NFL Rookie Watch @NFLRookieWatxh
Several NFL scouts reportedly believe Anthony Richardson could go “as high” as ninth overall.
The Panthers currently hold the ninth overall pick in the NFL Draft.
ESPN’s Mel Kiper Jr. said he’s heard from people in the league that Richardson is not getting out of the Top 15![]()
Zareh Kantzabedian @ZKantzFF
Anthony Richardson threw for 50 air yards here without fully clearing his hips, lead arm, and back shoulder. This is a testament to arm strength.
Also, honorable mention to Richardson’s top-to-bottom textbook mechanics, from the drop back to the hitch.
So not "fully clearing his hips, lead arm, and back shoulder." is considered textbook mechanics?Zareh Kantzabedian @ZKantzFF
Anthony Richardson threw for 50 air yards here without fully clearing his hips, lead arm, and back shoulder. This is a testament to arm strength.
Also, honorable mention to Richardson’s top-to-bottom textbook mechanics, from the drop back to the hitch.
No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.
Oh, I believe someone mocked him there.I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.![]()
NFL Mock Draft 2023: Ravens move on from Lamar Jackson, Derek Carr signs with Jets and more QB movement
This mock is loaded with trades, involving the quarterback position of coursewww.cbssports.com
It'll be interesting, because Ballard's history suggests he likes toolsy players, but Irsay likely wants a guy ready to go week 1. Steichen is a wild card. How much will he care about mobility as Hurts is a big reason he has a HC job? Or will he prefer something else entirely?I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.
Everyone but the NFL was high on Willis and Coral too. I'm not sure if AR will go in the 1st round or not, but I do know the Colts will not want a project, they want someone that will develop reasonably fast. If they want a project and "their guy" is not there at #4, then draft other needs at #4 and take Hooker in the 2nd round and sign another veteran as a stop gap until Hooker is ready. Whatever they do they shouldn't trade future draft capital to move up to #1. They have other needs (OL, WR, and safety) that can't be solved by a QB, whoever it is.It'll be interesting, because Ballard's history suggests he likes toolsy players, but Irsay likely wants a guy ready to go week 1. Steichen is a wild card. How much will he care about mobility as Hurts is a big reason he has a HC job? Or will he prefer something else entirely?I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.
I do think it'd be a major upset if Richardson fell lower than 12, and it wouldn't blow my mind if he were the 1st QB off the board. He's certainly got the highest ceiling, and all it takes is 1 team thinking they can develop him. Logic would suggest that its more likely to be by a HC or GM with job security.
Were they? I don't recall anyone credible saying Corral was a 1st rounder, and nobody credible had Willis any higher than the Steelers pick. Richardson is a better prospect than either of those guys.Everyone but the NFL was high on Willis and Coral too. I'm not sure if AR will go in the 1st round or not, but I do know the Colts will not want a project, they want someone that will develop reasonably fast. If they want a project and "their guy" is not there at #4, then draft other needs at #4 and take Hooker in the 2nd round and sign another veteran as a stop gap until Hooker is ready. Whatever they do they shouldn't trade future draft capital to move up to #1. They have other needs (OL, WR, and safety) that can't be solved by a QB, whoever it is.It'll be interesting, because Ballard's history suggests he likes toolsy players, but Irsay likely wants a guy ready to go week 1. Steichen is a wild card. How much will he care about mobility as Hurts is a big reason he has a HC job? Or will he prefer something else entirely?I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.
I do think it'd be a major upset if Richardson fell lower than 12, and it wouldn't blow my mind if he were the 1st QB off the board. He's certainly got the highest ceiling, and all it takes is 1 team thinking they can develop him. Logic would suggest that its more likely to be by a HC or GM with job security.
Were they? I don't recall anyone credible saying Corral was a 1st rounder, and nobody credible had Willis any higher than the Steelers pick. Richardson is a better prospect than either of those guys.Everyone but the NFL was high on Willis and Coral too. I'm not sure if AR will go in the 1st round or not, but I do know the Colts will not want a project, they want someone that will develop reasonably fast. If they want a project and "their guy" is not there at #4, then draft other needs at #4 and take Hooker in the 2nd round and sign another veteran as a stop gap until Hooker is ready. Whatever they do they shouldn't trade future draft capital to move up to #1. They have other needs (OL, WR, and safety) that can't be solved by a QB, whoever it is.It'll be interesting, because Ballard's history suggests he likes toolsy players, but Irsay likely wants a guy ready to go week 1. Steichen is a wild card. How much will he care about mobility as Hurts is a big reason he has a HC job? Or will he prefer something else entirely?I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.
