What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Baker Mayfield, TB (4 Viewers)

Field Yates@FieldYates

It’s pretty crazy that between 2006-2016 there were 29 QBs taken in the first round and exactly zero of them are still with their original team.


I get the point, but its a strange timeframe - 2006-2016 - to use.  Yeah, it certainly is true that none of Vince Young, Matt Leinart or Jay Cutler are still playing for their original teams.

 
Mark my words, the Browns will not eat any of Mayfields salary.  They would rather Brock Osweiler him than do that.  

Someone will trade for him after a training camp injury at worst

 
Maybe I'm not reading the tea leaves but I'll be shocked (and disappointed) if the Lions take a QB in the first or second round. 
Agree. They have their “bridge guy”. They know they’re not a Super Bowl team, and Goff wildly exceeded expectations. I see no reason they’d draft a QB early this year. 

I’m starting to question whether there will be a 1st round QB this year. 

 
There is no deadline on this, either. 

The will gain that cap room, sure, but it's more important to carry that over to 2023. It's not like they need 18 mill in cap space this year to sign stud free agents. 

 
There is no deadline on this, either. 

The will gain that cap room, sure, but it's more important to carry that over to 2023. It's not like they need 18 mill in cap space this year to sign stud free agents. 
Yes the Browns are okay for 2022 even with Mayfield.   Next season is a different story but Mayfield won't be involved in that anyway.

 
Mark my words, the Browns will not eat any of Mayfields salary.  They would rather Brock Osweiler him than do that.  

Someone will trade for him after a training camp injury at worst
If they Osweiler him, then every team that can afford the contract should be interested regardless of what they have at QB. 

 
Is he really that bad?  I for one don't think so.  Not as good as Baker thinks he is, but he is talented.

CLE has him by the ****s.  And IMO they'd be smart to keep him almost up to the regular season.  He's a cap hit in all likelihood. And there's a chance Watson doesn't even play and they'd need Baker.  So I'd hold off until the DW situation becomes clearer.  Cause if DW can't play, Baker should be trying extremely hard to ensure interest in him next offseason.  And if DW can play, then maybe you move Baker just to get him out of the locker room

 
Is he really that bad?  I for one don't think so.  Not as good as Baker thinks he is, but he is talented.

CLE has him by the ****s.  And IMO they'd be smart to keep him almost up to the regular season.  He's a cap hit in all likelihood. And there's a chance Watson doesn't even play and they'd need Baker.  So I'd hold off until the DW situation becomes clearer.  Cause if DW can't play, Baker should be trying extremely hard to ensure interest in him next offseason.  And if DW can play, then maybe you move Baker just to get him out of the locker room
Baker isnt going be the good little soldier you think he would be here.  Zero chance

 
Baker isnt going be the good little soldier you think he would be here.  Zero chance
lmao - nope. Spot on here.  Dude went on a Twitter "goodbye cruel world, I've always loved you but never felt the love in return that I gave so freely unto you, which was my everything!" (paraphrasing, but basically same gist) rant when the Browns were merely *talking to* Watson. 

There's no way in hell he's gonna be a good soldier. Completely agree. 

And that rant, followed by his agent doubling down with the "irreconcilable differences" schtick likely soured him to many, many GMs and coaches, who were probably not all that sweet on him to begin with. 

At this rate, Seattle will get him + a pick + CLE eating 60% of his salary just to take him off their hands. 

ETA: The more I think about it, the more I believe Carroll might just roll into 2022 with Drew Lock hoping for a high draft pick in 2023. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Craig_MiamiFL said:
It'd be absolutely marvelous if Baker and Darnold were in Carolina together. For a cool combined $40 something million

:lmao:


yeah...I'm thinking rookie QB in Carolina.

Bracie Smathers said:
And the worst would be?

Worst would be a QB with the 2nd pick of the draft?  Second worst would be taking a QB in the 2nd round as that scenario would make taking a QB in 2023 less likely and place the Lions in QB limbo for a few years.  It would be much easier to move-on from Mayfield and I think his value as a tradeable asset would increase.

I think that the Lions taking a QB high in this draft is a real possibility.  


Mayfield only has one year left on his contract.  He will have less value as time moves on.  Who's going to trade a decent pick for a one year rental.  I suspect someone will like Mayfield and make the trade with a contract extension in place.

