Balco
Footballguy
Because it’s not 2015. None of those players are as good as they once were.Panthers front 7 has McCoy, Poe, Addison, Thompson, Irvin, Kuechly
and is even worse than GB against the run? Really?
Because it’s not 2015. None of those players are as good as they once were.Panthers front 7 has McCoy, Poe, Addison, Thompson, Irvin, Kuechly
and is even worse than GB against the run? Really?
I actually saw the same thing...if anything the packers tried to gift it to the panthers with the couple offsides/encroachment penalties on the last couple plays. I know CMC is a stud but maybe the panthers shoulda looked at giving someone else a shot instead of trying to force it to him, packers were ready for that and that’s all the panthers tried to doWe know your history.
Most would just say thank you and enjoy the win. You'll argue the obvious.
Id ask you to try not to make it personal for no reason and stick to the topicWe know your history.
Most would just say thank you and enjoy the win. You'll argue the obvious.
It wasmt a sack and it wasn’t intentional grounding at all. But it was a bad callSorry if repost and did not read all the previous posts.... but the Panthers got hozed by the officials! A Sack of A Rodgers in the End Zone (and he throws it away for Intentional Grounding) only to have the blind zebra over rule his collegue and call Personal Foul/ Roughing the Passer ("majority of weight landed on QB" - but wait replay clearly showed the DL (Addison?) Shoulder hit the ground NEXT TO AR)... Should have been a Safety & flip the game script. 2 Points & the Ball before the half would have changed the game completely!
Granted I was off visiting my son at college & watching game in bar... no audio, but the officials were terrible in that game!
probably talking about Allen’s gift-wrapped Int to Tramon in the end zoneI saw no gift...just a hard fought game. Don't give me more bogus complaints about the refs.
LOL, you sound like a Trumper...don't give me anymore bogus complaints about Russia or impeachment.I saw no gift...just a hard fought game. Don't give me more bogus complaints about the refs.
That and the Panthers D allowing 10+ ypcThat bull#### roughing call in the endzone determined this game.
So being in the grasp, on the way to the ground (End Zone no less), he chucks it at the feet of the lineman adding that the ball did not cross the line of scrimmage and he was still within the Tackles? What would you call it? The Zebra's had Rodgers on their fantasty team? or their opponent had the CAR Def? Either way, those officials did make some blantantly bad calls that determined the outcome of the game.It wasmt a sack and it wasn’t intentional grounding at all. But it was a bad call
How in the world did it determine the game?That bull#### roughing call in the endzone determined this game.
A. He wasn't on the way to the ground. One defender had him, the other wasn't grasping him yet. Not in control, not in danger to blow the whistle. If that is in the grasp enough for a sack, they will have to change the rules and have a lot of pissed off people. This is not "in the grasp". I can't find the exact rule in the book...but its quoted here as "The Referee must blow the play dead as soon as the passer is clearly in the grasp and control of any tackler behind the line, and the passer’s safety is in jeopardy.” Rodgers safety was not in jeopardy nor was he going down.So being in the grasp, on the way to the ground (End Zone no less), he chucks it at the feet of the lineman adding that the ball did not cross the line of scrimmage and he was still within the Tackles? What would you call it? The Zebra's had Rodgers on their fantasty team? or their opponent had the CAR Def? Either way, those officials did make some blantantly bad calls that determined the outcome of the game.
It was a close game before half (14-10 Packers lead)... The Safety (Intentional Grounding in End Zone = Safety) was 2 points and the ball. Instead, Packers got 1st down at 20 yard line and moved down the field.... they did not score, but it would have been a shift of the momentum 180 Degrees!How in the world did it determine the game?
