What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

OverReactions (1 Viewer)

RealReactions

Footballguy
Had to put the capital R just because my name is RealReactions :D but in all seriousness with everyone over reacting saying cooks was a mistake and same with calvin johnson and some other people, who are the top targets to trade for. Personally I'm going to go after lynch. Im loaded at wr with julio edleman cooks harvin and keenan allen while the other guys wr's are very weak as doug baldwin was one of his starters. I dont know who yet ill trade for him but i think i can swing a decent trade to give me lynch peterson and foster as my starters. Anyone else have any people they are targeting?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
i am targeting this one guy fred in one of my leauges that brohan is a total mook thanks for starting this sweet topic so i could finally get that off my chest take that to the bank fredmigo

 
capitilizing stuff is for show offs and chumps you dont need no capitals to make a seventy five charger make all the papershakers turn their heads is what i am talkin about brohans take that to the bank

 
capitilizing stuff is for show offs and chumps you dont need no capitals to make a seventy five charger make all the papershakers turn their heads is what i am talkin about brohans take that to the bank
Pretty late for you to be up?

 
capitilizing stuff is for show offs and chumps you dont need no capitals to make a seventy five charger make all the papershakers turn their heads is what i am talkin about brohans take that to the bank
This just put my mind in a pretzel trying to comprehend that

 
RealReactions said:
SWC said:
capitilizing stuff is for show offs and chumps you dont need no capitals to make a seventy five charger make all the papershakers turn their heads is what i am talkin about brohans take that to the bank
This just put my mind in a pretzel trying to comprehend that
If you can't understand the genius that is SWC, then that's on you. You want my advice? Get your money out of the bank and take that chump change to Coinstar, brohan.

 
Odell and Sammy have me pretty mad right now. But as always, week 1 can be a weird aberration.

It's just sad to know that Odell is human.

 
SWC said:
i am targeting this one guy fred in one of my leauges that brohan is a total mook thanks for starting this sweet topic so i could finally get that off my chest take that to the bank fredmigo
Why is Fred always the go to name for this stuff
 
SWC said:
i am targeting this one guy fred in one of my leauges that brohan is a total mook thanks for starting this sweet topic so i could finally get that off my chest take that to the bank fredmigo
Why is Fred always the go to name for this stuff
i actually normally use julio bromigo but the guy in my leage is named fred so i just told the truth he is not from boston tho take that to the bank

 
SWC said:
i am targeting this one guy fred in one of my leauges that brohan is a total mook thanks for starting this sweet topic so i could finally get that off my chest take that to the bank fredmigo
Why is Fred always the go to name for this stuff
i actually normally use julio bromigo but the guy in my leage is named fred so i just told the truth he is not from boston tho take that to the bank
Thats funny there's a guy at my work named swc he's a mean jerk sometimes but I've always been cool with him and you can take that to the jerk bank bronkowski.
 
SWC said:
i am targeting this one guy fred in one of my leauges that brohan is a total mook thanks for starting this sweet topic so i could finally get that off my chest take that to the bank fredmigo
Why is Fred always the go to name for this stuff
i actually normally use julio bromigo but the guy in my leage is named fred so i just told the truth he is not from boston tho take that to the bank
Thats funny there's a guy at my work named swc he's a mean jerk sometimes but I've always been cool with him and you can take that to the jerk bank bronkowski.
man i remember when the shark pool was so much cooler and we did not have posts like yours just being mean for the sake of being mean if only someone would start a thread about it take that to the bank

 
queue hundreds of snarky comments about bradford from people who actually think foles and/or sanchez are comparable qbs

 
It's week one.

Step back from the imaginary cliff you're on.

That player you projected to get 10 touchdowns isn't going to get them in week 1.

Relax,chill,have a glass of wine if you're old enough,if not have a root beer. :banned:

 
Ladsud said:
queue hundreds of snarky comments about bradford from people who actually think foles and/or sanchez are comparable qbs
Its not an overreaction to say Bradford sucks. Its truth.
enjoy those brutal TD drives?

was it worth it to get that "hot taek" in?
He threw 52 times, they lost, hes having x rays. Bradford sure is good.
21-of-25 for 219 and 2 tds in the second half

was looking like 250 and 3 in a comeback win if not for the matthews drop

lead a 135 yard drive

precautionary xray because he's at the tail end of an ongoing recovery

bradford sure is good

it's sad if you twist #### like this just for forum taeks

it's even sadder if you actually believe it

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ladsud said:
queue hundreds of snarky comments about bradford from people who actually think foles and/or sanchez are comparable qbs
Its not an overreaction to say Bradford sucks. Its truth.
enjoy those brutal TD drives?