 
Mayfield only has one year left on his contract.  He will have less value as time moves on.  Who's going to trade a decent pick for a one year rental.  I suspect someone will like Mayfield and make the trade with a contract extension in place.
An 18+ million dollar rental. :o  

 
If Baker cant fetch ANY pick, then none of the QBs should go in the 1st round this year.

I am happily trading a 5th or whatever for Baker and using my 1st elsewhere

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mayfield and Minschew and maybe Wilson make the case that QBs should not play when they are not fully healthy.  Those seasons are career killers.  

 
Still no arm strength for a pro quarterback. 

Year Two was a disaster. He was fully healthy. I rostered him so I watched him nearly every week. It was...terrible. He played his way out of a new contract with that year. 

maybe Wilson
Russ is going to get exactly what he wants. Everybody knows it was his finger last year. The only question is whether or not it has healed all the way. 

 
Still no arm strength for a pro quarterback. 

Year Two was a disaster. He was fully healthy. I rostered him so I watched him nearly every week. It was...terrible. He played his way out of a new contract with that year. 

Russ is going to get exactly what he wants. Everybody knows it was his finger last year. The only question is whether or not it has healed all the way. 


Year 2 has to be a huge pass for Baker.  Nobody was doing well with that coaching fiasco

 
Russ is going to get exactly what he wants. Everybody knows it was his finger last year. The only question is whether or not it has healed all the way. 
Agree in general, but I have a couple of non finger-related questions, mostly about his legs, and whether he can transition to more of a pocket passer. I don’t think he has the same escapability as he once did, and it hurt his overall numbers.

That said, that Seattle OL left a lot to be desired. 

 
An 18+ million dollar rental. :o  
By QB standards, that isn't really all that much. Teddy Bridgewater made more than that, and guys like Goff, Wentz, and Garoppolo cost 15, 14, and 10 million more respectively. Mayfield is probably better or at least has more potential than any of those guys.

3 strong seasons followed by one very bad season

definitely worth a third rounder…maybe more 
I wouldn't call Mayfield's 2nd season strong, but it was acceptable under the circumstances. Last year deserves a pass. I just find it weird how last year somehow seems to carry more weight than 2020.

Even beyond Mayfield being hurt, the Browns were all kinds of banged up. Chubb/Hunt both missed time. They were on their 5th string OT at one point. They just were a mediocre team, and even if they'd had Watson a year ago, they weren't going anywhere. 

If Baker cant fetch ANY pick, then none of the QBs should go in the 1st round this year.

I am happily trading a 5th or whatever for Baker and using my 1st elsewhere
I'd agree with this. I don't hate this class as much as some do, and I think Willis and Howell have enough upside, that they should be 1st rounders, that said, I'd rather have Mayfield.

100% I'd rather deal a day 3 pick for Mayfield than draft a guy. I also think its silly to "tank" for the 2023 class. No guarantees that class is better. What if Bryce Young suffers a major injury, or CJ Stroud regresses a ton without Wilson/Olave? Or any other number of things that could happen.

I mean, this time a year ago, most people were expecting the 2022 draft class to be headlined by Spencer Rattler, and Aidan Hutchinson was a borderline 1st round prospect.

 
With 0 interest in Baker, the shark move seems to be to keep him on the roster as insurance for Watson.  I not sure if anyone would even give a fifth round pick for him at this point.

 
With 0 interest in Baker, the shark move seems to be to keep him on the roster as insurance for Watson.  I not sure if anyone would even give a fifth round pick for him at this point.
The fact that he hasn't been traded yet doesnt mean there is "zero interest".

Theres a lot to hash out still with his contract, draft prep........

Ton of time left before anything realistically needs to happen

 
ghostguy123 said:
Baker isnt going be the good little soldier you think he would be here.  Zero chance
Agreed, and the funny thing is, that would be the best thing for his rep. Say Watson gets suspended for a bunch of games as expected. Baker could then be the good soldier and if he comes in and plays well, he raises his stock, both as a player and as a locker room team guy, but I don't think that mentality is in his DNA.  He would rather pout and show himself to be the immature tool that he truly is. 

 
Panthers just cleared almost 6 million dollars restructuring CMC. That means he's not getting traded, and it gives them more than enough space to afford Mayfield's contract, if they so desire.

