FarFromHome
Footballguy
I will say that all the haters have to toe to line to Purdy being good if he beats Mahomes today.
Mr. Irrelevant leads his team to the NFC Championship his first season and to the Super Bowl the next. You Niners fans are going to win the big one with him eventually.
I get what you're saying, but will counter a bit with I think SF throws the ball more in 2024. Purdy will have a full training camp and a year under his belt as the undisputed starter. He was coming off the injury last camp and there were questions if he would be ready to go. No such questions this year. Also think Shanahan fully trusts Purdy at this point and will open up the offense as a result. Plus, he shouldn't beat up CMC as much this year. McCaffrey is the kind of back who can excel into the age 30 realm if they monitor his touches a bit more.I may be way off on this, but I think Purdy is going to be over drafted fantasy-wise. Last year, his efficiency was way up there. He finished 20th in pass attempts, yet was 5th in passing yards and 3rd in passing yards. Of his pass attempts, 7.1% were TDs, which led the league by a fair margin (Dak was 2nd at 6.1%).
Not to say Purdy isn't an outstanding NFL QB - obviously he is. But with very little rushing floor, I'm not sure that his fantasy stats will follow as much again, even if he continues be a top-tier NFL QB.
You could be right, although I'm always a bit hesitant relying on fantasy production from guys that don't use their legs much. From a passing standpoint, you need either massive efficiency like Purdy had, or a bombs away offense like a Cousins has typically had.I get what you're saying, but will counter a bit with I think SF throws the ball more in 2024. Purdy will have a full training camp and a year under his belt as the undisputed starter. He was coming off the injury last camp and there were questions if he would be ready to go. No such questions this year. Also think Shanahan fully trusts Purdy at this point and will open up the offense as a result. Plus, he shouldn't beat up CMC as much this year. McCaffrey is the kind of back who can excel into the age 30 realm if they monitor his touches a bit more.I may be way off on this, but I think Purdy is going to be over drafted fantasy-wise. Last year, his efficiency was way up there. He finished 20th in pass attempts, yet was 5th in passing yards and 3rd in passing yards. Of his pass attempts, 7.1% were TDs, which led the league by a fair margin (Dak was 2nd at 6.1%).
Not to say Purdy isn't an outstanding NFL QB - obviously he is. But with very little rushing floor, I'm not sure that his fantasy stats will follow as much again, even if he continues be a top-tier NFL QB.
Agree, but Purdy is being drafted in the 10-12 range from what I've seen. I think that's about right for the reasons I stated. He won't throw as much as other QBs, but I think he will throw more than 2023 and his efficiency should continue to be high in a Shanahan offense. I also suspect they add another WR in round 1 or 2 as they prepare for Deebo leaving next year (I think Aiyuk stays).You could be right, although I'm always a bit hesitant relying on fantasy production from guys that don't use their legs much. From a passing standpoint, you need either massive efficiency like Purdy had, or a bombs away offense like a Cousins has typically had.I get what you're saying, but will counter a bit with I think SF throws the ball more in 2024. Purdy will have a full training camp and a year under his belt as the undisputed starter. He was coming off the injury last camp and there were questions if he would be ready to go. No such questions this year. Also think Shanahan fully trusts Purdy at this point and will open up the offense as a result. Plus, he shouldn't beat up CMC as much this year. McCaffrey is the kind of back who can excel into the age 30 realm if they monitor his touches a bit more.I may be way off on this, but I think Purdy is going to be over drafted fantasy-wise. Last year, his efficiency was way up there. He finished 20th in pass attempts, yet was 5th in passing yards and 3rd in passing yards. Of his pass attempts, 7.1% were TDs, which led the league by a fair margin (Dak was 2nd at 6.1%).
Not to say Purdy isn't an outstanding NFL QB - obviously he is. But with very little rushing floor, I'm not sure that his fantasy stats will follow as much again, even if he continues be a top-tier NFL QB.
