Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
Good call. I thought it a fishing trip but turned out to be an accurate question.
Good call. I thought it a fishing trip but turned out to be an accurate question.
He plays behind a QB who is adored by the owner and a lot of fans who the franchise traded multiple first round draft picks to get.I'm not an expert at watching film but what are his weakness' again?
Right now it appears to be the 2nd half of games.I'm not an expert at watching film but what are his weakness' again?
Folks forget that he started the last 3 games last season and was underwhelming.He plays behind a QB who is adored by the owner and a lot of fans who the franchise traded multiple first round draft picks to get.I'm not an expert at watching film but what are his weakness' again?
Agreed. Everyone seems to forget that Cousins hasn't always been spectacular when he comes in. I his 5 career starts, he had 3 really good ones: Cleveland in 2012, Atlanta in 2013 and yesterday. But in his 2 other starts, he's been pretty underwhelming. Could he be the real deal? Possibly. But he's yet to put together good starts consecutively.Folks forget that he started the last 3 games last season and was underwhelming.He plays behind a QB who is adored by the owner and a lot of fans who the franchise traded multiple first round draft picks to get.I'm not an expert at watching film but what are his weakness' again?
Also to note, the redskins will need to make a decision on RG3s 5th year option in the off season. So unless Cousins is undefeated from hear on out and flawless, i think RG3 will get back in there when healthy.
So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
I missed the part where I even mentioned RGIII.So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
one could argue that an awful oline, special teams and defense had a heavier hand at sinking that ship.I missed the part where I even mentioned RGIII.So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
But since you brought it up, one could argue that RGIII had a heavy hand in the sinking ship that was your Redskins 2013 campaign.
You guys are so insecure about RG3, you don't even realize I'm not even criticizing him.one could argue that an awful oline, special teams and defense had a heavier hand at sinking that ship.I missed the part where I even mentioned RGIII.But since you brought it up, one could argue that RGIII had a heavy hand in the sinking ship that was your Redskins 2013 campaign.So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
OR, one could argue that rg3 has NEVER in 3 seasons played a full 16 games. He has never been, and likely never will be, a great pocket passer. His Schtick is his athleticism. For him to be a dangerous QB, he needs to keep the defense honest with his legs. And seeing as how he has a tendency to get injured as much as vick, one could argue that that is not a great player to rest the fate of your nfl (or fantasy) team on year in and year out. One could argue that the skins brought in grudens to help groom rg3 into a pocket passer to avoid his injury tendencies. And one could argue that this was a desperation move by a franchise embarrassed to admit they made an error by giving up so much to draft rg3. They seem to be preferring to go down with the ship than to admit their error and move on.one could argue that an awful oline, special teams and defense had a heavier hand at sinking that ship.I missed the part where I even mentioned RGIII.But since you brought it up, one could argue that RGIII had a heavy hand in the sinking ship that was your Redskins 2013 campaign.So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
Like i said, lets see how cousins body of work looks in 7 weeks when RG3 is back. But again, i suspect that unless Cousins is flawless, RG3 will go back in.You guys are so insecure about RG3, you don't even realize I'm not even criticizing him.one could argue that an awful oline, special teams and defense had a heavier hand at sinking that ship.I missed the part where I even mentioned RGIII.But since you brought it up, one could argue that RGIII had a heavy hand in the sinking ship that was your Redskins 2013 campaign.So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
We're talking about Kirk cousins here guys, not RGIII!!!!
Only time will tell. All im saying is that there is not enough info yet to make that decision. Lets revisit this in 7 weeks and see how Cousins has done and how healthy RG3 is.OR, one could argue that rg3 has NEVER in 3 seasons played a full 16 games. He has never been, and likely never will be, a great pocket passer. His Schtick is his athleticism. For him to be a dangerous QB, he needs to keep the defense honest with his legs. And seeing as how he has a tendency to get injured as much as vick, one could argue that that is not a great player to rest the fate of your nfl (or fantasy) team on year in and year out. One could argue that the skins brought in grudens to help groom rg3 into a pocket passer to avoid his injury tendencies. And one could argue that this was a desperation move by a franchise embarrassed to admit they made an error by giving up so much to draft rg3. They seem to be preferring to go down with the ship than to admit their error and move on.one could argue that an awful oline, special teams and defense had a heavier hand at sinking that ship.I missed the part where I even mentioned RGIII.But since you brought it up, one could argue that RGIII had a heavy hand in the sinking ship that was your Redskins 2013 campaign.So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
One could also argue that cousins is a much better fit for jay grudens system. And one could argue that if cousins continues his stellar play that the Redskins ownership will be forced to demote and trade rg3.
He's not a for for gruden. Experiment failed.
Cousins' performance (good or bad) over the next several weeks and RG3's career trajectory are mutually exclusive things.Only time will tell. All im saying is that there is not enough info yet to make that decision. Lets revisit this in 7 weeks and see how Cousins has done and how healthy RG3 is.OR, one could argue that rg3 has NEVER in 3 seasons played a full 16 games. He has never been, and likely never will be, a great pocket passer. His Schtick is his athleticism. For him to be a dangerous QB, he needs to keep the defense honest with his legs. And seeing as how he has a tendency to get injured as much as vick, one could argue that that is not a great player to rest the fate of your nfl (or fantasy) team on year in and year out. One could argue that the skins brought in grudens to help groom rg3 into a pocket passer to avoid his injury tendencies. And one could argue that this was a desperation move by a franchise embarrassed to admit they made an error by giving up so much to draft rg3. They seem to be preferring to go down with the ship than to admit their error and move on.one could argue that an awful oline, special teams and defense had a heavier hand at sinking that ship.I missed the part where I even mentioned RGIII.But since you brought it up, one could argue that RGIII had a heavy hand in the sinking ship that was your Redskins 2013 campaign.So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
One could also argue that cousins is a much better fit for jay grudens system. And one could argue that if cousins continues his stellar play that the Redskins ownership will be forced to demote and trade rg3.
