$0 incentive for Watson to so thatAchilles is brutal.
Can the browns do an injury settlement?
Best thing he can do is ride off into the sunset. Or just sit a couple years.I wonder how much motivation there is to work your *** off in rehab to come back and not be good, for a franchise that doesn’t want you and a fanbase that hates you, media guaranteed to pick you apart etc etc etc (all justified imo but regardless). If you can medically retire and take the money and disappear to no longer be a public figure…seems like it might be best for everyone idk
If you are only viewing it through the lense of money, sure$0 incentive for Watson to so thatAchilles is brutal.
Can the browns do an injury settlement?
Tonya Harding was the culprit to Nancy.If he tries to come back next year they’re gonna Nancy Kerrigan his ###Odd. Rodgers was in game 1 but Cousins was injured around game 6 if memory serves. This says to me that he has a good chance to play next year if the Browns want him to.Unless he retires and gives some money back (lol, good luck with that), Cleveland will likely have to carry him on IR next year and cut him in 2026 because of that massive dead money next year. Assuming that’s an Achilles tear, he likely won’t be ready to start 2025 anyway.
Can potentially restructure him in some way to work around the cap hits in ‘26 & ‘27. Supposedly since he settled his most recent allegation, the alleged victim won’t cooperate with the NFL so the odds of him getting suspended again and voiding his remaining guarantees doesn’t look likely.
What's the other angle? Releasing him early and eating some $ isn't viable because no one else is signing him.If you are only viewing it through the lense of money, sure$0 incentive for Watson to so thatAchilles is brutal.
Can the browns do an injury settlement?
From Watson's perspectiveWhat's the other angle? Releasing him early and eating some $ isn't viable because no one else is signing him.If you are only viewing it through the lense of money, sure$0 incentive for Watson to so thatAchilles is brutal.
Can the browns do an injury settlement?
So he's just gonna donate some money cause my bad?From Watson's perspectiveWhat's the other angle? Releasing him early and eating some $ isn't viable because no one else is signing him.If you are only viewing it through the lense of money, sure$0 incentive for Watson to so thatAchilles is brutal.
Can the browns do an injury settlement?
What other lens would Watson view it through? I mean, last year it seemed potentially he may have been mailing it in but "rust" was a plausible excuse. This year it seems obvious he just has zero desire to be on the field and only wants to cash a paycheck. Frankly, I imagine he would be grateful if he had a season ending achilles. One season closer to realizing the entire value of his contract without overtly looking like he quit before the trade happened.If you are only viewing it through the lense of money, sure$0 incentive for Watson to so thatAchilles is brutal.
Can the browns do an injury settlement?
Sign her as Cleveland’s emergency qb3 thenTonya Harding was the culprit to Nancy.If he tries to come back next year they’re gonna Nancy Kerrigan his ###Odd. Rodgers was in game 1 but Cousins was injured around game 6 if memory serves. This says to me that he has a good chance to play next year if the Browns want him to.Unless he retires and gives some money back (lol, good luck with that), Cleveland will likely have to carry him on IR next year and cut him in 2026 because of that massive dead money next year. Assuming that’s an Achilles tear, he likely won’t be ready to start 2025 anyway.
Can potentially restructure him in some way to work around the cap hits in ‘26 & ‘27. Supposedly since he settled his most recent allegation, the alleged victim won’t cooperate with the NFL so the odds of him getting suspended again and voiding his remaining guarantees doesn’t look likely.
apparently the offense functioned as intended.Couldn't do it due to the salary cap, now may be able to with relief from insurance. It'll never come out, but this is one of the primary reasons he kept starting.Well they should have done that a while ago. What makes anybody think the owner will go for it a year from now?Gotta pay him, but at least they can officially move on.Contract is fully guaranteed. Cleveland has no outs. Think they have insurance for time missed.Do you think they're doubling down on Watson for '25? Is Cleveland locked into that? I can't imagine the fan base's reaction to that if Watson's play doesn't 360I’d think the opposite. They don’t want Jameis active as possible competition for Watson.Cleveland promoted Thompson-Robinson to QB2 over Jameis. This news and the trading of Cooper make it seem like they are inches away from calling the Watson experiment over
I'd rush to your waivers and pick up Thompson in your superflex leagues if you have roster space
They’re doubling down on Watson being the unquestioned starter.
