What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Joe Burrow, CIN (12 Viewers)

Odds are they will be out of it week 15/16 when he may be able to comeback. He'll either not be ready or shut down if ready. Yes, they are 2-0 but they'll most likely be 2-4 in 25 days
Browning looked pretty competent/capable last year. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them go .500 without Burrow. Tough division though.
I take it back. Browning is a chump who sucks more than any suck has sucked a suck. lol
 
Odds are they will be out of it week 15/16 when he may be able to comeback. He'll either not be ready or shut down if ready. Yes, they are 2-0 but they'll most likely be 2-4 in 25 days
Browning looked pretty competent/capable last year. I wouldn’t be surprised to see them go .500 without Burrow. Tough division though.
I take it back. Browning is a chump who sucks more than any suck has sucked a suck. lol
Agree to Agree about Agreeing.
 
Glass Joe
He's not made of glass but i understand the joke
They can't protect him
Glass ownership. He can't escape this franchise soon enough.
I don't think he can get until 2030 unless he demands a trade. I think a lot of this is just Joe. He was getting hurt long before he became a Bengal. At Ohio State, he broke his hand and had surgery. He tore rib cartilidge at LSU. He likes to hold the ball and look for big plays which also means he is going to take hits. But I think some of his injuries have come on rather mundane players. This foot injury wasn't some brutal hit. He was bouncing around, trying to extend the play and in the process of being tackled a defender just fell on his foot funny.
 
We can blame Cincinnati ownership (and I'm up for ripping cheap billionaires) but Joe went out of his way for both Tee and Ja'Marr and their contracts. He had to know what he was advocating for. It's a zero-sum game at times. You take that money from somewhere and it does not go into the offensive line.

I think Ilov80s makes a good point also. Joe has a really, really high sack rate and holds the ball a long, long time back there.
 
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
 
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
IMO it depends.

If the Bengals are in the playoff hunt I can see Burrow playing, if able.

If the Bengals are out of it by then, why bring him back?
 
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
IMO it depends.

If the Bengals are in the playoff hunt I can see Burrow playing, if able.

If the Bengals are out of it by then, why bring him back?
Interesting, that would be a shaky spot... understanding fully that Burrow is Burrow but if Flacco is able to resurrect this squad to a playoff position, it would seem risky to remove him while Burrow ramps back up, regular season wise
 
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
IMO it depends.

If the Bengals are in the playoff hunt I can see Burrow playing, if able.

If the Bengals are out of it by then, why bring him back?
Interesting, that would be a shaky spot... understanding fully that Burrow is Burrow but if Flacco is able to resurrect this squad to a playoff position, it would seem risky to remove him while Burrow ramps back up, regular season wise

So if the Bengals are in the hunt you would start Flacco over a healthy Burrow?

I give that a 0% chance of happening regardless of how Flacco plays.
 
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
IMO it depends.

If the Bengals are in the playoff hunt I can see Burrow playing, if able.

If the Bengals are out of it by then, why bring him back?
Interesting, that would be a shaky spot... understanding fully that Burrow is Burrow but if Flacco is able to resurrect this squad to a playoff position, it would seem risky to remove him while Burrow ramps back up, regular season wise

So if the Bengals are in the hunt you would start Flacco over a healthy Burrow?

I give that a 0% chance of happening regardless of how Flacco plays.
Week 17 he's back, first game back, Flacco has gotten from 2-4 to 8-8, I go to a guy who has sat for 3 months? As opposed to Flacco who lets say is executing them ostensibly functionally,

Playoffs are semi- house money, you go to Burrow

To get in... you go back to Burrow? You better win that game if you do or you'll face a lot of second guessing going away from the guy in rhythm.
 
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
IMO it depends.

If the Bengals are in the playoff hunt I can see Burrow playing, if able.

If the Bengals are out of it by then, why bring him back?
Interesting, that would be a shaky spot... understanding fully that Burrow is Burrow but if Flacco is able to resurrect this squad to a playoff position, it would seem risky to remove him while Burrow ramps back up, regular season wise

So if the Bengals are in the hunt you would start Flacco over a healthy Burrow?

I give that a 0% chance of happening regardless of how Flacco plays.
Week 17 he's back, first game back, Flacco has gotten from 2-4 to 8-8, I go to a guy who has sat for 3 months? As opposed to Flacco who lets say is executing them ostensibly functionally,

Playoffs are semi- house money, you go to Burrow

To get in... you go back to Burrow? You better win that game if you do or you'll face a lot of second guessing going away from the guy in rhythm.
Yes. Absolutely.

No way I bench a healthy top 3 QB in the league for a 40 year old journeyman at this point.

If you lose with Burrow IMO it’s defendable.

If you lose with Flacco, and Burrow was healthy, IMO it’s fireable.
 
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
IMO it depends.

If the Bengals are in the playoff hunt I can see Burrow playing, if able.

