Hastur
Footballguy
The subtle dark humor is off the charts great. Too soon though.I've often wondered how Kurt Cobain would have felt about Nirvana t-shirts being sold at Target.
The subtle dark humor is off the charts great. Too soon though.I've often wondered how Kurt Cobain would have felt about Nirvana t-shirts being sold at Target.
51 to 51. Prolly about how it should go. No wrong answer here people.
That was a good one. Ha ha51 to 51. Prolly about how it should go. No wrong answer here people.
Are you new around here?
Maybe it isn't contrarian, and many people actually prefer Pearl Jam? I mean, this board is comprised of the demographic who heard both bands in their primes, and the poll is a dead heat.I agree with Kobe.That's exactly what I'm saying.Bold statement, and that is going to mean different things to different people. Some will think you are saying Nirvana is overrated.Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Kurt's early death made people think more highly of him than they ought, same as Kobe.
Disagree with Nirvana. But that's part of what I was alluding to in my first post. Its popular to lean into PJ>Nirvana just to be contrarian, and pointing to Kurt's death as why he is overrated.
That may be true. And this board is probably a good metric for both those bands. But it did become a thing for people to choose PJ just to say they were anti-Nirvana. Perhaps that was at a specific time and place in life and now there can be a genuine discussion of the two. Hope so. Both are icons of a genre and an era.Maybe it isn't contrarian, and many people actually prefer Pearl Jam? I mean, this board is comprised of the demographic who heard both bands in their primes, and the poll is a dead heat.I agree with Kobe.That's exactly what I'm saying.Bold statement, and that is going to mean different things to different people. Some will think you are saying Nirvana is overrated.Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Kurt's early death made people think more highly of him than they ought, same as Kobe.
Disagree with Nirvana. But that's part of what I was alluding to in my first post. Its popular to lean into PJ>Nirvana just to be contrarian, and pointing to Kurt's death as why he is overrated.
I like both bands, but chose Pearl Jam. Enjoy more songs from Ten than Nevermind, and it seemed like the former had more radio airplay. Smells Like Teen Spirit is certainly the most iconic single from either band though.
ETA Surprised to see Nevermind outsold Ten by 3-to-1. Was this mostly due to international popularity?
I had literally typed out a response regarding the shorter career length of Nirvana that included the qualifier "Through no fault of their own.." before I realized that.....uh....yeah, I'm an idiot.I like both bands.... but, as stated upthread at least once, due to Cobain's untimely suicide, they obviously didn't have the staying power that PJ has had. Therefore I voted PJ, but who knows what could have happened if Cobain didn't take his own life....![]()
5 albumsI'm sure it's been mentioned but they only made (3) . 2 big commercial ones and their original because you know Cobain dying and allName more than 2 Nirvana albums.I like both groups, but given the choice, I'd usually prefer to put on Nirvana. So Nirvana.
In fairness, I only know Pearl Jam's first few albums, but I imagine that the case for a large majority of people.
Ten, Versus & Vitalogy are all better than any single Nirvana album.
Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Yeah, amazing. Especially this...If I were to name my favorite 10 songs between the two bands, more are Nirvana. Overall, I thought PJ was a more consistant and better band though. The electricity of Nirvana Live at Reading is truly special.
Allegedly. I have some doubts.You realize he eventually stuck a shotgun in his mouth and pulled the trigger? Maybe...just maybe...he was a little messed up in the head,Let me google that for you.Can you give some examples?One band was pretentious.
I always rolled my eyes at Kurt's attitude towards being famous or mainstream. He seemed to look down on everyone else that just wanted to be rock stars. He even had a name for it called "**** rock". In Bloom was basically about his disdain for fanboys who weren't "genuine enough" or didn't know what the lyrics meant.
Please, his girlfriend was Courtney Love for Pete's sake. They played SNL and MTV Unplugged. He was super mainstream and then tried to act like he was too cool for mainstream.
No depth to PJ's catalogue? You're obviously a VERY casual fan. They are super deep.Slight nod to Pearl Jam. More of their songs stick in my head. I don't think either band was great. They were solid grunge and a nice answer to bad pop music and the end of hair metal. But there's no depth to their catalogs. 5-7 decent songs. Then nada. I much preferred STP who also had limited depth, but IMO had better songs. Sex Type Thing, Interstate, Creep, Plush, Wicked Garden. All excellent tunes.