While I admit I was in a non-audio area (BAR), but thanks for the clips. Good evidence in the films! I still believe it was Intentional Grounding.. he threw it away to avoid a sack/safety.... And I agree the officials are really controlling the outcome of games with bad calls. This is just another example.A. He wasn't on the way to the ground. One defender had him, the other wasn't grasping him yet. Not in control, not in danger to blow the whistle. If that is in the grasp enough for a sack, they will have to change the rules and have a lot of pissed off people. This is not "in the grasp". I can't find the exact rule in the book...but its quoted here as "The Referee must blow the play dead as soon as the passer is clearly in the grasp and control of any tackler behind the line, and the passer’s safety is in jeopardy.” Rodgers safety was not in jeopardy nor was he going down.
B. It was not at the feet of the lineman. You can clearly see here that it is toward Jamaal Williams...a receiver in the vicinity. So, not getting to the LOS doesn't matter at all...nor does between the tackles.
What I would call it? Is yet another example of many of bad officiating especially with the roughing the passer penalty. It has happened over and over and over in this league. Not sure what other blatantly bad calls determined the game...
Absolutely not grounding. Aikman even pointed out Williams in the area. Terrible roughing the pass call I agree. The refs also missed a clear intentional grounding on the Panthers last drive where Allen was clearly in the pocket and shot putted the ball with no receiver in the area. It was mentioned during the broadcast as a missed call.While I admit I was in a non-audio area (BAR), but thanks for the clips. Good evidence in the films! I still believe it was Intentional Grounding.. he threw it away to avoid a sack/safety.... And I agree the officials are really controlling the outcome of games with bad calls. This is just another example.
Thanks for providing the info!
A. He wasn't on the way to the ground. One defender had him, the other wasn't grasping him yet. Not in control, not in danger to blow the whistle. If that is in the grasp enough for a sack, they will have to change the rules and have a lot of pissed off people. This is not "in the grasp". I can't find the exact rule in the book...but its quoted here as "The Referee must blow the play dead as soon as the passer is clearly in the grasp and control of any tackler behind the line, and the passer’s safety is in jeopardy.” Rodgers safety was not in jeopardy nor was he going down.So being in the grasp, on the way to the ground (End Zone no less), he chucks it at the feet of the lineman adding that the ball did not cross the line of scrimmage and he was still within the Tackles? What would you call it? The Zebra's had Rodgers on their fantasty team? or their opponent had the CAR Def? Either way, those officials did make some blantantly bad calls that determined the outcome of the game.
B. It was not at the feet of the lineman. You can clearly see here that it is toward Jamaal Williams...a receiver in the vicinity. So, not getting to the LOS doesn't matter at all...nor does between the tackles.
What I would call it? Is yet another example of many of bad officiating especially with the roughing the passer penalty. It has happened over and over and over in this league. Not sure what other blatantly bad calls determined the game...
I don't feel the need most of the time. Bad calls happen...even this one.Must be exhausting having to defend this every other game.
There is a receiver (RB) near where the ball is thrown. That has never been grounding and never will be grounding. That is for the QB's safety.While I admit I was in a non-audio area (BAR), but thanks for the clips. Good evidence in the films! I still believe it was Intentional Grounding.. he threw it away to avoid a sack/safety.... And I agree the officials are really controlling the outcome of games with bad calls. This is just another example.
Thanks for providing the info!
Yes, when as a defensive tackle you are heads up and watch the Q.B. throw the ball, by all means take a step, wrap him up, take another step and drive him to the ground landing with at least 3/4 of your fat ### weight on him. By all means don't pull up knowing that the ball is gone. just keep coming and make affirmative effort to lay a wallop on the guy after the football play has passed you bye.Zow said:y did appreciate the announcer pointing out that McCoy’s technique should be used as a training video for what to do.
So, obviously you know nothing of football. Thanks for posting with your thoughts though.Birdie048 said:Sorry if repost and did not read all the previous posts.... but the Panthers got hozed by the officials! A Sack of A Rodgers in the End Zone (and he throws it away for Intentional Grounding) only to have the blind zebra over rule his collegue and call Personal Foul/ Roughing the Passer ("majority of weight landed on QB" - but wait replay clearly showed the DL (Addison?) Shoulder hit the ground NEXT TO AR)... Should have been a Safety & flip the game script. 2 Points & the Ball before the half would have changed the game completely!
