No, especially not when you're starting out. Your body needs rest to recover and build endurance.Should I be running every day?
That's about right.Every other day?
Bad idea. When you're starting out, it's much better to run longer distances slower than shorter distances faster. You can always build speed later. Running "too hard" is a very common beginner mistake that leads people to either quit running (because they feel like hell) or get injured.I'm heading to the gym in an hour and was thinking of running a shorter distance at a higher speed.
You burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.Again, my MAIN goal is to lose weight and I'm using the 10k as a motivating tool.
Why would you start with one program then switch? The 10k is geared - from start to finish - to get you where you want to go. It sounds like you're already able to do the base mileage for his novice program.Actual traning program starts next week. Going with Higdon 5k program then the 10k program.
Never underestimate the value of comic relief.Yeah I meant MTS, my fault. Seriously though, you're not being helpful here.Well, if by MTT you mean me,
You burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.Again, my MAIN goal is to lose weight and I'm using the 10k as a motivating tool.
That is so far off it's not funnyYou burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.Again, my MAIN goal is to lose weight and I'm using the 10k as a motivating tool.
Okay I dug up a link because I knew I just read this a few days ago and the topic comes up pretty often.That is so far off it's not funnyhttp://www.nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htmYou burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.
linkEdit: Oh and by the way, the data you linked to agree that you burn roughly the same calories per mile regardless of how fast you run. I think you may have misread my post somehow. For example, a 130 lb person who runs for 1 hour at a 6 minute mile will run 10 miles and burn 944 calories, for 94.4 calories per mile. That same person who runs for 1 hour at an 8.5 minute mile will run 7 miles and burn 679 calories, for 97 calories per mile.But before we end this week of instructions, let's talk briefly about calorie burn. Running will help you maintain or lose weight. You burn the same number of calories (about 100) walking a mile as you do running a mile. That seems unfair, but calorie burn is related to foot-pounds: how many pounds you push over so many feet.
I guess that explains how I can eat 4 candy bars, basically 5 full meals a day some over 2000cals, and suck down 5-600 calories while exercising and still go from 165#-145# each peak season then. Oh wait.Okay I dug up a link because I knew I just read this a few days ago and the topic comes up pretty often.That is so far off it's not funnyhttp://www.nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htmYou burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.linkEdit: Oh and by the way, the data you linked to agree that you burn roughly the same calories per mile regardless of how fast you run. I think you may have misread my post somehow.But before we end this week of instructions, let's talk briefly about calorie burn. Running will help you maintain or lose weight. You burn the same number of calories (about 100) walking a mile as you do running a mile. That seems unfair, but calorie burn is related to foot-pounds: how many pounds you push over so many feet.
I honestly don't have any interest in getting into a pissing contest on this, but you're misinterpreting the data you linked to. If you crunch the numbers, the calories burned per mile are pretty much the same whether you run 10 mph or 6 mph or whatever. It's the distance that matters, not the speed. The data assume that you're running for ONE HOUR. So of course if you run faster for that hour, you'll burn more calories not because you're running faster, but because you're running more miles. Your calories/mile is more or less constant. I just don't want "new" runners getting the idea that they have to worry about speed, because that's a common mistake that creates problems for people.I guess that explains how I can eat 4 candy bars, basically 5 full meals a day some over 2000cals, and suck down 5-600 calories while exercising and still go from 165#-145# each peak season then. Oh wait.Okay I dug up a link because I knew I just read this a few days ago and the topic comes up pretty often.That is so far off it's not funnyhttp://www.nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htmYou burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.linkEdit: Oh and by the way, the data you linked to agree that you burn roughly the same calories per mile regardless of how fast you run. I think you may have misread my post somehow.But before we end this week of instructions, let's talk briefly about calorie burn. Running will help you maintain or lose weight. You burn the same number of calories (about 100) walking a mile as you do running a mile. That seems unfair, but calorie burn is related to foot-pounds: how many pounds you push over so many feet.