I'm surprised it was only three to one. Nirvana was the biggest band in the world. Pearl Jam only got noticed because of Nirvana. Ten came out a month earlier if I remember right.Maybe it isn't contrarian, and many people actually prefer Pearl Jam? I mean, this board is comprised of the demographic who heard both bands in their primes, and the poll is a dead heat.I agree with Kobe.That's exactly what I'm saying.Bold statement, and that is going to mean different things to different people. Some will think you are saying Nirvana is overrated.Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Kurt's early death made people think more highly of him than they ought, same as Kobe.
Disagree with Nirvana. But that's part of what I was alluding to in my first post. Its popular to lean into PJ>Nirvana just to be contrarian, and pointing to Kurt's death as why he is overrated.
I like both bands, but chose Pearl Jam. Enjoy more songs from Ten than Nevermind, and it seemed like the former had more radio airplay. Smells Like Teen Spirit is certainly the most iconic single from either band though.
ETA Surprised to see Nevermind outsold Ten by 3-to-1. Was this mostly due to international popularity?
Yeah the no depth is a very strange (ie wrong) take. Depth is PJ’s greatest strength. There are 3-7 greats songs off of every one of their 12 albums. The catalog is super deep.No depth to PJ's catalogue? You're obviously a VERY casual fan. They are super deep.Slight nod to Pearl Jam. More of their songs stick in my head. I don't think either band was great. They were solid grunge and a nice answer to bad pop music and the end of hair metal. But there's no depth to their catalogs. 5-7 decent songs. Then nada. I much preferred STP who also had limited depth, but IMO had better songs. Sex Type Thing, Interstate, Creep, Plush, Wicked Garden. All excellent tunes.
But when they were on - in mid to late '91 - they were fantastic. Better than Pearl Jam.Another note, Pearl Jams' touring and live act was consistently amazing as they brought intensity with every show and are considered one of the best live rock acts ever. With Nirvana it depended on which version/mood they were in and if Kurt's experimentation landed or whiffed.
Very fair, and another tally for PJ's favor to me is their access they give to fans with their easily available live shows. I had quite a few of those on CD and now there are a ton of shows on Spotify as well.Another note, Pearl Jams' touring and live act was consistently amazing as they brought intensity with every show and are considered one of the best live rock acts ever. With Nirvana it depended on which version/mood they were in and if Kurt's experimentation landed or whiffed.
Nirvana put grunge on the map, but it’s a real stretch to attribute PJs success to them. If Nevermind was released 6 months or a year later, I’m pretty sure Pearl Jam would’ve done just as well.I'm surprised it was only three to one. Nirvana was the biggest band in the world. Pearl Jam only got noticed because of Nirvana. Ten came out a month earlier if I remember right.Maybe it isn't contrarian, and many people actually prefer Pearl Jam? I mean, this board is comprised of the demographic who heard both bands in their primes, and the poll is a dead heat.I agree with Kobe.That's exactly what I'm saying.Bold statement, and that is going to mean different things to different people. Some will think you are saying Nirvana is overrated.Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Kurt's early death made people think more highly of him than they ought, same as Kobe.
Disagree with Nirvana. But that's part of what I was alluding to in my first post. Its popular to lean into PJ>Nirvana just to be contrarian, and pointing to Kurt's death as why he is overrated.
I like both bands, but chose Pearl Jam. Enjoy more songs from Ten than Nevermind, and it seemed like the former had more radio airplay. Smells Like Teen Spirit is certainly the most iconic single from either band though.
ETA Surprised to see Nevermind outsold Ten by 3-to-1. Was this mostly due to international popularity?
Nirvana put grunge on the map, but it’s a real stretch to attribute PJs success to them. If Nevermind was released 6 months or a year later, I’m pretty sure Pearl Jam would’ve done just as well.
Another note, Pearl Jams' touring and live act was consistently amazing as they brought intensity with every show and are considered one of the best live rock acts ever. With Nirvana it depended on which version/mood they were in and if Kurt's experimentation landed or whiffed.