 
Panthers just cleared almost 6 million dollars restructuring CMC. That means he's not getting traded, and it gives them more than enough space to afford Mayfield's contract, if they so desire.
Twitter reports are that there is "mutual disinterest" between the two parties. It was actually funny reporting, but it didn't sound sanguineous for Baker's chances of going to Carolina. 

 
He is still recovering from surgery so he can't participate in any off-season work.  He is 'scheduled' to come back in the July/August time frame.  He is ahead of Jimmy-G's recovery who isn't scheduled back until after the season begins.

Baker won't go now, ahead of the draft.  After the draft music plays and teams are left without a QB another window opens.  Then after he's completed his rehab from surgery, another window opens.  Then a window opens if/when a starter goes down. 

The two least likely way it could play out.

1. The Browns cut him and eat his entire salary and let him go anywhere he wants since Pittsburgh has been interested.  Extremely unlikely, they'd keep him on the roster and deactivate him instead of allowing that to happen.

2. The Browns keep him as starter insurance when Watson gets suspended.  This is the least-likely scenario since that ship has sailed. 

Can't see anything happening for a while.  I don't expect anything other than bluster until late summer.

 
1. The Browns cut him and eat his entire salary and let him go anywhere he wants since Pittsburgh has been interested.  Extremely unlikely, they'd keep him on the roster and deactivate him instead of allowing that to happen.
Aside from an SI opinion piece that speculated the Steelers would "pounce" on Mayfield if he was released I haven't read or heard anything that says there is interest on the part of the Steelers (or Mayfield for that matter).

To me it makes absolutely no sense.  The Steelers brought in Trubisky as the bridge QB and have Rudolph and Haskins signed for 2022.  There is still a very good chance they'll draft a QB this year or next.   I am not sure why they would they want to complicate the situation by bringing in yet another QB into the mix, especially one that is coming off a bad year, offseason surgery and supposed maturity issues.

Also I am not sure why Baker would want to sign with the Steelers unless he was going to be the starter and I can't see that being guaranteed or even likely.  It would be a good "up yours" move to the Browns going to the rival Steelers but does Mayfield want to be standing on the sideline holding the clipboard for Trubisky?

 
To me it makes absolutely no sense.  The Steelers brought in Trubisky as the bridge QB and have Rudolph and Haskins signed for 2022.  There is still a very good chance they'll draft a QB this year or next.   I am not sure why they would they want to complicate the situation by bringing in yet another QB into the mix, especially one that is coming off a bad year, offseason surgery and supposed maturity issues.


Mayfield >>>>>> Trubisky, Rudolph, Haskins, 2022 rookie QBs....imo.

 
Aside from an SI opinion piece that speculated the Steelers would "pounce" on Mayfield if he was released I haven't read or heard anything that says there is interest on the part of the Steelers (or Mayfield for that matter).

To me it makes absolutely no sense.  The Steelers brought in Trubisky as the bridge QB and have Rudolph and Haskins signed for 2022.  There is still a very good chance they'll draft a QB this year or next.   I am not sure why they would they want to complicate the situation by bringing in yet another QB into the mix, especially one that is coming off a bad year, offseason surgery and supposed maturity issues.

Also I am not sure why Baker would want to sign with the Steelers unless he was going to be the starter and I can't see that being guaranteed or even likely.  It would be a good "up yours" move to the Browns going to the rival Steelers but does Mayfield want to be standing on the sideline holding the clipboard for Trubisky?
In an open competition that would have very little chance of happening. There is a huge drop off from Mayfield to Trubisky, bigger than the drop off (if there even is one) from Trubisky to Haskins/Rudolph.

That being said, I do think the Steelers seem pretty likely to draft a 1st round QB. 

 
News to me.  I did a Google search and don't see any credible source stating the Steelers are interested in Baker Mayfield.
Tony Serino of AFC North Talk had been on it since last season.  I've seen/heard other Steeler sources before yesterday.  Serino is credible IMHO but I've seen the same thing long  before the 'story broke'.  #oldnews to me

 
If ATL signed Mariota after Watson was signed (i think that is right?)..... ooooof on the "interest" in Baker.

Cowherd reported one team was demanding to be GIVEN draft picks to take Baker.