I think the team will put more of a burden on him this year for the reason you state. Also, they need to figure out if he's a guy worth paying $50m/year to, so I think they'll want some more data on what he can do when the team is relying on him more and less on his playmakers. They may not have a choice in that regard as CMC, Kittle, and Deebo are all safe bets to miss more time this year than they did last year.This might be a bit bold, but I think Brock Purdy is going to continue to exceed expectations. I think SF keeps upping his passing workload as they get more and more confident in him, and while he's not gonna be throwing among the league leaders, I also don't expect him to be near the bottom in attempts either. League average, with his efficiency, is gonna lead to some strong results.
Right now, I have Purdy QB6, and I think he's a sneaky bet to lead the NFL in TD passes.
Pass attempts (and tds) in 2023:I think the efficiency has to come back to earth to an extent. He's been unholy.
Last year
Nearly 10 yards/attempt.
A TD on 7% of his passes
Patrick Mahommes: TD on 4.5% of passes.
Josh Allen: TD on 5% of passes
Dak was closer at 6.1%.
I'm certainly not here to tear him down or say he's just a game manager.Pass attempts (and tds) in 2023:I think the efficiency has to come back to earth to an extent. He's been unholy.
Last year
Nearly 10 yards/attempt.
A TD on 7% of his passes
Patrick Mahommes: TD on 4.5% of passes.
Josh Allen: TD on 5% of passes
Dak was closer at 6.1%.
Mahomes 597 (27 tds)
Prescott 590 (36 tds)
Allen 579 (29 tds)
Purdy 444 (31 tds)
Only Prescott (36 tds) and Love (32 tds on 579 attempts) had more TD passes than Purdy. That is pretty wild.
Not bad for a game manager that is only good because of his supporting cast.![]()
I'm certainly not here to tear him down or say he's just a game manager.Pass attempts (and tds) in 2023:I think the efficiency has to come back to earth to an extent. He's been unholy.
Last year
Nearly 10 yards/attempt.
A TD on 7% of his passes
Patrick Mahommes: TD on 4.5% of passes.
Josh Allen: TD on 5% of passes
Dak was closer at 6.1%.
Mahomes 597 (27 tds)
Prescott 590 (36 tds)
Allen 579 (29 tds)
Purdy 444 (31 tds)
Only Prescott (36 tds) and Love (32 tds on 579 attempts) had more TD passes than Purdy. That is pretty wild.
Not bad for a game manager that is only good because of his supporting cast.![]()
I do think it speaks more to being an outlier than where he'll be his entire career. I don't think he can continue to throw more TD's on less passes than Mahommes, Allen, etc.
My game manager comment wasn't directed towards you, it was more toward the general consensus of the non believers.I'm certainly not here to tear him down or say he's just a game manager.Pass attempts (and tds) in 2023:I think the efficiency has to come back to earth to an extent. He's been unholy.
Last year
Nearly 10 yards/attempt.
A TD on 7% of his passes
Patrick Mahommes: TD on 4.5% of passes.
Josh Allen: TD on 5% of passes
Dak was closer at 6.1%.
Mahomes 597 (27 tds)
Prescott 590 (36 tds)
Allen 579 (29 tds)
Purdy 444 (31 tds)
Only Prescott (36 tds) and Love (32 tds on 579 attempts) had more TD passes than Purdy. That is pretty wild.
Not bad for a game manager that is only good because of his supporting cast.![]()
I do think it speaks more to being an outlier than where he'll be his entire career. I don't think he can continue to throw more TD's on less passes than Mahommes, Allen, etc.
Very possible, he will need Aiyuk to settle in order to achieve this though.2024 league MVP.
One WR won't make the difference. Someone else will step up.Very possible, he will need Aiyuk to settle in order to achieve this though.2024 league MVP.
I am on the side of Aiyuk makes a difference. It may not show due to him not being the typically heavily targeted WR1, but him and Purdy have a good chemistry and I think the results would be negatively impacted if he is not on the field. Hopefully a non-issue come week one.One WR won't make the difference. Someone else will step up.Very possible, he will need Aiyuk to settle in order to achieve this though.2024 league MVP.