was it worth it to get that "hot taek" in?
He threw 52 times, they lost, hes having x rays. Bradford sure is good.
21-of-25 for 219 and 2 tds in the second half

was looking like 250 and 3 in a comeback win if not for the matthews drop

lead a 135 yard drive

precautionary xray because he's at the tail end of an ongoing recovery

bradford sure is good

it's sad if you twist #### like this just for forum taeks

it's even sadder if you actually believe it
I dont really care what a forum take is, is that like internet street cred? Hes an oft injured QB with a 20-31-1 career record, career high of 21 tds in a year, he has sub 60% completions for his career. Maybe he turns it around, maybe he doesnt, His track record is that of a dink and dunk losing QB. Those are facts I believe.

 
just like you ignored the fact that he was obviously shaking off rust and needed to calm down in the first half

you also ignore that his entire career as a ram he had terrible playcalling, poor weapons, and a line that gave him about 1.2 second before he was hit. no one would have been successful under those conditions

sam bradford hate is extremely narrative based and very lazy. he's extremely talented and he showed it again last night.

like i said and you ignored, 21-of-25 for 219 and 2 tds in the second half

 
just like you ignored the fact that he was obviously shaking off rust and needed to calm down in the first half

you also ignore that his entire career as a ram he had terrible playcalling, poor weapons, and a line that gave him about 1.2 second before he was hit. no one would have been successful under those conditions

sam bradford hate is extremely narrative based and very lazy. he's extremely talented and he showed it again last night.

like i said and you ignored, 21-of-25 for 219 and 2 tds in the second half
Narratives are nice, numbers are fact. Takes more than a half of football to redefine a career. Ill gladly eat crow at the end of the year if he solid, but the numbers say he isnt.

 
As an Eagles fan I'll just add this:

The Eagles are 0-1

The Rams are 1-0

But no one in Philly is clamoring for Nick Foles today.

If he stays on the field Bradford will be a Top 5-7 fantasy QB for sure.

 
just like you ignored the fact that he was obviously shaking off rust and needed to calm down in the first half

you also ignore that his entire career as a ram he had terrible playcalling, poor weapons, and a line that gave him about 1.2 second before he was hit. no one would have been successful under those conditions

sam bradford hate is extremely narrative based and very lazy. he's extremely talented and he showed it again last night.

like i said and you ignored, 21-of-25 for 219 and 2 tds in the second half
I'll need to see him throw the ball downfield some more before I give him credit for being better than mediocre. 21 for 25 is only impressive if he's connecting that high % on difficult throws. Dumping the ball off to Sproles and Mathews doesn't exactly require a skilled QB. So far he's Alex Smith with more passes. And by passes, for both players, I mean dump offs/check downs.

 
Dumping the ball off to Sproles and Mathews doesn't exactly require a skilled QB.
yes it does

21 for 25 is only impressive if he's connecting that high % on difficult throws.... So far he's Alex Smith with more passes.
people praise brady for the same type of play, and it's the analogy they'd draw if it wasn't so popular to hate on bradford.

btw, he did make some great downfield throws. they were dropped.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
queue hundreds of snarky comments about bradford from people who actually think foles and/or sanchez are comparable qbs
Why would that be difficult to believe based on their respective careers? It wouldn't need to be based off of one game. For the record I don't think either QB is better than Bradford overall necessarily, but Foles is pretty close.

21-of-25 for 219 and 2 tds in the second half

was looking like 250 and 3 in a comeback win if not for the matthews drop
Bradford only threw for 1 TD last night.

 
Bradford only threw for 1 TD last night.
he had a phantom td to matthews. clearly reached over the pylon before going out of bounds. they wanted to keep the tempo up so they lined up and ran an easy rmathews td a few seconds later instead of challenging.

doesn't change that he threw a td to matthews

 
Ladsud said:
queue hundreds of snarky comments about bradford from people who actually think foles and/or sanchez are comparable qbs
Its not an overreaction to say Bradford sucks. Its truth.
enjoy those brutal TD drives?was it worth it to get that "hot taek" in?
He threw 52 times, they lost, hes having x rays. Bradford sure is good.
Lost after leading the team down the field and bum kicker missed a field goal.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top