If the Bengals are out of it by then, why bring him back?
Interesting, that would be a shaky spot... understanding fully that Burrow is Burrow but if Flacco is able to resurrect this squad to a playoff position, it would seem risky to remove him while Burrow ramps back up, regular season wise

So if the Bengals are in the hunt you would start Flacco over a healthy Burrow?

I give that a 0% chance of happening regardless of how Flacco plays.
Week 17 he's back, first game back, Flacco has gotten from 2-4 to 8-8, I go to a guy who has sat for 3 months? As opposed to Flacco who lets say is executing them ostensibly functionally,

Playoffs are semi- house money, you go to Burrow

To get in... you go back to Burrow? You better win that game if you do or you'll face a lot of second guessing going away from the guy in rhythm.
Is this conjecture on your part based on "Mid-December" or has someone pinpointed that particular week?
 
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
IMO it depends.

If the Bengals are in the playoff hunt I can see Burrow playing, if able.

If the Bengals are out of it by then, why bring him back?
Interesting, that would be a shaky spot... understanding fully that Burrow is Burrow but if Flacco is able to resurrect this squad to a playoff position, it would seem risky to remove him while Burrow ramps back up, regular season wise

So if the Bengals are in the hunt you would start Flacco over a healthy Burrow?

I give that a 0% chance of happening regardless of how Flacco plays.
Week 17 he's back, first game back, Flacco has gotten from 2-4 to 8-8, I go to a guy who has sat for 3 months? As opposed to Flacco who lets say is executing them ostensibly functionally,

Playoffs are semi- house money, you go to Burrow

To get in... you go back to Burrow? You better win that game if you do or you'll face a lot of second guessing going away from the guy in rhythm.
Is this conjecture on your part based on "Mid-December" or has someone pinpointed that particular week?
No real firm conjecture at all

If they fall out of it, I can't see putting Burrow out for a game, 2, 3 behind that line. I mean I guess 3 games.

If there's a question to bring him back its because they're alive.
 
There's no way they sit Burrow if he's 100%. Just the fallout, alone, would make it prohibitive. Imagine losing with Flacco while Burrow was healthy. Lose with Burrow? There'll still be some Monday morning coaches yapping if you lose, but it's much better than the alternative.

Now, what would actually be better as far as on the field? First, are we assuming Flacco keeps this up? He's certainly not going to throw for 300/3 every game. I mean, Burrow doesn't do that. The only question would be if Burrow could overcome any potential rust in a critical game. For me, that's not nearly enough of a concern to sit him for a guy like Flacco. With the mid-December timeline in mind, a week 16 return against Miami would be ideal to let Burrow get tuned up.

What if Flacco goes on a record-breaking streak? Well...I guess that could change things, but the chance of that happening is slim to none and Slim left town.
 
Last edited:
So...if you pick up Flacco for one of your wait-on-a-QB type teams and are counting on him in the ff playoffs...does this mean ya probably shouldn't?
IMO it depends.

If the Bengals are in the playoff hunt I can see Burrow playing, if able.

If the Bengals are out of it by then, why bring him back?
Interesting, that would be a shaky spot... understanding fully that Burrow is Burrow but if Flacco is able to resurrect this squad to a playoff position, it would seem risky to remove him while Burrow ramps back up, regular season wise

So if the Bengals are in the hunt you would start Flacco over a healthy Burrow?

I give that a 0% chance of happening regardless of how Flacco plays.
Week 17 he's back, first game back, Flacco has gotten from 2-4 to 8-8, I go to a guy who has sat for 3 months? As opposed to Flacco who lets say is executing them ostensibly functionally,

Playoffs are semi- house money, you go to Burrow

To get in... you go back to Burrow? You better win that game if you do or you'll face a lot of second guessing going away from the guy in rhythm.
Is this conjecture on your part based on "Mid-December" or has someone pinpointed that particular week?
No real firm conjecture at all

If they fall out of it, I can't see putting Burrow out for a game, 2, 3 behind that line. I mean I guess 3 games.

If there's a question to bring him back its because they're alive.
No, I meant the week in particular of his return.
 
There's no way they sit Burrow if he's 100%. Just the fallout, alone, would make it prohibitive. Imagine losing with Flacco while Burrow was healthy. Lose with Burrow? There'll still be some Monday morning coaches yapping if you lose, but it's much better than the alternative.

Now, what would actually be better as far as on the field? First, are we assuming Flacco keeps this up? He's certainly not going to throw for 300/3 every game. I mean, Burrow doesn't do that. The only question would be if Burrow could overcome any potential rust in a critical game. For me, that's not nearly enough of a concern to sit him for a guy like Flacco. With the mid-December timeline in mind, a week 16 return against Miami would be ideal to let Burrow get tuned up.

What if Flacco goes on a record-breaking streak? Well...I guess that could change things, but the chance of that happening is slim to none and Slim left town.
100% Burrow's job when he's healthy. If Flacco doesn't lose another game until Burrow is healthy, its still Burrow's job. Not even a real conversation. Frank Reich led the greatest playoff comeback in NFL history, then easily won the next game. It didn't matter. He wasn't getting Jim Kelly's job.
 