I do think it'd be a major upset if Richardson fell lower than 12, and it wouldn't blow my mind if he were the 1st QB off the board. He's certainly got the highest ceiling, and all it takes is 1 team thinking they can develop him. Logic would suggest that its more likely to be by a HC or GM with job security.
If the Colts stay at #4, I think QB is probably 50-50. Probably would be teams wanting to jump into Arizona's spot at #3 to get ahead of Indy, and other than the Bears it makes more sense for the Cards to move down than anyone.
He seems to be a terrible passer to me and I question his mental makeup. Did you see him mentally implode against KY?Were they? I don't recall anyone credible saying Corral was a 1st rounder, and nobody credible had Willis any higher than the Steelers pick. Richardson is a better prospect than either of those guys.Everyone but the NFL was high on Willis and Coral too. I'm not sure if AR will go in the 1st round or not, but I do know the Colts will not want a project, they want someone that will develop reasonably fast. If they want a project and "their guy" is not there at #4, then draft other needs at #4 and take Hooker in the 2nd round and sign another veteran as a stop gap until Hooker is ready. Whatever they do they shouldn't trade future draft capital to move up to #1. They have other needs (OL, WR, and safety) that can't be solved by a QB, whoever it is.It'll be interesting, because Ballard's history suggests he likes toolsy players, but Irsay likely wants a guy ready to go week 1. Steichen is a wild card. How much will he care about mobility as Hurts is a big reason he has a HC job? Or will he prefer something else entirely?I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.
I do think it'd be a major upset if Richardson fell lower than 12, and it wouldn't blow my mind if he were the 1st QB off the board. He's certainly got the highest ceiling, and all it takes is 1 team thinking they can develop him. Logic would suggest that its more likely to be by a HC or GM with job security.
If the Colts stay at #4, I think QB is probably 50-50. Probably would be teams wanting to jump into Arizona's spot at #3 to get ahead of Indy, and other than the Bears it makes more sense for the Cards to move down than anyone.
He had a bad game against Kentucky for sure. Every QB had at least 1 bad game except for Young.He seems to be a terrible passer to me and I question his mental makeup. Did you see him mentally implode against KY?Were they? I don't recall anyone credible saying Corral was a 1st rounder, and nobody credible had Willis any higher than the Steelers pick. Richardson is a better prospect than either of those guys.Everyone but the NFL was high on Willis and Coral too. I'm not sure if AR will go in the 1st round or not, but I do know the Colts will not want a project, they want someone that will develop reasonably fast. If they want a project and "their guy" is not there at #4, then draft other needs at #4 and take Hooker in the 2nd round and sign another veteran as a stop gap until Hooker is ready. Whatever they do they shouldn't trade future draft capital to move up to #1. They have other needs (OL, WR, and safety) that can't be solved by a QB, whoever it is.It'll be interesting, because Ballard's history suggests he likes toolsy players, but Irsay likely wants a guy ready to go week 1. Steichen is a wild card. How much will he care about mobility as Hurts is a big reason he has a HC job? Or will he prefer something else entirely?I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.
I do think it'd be a major upset if Richardson fell lower than 12, and it wouldn't blow my mind if he were the 1st QB off the board. He's certainly got the highest ceiling, and all it takes is 1 team thinking they can develop him. Logic would suggest that its more likely to be by a HC or GM with job security.
If the Colts stay at #4, I think QB is probably 50-50. Probably would be teams wanting to jump into Arizona's spot at #3 to get ahead of Indy, and other than the Bears it makes more sense for the Cards to move down than anyone.
He has a very strong arm but I am not sure he throws a great deep ball. He can throw a pretty ball deep but the 3-4 game films I watched don't really suggest he was throwing his guys open 30+ yards down field.I see a guy who throws a great deep ball,
He has a very strong arm but I am not sure he throws a great deep ball. He can throw a pretty ball deep but the 3-4 game films I watched don't really suggest he was throwing his guys open 30+ yards down field.I see a guy who throws a great deep ball,
Considering those are low % throws to begin with I have trouble putting high 1st round value on a player that is wildly inconsistent (inaccurate) in the short to intermediate game, where the vast majority of passing action takes place in the NFL.