Why? They weren't getting radio play. Or on MTV. Pretty sure the record didn't go Gold until late 92. Nirvana was doing something like 300k A WEEK in early 92. That prompted the search for the next Nirvana and garnered more promotion from their label than they likely would have done.Nirvana put grunge on the map, but it’s a real stretch to attribute PJs success to them. If Nevermind was released 6 months or a year later, I’m pretty sure Pearl Jam would’ve done just as well.I'm surprised it was only three to one. Nirvana was the biggest band in the world. Pearl Jam only got noticed because of Nirvana. Ten came out a month earlier if I remember right.Maybe it isn't contrarian, and many people actually prefer Pearl Jam? I mean, this board is comprised of the demographic who heard both bands in their primes, and the poll is a dead heat.I agree with Kobe.That's exactly what I'm saying.Bold statement, and that is going to mean different things to different people. Some will think you are saying Nirvana is overrated.Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Kurt's early death made people think more highly of him than they ought, same as Kobe.
Disagree with Nirvana. But that's part of what I was alluding to in my first post. Its popular to lean into PJ>Nirvana just to be contrarian, and pointing to Kurt's death as why he is overrated.
I like both bands, but chose Pearl Jam. Enjoy more songs from Ten than Nevermind, and it seemed like the former had more radio airplay. Smells Like Teen Spirit is certainly the most iconic single from either band though.
ETA Surprised to see Nevermind outsold Ten by 3-to-1. Was this mostly due to international popularity?
i’m just gonna go ahead and quote some of the dumbest things ever said on this board. i’ve been here since 1999, and this entire thing isWhy? They weren't getting radio play. Or on MTV. Pretty sure the record didn't go Gold until late 92. Nirvana was doing something like 300k A WEEK in early 92. That prompted the search for the next Nirvana and garnered more promotion from their label than they likely would have done.Nirvana put grunge on the map, but it’s a real stretch to attribute PJs success to them. If Nevermind was released 6 months or a year later, I’m pretty sure Pearl Jam would’ve done just as well.I'm surprised it was only three to one. Nirvana was the biggest band in the world. Pearl Jam only got noticed because of Nirvana. Ten came out a month earlier if I remember right.Maybe it isn't contrarian, and many people actually prefer Pearl Jam? I mean, this board is comprised of the demographic who heard both bands in their primes, and the poll is a dead heat.I agree with Kobe.That's exactly what I'm saying.Bold statement, and that is going to mean different things to different people. Some will think you are saying Nirvana is overrated.Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Kurt's early death made people think more highly of him than they ought, same as Kobe.
Disagree with Nirvana. But that's part of what I was alluding to in my first post. Its popular to lean into PJ>Nirvana just to be contrarian, and pointing to Kurt's death as why he is overrated.
I like both bands, but chose Pearl Jam. Enjoy more songs from Ten than Nevermind, and it seemed like the former had more radio airplay. Smells Like Teen Spirit is certainly the most iconic single from either band though.
ETA Surprised to see Nevermind outsold Ten by 3-to-1. Was this mostly due to international popularity?
Mother Love Bone didn't sell millions of records. Ten was all MLB songs with Vedder's singing/lyrics. They likely would have been like AIC and Soundgarden pre-Nirvana. Modest successes.
I'm pretty confident Ten wouldn't have gone platinum without Nirvana. I'm surprised that's controversial.
vedders and pearl jam with young keep on rocking in the free world crushes them both take that to the bank brohansNirvana also plays better covers
D7: https://youtu.be/0oBHEvYAJnY?si=WddINH7Hr5iAUKFO
Love Buzz: https://youtu.be/ZEh3mO9MPV0?si=eF-Cq3OpdIxR8eWV
Where did you sleep last night: https://youtu.be/CISzg6yi8YE?si=esIZBgbeeNRkw1-U
To name just a few.
So do you believe Pearl Jam owes their success to Nirvana?Nirvana put grunge on the map, but it’s a real stretch to attribute PJs success to them. If Nevermind was released 6 months or a year later, I’m pretty sure Pearl Jam would’ve done just as well.
Ten was actually released a month prior to Nevermind in 1991 but didn't gain any traction until the following year after "Smells Like Teen Spirit" broke.