I'm just saying 100 cals/hr for any exercise is absurd. I bet you would burn 100 rubbing one out.I honestly don't have any interest in getting into a pissing contest on this, but you're misinterpreting the data you linked to. If you crunch the numbers, the calories burned per mile are pretty much the same whether you run 10 mph or 6 mph or whatever. It's the distance that matters, not the speed. The data assume that you're running for ONE HOUR. So of course if you run faster for that hour, you'll burn more calories not because you're running faster, but because you're running more miles. Your calories/mile is more or less constant. I just don't want "new" runners getting the idea that they have to worry about speed, because that's a common mistake that creates problems for people.I guess that explains how I can eat 4 candy bars, basically 5 full meals a day some over 2000cals, and suck down 5-600 calories while exercising and still go from 165#-145# each peak season then. Oh wait.Okay I dug up a link because I knew I just read this a few days ago and the topic comes up pretty often.That is so far off it's not funnyhttp://www.nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htmYou burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.linkEdit: Oh and by the way, the data you linked to agree that you burn roughly the same calories per mile regardless of how fast you run. I think you may have misread my post somehow.But before we end this week of instructions, let's talk briefly about calorie burn. Running will help you maintain or lose weight. You burn the same number of calories (about 100) walking a mile as you do running a mile. That seems unfair, but calorie burn is related to foot-pounds: how many pounds you push over so many feet.
I have 16 weeks until the 1ok and the programs are 8 weeks each.Why would you start with one program then switch? The 10k is geared - from start to finish - to get you where you want to go. It sounds like you're already able to do the base mileage for his novice program.Actual traning program starts next week. Going with Higdon 5k program then the 10k program.
Maybe I will look at doing the novice program.If it takes him an hour to do that then he should be less worried about calories and more worried about chaffing.But, I agree with Ivan - you are not reading his post correctly. He said 100 calories a mile. Seems consistent with your table.I'm just saying 100 cals/hr for any exercise is absurd. I bet you would burn 100 rubbing one out.I honestly don't have any interest in getting into a pissing contest on this, but you're misinterpreting the data you linked to. If you crunch the numbers, the calories burned per mile are pretty much the same whether you run 10 mph or 6 mph or whatever. It's the distance that matters, not the speed. The data assume that you're running for ONE HOUR. So of course if you run faster for that hour, you'll burn more calories not because you're running faster, but because you're running more miles. Your calories/mile is more or less constant. I just don't want "new" runners getting the idea that they have to worry about speed, because that's a common mistake that creates problems for people.I guess that explains how I can eat 4 candy bars, basically 5 full meals a day some over 2000cals, and suck down 5-600 calories while exercising and still go from 165#-145# each peak season then. Oh wait.Okay I dug up a link because I knew I just read this a few days ago and the topic comes up pretty often.That is so far off it's not funnyhttp://www.nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htmYou burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.linkEdit: Oh and by the way, the data you linked to agree that you burn roughly the same calories per mile regardless of how fast you run. I think you may have misread my post somehow.But before we end this week of instructions, let's talk briefly about calorie burn. Running will help you maintain or lose weight. You burn the same number of calories (about 100) walking a mile as you do running a mile. That seems unfair, but calorie burn is related to foot-pounds: how many pounds you push over so many feet.
I crunched the numbers as well, before reading down here to the pissing match. For a 130lb person, no matter what the speed, it's as you said, ~100cal/mile; for the other two columns on the chart, 155lbs = ~115cal/mile, and 190lbs = ~140cal/mile.So, to burn more calories, gain some weight and run far.I honestly don't have any interest in getting into a pissing contest on this, but you're misinterpreting the data you linked to. If you crunch the numbers, the calories burned per mile are pretty much the same whether you run 10 mph or 6 mph or whatever. It's the distance that matters, not the speed. The data assume that you're running for ONE HOUR. So of course if you run faster for that hour, you'll burn more calories not because you're running faster, but because you're running more miles. Your calories/mile is more or less constant. I just don't want "new" runners getting the idea that they have to worry about speed, because that's a common mistake that creates problems for people.I guess that explains how I can eat 4 candy bars, basically 5 full meals a day some over 2000cals, and suck down 5-600 calories while exercising and still go from 165#-145# each peak season then. Oh wait.Okay I dug up a link because I knew I just read this a few days ago and the topic comes up pretty often.That is so far off it's not funnyhttp://www.nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htmYou burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.linkEdit: Oh and by the way, the data you linked to agree that you burn roughly the same calories per mile regardless of how fast you run. I think you may have misread my post somehow.But before we end this week of instructions, let's talk briefly about calorie burn. Running will help you maintain or lose weight. You burn the same number of calories (about 100) walking a mile as you do running a mile. That seems unfair, but calorie burn is related to foot-pounds: how many pounds you push over so many feet.