 
Tony Serino of AFC North Talk had been on it since last season.  I've seen/heard other Steeler sources before yesterday.  Serino is credible IMHO but I've seen the same thing long  before the 'story broke'.  #oldnews to me
I don't normally listen to the guy but if he "broke" the story last season he was smoking dope.

 
I don't normally listen to the guy but if he "broke" the story last season he was smoking dope.
Broke? 

He was speculating BEFORE the season began and kept on-it and ramped it up months ago right after the season when that chat goes into hibernation.  Broke the story?  The story IS speculation.  If you consider speculation BREAKING the story then yeah, he broke it long before anyone else.  

 
Broke? 

He was speculating BEFORE the season began and kept on-it and ramped it up months ago right after the season when that chat goes into hibernation.  Broke the story?  The story IS speculation.  If you consider speculation BREAKING the story then yeah, he broke it long before anyone else.  


I was just using your words:  "Serino is credible IMHO but I've seen the same thing long  before the 'story broke'."

For me this is a complete non-story.  The Steelers are not going to sign Baker Mayfield and even if they wanted to Mayfield would not agree to the terms the Steelers would offer.

The whole thing is silly.

 
Brunell4MVP said:
Is he really that bad?  I for one don't think so.  Not as good as Baker thinks he is, but he is talented.

CLE has him by the ****s.  And IMO they'd be smart to keep him almost up to the regular season.  He's a cap hit in all likelihood. And there's a chance Watson doesn't even play and they'd need Baker.  So I'd hold off until the DW situation becomes clearer.  Cause if DW can't play, Baker should be trying extremely hard to ensure interest in him next offseason.  And if DW can play, then maybe you move Baker just to get him out of the locker room
Here's a name I haven't see in a while, waddup Brunell?

-I am going to put a thread up on Baker, his numbers are actually pretty good 2 of his first 3 seasons, QBR around 95 which is higher than many other starting QBs around the league. Baker has limitations as well but I think a fresh start somewhere other than Cleveland is a good idea for him. It would be better if he could land somewhere that has a decent team already. 

 
OK, whatever.  I had heard it long before 'it' became a story and from a source we both deem credible.  

Now, think about WHY the Steelers would leak this?  Think hard because it makes sense.  Wondering if you can figure it out.




This is what I am reading:   

"According to Cleveland Browns reporter Mary Kay Cabot, if the Browns release quarterback Baker Mayfield, the Pittsburgh Steelers would be one of the first teams to try to sign him. Cabot was on the Orange and Brown Talk podcast and in her words, the Steelers would “pounce” on the opportunity. This is via Sports Illustrated."

https://www.si.com/nfl/2022/03/22/steelers-baker-mayfield-free-agent-rumors-browns-deshaun-watson

I don't see Cabot claiming anyone associated with the Steelers as her source.  In fact she doesn't claim a source at all - it appears to be her opinion on a Browns radio broadcast.  It is a pretty big leap to say the Steelers leaked anything based on this. 

If you have a link showing Cabot, Serino or anyone else claiming to have a source on the Steelers having expressed an interest in Baker Mayfield I would love to see it. 

 
If you have a link showing Cabot, Serino or anyone else claiming to have a source on the Steelers having expressed an interest in Baker Mayfield I would love to see it. 
Dude, take a pill with the over-the-top aggressiveness.  Seriously, chill.

The 'story' IS speculation and I'm assuming you know what that means so 'the story', i.e., SPECULATION was being 'reported' by Serino for months and months.  

Now figure out why this got leaked because MKC doesn't 'report' this without it being fed to her.  Now I doubt you can figure it out when it is pretty obvious IMHO.

 
Statistics don't back up the Mayfield >>>>>> Trubisky argument but even if they did the Steelers are not going to sign Baker Mayfield.  
I mean, that is a crazy amount of greater than signs. Maybe it should be more like Mayfield>>Trubisky?

That said, Mayfield is clearly better. Trubisky has a better comp% and fewer INT's, which is because he's incapable of throwing the ball more than 15 yards downfield. Mayfield wins in literally every other category, and by a lot in things like YPA, PFF grade, QBR, and YPG. Trubisky has also had a better team around him for the most part. 

I agree its not likely the Steelers end up with Mayfield, they seem far more likely to draft a guy at #20, or even trade up. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top