He has the kind of measurables that make coaches salivate for sure, but he is incredibly raw and wildly inconsistent. IMO he is just as likely to be a coach killer as a franchise savior.
If he ends up with the Giants or Chiefs I would have incredibly high hopes for him but I am not sure which other franchises have coaches in place who could turn this this guy into a consistent NFL QB.
All that being said, I think he is absolutely a worthwhile prospect in the late teens to early 2nd round.
Neither has anyone else. He hasn't played a lot. It's a concern. it's not a death sentence, but I would rather have three years of performance for people to look at.As I said, haven’t seen him play enough
We aren't even hearing THAT yet.Don't believe a word you hear from NFL coaches, GMs or scouts...or "sources" this time of year
He seems to be a terrible passer to me and I question his mental makeup. Did you see him mentally implode against KY?Were they? I don't recall anyone credible saying Corral was a 1st rounder, and nobody credible had Willis any higher than the Steelers pick. Richardson is a better prospect than either of those guys.Everyone but the NFL was high on Willis and Coral too. I'm not sure if AR will go in the 1st round or not, but I do know the Colts will not want a project, they want someone that will develop reasonably fast. If they want a project and "their guy" is not there at #4, then draft other needs at #4 and take Hooker in the 2nd round and sign another veteran as a stop gap until Hooker is ready. Whatever they do they shouldn't trade future draft capital to move up to #1. They have other needs (OL, WR, and safety) that can't be solved by a QB, whoever it is.It'll be interesting, because Ballard's history suggests he likes toolsy players, but Irsay likely wants a guy ready to go week 1. Steichen is a wild card. How much will he care about mobility as Hurts is a big reason he has a HC job? Or will he prefer something else entirely?I haven’t seen him 1.01 yet, but I’ve seen 2 with the Colts taking Levis at 1.04 & a couple with the Colts taking AR 1.04No f-n wayJust saw the first mock draft that had him going first overall (via a Bears trade with the Colts). Was kind of surprised at that. Think it was a CBS mock.
I don’t believe any of it.
I do think it'd be a major upset if Richardson fell lower than 12, and it wouldn't blow my mind if he were the 1st QB off the board. He's certainly got the highest ceiling, and all it takes is 1 team thinking they can develop him. Logic would suggest that its more likely to be by a HC or GM with job security.
If the Colts stay at #4, I think QB is probably 50-50. Probably would be teams wanting to jump into Arizona's spot at #3 to get ahead of Indy, and other than the Bears it makes more sense for the Cards to move down than anyone.
From what I’ve been reading from scouts/‘sperts, the issue isn’t his arm strength so much as his stubbornness.He has a very strong arm but I am not sure he throws a great deep ball. He can throw a pretty ball deep but the 3-4 game films I watched don't really suggest he was throwing his guys open 30+ yards down field.I see a guy who throws a great deep ball,
Considering those are low % throws to begin with I have trouble putting high 1st round value on a player that is wildly inconsistent (inaccurate) in the short to intermediate game, where the vast majority of passing action takes place in the NFL.
He has the kind of measurables that make coaches salivate for sure, but he is incredibly raw and wildly inconsistent. IMO he is just as likely to be a coach killer as a franchise savior.
If he ends up with the Giants or Chiefs I would have incredibly high hopes for him but I am not sure which other franchises have coaches in place who could turn this this guy into a consistent NFL QB.
All that being said, I think he is absolutely a worthwhile prospect in the late teens to early 2nd round.
Haven’t watched enough of Richardson’s film to form an opinion. But just glancing over his PFF profile:
Then the draft guide shows:
- Run Grade 84.8 7th/112 qualifying QBs
- Pass Grade 70.5 136th/269
For comparison, those last 4 for other QBs:
- Intermediate Passing 85.8
- Deep Passing 93.1
- No Pressure 84.5
- Pressure grade 41.9
As I said, haven’t seen him play enough. His 6 highest graded games were Utah (82.1), Tennessee (78.6), Eastern Washington (94.2), LSU (76.0), Texas A&M (86.2), and Vanderbilt (84.7).