Agreed. I have Purdy in dynasty and I would 100% be substantially more confident in Purdy for fantasy this season as soon as this Aiyuk business gets behind us.I am on the side of Aiyuk makes a difference. It may not show due to him not being the typically heavily targeted WR1, but him and Purdy have a good chemistry and I think the results would be negatively impacted if he is not on the field. Hopefully a non-issue come week one.One WR won't make the difference. Someone else will step up.Very possible, he will need Aiyuk to settle in order to achieve this though.2024 league MVP.
And this is why Matt Ryan shouldn’t have been the MVP that year. Because the stats were more about the system than about him.2016 Matt Ryan with Shanahan 373/534 for 4944, 9.26 per attempt, 38 TD 7 INT.
This is what Shanahan does. There is no "back to Earth", "regression" or "outlier".
2021 noodle armed Jimmy G. 15 games 301/441. 8.64 per attempt 20 TD to 12 INT.
Only QB with a per higher attempt was Joe Burrow with 8.81
2022 Jimmy G(11 games) goes below 8.0 in yards per(7.91) with 4 starters above 8.0
Mahomes(8.1), Tua(8.87), Hurts(8.05)P, and Purdy(8.08), 9 games first year starting.
Does 9+ yards per repeat? doubtful. 8+ per attempt is the "norm" for Shanahan with
only a handful of other QB's doing it.
How do you quantify that, though? Realistically, isn’t every “system” that a MVP-caliber quarterback is in “good” for that player? I mean, the Ravens have catered their whole offense around Lamar’s unique skill set.And this is why Matt Ryan shouldn’t have been the MVP that year. Because the stats were more about the system than about him.2016 Matt Ryan with Shanahan 373/534 for 4944, 9.26 per attempt, 38 TD 7 INT.
This is what Shanahan does. There is no "back to Earth", "regression" or "outlier".
2021 noodle armed Jimmy G. 15 games 301/441. 8.64 per attempt 20 TD to 12 INT.
Only QB with a per higher attempt was Joe Burrow with 8.81
2022 Jimmy G(11 games) goes below 8.0 in yards per(7.91) with 4 starters above 8.0
Mahomes(8.1), Tua(8.87), Hurts(8.05)P, and Purdy(8.08), 9 games first year starting.
Does 9+ yards per repeat? doubtful. 8+ per attempt is the "norm" for Shanahan with
only a handful of other QB's doing it.
Except Favre who never met a system he couldn't ignore.ALL QB's are system QB's
Do you think that's too low, too high or is that where you think he belongs? Seems about where he belongs to me.Guy gets no respect. Locked in at QB11/12 of the board.
I might pull the trigger a smidge higher than that but I think I'm in one of those leagues where he won't fall that far. I lucked into him last year behind Burrows but he's out into the light now.Do you think that's too low, too high or is that where you think he belongs? Seems about where he belongs to me.Guy gets no respect. Locked in at QB11/12 of the board.
I think that's a little low. I have a hard time putting Murray and Richardson in front of him. It's not so where where he's ranked, it's that there's little variance in where he's drafted. Guys like Love, Dak, Burrow, Richardson, and Stroud are all over the map in the order they are drafted. It's strange you don't see that with Purdy.Do you think that's too low, too high or is that where you think he belongs? Seems about where he belongs to me.Guy gets no respect. Locked in at QB11/12 of the board.
Personally I have Love, Dak & Burrow over Purdy with little question. Too much history of production and receiving talent. Love is a bigger question but he appears to be the real deal and absolutely the focal point of that offense. Adding Jacobs is pretty much a push over A.Jones IMO, I don't see LaFleur suddenly becoming a true ground'n'pound coach.I think that's a little low. I have a hard time putting Murray and Richardson in front of him. It's not so where where he's ranked, it's that there's little variance in where he's drafted. Guys like Love, Dak, Burrow, Richardson, and Stroud are all over the map in the order they are drafted. It's strange you don't see that with Purdy.Do you think that's too low, too high or is that where you think he belongs? Seems about where he belongs to me.Guy gets no respect. Locked in at QB11/12 of the board.
