Long Ball Larry
Footballguy
not too quickly...Actually ESPN sounds like it has the mashup response to his position. That's absurd they have him at TE. They should rectify that really quickly.
not too quickly...Actually ESPN sounds like it has the mashup response to his position. That's absurd they have him at TE. They should rectify that really quickly.
That’s what schefter says.Sounds like Jameis is not part of the plan this week??? Unless injury?
I am giddy, but also totally ready for a Lucy football momentNot too difficult to discern who amongst this thread's respondents picked up Hill in ESPN and who didn't.
My shark prediction is that as long as he scores more fantasy points than either Hurst or Ebron, I will be a happy camper.Next comes those "experts" who will do the rankings and projections. Bloom has Taysom Hill with around 22 points this week so far. Talking passing a TD, rushing a TD, throwing 150 yards, rushing 50 + yards. It all adds up. That's low end QB #1 numbers already. Any other Shark projections for T Hill this week?
Over or under 20?
Won't make it past the third quarter.Is this real life?
Lol, what a train wreck this is gonna be.
Well, this is being reported, looks like Payton is all in:If you're playing where he's classified as a TE, that mitigates a lot of the risk in starting him. Where he's considered a QB, there's a huge risk to starting him. Outcomes range from "he doesn't take a typical volume of QB snaps or anywhere close to it" to "he sucks and is pulled".
Next comes those "experts" who will do the rankings and projections. Bloom has Taysom Hill with around 22 points this week so far. Talking passing a TD, rushing a TD, throwing 150 yards, rushing 50 + yards. It all adds up. That's low end QB #1 numbers already. Any other Shark projections for T Hill this week?
Over or under 20?
Dodds has him at 7 I believeDodds just bumped T Hill to a top 6 QB this week.
If it’s a big money league or a league with strangers, I think this is absolutely right. If it’s a longtime league with friends or a league with co-workers, maybe taking advantage isn’t the best play unless everyone is good with it.Early on in my career, one of my mentors defined fairness in a way that I still do to this day, 25 years later. In order to be fair, something has to meet two criteria.
1) the rules are spelled out before the game starts.
2) everyone plays by the same rules.
Say what you want about his eligibility, but you cannot call it unfair.
Like I said.Hill is Tebow.....non-kneeling
I added him in one Fleaflicker league. Will not use him at WR. I've been over this many times in the SP why I won't do that. I'd rather have a cleaner conscience than a win or some points. You'll feel better for not doing it.If it’s a big money league or a league with strangers, I think this is absolutely right. If it’s a longtime league with friends or a league with co-workers, maybe taking advantage isn’t the best play unless everyone is good with it.
I got a bit of blowback in my league (20+ years with basically same guys), and decided that it’s not really in the spirit of that league and that I’d rather be the guy that didn’t take advantage than the guy that angered some friends over fantasy football.
Eric Metcalf's first year in Atlanta he caught 104 passes while listed as a RB in our PPR league.Historically, a few other big ones I can think of:
Marques Colston was listed as a TE for a long time his rookie season.
Joe Webb started a few games where he was RB/WR eligible.
I know there have been a number RB/WR flips as well but don’t necessarily recall them off the top of my head.
I just started T Hill in DraftKings and could not think of any real stacks I prefer, so yes, he's stand alone like Lamar in my early perception. T Hill benefits the most.Which WR benefits the most here? Does Thomas finally show up? Or is this Lamar Jackson lite, where stacking isn't necessary.
Forgot QB Option, Reverse QB Keeper, Wildcat WR throw to QB, "Philly Special".Pick Six Podcast @picksixpod
We've obtained the Saints' playbook for Taysom Hill's start at quarterback
When you are finished, can you pass the salt? Thanks in advance.Bush league. But if your league rules allows for it....than, I'm hope for 3 INT's and 2 fumbles!
Opinions... We're allowed to have them. You have yours, I have mineWhen you are finished, can you pass the salt? Thanks in advance.
Utter and complete nonsense of an article. Nobody was saving Timmy's 47% completion rate. Nobody. I watched the year he won seven out of eleven in Denver. They respected him so little he was constantly seeing zero coverage defensive packages. He was awful, and I'm on these boards as stating otherwise. But he was terrible, my initial protestations aside.
He's been one of my QBs on Fleaflicker in some 3 QB Leagues where I lost most of my starters (Dak, Minshew, etc). Surprisingly, he hasn't outright lost me any games.I added him in one Fleaflicker league. Will not use him at WR. I've been over this many times in the SP why I won't do that. I'd rather have a cleaner conscience than a win or some points. You'll feel better for not doing it.
I agree, I don't understand how some sites can be so behind with the times. CBS hasn't had him as a TE all year.Bush league. But if your league rules allows for it....than, I'm hope for 3 INT's and 2 fumbles!
this, but I've picked Hill up just in casejust because he has been "announced as the starter" doesn't necessarily mean thats how things will play out.....Winston could very easily lead the team in QB snaps this week by a wide margin.....I think it's risky to start him at QB or TE or Flex...Payton could be playing games with the whole "announced as the starter" thing....
But it also pretty much guarantees you can't start Winston in a superflex, either.just because he has been "announced as the starter" doesn't necessarily mean thats how things will play out.....Winston could very easily lead the team in QB snaps this week by a wide margin.....I think it's risky to start him at QB or TE or Flex...Payton could be playing games with the whole "announced as the starter" thing....
what should his designation have been.....?....he hasn't really been used like a "starting QB".... in fact he hasn't been used like even a "backup QB" as Winston came in last week when Brees went out....he designation was actually appropriate.....you could argue ESPN actually "had it right" compared to other sites......I agree, I don't understand how some sites can be so behind with the times. CBS hasn't had him as a TE all year.
He's been used more as a RB than a TEwhat should his designation have been.....?....he hasn't really been used like a "starting QB".... in fact he hasn't been used like even a "backup QB" as Winston came in last week when Brees went out....he designation was actually appropriate.....you could argue ESPN actually "had it right" compared to other sites......
Jesus, what a messSean Payton has declined to name a starter.
In fairness the two things aren't mutually exclusive.Last week I dreamed a large awkward white man was stealing touchdowns from a large container Alvin Kamara was holding while Drew Brees was crying in the background.
I thought it meant I just needed to get out of the house more and stop obsessing over fantasy.
But it all makes sense now...
Yeah, but look at that ####-eating grin. Taysom's starting.
Yes 100% he's starting.Yeah, but look at that ####-eating grin. Taysom's starting.