And the Browns give up a kick return TD as I type this.
I pretty sure Giants fans said similar things about Daniel Jones but mysteriously he is still starting.If Deshaun plays ball, and there's no reason he shouldn't, the Browns will milk this, as they should, cause he's never playing a down for this team again.Odd. Rodgers was in game 1 but Cousins was injured around game 6 if memory serves. This says to me that he has a good chance to play next year if the Browns want him to.Unless he retires and gives some money back (lol, good luck with that), Cleveland will likely have to carry him on IR next year and cut him in 2026 because of that massive dead money next year. Assuming that’s an Achilles tear, he likely won’t be ready to start 2025 anyway.
Can potentially restructure him in some way to work around the cap hits in ‘26 & ‘27. Supposedly since he settled his most recent allegation, the alleged victim won’t cooperate with the NFL so the odds of him getting suspended again and voiding his remaining guarantees doesn’t look likely.
Jimmy has a new stadium to pitch and tickets to sell. That ain't happening if Groper Cleveland returns.I pretty sure Giants fans said similar things about Daniel Jones but mysteriously he is still starting.If Deshaun plays ball, and there's no reason he shouldn't, the Browns will milk this, as they should, cause he's never playing a down for this team again.Odd. Rodgers was in game 1 but Cousins was injured around game 6 if memory serves. This says to me that he has a good chance to play next year if the Browns want him to.Unless he retires and gives some money back (lol, good luck with that), Cleveland will likely have to carry him on IR next year and cut him in 2026 because of that massive dead money next year. Assuming that’s an Achilles tear, he likely won’t be ready to start 2025 anyway.
Can potentially restructure him in some way to work around the cap hits in ‘26 & ‘27. Supposedly since he settled his most recent allegation, the alleged victim won’t cooperate with the NFL so the odds of him getting suspended again and voiding his remaining guarantees doesn’t look likely.
Not to relitigate it 30 years later, but Tonya wasn't the culprit. Her abusive ex planned the attack and got his buddy to carry it out. There's some debate about how culpable Harding was, but she definitely was not the driving force.Tonya Harding was the culprit to Nancy.If he tries to come back next year they’re gonna Nancy Kerrigan his ###Odd. Rodgers was in game 1 but Cousins was injured around game 6 if memory serves. This says to me that he has a good chance to play next year if the Browns want him to.Unless he retires and gives some money back (lol, good luck with that), Cleveland will likely have to carry him on IR next year and cut him in 2026 because of that massive dead money next year. Assuming that’s an Achilles tear, he likely won’t be ready to start 2025 anyway.
Can potentially restructure him in some way to work around the cap hits in ‘26 & ‘27. Supposedly since he settled his most recent allegation, the alleged victim won’t cooperate with the NFL so the odds of him getting suspended again and voiding his remaining guarantees doesn’t look likely.
He should go into the stands and swing his helmet at all of them. Then call them racist.
Well, that's kinda what happens when people retire.So he's just gonna donate some money cause my bad?From Watson's perspectiveWhat's the other angle? Releasing him early and eating some $ isn't viable because no one else is signing him.If you are only viewing it through the lense of money, sure$0 incentive for Watson to so thatAchilles is brutal.
Can the browns do an injury settlement?
Yeah, I couldn't think of one before kick off yesterday either. but its drop time for sureCan’t think of a reason to hold any longer in dynasty
SF was a hard choice but trading him away before the season was one of the best moves I made.Can’t think of a reason to hold any longer in dynasty
I'd honestly be surprised if he does.Don't think it's really hyperbole to say it's possible he never plays another down.
I couldn't even get a 3rd. At that point I had to hold and pray that he put up some decent numbers and that I could flip him in season to an owner with injury or bye week problems.SF was a hard choice but trading him away before the season was one of the best moves I made.Can’t think of a reason to hold any longer in dynasty
And I'd be surprised if he does not. Extremely so.I'd honestly be surprised if he does.Don't think it's really hyperbole to say it's possible he never plays another down.
I know it all sounds good that his achilles means the Browns get immediate cap relief but I find that hard to believe and why wouldn't that apply to other major injuries to other teams?