This is for marathons, but it might be close.If I am going to burn 600 calories, what do I need to do for eating before the race? Any pre-race nutrition advice out there?
Ah 100/cal mile. Makes more sense. Though I would think there would be some modifier for speed as I know riding faster raises my heart rate more. That has to account for increased work somehow beyond the force*distance mechanisms which dominate most of the calorie loss. And interval training is supposed to be the highest calorie burn rate IIRC even taking into account walk time.GStrot said:If it takes him an hour to do that then he should be less worried about calories and more worried about chaffing.But, I agree with Ivan - you are not reading his post correctly. He said 100 calories a mile. Seems consistent with your table.culdeus said:I'm just saying 100 cals/hr for any exercise is absurd. I bet you would burn 100 rubbing one out.IvanKaramazov said:I honestly don't have any interest in getting into a pissing contest on this, but you're misinterpreting the data you linked to. If you crunch the numbers, the calories burned per mile are pretty much the same whether you run 10 mph or 6 mph or whatever. It's the distance that matters, not the speed. The data assume that you're running for ONE HOUR. So of course if you run faster for that hour, you'll burn more calories not because you're running faster, but because you're running more miles. Your calories/mile is more or less constant. I just don't want "new" runners getting the idea that they have to worry about speed, because that's a common mistake that creates problems for people.culdeus said:I guess that explains how I can eat 4 candy bars, basically 5 full meals a day some over 2000cals, and suck down 5-600 calories while exercising and still go from 165#-145# each peak season then. Oh wait.IvanKaramazov said:Okay I dug up a link because I knew I just read this a few days ago and the topic comes up pretty often.culdeus said:That is so far off it's not funnyhttp://www.nutristrategy.com/activitylist3.htmYou burn ~100 calories per mile whether you're going 5 mph or 8 mph.linkEdit: Oh and by the way, the data you linked to agree that you burn roughly the same calories per mile regardless of how fast you run. I think you may have misread my post somehow.But before we end this week of instructions, let's talk briefly about calorie burn. Running will help you maintain or lose weight. You burn the same number of calories (about 100) walking a mile as you do running a mile. That seems unfair, but calorie burn is related to foot-pounds: how many pounds you push over so many feet.
If I am going to burn 600 calories, what do I need to do for eating before the race? Any pre-race nutrition advice out there?
I agree. For a 10K, you'll just need some fluids as you go along.I'd add that a big emphasis is often put on carbo-loading the night before a race. I have read, and agree, that it's better to carbo-load two nights before and on into the morning before your race morning. Those are the calories that will be digested and fuel your race. As Floppo says, eat carefully the night before - I try to eat foods that I pretty much know will allow me to be regular on race morning (i.e., that will allow me to poo before racing).re: Nutrition pre/during race: 10k, you're not going to be burning/needing that many cals, so I wouldn't sweat it too much. Try and do some training runs at roughly the same time as the race so you get your body used to it and to reacting to whatever you eat in the morning before hand. Also try and find out what they're handing out on the race course and try it while training. Again- you're not going to need the cals/minerals replacement during the race, so you could also just go with straight water instead of the sport-drink they hand out. Don't bother using gels/bars/etc during the race- you don't need them.It wouldn't hurt to carb load for a few days before the race with a decent mix of proteins- just make sure you eat something the night before the race that you are dead certain you can digest without issue.
I'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).
VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).
Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.They don't have to be Nikes. My buddy has a small velcro pouch that slides into your shoe laces. You put the chip in there, works like a charm. I'm sure there are a number of ways to affix the chip to any shoe.I don't like Nike shoes.Haven't read the thread but christ must you be outta shape (sure it's been said).Anyway, I just bought that Nike running thingy that plugs into your ipod/nano while you run. It has some chip you put in your shoe to tell you EXACTLY how far you've gone, how fast, etc. The thing is genius. For 30 bucks, it's a must if you are training for anything.Haven't done it yet, but it also graphs your run when downloaded on to your computer. It'll help you a lot.
I will check it out. Are you sure it was only $30?They don't have to be Nikes. My buddy has a small velcro pouch that slides into your shoe laces. You put the chip in there, works like a charm. I'm sure there are a number of ways to affix the chip to any shoe.I don't like Nike shoes.Haven't read the thread but christ must you be outta shape (sure it's been said).Anyway, I just bought that Nike running thingy that plugs into your ipod/nano while you run. It has some chip you put in your shoe to tell you EXACTLY how far you've gone, how fast, etc. The thing is genius. For 30 bucks, it's a must if you are training for anything.Haven't done it yet, but it also graphs your run when downloaded on to your computer. It'll help you a lot.
Big runs was in quotes for a reason. Following the Higdon plan. Not a lot of running there. Gradually working my way up.Should I run everything at my projected 10k pace?VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.
No. Do what your body can handle. Don't worry about your race pace before you even start your training. The biggest thing at this point would be to get your legs/body used to the mileage. At this point the best way to make yourself "faster" is to just increase your mileage as opposed to trying to run 10k faster and faster. I trained for my first 5k at a 10 minute mile running about 4 or 5 miles at a time and ended up running 8:30 pace.Big runs was in quotes for a reason. Following the Higdon plan. Not a lot of running there. Gradually working my way up.Should I run everything at my projected 10k pace?VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...
And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.
Thanks. So, you ran more than 5k when you were traning for a 5k?No. Do what your body can handle. Don't worry about your race pace before you even start your training. The biggest thing at this point would be to get your legs/body used to the mileage. At this point the best way to make yourself "faster" is to just increase your mileage as opposed to trying to run 10k faster and faster. I trained for my first 5k at a 10 minute mile running about 4 or 5 miles at a time and ended up running 8:30 pace.Big runs was in quotes for a reason. Following the Higdon plan. Not a lot of running there. Gradually working my way up.Should I run everything at my projected 10k pace?VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...
And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.
Good advice by Dolphan. You are not looking to be a world beater, but yes you should eventually get to the point where you do a couple 7-8 mile runs. The race shouldn't be the longest run you go on, cause you'll need an added base of andurance to compensate for running faster. You will generally race a minute+ faster than you can handle for a training run, so don't try to do those runs at race pace. Maybe if you decide to do any faster, shorter runs, you can do those at or a bit faster than your goal race pace.Thanks. So, you ran more than 5k when you were traning for a 5k?No. Do what your body can handle. Don't worry about your race pace before you even start your training. The biggest thing at this point would be to get your legs/body used to the mileage. At this point the best way to make yourself "faster" is to just increase your mileage as opposed to trying to run 10k faster and faster. I trained for my first 5k at a 10 minute mile running about 4 or 5 miles at a time and ended up running 8:30 pace.Big runs was in quotes for a reason. Following the Higdon plan. Not a lot of running there. Gradually working my way up.Should I run everything at my projected 10k pace?VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...
And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.
linkThey don't have to be Nikes. My buddy has a small velcro pouch that slides into your shoe laces. You put the chip in there, works like a charm. I'm sure there are a number of ways to affix the chip to any shoe.I don't like Nike shoes.Haven't read the thread but christ must you be outta shape (sure it's been said).
Anyway, I just bought that Nike running thingy that plugs into your ipod/nano while you run. It has some chip you put in your shoe to tell you EXACTLY how far you've gone, how fast, etc. The thing is genius. For 30 bucks, it's a must if you are training for anything.
Haven't done it yet, but it also graphs your run when downloaded on to your computer. It'll help you a lot.
