While he's been in the league for 4 years, people seem to want to ignore that he only has started like 24 games now, which is less than two seasons. Most QBs take at least 2 seasons to really start putting things together. Add in that Orton was holding the clipboard for Rex Grossman, not exactly a stellar QB to learn from, and the Bears have no real QB coach, he is doing very well.He's no Peyton Manning or Matt Ryan, but could he develop into a Drew Brees? Why not?As a Bears fan, I do not think that Orton is very good.
Honestly, you make a good point Switz, especially in your comparison to Drew Brees (considering they are both Purdue guys).I think as Bears fans we are pretty much just kind of in the mind that we have no ability to draft QB's, and since we drafted Orton he is destined for failure. This is not a logical argument, mind you. This is strictly me as a Bears fan projecting my expectations for a QB that we draft.Clearly the guy has a great record, but we tend to pin that more on the Defense and Special Teams than we do on Orton. This year he has been asked to make some plays and he has made some plays for us, so I really have no reason to complain other than that he is a QB who we drafted.I'm really surprised anyone could come to a strong conclusion in either direction given Orton's short history. While he's been in the league for 4 years, people seem to want to ignore that he only has started like 24 games now, which is less than two seasons. Most QBs take at least 2 seasons to really start putting things together. Add in that Orton was holding the clipboard for Rex Grossman, not exactly a stellar QB to learn from, and the Bears have no real QB coach, he is doing very well.He's no Peyton Manning or Matt Ryan, but could he develop into a Drew Brees? Why not?As a Bears fan, I do not think that Orton is very good.
This sounds vaguely familiar.switz said:I'm really surprised anyone could come to a strong conclusion in either direction given Orton's short history. While he's been in the league for 4 years, people seem to want to ignore that he only has started like 24 games now, which is less than two seasons.MDSkinner said:As a Bears fan, I do not think that Orton is very good.
So ride the wave. No sense in selling low and who knows, maybe it real.VICK-tory said:I have been trying to trade Orton but no takers . no one in my league is buying into him. i think he could be great one day but is sorta walking a tightrope until they get a blue chip Wr like Andre Johnson.
As a Chargers fan I see the similarities as well. Brees was pretty bad in 2003 and then "got it" in 2004. I don't quite see Orton on that level, but he seems to be doing pretty well and without all the weapons Brees was blessed with.I see a lot of similarities between Orton's career and Drew Brees' early career. I doubt Orton will turn out quite that good though.
If this continues, I may be eating my words. I'd love to eat my words in this case.No. Everyone looks good against Detroit. Even after this game, his stats are average. Look at his history. He's not very good and never will be.
Kudos for admitting you might be wrong.BTW, Orton is on pace for 3815 yards, 23 TDs, 9 INTsThose numbers measure up quite well with Tom Brady's numbers from '03-'06, and it's arguable that even in those years Brady had better WRs than the guys Orton is throwing to. It's probably time for all the Orton-haters to man up and admit they were wrong.flapgreen said:If this continues, I may be eating my words. I'd love to eat my words in this case.No. Everyone looks good against Detroit. Even after this game, his stats are average. Look at his history. He's not very good and never will be.