What I find so interesting that you can find people who will put most of these guys in the top 5, but not Purdy. From FBG high rank:Personally I have Love, Dak & Burrow over Purdy with little question. Too much history of production and receiving talent. Love is a bigger question but he appears to be the real deal and absolutely the focal point of that offense. Adding Jacobs is pretty much a push over A.Jones IMO, I don't see LaFleur suddenly becoming a true ground'n'pound coach.I think that's a little low. I have a hard time putting Murray and Richardson in front of him. It's not so where where he's ranked, it's that there's little variance in where he's drafted. Guys like Love, Dak, Burrow, Richardson, and Stroud are all over the map in the order they are drafted. It's strange you don't see that with Purdy.Do you think that's too low, too high or is that where you think he belongs? Seems about where he belongs to me.Guy gets no respect. Locked in at QB11/12 of the board.
Stroud obviously has a short history but, again, the offense really seems to run through him and adding Diggs gives him an amazing receiving corps.
I want to put Richardson over Purdy but it's a total coin toss. Richardson clearly has QB1, and #1 fantasy player overall upside. His per play production was ridiculous. But, his injury history dating back to high school is terrible, like epically bad. Guarantee 17 from him (obviously impossible) and I'll take him #1 overall in my SF league.
There is zero chance Purdy has Richardson's upside. I doubt he has 40 TD upside, let alone 45+, which a #1 overall player at the QB position needs in a SF league. Even if Aiyuk gets signed immediately after I hit "Post Reply".
On my draft day, Saturday of Labor Day weekend, they will likely go off the board near each other (Stroud, Richardson & Purdy. I take Love above all of them right now) and it will absolutely come down to risk appetite.
ATM, with the Aiyuk situation unresolved, I probably go with Stroud, Richardson, Purdy.
My top #5-ish QBs...okay more like those I unquestionably ahead of Purdy...?What I find so interesting that you can find people who will put most of these guys in the top 5, but not Purdy. From FBG high rank:Personally I have Love, Dak & Burrow over Purdy with little question. Too much history of production and receiving talent. Love is a bigger question but he appears to be the real deal and absolutely the focal point of that offense. Adding Jacobs is pretty much a push over A.Jones IMO, I don't see LaFleur suddenly becoming a true ground'n'pound coach.I think that's a little low. I have a hard time putting Murray and Richardson in front of him. It's not so where where he's ranked, it's that there's little variance in where he's drafted. Guys like Love, Dak, Burrow, Richardson, and Stroud are all over the map in the order they are drafted. It's strange you don't see that with Purdy.Do you think that's too low, too high or is that where you think he belongs? Seems about where he belongs to me.Guy gets no respect. Locked in at QB11/12 of the board.
Stroud obviously has a short history but, again, the offense really seems to run through him and adding Diggs gives him an amazing receiving corps.
I want to put Richardson over Purdy but it's a total coin toss. Richardson clearly has QB1, and #1 fantasy player overall upside. His per play production was ridiculous. But, his injury history dating back to high school is terrible, like epically bad. Guarantee 17 from him (obviously impossible) and I'll take him #1 overall in my SF league.
There is zero chance Purdy has Richardson's upside. I doubt he has 40 TD upside, let alone 45+, which a #1 overall player at the QB position needs in a SF league. Even if Aiyuk gets signed immediately after I hit "Post Reply".
On my draft day, Saturday of Labor Day weekend, they will likely go off the board near each other (Stroud, Richardson & Purdy. I take Love above all of them right now) and it will absolutely come down to risk appetite.
ATM, with the Aiyuk situation unresolved, I probably go with Stroud, Richardson, Purdy.
Purdy - 10
Dak - 2
Burrow - 3
Richardson - 2
Stroud - 5
Murray - 5
Love - 5
Daniels - 10
Lawrence - 5
Williams - 9
He had 33 total TDs last season (31 pass, 2 rush). If he takes a step this season, 40 total TDs isn't that far fetched IMO.I doubt he has 40 TD upside
Get Aiyuk on the field and we'll talk.He had 33 total TDs last season (31 pass, 2 rush). If he takes a step this season, 40 total TDs isn't that far fetched IMO.I doubt he has 40 TD upside