You’re certainly entitled to your opinion, but I don’t think recognizing Pearl Jam is awesome in their own right, deserving the success they’ve achieved, is a controversial take.Why? They weren't getting radio play. Or on MTV. Pretty sure the record didn't go Gold until late 92. Nirvana was doing something like 300k A WEEK in early 92. That prompted the search for the next Nirvana and garnered more promotion from their label than they likely would have done.Nirvana put grunge on the map, but it’s a real stretch to attribute PJs success to them. If Nevermind was released 6 months or a year later, I’m pretty sure Pearl Jam would’ve done just as well.I'm surprised it was only three to one. Nirvana was the biggest band in the world. Pearl Jam only got noticed because of Nirvana. Ten came out a month earlier if I remember right.Maybe it isn't contrarian, and many people actually prefer Pearl Jam? I mean, this board is comprised of the demographic who heard both bands in their primes, and the poll is a dead heat.I agree with Kobe.That's exactly what I'm saying.Bold statement, and that is going to mean different things to different people. Some will think you are saying Nirvana is overrated.Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Kurt's early death made people think more highly of him than they ought, same as Kobe.
Disagree with Nirvana. But that's part of what I was alluding to in my first post. Its popular to lean into PJ>Nirvana just to be contrarian, and pointing to Kurt's death as why he is overrated.
I like both bands, but chose Pearl Jam. Enjoy more songs from Ten than Nevermind, and it seemed like the former had more radio airplay. Smells Like Teen Spirit is certainly the most iconic single from either band though.
ETA Surprised to see Nevermind outsold Ten by 3-to-1. Was this mostly due to international popularity?
Mother Love Bone didn't sell millions of records. Ten was all MLB songs with Vedder's singing/lyrics. They likely would have been like AIC and Soundgarden pre-Nirvana. Modest successes.
I'm pretty confident Ten wouldn't have gone platinum without Nirvana. I'm surprised that's controversial.
So do you believe Pearl Jam owes their success to Nirvana?
I understand your point but are there any OTHER bands from the early 60s in Liverpool that hit it big for 30 years? It still had more to do with Pearl Jam being a great and popular band than people just wanting to listen to the next Nirvana. Especially when they really didn't sound like Nirvana that much. But certainly, people looking for the next Nirvana sold Pearl Jam some more records and then their talent took it from there. I'd just peg that as contributing about 10-15% of Pearl Jam's success. I feel like your post (and others) sound like they peg it closer to 50%.So do you believe Pearl Jam owes their success to Nirvana?
Artistically no but commercially yes (possibly).
Ten didn't find its audience until after "Smells Like Teen Spirit" broke huge and Epic/CBS refocused their promotional muscle behind Pearl Jam. It was extremely rare in the industry to promote a record that had already been out on the street for six months. Especially in that era, major labels were all about the next big thing. Countless bands were signed and dropped without ever earning back their advance.
If Ten hadn't hit on its second at bat, Pearl Jam would still be a great band remembered fondly by everyone who was lucky enough to see them live but they probably wouldn't be playing stadiums thirty years later. They were fortunate to get caught in the slipstream of the Nirvana phenomenon of 1991-2 when everybody wanted a piece of bands from the Pacific Northwest. That's taking nothing away from Pearl Jam as a band but it's just the way the music industry works.
Yes I'm crazy to think something that 47% of the FFA agrees with.i’m just gonna go ahead and quote some of the dumbest things ever said on this board. i’ve been here since 1999, and this entire thing isWhy? They weren't getting radio play. Or on MTV. Pretty sure the record didn't go Gold until late 92. Nirvana was doing something like 300k A WEEK in early 92. That prompted the search for the next Nirvana and garnered more promotion from their label than they likely would have done.Nirvana put grunge on the map, but it’s a real stretch to attribute PJs success to them. If Nevermind was released 6 months or a year later, I’m pretty sure Pearl Jam would’ve done just as well.I'm surprised it was only three to one. Nirvana was the biggest band in the world. Pearl Jam only got noticed because of Nirvana. Ten came out a month earlier if I remember right.Maybe it isn't contrarian, and many people actually prefer Pearl Jam? I mean, this board is comprised of the demographic who heard both bands in their primes, and the poll is a dead heat.I agree with Kobe.That's exactly what I'm saying.Bold statement, and that is going to mean different things to different people. Some will think you are saying Nirvana is overrated.Nirvana is the Kobe Bryant of the music world.
Kurt's early death made people think more highly of him than they ought, same as Kobe.