He's not a for for gruden. Experiment failed.
Coach Jay Gruden wouldn't rule out Kirk Cousins holding the starting job the rest of the season.
Robert Griffin III (ankle) is expected back in 6-8 weeks, but it's become increasingly clear that he's in serious danger of getting Pipped. Gruden's scheme is tailored to a pocket passer like Cousins, who was sensational at Philadelphia in Week 3. There's little reason to hold RG3 on fantasy benches.
Source: Jordan Raanan on Twitter
Sep 23 - 12:00 PM
If my QB isn't a leader I don't want him and there's been alot of talk in that direction re RG3. If he goes out and stinks it up next year, his value is gone.
You're not alone, but there's a reason the short bus is short.Am I alone in thinking the Skins should dial up the Texans to see if they would part with a couple 2s, this year and next, for Griffin? Skins rid themselves of RG3, recoup some pics while he still holds market value, and roll with Cousins. If he's good, they have a keeper, if he stinks, draft your franchise guy next year. Being a Texas guy, RG3 would be a great sell for the Texans.

Agreed. I mean what better way to kill Kirk's confidence then to say, "Kirk played really well last week, but no matter what he does from here on out, he's not starting again once Robert is healthy".jbz said:I'm pretty sure at this point Gruden has to say that. No sense kicking his current starting QB in the balls after a nice game by telling him he's not in the conversation for the starting gig.
Pretty sure Gruden sees that RG the turd is not only a bad QB, but he's also hurt all the time. He's got the guy he wanted starting the day he took the HC job.jbz said:I'm pretty sure at this point Gruden has to say that. No sense kicking his current starting QB in the balls after a nice game by telling him he's not in the conversation for the starting gig.
Jimmie Johnson also said on Sunday that RG3 would never be his #1 QB because he wouldn't be able to trust him to stay healthy.Two-time Super Bowl winning head coach Jimmy Johnson on the premise that Robert Griffin III can’t lose his starting quarterback job while injured:“Who made up this rule? I think it was some injured player that made up this rule. You play the player that helps you win the ballgame. When Drew Bledsoe got healthy, did [the New England Patriots] sit Tom Brady down? I don’t think so. So, that’s not a rule for me. Kirk Cousins has six-to-eight weeks to prove himself as being the guy. If he proves himself and he is the guy, I don’t think Dan Snyder is going to be real happy, because they’ve got a little problem with the nickname of the team and now you’re going to have another problem – you gave up three first-round picks for a backup quarterback.”
You should have bid that last week. Now, after 400 yards, who knows.I've got R. Wilson on bye this week and I'm going 30-40% of my WW on Cousins. I compared their remaining schedules and they match up very nicely. Anyone opinions on bid amounts?
something tells me this is very coorelated.PinkydaPimp said:Only time will tell. All im saying is that there is not enough info yet to make that decision. Lets revisit this in 7 weeks and see how Cousins has done and how healthy RG3 is.rickyg said:OR, one could argue that rg3 has NEVER in 3 seasons played a full 16 games. He has never been, and likely never will be, a great pocket passer. His Schtick is his athleticism. For him to be a dangerous QB, he needs to keep the defense honest with his legs. And seeing as how he has a tendency to get injured as much as vick, one could argue that that is not a great player to rest the fate of your nfl (or fantasy) team on year in and year out. One could argue that the skins brought in grudens to help groom rg3 into a pocket passer to avoid his injury tendencies. And one could argue that this was a desperation move by a franchise embarrassed to admit they made an error by giving up so much to draft rg3. They seem to be preferring to go down with the ship than to admit their error and move on.one could argue that an awful oline, special teams and defense had a heavier hand at sinking that ship.I missed the part where I even mentioned RGIII.But since you brought it up, one could argue that RGIII had a heavy hand in the sinking ship that was your Redskins 2013 campaign.So RG3 gets judged on last year but Cousins doesn't? The Skins ship was sinking before Cousins took over in Week 15.You sound like every caller on the radio today....
Lol at listing Kirks 3 games last year when Cousins took the reins of a 3 win club, with a lame duck coach, and 1 remaining WR worth his grain of salt.
You can fairly judge Cousins on this past game and the games going forward.
One could also argue that cousins is a much better fit for jay grudens system. And one could argue that if cousins continues his stellar play that the Redskins ownership will be forced to demote and trade rg3.
He's not a for for gruden. Experiment failed.
sadly in his 10 games he has 16 turnovers (13 ints and 3 lost fumbles).He's Grossman 2.0.
It's funny to read back and see the grilling I took in this thread! While this story is far from complete, Cousins has accounted for himself really well.
Maybe just maybe someone who wasn't on RGIII's jock could be right after all?!
Cousins got his shot. He failed. Pretty simple.
Anything else you'd like to discuss?
Good call. I thought it a fishing trip but turned out to be an accurate question.
It's funny to read back and see the grilling I took in this thread! While this story is far from complete, Cousins has accounted for himself really well.
Maybe just maybe someone who wasn't on RGIII's jock could be right after all?!![]()

Giants D is a bit different test than Jacksonville and the Eagles.Same as last year. One great game followed by a stinker
Hero to zero in 1 weekSame as last year. One great game followed by a stinker
Maybe he's just somewhere in the middle...Hero to zero in 1 weekSame as last year. One great game followed by a stinker