Granted I was off visiting my son at college & watching game in bar... no audio, but the officials were terrible in that game!
So, you have no idea what in the grasp is, and you do not recognize that the Q.B. when his arm is hit, does not have the ball go where intended. When the arm is hit the rule about a receiver in the vicinity or the line of scrimmage is out the window since, well, the pass is partially blocked.Birdie048 said:So being in the grasp, on the way to the ground (End Zone no less), he chucks it at the feet of the lineman adding that the ball did not cross the line of scrimmage and he was still within the Tackles? What would you call it? The Zebra's had Rodgers on their fantasty team? or their opponent had the CAR Def? Either way, those officials did make some blantantly bad calls that determined the outcome of the game.
And I agree, it was not in the grasp, nor roughing the passer... so it should not have been a flag on either team. But it did impact the game and resulted in a momentum shift.So, obviously you know nothing of football. Thanks for posting with your thoughts though.
The constant whining does get tiring, but I think it just comes with being a successful team.Hov34 said:Must be exhausting having to defend this every other game.
I think the expiration date on commenting has not passed for Detroit fans, but the rest, yeah nothing but sour grapes. The thesis that the Packers get all of the calls fails when one remembers replay was instituted after the San Fran game when they got another chance after a blown call. The replacement refs were replaced after a blown call inuring to the Packers detriment. The new emphasis on Q.B. safety was instituted after a no call and Rodgers out in a year where they Packers were off to a great start. Do they get some calls, sure, all teams do. Do they get jobbed, sure, all teams do. The whining, well that is an indictment of the whiner, except, as I said, the Lions fans. It takes a while to recover from getting jobbed so they get dispensation for a while.The constant whining does get tiring, but I think it just comes with being a successful team.
You need to take your swiss cheese glasses off if you think he could have pulled up on that play.Yes, when as a defensive tackle you are heads up and watch the Q.B. throw the ball, by all means take a step, wrap him up, take another step and drive him to the ground landing with at least 3/4 of your fat ### weight on him. By all means don't pull up knowing that the ball is gone. just keep coming and make affirmative effort to lay a wallop on the guy after the football play has passed you bye.
Sorry, you are wrong. I did not say stop in his tracks, just pull up, as in not continue charging forward, wrapping the man up after he saw the ball come out, and then driving him to the ground. Had he run into him a bit while pulling his arms back that would have been fine. It would have been fine even if Rodgers went sprawling. Had he been tripped it would have been fine had he landed on Rodgers. What was not fine was seeing the play, taking another step forward , pushing through a 300 pound man to do so, wrapping Rodgers up and then forcing him to the ground with most, albeit not all, of his weight landing on him.You need to take your swiss cheese glasses off if you think he could have pulled up on that play.
WTFSorry, you are wrong. I did not say stop in his tracks, just pull up, as in not continue charging forward, wrapping the man up after he saw the ball come out, and then driving him to the ground. Had he run into him a bit while pulling his arms back that would have been fine. It would have been fine even if Rodgers went sprawling. Had he been tripped it would have been fine had he landed on Rodgers. What was not fine was seeing the play, taking another step forward , pushing through a 300 pound man to do so, wrapping Rodgers up and then forcing him to the ground with most, albeit not all, of his weight landing on him.
BTW, I remember your perception of this call and two others also against Matthews. https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=clay+matthews+roughing+calls&view=detail&mid=4AFF4AA189938AB2E1994AFF4AA189938AB2E199&FORM=VIRE
I appreciate the perspective of those who are wrong, it affirms my belief about my fellow travelers. BTW, the authority from the article you site has this to say about himselfDiktaless wonders where the flag was on this tackle
https://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2019/11/10/20958391/aaron-rodgers-gerald-mccoy-roughing-the-passer-penalty-packers-panthers
That explains everything except if the issue is senility or waning eyesight.Me, I'll take my 55+ years of watching and playing over the guy who covered women's bowling and Vanderbilt football.
There you go.That explains everything except if the issue is senility or waning eyesight.