Disagree with Nirvana. But that's part of what I was alluding to in my first post. Its popular to lean into PJ>Nirvana just to be contrarian, and pointing to Kurt's death as why he is overrated.
I like both bands, but chose Pearl Jam. Enjoy more songs from Ten than Nevermind, and it seemed like the former had more radio airplay. Smells Like Teen Spirit is certainly the most iconic single from either band though.
ETA Surprised to see Nevermind outsold Ten by 3-to-1. Was this mostly due to international popularity?
Mother Love Bone didn't sell millions of records. Ten was all MLB songs with Vedder's singing/lyrics. They likely would have been like AIC and Soundgarden pre-Nirvana. Modest successes.
I'm pretty confident Ten wouldn't have gone platinum without Nirvana. I'm surprised that's controversial.
jayrod is either fishing with the best bait ever, drunk, stoned, or…..
Look at Soundgarden, then. Before Nirvana, they were on a major label and put out Louder Than Love. They were a great live band and toured with some of the biggest acts like GNR and Metallica. But their record didn't sell.I understand your point but are there any OTHER bands from the early 60s in Liverpool that hit it big for 30 years? It still had more to do with Pearl Jam being a great and popular band than people just wanting to listen to the next Nirvana. Especially when they really didn't sound like Nirvana that much. But certainly, people looking for the next Nirvana sold Pearl Jam some more records and then their talent took it from there. I'd just peg that as contributing about 10-15% of Pearl Jam's success. I feel like your post (and others) sound like they peg it closer to 50%.So do you believe Pearl Jam owes their success to Nirvana?
Artistically no but commercially yes (possibly).
Ten didn't find its audience until after "Smells Like Teen Spirit" broke huge and Epic/CBS refocused their promotional muscle behind Pearl Jam. It was extremely rare in the industry to promote a record that had already been out on the street for six months. Especially in that era, major labels were all about the next big thing. Countless bands were signed and dropped without ever earning back their advance.
If Ten hadn't hit on its second at bat, Pearl Jam would still be a great band remembered fondly by everyone who was lucky enough to see them live but they probably wouldn't be playing stadiums thirty years later. They were fortunate to get caught in the slipstream of the Nirvana phenomenon of 1991-2 when everybody wanted a piece of bands from the Pacific Northwest. That's taking nothing away from Pearl Jam as a band but it's just the way the music industry works.
Now who can argue with that? I think we're all indebted to SWC for clearly stating what needed to be said. I'm particulary glad that these lovely children were here today to hear that speech. Not only was it authentic frontier gibberish, it expressed a courage little seen in this day and age.rolling stone says the no 1 nirvana song is lithium pear jam is black and ok thats a solid battle but by the time you get to 7 its nirvana aneurism vs pj even flow by 10 its nirvana lounge act vs pj elderly woman behind a counter blah blah blah i mean nirvana had some big songs but after 5 or 6 you are sort of searching for songs that many non hardcore nirvana fans probably dont know all that well that is all i am saying take that to the bank brohans
I think it's two different discussions. It could be true that both Pearl Jam is a great band (and even better than Nirvana) and Nirvana opened the door for the rest of the Seattle bands to break out (including Pearl Jam).but just because nirvana hit first doesnt diminish how great pearl jam is
Better to burn out than fade away, huh?Also, longevity points are for losers...give me lightning in a bottle every time.
They were probably third or fourth in my rotation back in the day, but Alice in Chains has aged really well in my opinion. Much better than Soundgarden, for example. And I feel like if I spin up one of their albums, I pretty much listen to the whole thing straight through, as there are very few weak songs.As much as I like that one, I love the riff to Check My Brain.I've always liked this short but sweet riff of an AIC song:AiC is the best live band
Your browser is deprecated. Please upgrade.
music.youtube.com
Saw Soundgarden open for GNR in San Diego. Great show.Look at Soundgarden, then. Before Nirvana, they were on a major label and put out Louder Than Love. They were a great live band and toured with some of the biggest acts like GNR and Metallica
Probably a bunch of REM, Phish and Dave Matthews fans chiming in.Thank God the FFA course corrected and put Nirvana in the lead here...was losing my faith in the collective wisdom of the FFA. Pearl Jam is great, but never was and never will be Nirvana.
And Nirvana Unplugged is one of the best live albums of all time...take that to the bank bromigos.