Maybe he'll play again, like I said just think it's possible he doesn't. He's a bad QB, with his history doubt another team would want much to do with him, maybe Cleveland will give him one more shot. But they also need to seriously think about their future, can't just wait around for a crappy QB to get healthy.And I'd be surprised if he does not. Extremely so.I'd honestly be surprised if he does.Don't think it's really hyperbole to say it's possible he never plays another down.
Again have to say I'm afraid I must disagree.Maybe he'll play again, like I said just think it's possible. He's a bad QB, with his history doubt another team gives him a shot, maybe Cleveland will give him more shot.And I'd be surprised if he does not. Extremely so.I'd honestly be surprised if he does.Don't think it's really hyperbole to say it's possible he never plays another down.
Vick was good before he went to prison, don't see that as similar at all.Again have to say I'm afraid I must disagree.Maybe he'll play again, like I said just think it's possible. He's a bad QB, with his history doubt another team gives him a shot, maybe Cleveland will give him more shot.And I'd be surprised if he does not. Extremely so.I'd honestly be surprised if he does.Don't think it's really hyperbole to say it's possible he never plays another down.
We have Watson himself as an example and as I have said over and over again it's not just the Browns who were lining up to make that trade with the Texans and that's with that baggage fully known.
Countless other examples.
So the counter to that is, "yeah, but that's when teams thought he was good". That's true. But, he was also expensive in salary and trade capital when teams were willing to look past that baggage. If we are going to game out a scenario where Cleveland cuts the cord that would put him in a situation similar to the one Russ Wilson was in this year. League minimum, dirt cheap because someone else is paying his salary and unlike Wilson they might be paying his salary for multiple years in this scenario making him a multiple season dirt cheap option. What I strongly contend is even with his play not being great during most of his return that if he's a league minimum type player while the Browns are paying his salary he's going to have options with multiple teams to continue his career.
Mentioned countless other examples and the the one that is most similar is Vicks coming out of prison. Almost two years in confinement lead to a lot of questions if he was still any good and the baggage was every bit as high as Watson's. But he was cheap and free to acquire and did not take long at all to get signed.
You had no idea if Vick was still good after almost two years of prison confinement. So to me it's pretty dead on similar.Vick was good before he went to prison, don't see that as similar at all.Again have to say I'm afraid I must disagree.Maybe he'll play again, like I said just think it's possible. He's a bad QB, with his history doubt another team gives him a shot, maybe Cleveland will give him more shot.And I'd be surprised if he does not. Extremely so.I'd honestly be surprised if he does.Don't think it's really hyperbole to say it's possible he never plays another down.
We have Watson himself as an example and as I have said over and over again it's not just the Browns who were lining up to make that trade with the Texans and that's with that baggage fully known.
Countless other examples.
So the counter to that is, "yeah, but that's when teams thought he was good". That's true. But, he was also expensive in salary and trade capital when teams were willing to look past that baggage. If we are going to game out a scenario where Cleveland cuts the cord that would put him in a situation similar to the one Russ Wilson was in this year. League minimum, dirt cheap because someone else is paying his salary and unlike Wilson they might be paying his salary for multiple years in this scenario making him a multiple season dirt cheap option. What I strongly contend is even with his play not being great during most of his return that if he's a league minimum type player while the Browns are paying his salary he's going to have options with multiple teams to continue his career.
Mentioned countless other examples and the the one that is most similar is Vicks coming out of prison. Almost two years in confinement lead to a lot of questions if he was still any good and the baggage was every bit as high as Watson's. But he was cheap and free to acquire and did not take long at all to get signed.