- Young - 94.2-95.0-93.2-67.5
- Levis - 67.4-70.0-71.7-54.1
- Stroud - 75.3-94.2-92.9-43.9
edit - formatting
Hey, man, The Heatonist in Chelsea is out of all your products. I gotta check Brooklyn at some point, but probably better to use your site anyway.Take these all with a grain of salt, because I’ve only seen clips of his play and as such am an unreliable narrator, as they say.
Did you register a complaint?Hey, man, The Heatonist in Chelsea is out of all your products. I gotta check Brooklyn at some point, but probably better to use your site anyway.Take these all with a grain of salt, because I’ve only seen clips of his play and as such am an unreliable narrator, as they say.
I kicked over a table. They got the message.Did you register a complaint?
I saw this more than a few times in the 3-4 game films I watched.Like not even close - balls sailing 10-15 yards past the WR in a different postcode repeatedly.
Very biblicalI kicked over a table.
Yup. As a long suffering Raider fan as well, Richardson is a guy I am following very closely.Not a player I am looking forward to more at the combine. Just feels like every throw will unleash a fresh torrent of Twitter garbage. Really looking forward to that train wreck
As a fan of a team without a QB (sorry Stidham) QB workouts and such will be really fun to watch.
He seems more like JaMarcus Russell then Terrelle Pryor.Yup. As a long suffering Raider fan as well, Richardson is a guy I am following very closely.Not a player I am looking forward to more at the combine. Just feels like every throw will unleash a fresh torrent of Twitter garbage. Really looking forward to that train wreck
As a fan of a team without a QB (sorry Stidham) QB workouts and such will be really fun to watch.
The Terrell Pryor comparison feels closest to me. Pryor was more accurate, but not in his first season as a full time starter. And Pryor never got a fair shake as an NFL QB. I think, in today's NFL (only a dozen years removed from Pryor's time) Pryor would easily be a top 5 pick in most years and, relative to the 2023 class of QBs would be the unquestionable #1 pick.
The problem is Pryor played in ~39 college games for a team that went 33-6 during his tenure and he threw 783 passes over that span. Richardson has played in 19 games on a team that went 12-14 and has thrown 391 career passes. If he has Pryor level ability in the 2023 NFL, may be open to the Raiders taking him at 1.7. However the film I have watched makes me very skeptical he has Pryor's ability as a passer, based on college experience Pryor was a 65% passer in his final season at OSU, on 323 passes, with an 8.6 y/a.
It is a big assumption so suggest Richardson can make the soph to junior jump that Pryor did.
What about Richardson is similar to Russell? Russell was a 6-6 265 pounder who was completely immobile, Richardson is 6-4 230 and runs a 4.4.He seems more like JaMarcus Russell then Terrelle Pryor.Yup. As a long suffering Raider fan as well, Richardson is a guy I am following very closely.Not a player I am looking forward to more at the combine. Just feels like every throw will unleash a fresh torrent of Twitter garbage. Really looking forward to that train wreck
As a fan of a team without a QB (sorry Stidham) QB workouts and such will be really fun to watch.
The Terrell Pryor comparison feels closest to me. Pryor was more accurate, but not in his first season as a full time starter. And Pryor never got a fair shake as an NFL QB. I think, in today's NFL (only a dozen years removed from Pryor's time) Pryor would easily be a top 5 pick in most years and, relative to the 2023 class of QBs would be the unquestionable #1 pick.
The problem is Pryor played in ~39 college games for a team that went 33-6 during his tenure and he threw 783 passes over that span. Richardson has played in 19 games on a team that went 12-14 and has thrown 391 career passes. If he has Pryor level ability in the 2023 NFL, may be open to the Raiders taking him at 1.7. However the film I have watched makes me very skeptical he has Pryor's ability as a passer, based on college experience Pryor was a 65% passer in his final season at OSU, on 323 passes, with an 8.6 y/a.
It is a big assumption so suggest Richardson can make the soph to junior jump that Pryor did.
the combine, and ensuing hype, will be fascinating to watch.