Gee, why would Nike recommend Nike shoes?Nike+iPod
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Nike+iPod Sports KitThe Nike+iPod Sports Kit is a device which measures and records the distance and pace of a walk or run. The Nike+ consists of a small accelerometer attached to or imbedded in a shoe which communicates wirelessly with a receiver plugged into an iPod nano. Itunes software can be used to view the walk/run history. The kit was revealed on May 23, 2006 but for a short time was unavailable for purchase. The kit is able to store information such as the elapsed time of the workout, the distance traveled, pace, or calories burned by the individual wearing the shoes, and display it on the screen or broadcast it through the headphones of an iPod.
The kit consists of two pieces: An accelerometer/transmitter that is mounted under the inner sole of the shoe and a receiver that connects to the iPod. Nike reccomends that the shoe be a Nike+ model with a special pocket in which to place the device. Users who don't want to change shoes place the accelerometer in a cavity which they create under the insole of an ordinary shoe or attach it to the laces with a pouch or other means. The battery in the transmitter is not removable so the entire kit must be replaced when it expires.
In addition to the audio feedback provided by a generic male or female voice (user's choice), there are pre-recorded congratulations provided by Lance Armstrong and Paula Radcliffe whenever a user achieves a personal best (such as fastest mile, fastest 10K, longest run yet) or reaches certain long-term milestones (such as 250 miles, 500 kilometers). This "celebrity feedback" is heard after the usual end-of-run statistics.
On October 19, 2006, new features were added to the Nike+ website, including the ability to name runs. Forums were also added, allowing users to meet and challenge other runners, ask questions, and give feedback.
Privacy concerns were raised when graduate students T. Scott Saponas, Jonathan Lester, and Carl Hartung at the University of Washington discovered security flaws in the device that can be exploited to track the user.[1] [2] According to their research, the students discovered that the Nike+iPod transmitter gives off radio frequencies that can be read up to 60 feet away using RFID, or Radio Frequency Identification. During the test, students built a $250 surveillance device and integrated it with Google Maps, easily tracking the movement of the person wearing the Nike+iPod transmitter. Although no personal data is stored in the transmitter's chip, an RFID privacy concern was raised after the students were easily able to track the movement of the person, claiming that its tracking ability could be used for surveillance by scanning the data and linking it to a user's identity.[3]

Yes. I started out running 3 miles each time I ran/trained for my 5k. Then I started throwing in a 4 or 5 miler. You will run faster during a race than when you train, especially as a "beginner". You need to have your legs used to extra mileage so that they can handle the faster pace over a shorter distance. Once your legs are used to running the distance you can work on speed if you really want to. I would start out by upping the treadmill from let's say 6.0 to 7.0 and run for a few minutes and then back it down (for example). Don't all of a sudden try and put the treadmill on 7.0 and run 6 miles. Do it intermittenly for short bursts and then slowly work up to doing a mile at the faster pace and then maybe a 2nd mile.GStrot said:Thanks. So, you ran more than 5k when you were traning for a 5k?DolphinsPhan said:No. Do what your body can handle. Don't worry about your race pace before you even start your training. The biggest thing at this point would be to get your legs/body used to the mileage. At this point the best way to make yourself "faster" is to just increase your mileage as opposed to trying to run 10k faster and faster. I trained for my first 5k at a 10 minute mile running about 4 or 5 miles at a time and ended up running 8:30 pace.Big runs was in quotes for a reason. Following the Higdon plan. Not a lot of running there. Gradually working my way up.Should I run everything at my projected 10k pace?VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...
And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.
Yes. And don't worry about your race pace. It will be faster than your training pace, regardless. It just happens if you follow the plan.GStrot said:Thanks. So, you ran more than 5k when you were traning for a 5k?DolphinsPhan said:No. Do what your body can handle. Don't worry about your race pace before you even start your training. The biggest thing at this point would be to get your legs/body used to the mileage. At this point the best way to make yourself "faster" is to just increase your mileage as opposed to trying to run 10k faster and faster. I trained for my first 5k at a 10 minute mile running about 4 or 5 miles at a time and ended up running 8:30 pace.Big runs was in quotes for a reason. Following the Higdon plan. Not a lot of running there. Gradually working my way up.Should I run everything at my projected 10k pace?VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...