Last edited:
Picked him up in one league. It’s also a league I have Daniels in the IR slot so I hate burning 3 spots to QBs.

However no other player at this point in the season on waivers has the ceiling of those two. And it could block another potential playoff matchup from fielding one of them.

Worth it imo.
 
Tried to pick him up three hours ago in League Uno. I can't. I dont have anyone it allows me to drop. Smh. Note to self. Always keep a bye week player as last player on roster for these moments. Ha ha
 
I've been playing Russian Roulette with the likes of Geno, Fields, Rodgers, etc... since he went down. Missed out on Flacco. So I'll roll the dice on the returns.
 
Tried to pick him up three hours ago in League Uno. I can't. I dont have anyone it allows me to drop. Smh. Note to self. Always keep a bye week player as last player on roster for these moments. Ha ha
Oh wow. I didn't even think of that.

I could totally drop either E. Wilson or C. Watson for him prior to kickoff in a superflex league.

Yahtzee!
 
Oh wow. I didn't even think of that.

I could totally drop either E. Wilson or C. Watson for him prior to kickoff in a superflex league.

Yahtzee!
If possible I would 100% make that move. I really really really almost dropped Kelce. I could either drop Kelce or Chase. Smh. Stings even worse when you roster Mccarthy and Brissett. Smh
 
Oh wow. I didn't even think of that.

I could totally drop either E. Wilson or C. Watson for him prior to kickoff in a superflex league.

Yahtzee!
If possible I would 100% make that move. I really really really almost dropped Kelce. I could either drop Kelce or Chase. Smh. Stings even worse when you roster Mccarthy and Brissett. Smh
Done. Dropped lotto ticket E. Wilson for Burrow.

So guarantee you that Jacobs tears his ACL tonight.
 
Oh wow. I didn't even think of that.

I could totally drop either E. Wilson or C. Watson for him prior to kickoff in a superflex league.

Yahtzee!
If possible I would 100% make that move. I really really really almost dropped Kelce. I could either drop Kelce or Chase. Smh. Stings even worse when you roster Mccarthy and Brissett. Smh
Done. Dropped lotto ticket E. Wilson for Burrow.

So guarantee you that Jacobs tears his ACL tonight.
Bite your tongue!!!! Lol
 
Are we confident he's actually better than Flacco right now? He sucked before the injury.
Trying to decide whether I drop Flacco for him. Have Daniel Jones as my QB this week but was planning on going with Flacco for the next few starts. Hmmm
 
Are we confident he's actually better than Flacco right now? He sucked before the injury.
Trying to decide whether I drop Flacco for him. Have Daniel Jones as my QB this week but was planning on going with Flacco for the next few starts. Hmmm
And to complicate it, Jones is on a bye next week, so if I drop Flacco I gotta hope to pick him back up or find someone else
 
And to complicate it, Jones is on a bye next week, so if I drop Flacco I gotta hope to pick him back up or find someone else
That does complicate things, but I wouldnt care. If there is a chance Burrow can come back in even 3 weeks with that defense you drop Flacco and figure out a one week back up plan for next week. It more then likely moves Jones to your bench down the road.
 
FIO on sleeper I got Burrow right away by swapping for a player on bye (Brashard Smith). Only worked with a player on bye.
 
I'd like to see the 2025 stats (SSS for Burrow I know) on Burrow vs Flacco for time to release the ball -- to get a feel for whether the O line has improved or does Flacco get it out sooner (or both of course). Flacco looks like he is processing quickly just watching his face but that doesn't mean Burrow isn't his equal. And the decision to hold the ball can be about philosophy or game/down/play-call situation too not just the speed of progressing through the reads.
 
And to complicate it, Jones is on a bye next week, so if I drop Flacco I gotta hope to pick him back up or find someone else
That does complicate things, but I wouldnt care. If there is a chance Burrow can come back in even 3 weeks with that defense you drop Flacco and figure out a one week back up plan for next week. It more then likely moves Jones to your bench down the road.
Amazingly I was able to reacquire Flacco despite having the last priority. Let's go Cinci QBs!
 
If you already had Flacco would you drop Daniels for Burrow? I like Daniels' upside with the rushing more than Burrow's, but it is "cleaner" to have both Cincy QBs because you don't have to worry about when Burrow comes back, you just play whoever plays. I guess I just answered my own question, lol.
 
Last edited:
If you already had Flacco would you drop Daniels for Burrow? I like Daniels' upside with the rushing more than Burrow's, but it is "cleaner" to have both Cincy QBs because you don't have to worry about when Burrow comes back, you just play whoever plays. I guess I just answered my own question, lol.

For this season? It sounds like it might be a wrap on Daniels for the season so yeah that might be the upside play. I mean the Bengals game plan is pretty much to try and win 45-42 every week. If there are keeper league implications it might depend on the rules for that (like say it is a cheap pick next year to keep Daniels, you can't keep Burrow because he is FA pickup, whatever) but no more byes for the Bengals so I would say do it
-QG
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top