bicycle_seat_sniffer
Smells like chicken
had my eye on fields as well...
I don't mind y'all grabbing TEs as long as you leave my guy alone.Nice try with that reverse psychology!I don't get the TE love. Last year in this league TE21 went at 9.11 instead of 7.9. Last year we were coming off a prior year of huge TE performances, received 2 ppr instead of 1.5, and they filled one of 6 spots instead of 1 of 9.
Same. I need someone to pair with McBride but I’m happy to wait.I don't mind y'all grabbing TEs as long as you leave my guy alone.Nice try with that reverse psychology!I don't get the TE love. Last year in this league TE21 went at 9.11 instead of 7.9. Last year we were coming off a prior year of huge TE performances, received 2 ppr instead of 1.5, and they filled one of 6 spots instead of 1 of 9.
I strongly considered Maye last round and if I had waited on QB I would be happy with him as my #2.When I saw all those QB go I decided to grab McCarthy although I had hoped I might be able to wait another round.
Eta - I wanted Maye or McCarthy. Figured Maye would go before McCarthy. Once Maye was gone that was my signal.
qb not limitedWOW. Now fellas, if you want people to pre-draft, perhaps we shouldn't sandwich a pre-drafted pick with SEVEN STRAIGHT PLAYERS AT THE SAME LIMITED POSITION!
BS....by definition the most limited position in football. No more then 32 can be relied upon to play in a given week...26 on a heavy bye week. Even TEs have 45 or so touch the ball in a given week.qb not limitedWOW. Now fellas, if you want people to pre-draft, perhaps we shouldn't sandwich a pre-drafted pick with SEVEN STRAIGHT PLAYERS AT THE SAME LIMITED POSITION!
sorry thought you meant only so many could be drafted by a team....BS....by definition the most limited position in football. No more then 32 can be relied upon to play in a given week...26 on a heavy bye week. Even TEs have 45 or so touch the ball in a given week.qb not limitedWOW. Now fellas, if you want people to pre-draft, perhaps we shouldn't sandwich a pre-drafted pick with SEVEN STRAIGHT PLAYERS AT THE SAME LIMITED POSITION!
Would have thought that not having single elimination weeks would help a little bit, as you have at least a little better shot at surviving a week without a QB.
absolutely, just seems....early.... for it when I would have thought it would be later if anythingsorry thought you meant only so many could be drafted by a team....BS....by definition the most limited position in football. No more then 32 can be relied upon to play in a given week...26 on a heavy bye week. Even TEs have 45 or so touch the ball in a given week.qb not limitedWOW. Now fellas, if you want people to pre-draft, perhaps we shouldn't sandwich a pre-drafted pick with SEVEN STRAIGHT PLAYERS AT THE SAME LIMITED POSITION!
Would have thought that not having single elimination weeks would help a little bit, as you have at least a little better shot at surviving a week without a QB.
eta: but then again.....in every single one of these for years the QB2 run happens....it's not new
Nah, I’m with Ref. Some drafts it’s the 8th round - some drafts the 9th. In our 16-teamers that’s basically the only drama involved.absolutely, just seems....early.... for it when I would have thought it would be later if anythingsorry thought you meant only so many could be drafted by a team....BS....by definition the most limited position in football. No more then 32 can be relied upon to play in a given week...26 on a heavy bye week. Even TEs have 45 or so touch the ball in a given week.qb not limitedWOW. Now fellas, if you want people to pre-draft, perhaps we shouldn't sandwich a pre-drafted pick with SEVEN STRAIGHT PLAYERS AT THE SAME LIMITED POSITION!
Would have thought that not having single elimination weeks would help a little bit, as you have at least a little better shot at surviving a week without a QB.
eta: but then again.....in every single one of these for years the QB2 run happens....it's not new
It's actually a little late. Usually it happens when the TE run happened in this draft.absolutely, just seems....early.... for it when I would have thought it would be later if anythingsorry thought you meant only so many could be drafted by a team....BS....by definition the most limited position in football. No more then 32 can be relied upon to play in a given week...26 on a heavy bye week. Even TEs have 45 or so touch the ball in a given week.qb not limitedWOW. Now fellas, if you want people to pre-draft, perhaps we shouldn't sandwich a pre-drafted pick with SEVEN STRAIGHT PLAYERS AT THE SAME LIMITED POSITION!
Would have thought that not having single elimination weeks would help a little bit, as you have at least a little better shot at surviving a week without a QB.
eta: but then again.....in every single one of these for years the QB2 run happens....it's not new
I did not realize that you had four TEs. I am not sure what to think of that. I do know that I did not want to have to wait on 28 picks hoping a decent QB would be there.with two extra roster spots and no PK....taking QB2 "earlier" seems about right...cause you can even afford to take three and play keep away and put a team or teams at a disadvantage in a survivor format......
not that I would think about taking a third QB with four TE's.....![]()
Figured he’d be gone but after fields went I was going to stack Stroud with NicoGlad that Stroud survived the turn. Personally I'd rather have him than Nix, McCarthy, and Maye.
