Settle down sparky, it's the first preseason game, and welcome to FBG's.HALFbakedHAWK said:This game better serve as a lesson, that type of performance is unacceptable, we need Burlson to step it up fast and not become another Koren Robinson in terms of unseen potential. All and all though it should hepl to serve as a character builder and lesson, though we didn't have D-Jack,Wistrom, Stevens, Womack, Bernard, or Tubbs we still should've won even a preseason game at the Qwest. Tapp looked good, Spencer looked a little raw, Peterson looked like he was adapting excellently to our scheme and I can't wait to see more. The Hamlin is back but I'm still waiting on a beloved"HAMMERING" of an unsuspecting reciever.
Boulware didn't make the trip.I saw Celstin was racking up some tackles... Boulware didn't start? Even if he's hurt, a bit of a surprise to see Celestin get the nod.... I thought he was buried on Seattle's depth chart.
As I see in many posts, you just like to piss people off, I'm not taking the bait. 6 yr ticket holder, I only live 3 hrs away. Seats in the Kingdome, UW, and Qwest. Making the Super Bowl via backups???? It's really neither here nor there. Depth is important, however once again it's preseason.If you really want to rant 12th man, search the Super Bowl threads.HALFbakedHAWK said:You live in Oregon so you probably only make it to the Qwest 1 or 2 times a year, so I'll give ya' a pass on that one. This fact makes you a true Hawk fan but a twelth man you are NOT, so know your tone when talking to a 4 time ticket holder, Sparky. FBGs? No compreheno, amigo. True virtually nobody made the game, but the Hawks of last year had to rely on the back-ups to make it all the way, and such is traditionally the case. So these guys performance IS very important, if only in terms of seeing the effort given and willingness to give to the team.
I'm not sure what you are referring to by "not so quick". If you read the entire post I am simply saying Romo looked good the O-line did not, and 2 young receivers stood out for Dallas. It's only pre-season, there's no reason to come on here and try to defend the Hawks performance, I was commenting on Dallas players.Hawkstradamus said:not so quick, no Wistrom,Tubbs,Bernard and Romo is more mobile than BledsoeRomo was impressive, if this game was to showcase him for a trade then he did alot for his value. I can easily see this guy as a starting QB in the NFL someday soon. It appears, at least early on, the moves Dallas made to improve to O-line in the offseson have not panned out thus far. Hurd and Crayton impressive
Shick! is gonna love this guy.As I see in many posts, you just like to piss people off, I'm not taking the bait. 6 yr ticket holder, I only live 3 hrs away. Seats in the Kingdome, UW, and Qwest. Making the Super Bowl via backups???? It's really neither here nor there. Depth is important, however once again it's preseason.If you really want to rant 12th man, search the Super Bowl threads.HALFbakedHAWK said:You live in Oregon so you probably only make it to the Qwest 1 or 2 times a year, so I'll give ya' a pass on that one. This fact makes you a true Hawk fan but a twelth man you are NOT, so know your tone when talking to a 4 time ticket holder, Sparky. FBGs? No compreheno, amigo. True virtually nobody made the game, but the Hawks of last year had to rely on the back-ups to make it all the way, and such is traditionally the case. So these guys performance IS very important, if only in terms of seeing the effort given and willingness to give to the team.![]()
ooooh a four time ticket holder. Way to stick with them through the leen years. Bandwagon>hiHALFbakedHAWK said:You live in Oregon so you probably only make it to the Qwest 1 or 2 times a year, so I'll give ya' a pass on that one. This fact makes you a true Hawk fan but a twelth man you are NOT, so know your tone when talking to a 4 time ticket holder, Sparky. FBGs? No compreheno, amigo. True virtually nobody made the game, but the Hawks of last year had to rely on the back-ups to make it all the way, and such is traditionally the case. So these guys performance IS very important, if only in terms of seeing the effort given and willingness to give to the team.
HALFbakedHAWK said:You live in Oregon so you probably only make it to the Qwest 1 or 2 times a year, so I'll give ya' a pass on that one. This fact makes you a true Hawk fan but a twelth man you are NOT, so know your tone when talking to a 4 time ticket holder, Sparky. FBGs? No compreheno, amigo. True virtually nobody made the game, but the Hawks of last year had to rely on the back-ups to make it all the way, and such is traditionally the case. So these guys performance IS very important, if only in terms of seeing the effort given and willingness to give to the team.
seahawk 17 said:Two things I also thought, Shick will surely put this guy on vacation, and I like the fact that he became a Seahawk fan right about the time they won there first playoff game in 20 yrs.![]()
seriously underappreciated back in UCLA history.seahawk 17 said:Two things I also thought, Shick will surely put this guy on vacation, and I like the fact that he became a Seahawk fan right about the time they won there first playoff game in 20 yrs.![]()
I wonder what he'd say about me? I'm a better Seahawks fan than most I've ever met and I've never even been to Seattle. 28 years since the days of Doornick, Theotis Brown, and Jack Patera.
![]()
We Hawk fans have to stick together as a serious minority.
Thanks for the heads up. I was gone all weekend. I'll look into his posting history.seahawk 17 said:Two things I also thought, Shick will surely put this guy on vacation, and I like the fact that he became a Seahawk fan right about the time they won there first playoff game in 20 yrs.![]()