The fact that several folks on YouTube & Twitter have said “he can throw 60 yards from his knees” as though that comes up a lot in games.What about Richardson is similar to Russell? Russell
I remember that being a Kyle Boller blurb back in the day.The fact that several folks on YouTube & Twitter have said “he can throw 60 yards from his knees” as though that comes up a lot in games.What about Richardson is similar to Russell? Russell
I think Jamarcus is a terrible comp. Jamarcus.was a statue in the pocket. Jamarcus had 79 yards rushing on 139 attempts in college. Jamarcus was a Drew Bledsoe clone without the work ethic.He seems more like JaMarcus Russell then Terrelle Pryor.Yup. As a long suffering Raider fan as well, Richardson is a guy I am following very closely.Not a player I am looking forward to more at the combine. Just feels like every throw will unleash a fresh torrent of Twitter garbage. Really looking forward to that train wreck
As a fan of a team without a QB (sorry Stidham) QB workouts and such will be really fun to watch.
The Terrell Pryor comparison feels closest to me. Pryor was more accurate, but not in his first season as a full time starter. And Pryor never got a fair shake as an NFL QB. I think, in today's NFL (only a dozen years removed from Pryor's time) Pryor would easily be a top 5 pick in most years and, relative to the 2023 class of QBs would be the unquestionable #1 pick.
The problem is Pryor played in ~39 college games for a team that went 33-6 during his tenure and he threw 783 passes over that span. Richardson has played in 19 games on a team that went 12-14 and has thrown 391 career passes. If he has Pryor level ability in the 2023 NFL, may be open to the Raiders taking him at 1.7. However the film I have watched makes me very skeptical he has Pryor's ability as a passer, based on college experience Pryor was a 65% passer in his final season at OSU, on 323 passes, with an 8.6 y/a.
It is a big assumption so suggest Richardson can make the soph to junior jump that Pryor did.
the combine, and ensuing hype, will be fascinating to watch.
See above: it was tongue in cheek.I think Jamarcus is a terrible comp. Jamarcus.was a statue in the pocket. Jamarcus had 79 yards rushing on 139 attempts in college. Jamarcus was a Drew Bledsoe clone without the work ethic.
…and wash it down with purple drank.You could have a blast just finding Richardson posts on social media and just keep commenting, "Getting major JaMarcus vibes here".
Be hilarious to have Raider fans and social justice warriors both going crazy. Maybe you can work animal lovers into the mix. "IF Richardson wins a playoff game, I will eat my kitten"
Didn't see the joke. My bad.See above: it was tongue in cheek.I think Jamarcus is a terrible comp. Jamarcus.was a statue in the pocket. Jamarcus had 79 yards rushing on 139 attempts in college. Jamarcus was a Drew Bledsoe clone without the work ethic.
The only comp is the hype that he “can throw 60 yards from his knees”, which was said over and over again about Jamarcus before the Raiders drafted him. It’s a nod to the hype he’s getting based on 1 attribute, while his significant warts are being glossed over to push him into 1st round consideration, which IMO would be a massive mistake.
It was not intended as a serious comp for ARich. Your Pryor comp was significantly better.
Jokes aside, I don’t think he will be as good as Terell Pryor could have been.
No, I should have made it more obvious. It was probably only funny in my head.Didn't see the joke. My bad.
That would be a serious mistake. It could ruin him. I've seen him mentally fall apart and that would most likely hurt him mentally.If he gets drafted in the first round (which he will) he's not sitting for years to "develop". That doesn't happen nowadays.
At worst he'll sit most of his rookie season playing in certain packages. If the team he's drafted to is out of playoff contention he'll be starting at the end of year 1.
If they aren't mentally tough enough to make mistakes and learn on the field they likely won't ever pan out. Better to find out early.
If a team is afraid he's gonna mentally fall apart when faced with adversity they won't draft him. You can't waste 2 years of a QB on their rookie deal if you invested a top 15 draft pick on them.That would be a serious mistake. It could ruin him. I've seen him mentally fall apart and that would most likely hurt him mentally.If he gets drafted in the first round (which he will) he's not sitting for years to "develop". That doesn't happen nowadays.
At worst he'll sit most of his rookie season playing in certain packages. If the team he's drafted to is out of playoff contention he'll be starting at the end of year 1.
If they aren't mentally tough enough to make mistakes and learn on the field they likely won't ever pan out. Better to find out early.