Maybe one team will take a chance, think back to Kareem Hunt (Watson's crimes/behavior were much worse, not comparing those) most teams wouldn't take him until finally one team (the Browns lol) finally gave him a chance.I could easily see someone kicking the tires or having him in as a backup. There’s a massive shortage of QB’s and as bad as he’s been you can at least point to injuries on the Browns line as a big excuse for his poor play this year. If he’s cut before the 2026 season, I definitely see a team bringing him in for the minimum while Cleveland pays him just like Russell Wilson for Pittsburgh this year. We can only speculate on his mentality and what he’s thinking though if that’s something he wants to do. (From his play on the field sure seems like he might just be there to collect his guaranteed and be done IMO)
If the Browns stick with him as the starter in 2025, hopefully they can land a very good WR1 in FA (Higgins?) or the draft (I don’t believe in Jeudy) to help him out and get the o’line healthy. Plus that benefits any future QB they draft or bring in once Watson inevitably sucks again a year from now (IMO)
But Watson can't play now.You had no idea if Vick was still good after almost two years of prison confinement. So to me it's pretty dead on similar.Vick was good before he went to prison, don't see that as similar at all.Again have to say I'm afraid I must disagree.Maybe he'll play again, like I said just think it's possible. He's a bad QB, with his history doubt another team gives him a shot, maybe Cleveland will give him more shot.And I'd be surprised if he does not. Extremely so.I'd honestly be surprised if he does.Don't think it's really hyperbole to say it's possible he never plays another down.
We have Watson himself as an example and as I have said over and over again it's not just the Browns who were lining up to make that trade with the Texans and that's with that baggage fully known.
Countless other examples.
So the counter to that is, "yeah, but that's when teams thought he was good". That's true. But, he was also expensive in salary and trade capital when teams were willing to look past that baggage. If we are going to game out a scenario where Cleveland cuts the cord that would put him in a situation similar to the one Russ Wilson was in this year. League minimum, dirt cheap because someone else is paying his salary and unlike Wilson they might be paying his salary for multiple years in this scenario making him a multiple season dirt cheap option. What I strongly contend is even with his play not being great during most of his return that if he's a league minimum type player while the Browns are paying his salary he's going to have options with multiple teams to continue his career.
Mentioned countless other examples and the the one that is most similar is Vicks coming out of prison. Almost two years in confinement lead to a lot of questions if he was still any good and the baggage was every bit as high as Watson's. But he was cheap and free to acquire and did not take long at all to get signed.
thought this was an Onion article
Heard a bunch of people say "Stefanski was losing the lockeroom" by sticking with Watson. This does not sound like that at all.
Browns need to find a doc who will make the recovery as long as possible.
I don't know how representative Garrett's comments are. At that stage, having played with a guy, you're not ripping him just after he had a serious injury.Heard a bunch of people say "Stefanski was losing the lockeroom" by sticking with Watson. This does not sound like that at all.
Wasn’t Garrett the one who swung a helmet at Mason Rudolph?I don't know how representative Garrett's comments are. At that stage, having played with a guy, you're not ripping him just after he had a serious injury.Heard a bunch of people say "Stefanski was losing the lockeroom" by sticking with Watson. This does not sound like that at all.
I had a friend who played in a Grey Cup (Canadian Super Bowl, but going for over a 100 years) and the future HoF running back on the team was going around to the team and telling them they'd better not **** up the game because he wanted his bonus and incentive check. He was pissed at the thought of losing that money and the game hadn't even started
You lose the locker room because guys are losing money and future opportunities. That doesn't affect Garrett one iota.
I can see it now, after he has spent his last day on earth, he will think he's going to heaven when there is a massage table waiting on him. But soon finds out it's an eternal massage, from which will never end, from Mr. T. "Now lay down sucka. I pity the fool!" -- Mr. TSurgery and lots of massages in store for Watson
Rudolph was running at him to fight with two other Steelers surrounding him. I'll give Myles a pass on that oneWasn’t Garrett the one who swung a helmet at Mason Rudolph?I don't know how representative Garrett's comments are. At that stage, having played with a guy, you're not ripping him just after he had a serious injury.Heard a bunch of people say "Stefanski was losing the lockeroom" by sticking with Watson. This does not sound like that at all.
I had a friend who played in a Grey Cup (Canadian Super Bowl, but going for over a 100 years) and the future HoF running back on the team was going around to the team and telling them they'd better not **** up the game because he wanted his bonus and incentive check. He was pissed at the thought of losing that money and the game hadn't even started
You lose the locker room because guys are losing money and future opportunities. That doesn't affect Garrett one iota.
Not sure he’s exactly the SME on what makes a “model citizen”.
I think those things are factors as well as not winning and when players feel like other players are not being putting in the work or being held accountable are other reasons.You lose the locker room because guys are losing money and future opportunities. That doesn't affect Garrett one iota.