@renesauz - I very rarely pre-draft early for this precise reason, and I never urge folks to pre-draft. I also understand that your work and sleep schedule sometimes puts you in challenging spots. I suspect that if you avoided pre-drafting at all, you might feel some peer pressure about long waits. So, you of probably all of our regular drafters may feel conflicted about that QB run.BS....by definition the most limited position in football. No more then 32 can be relied upon to play in a given week...26 on a heavy bye week. Even TEs have 45 or so touch the ball in a given week.qb not limitedWOW. Now fellas, if you want people to pre-draft, perhaps we shouldn't sandwich a pre-drafted pick with SEVEN STRAIGHT PLAYERS AT THE SAME LIMITED POSITION!
Would have thought that not having single elimination weeks would help a little bit, as you have at least a little better shot at surviving a week without a QB.
Back to you
@-OZ- @BassNBrew - is there a precedent for changing picks after others have made picks? Six picks have been made since the one that @-OZ- made that he would like to change, including another pick made by @-OZ- .I realized this morning that I screwed up my pick. I didn’t actually want the packers defense.
I’d make a replacement pick but the draft has moved on and I didn’t catch it earlier.
IMO....if it is that he meant to click a different defense but accidentally clicked/settled on the Packers DST....and he wants a different defense then that is one thing......but switching it to a position player would be a different story....@-OZ- @BassNBrew - is there a precedent for changing picks after others have made picks? Six picks have been made since the one that @-OZ- made that he would like to change, including another pick made by @-OZ- .I realized this morning that I screwed up my pick. I didn’t actually want the packers defense.
I’d make a replacement pick but the draft has moved on and I didn’t catch it earlier.
I’ll Change to the lions if that’s alright.IMO....if it is that he meant to click a different defense but accidentally clicked/settled on the Packers DST....and he wants a different defense then that is one thing......but switching it to a position player would be a different story....@-OZ- @BassNBrew - is there a precedent for changing picks after others have made picks? Six picks have been made since the one that @-OZ- made that he would like to change, including another pick made by @-OZ- .I realized this morning that I screwed up my pick. I didn’t actually want the packers defense.
I’d make a replacement pick but the draft has moved on and I didn’t catch it earlier.
I approve dropping Packers DST for the Lions DST.I’ll Change to the lions if that’s alright.IMO....if it is that he meant to click a different defense but accidentally clicked/settled on the Packers DST....and he wants a different defense then that is one thing......but switching it to a position player would be a different story....@-OZ- @BassNBrew - is there a precedent for changing picks after others have made picks? Six picks have been made since the one that @-OZ- made that he would like to change, including another pick made by @-OZ- .I realized this morning that I screwed up my pick. I didn’t actually want the packers defense.
I’d make a replacement pick but the draft has moved on and I didn’t catch it earlier.
That’s what I get for drafting in bed, half asleep.
I will begin that I do not like picking at the top of the first round, much prefer the middle picks, around six to eleven. Picking at the end means guessing about future picks much more than simply selecting value. You can still make value picks, but occasionally you are forced into selecting positions rather than best available. I rarely embrace the teams that I draft from top three and thus far, I don't see this team near the top of this league.
Picks #45 and #52
3.13 RB - RJ Harvey - Denver
I haven't seen a rookie RB class this strong since 2008, even guys that appear to be 3rd on certain depth charts have upside late
Harvey is one of the few RB drafted to already be penciled in as RB1 on depth charts throughout the internet
I'm not going to oversell his skill set, he's battled injuries but he looked great in college last year.
B2B he racks 1,650/17TD and then 1.850/25 TD and roughly the same number of touches both seasons
Denver traded back but then invested a 2nd round selection for Harvey, they could have had many different RB and they targeted him for a reason
I like the Devner offense and how they have evovled under Coach Sean
4.04 RB - Kaleb Johnson - Pittsburgh
Why take one of the top RB prospects when you can flex several so I started to build a 3-Man rotation at the top I felt good about.
I might not have the Top RB1 but I feel strongly I have 3 RBs that all can easily crack the Top 20, all 3 should see the most touches
Johnson was the primary weapon in Iowa on a team that has a hard time scoring so he's used to the style of offense that awaits him Pittsburgh
I'm sure he will see some competition at times for touches, especially on 3rd down but as an RB3 and the lead RB taking off for the Chargers, lot of touches to go around