You can if you draft him in the 2nd or 3rd round.If a team is afraid he's gonna mentally fall apart when faced with adversity they won't draft him. You can't waste 2 years of a QB on their rookie deal if you invested a top 15 draft pick on them.That would be a serious mistake. It could ruin him. I've seen him mentally fall apart and that would most likely hurt him mentally.If he gets drafted in the first round (which he will) he's not sitting for years to "develop". That doesn't happen nowadays.
At worst he'll sit most of his rookie season playing in certain packages. If the team he's drafted to is out of playoff contention he'll be starting at the end of year 1.
If they aren't mentally tough enough to make mistakes and learn on the field they likely won't ever pan out. Better to find out early.
Good or bad he'll be starting by year 2 at the latest. Likely end of his rookie year if his team is out of contention.
Are we really judging him entirely based off the Kentucky game?That would be a serious mistake. It could ruin him. I've seen him mentally fall apart and that would most likely hurt him mentally.If he gets drafted in the first round (which he will) he's not sitting for years to "develop". That doesn't happen nowadays.
At worst he'll sit most of his rookie season playing in certain packages. If the team he's drafted to is out of playoff contention he'll be starting at the end of year 1.
If they aren't mentally tough enough to make mistakes and learn on the field they likely won't ever pan out. Better to find out early.
I guess CJ Stroud is garbage, because he played every bit as bad as Richardson did against Kentucky against a FAR worse Northwestern team, with FAR more talent around him.Are we really judging him entirely based off the Kentucky game?That would be a serious mistake. It could ruin him. I've seen him mentally fall apart and that would most likely hurt him mentally.If he gets drafted in the first round (which he will) he's not sitting for years to "develop". That doesn't happen nowadays.
At worst he'll sit most of his rookie season playing in certain packages. If the team he's drafted to is out of playoff contention he'll be starting at the end of year 1.
If they aren't mentally tough enough to make mistakes and learn on the field they likely won't ever pan out. Better to find out early.
By that standard it's too late because he's already ruined.
He has a very strong arm but I am not sure he throws a great deep ball. He can throw a pretty ball deep but the 3-4 game films I watched don't really suggest he was throwing his guys open 30+ yards down field.I see a guy who throws a great deep ball,
Considering those are low % throws to begin with I have trouble putting high 1st round value on a player that is wildly inconsistent (inaccurate) in the short to intermediate game, where the vast majority of passing action takes place in the NFL.
He has the kind of measurables that make coaches salivate for sure, but he is incredibly raw and wildly inconsistent. IMO he is just as likely to be a coach killer as a franchise savior.
If he ends up with the Giants or Chiefs I would have incredibly high hopes for him but I am not sure which other franchises have coaches in place who could turn this this guy into a consistent NFL QB.
All that being said, I think he is absolutely a worthwhile prospect in the late teens to early 2nd round.
Haven’t watched enough of Richardson’s film to form an opinion. But just glancing over his PFF profile:
Then the draft guide shows:
- Run Grade 84.8 7th/112 qualifying QBs
- Pass Grade 70.5 136th/269
For comparison, those last 4 for other QBs:
- Intermediate Passing 85.8
- Deep Passing 93.1
- No Pressure 84.5
- Pressure grade 41.9
As I said, haven’t seen him play enough. His 6 highest graded games were Utah (82.1), Tennessee (78.6), Eastern Washington (94.2), LSU (76.0), Texas A&M (86.2), and Vanderbilt (84.7).
- Young - 94.2-95.0-93.2-67.5
- Levis - 67.4-70.0-71.7-54.1
- Stroud - 75.3-94.2-92.9-43.9
edit - formatting
No, but it does show a lack of mental toughness and loss of composure. Is that teachable?Are we really judging him entirely based off the Kentucky game?That would be a serious mistake. It could ruin him. I've seen him mentally fall apart and that would most likely hurt him mentally.If he gets drafted in the first round (which he will) he's not sitting for years to "develop". That doesn't happen nowadays.
At worst he'll sit most of his rookie season playing in certain packages. If the team he's drafted to is out of playoff contention he'll be starting at the end of year 1.
If they aren't mentally tough enough to make mistakes and learn on the field they likely won't ever pan out. Better to find out early.
By that standard it's too late because he's already ruined.