And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.
I have 16 weeks so I just started an 8 week plan for a 5k then I will start another 8 week program for a 10k. But, the plan does not have me go over 5k or 10k until race day.Is the Novice 5k plan not be the best plan?Yes. I started out running 3 miles each time I ran/trained for my 5k. Then I started throwing in a 4 or 5 miler. You will run faster during a race than when you train, especially as a "beginner". You need to have your legs used to extra mileage so that they can handle the faster pace over a shorter distance. Once your legs are used to running the distance you can work on speed if you really want to. I would start out by upping the treadmill from let's say 6.0 to 7.0 and run for a few minutes and then back it down (for example). Don't all of a sudden try and put the treadmill on 7.0 and run 6 miles. Do it intermittenly for short bursts and then slowly work up to doing a mile at the faster pace and then maybe a 2nd mile.Thanks. So, you ran more than 5k when you were traning for a 5k?No. Do what your body can handle. Don't worry about your race pace before you even start your training. The biggest thing at this point would be to get your legs/body used to the mileage. At this point the best way to make yourself "faster" is to just increase your mileage as opposed to trying to run 10k faster and faster. I trained for my first 5k at a 10 minute mile running about 4 or 5 miles at a time and ended up running 8:30 pace.Big runs was in quotes for a reason. Following the Higdon plan. Not a lot of running there. Gradually working my way up.Should I run everything at my projected 10k pace?VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...
And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.
The plans look great to me. They build mileage slowly, include rest, some speed, and have a taper at the end. Completing either plan will have you more than ready for the raceI have 16 weeks so I just started an 8 week plan for a 5k then I will start another 8 week program for a 10k. But, the plan does not have me go over 5k or 10k until race day.Is the Novice 5k plan not be the best plan?Yes. I started out running 3 miles each time I ran/trained for my 5k. Then I started throwing in a 4 or 5 miler. You will run faster during a race than when you train, especially as a "beginner". You need to have your legs used to extra mileage so that they can handle the faster pace over a shorter distance. Once your legs are used to running the distance you can work on speed if you really want to. I would start out by upping the treadmill from let's say 6.0 to 7.0 and run for a few minutes and then back it down (for example). Don't all of a sudden try and put the treadmill on 7.0 and run 6 miles. Do it intermittenly for short bursts and then slowly work up to doing a mile at the faster pace and then maybe a 2nd mile.Thanks. So, you ran more than 5k when you were traning for a 5k?No. Do what your body can handle. Don't worry about your race pace before you even start your training. The biggest thing at this point would be to get your legs/body used to the mileage. At this point the best way to make yourself "faster" is to just increase your mileage as opposed to trying to run 10k faster and faster. I trained for my first 5k at a 10 minute mile running about 4 or 5 miles at a time and ended up running 8:30 pace.Big runs was in quotes for a reason. Following the Higdon plan. Not a lot of running there. Gradually working my way up.Should I run everything at my projected 10k pace?VeryI'd stay off the "big runs" for at least another 2-3 weeks.Did 2 miles in about 20 minutes on Sunday but it was not run/walk. Boy, did that suck. Starting the real training program on Wednesday (running 3x per week on Wed, Fri and the "big runs" on Sundays).Get your legs more used to turning over for a couple of miles straight before doing "big runs" of whatever distance. Give yourself 2 more weeks, and then go for it. No point hurting yourself before this has even begun...
And great work keeping up with this! Easy enough to say- yeah, I'm gonna do it- and then not follow through.
Training for your first 5-K
1 M Rest or run/walk
T 1.5 m run
W Rest or run/walk
Th 1.5 m run
F Rest
Sa 1.5 m run
Su 30- 60 min walk
2 M Rest or run/walk
T 1.75 m run
W Rest or run/walk
Th 1.5 m run
F Rest
Sa 1.75 m run
Su35-60 min walk
3 M Rest or run/walk
T 2 mi run
W Rest or run/walk
Th 1.5 m run
F Rest
Sa 2 MI run
Su 40-60 min walk
4 M Rest or run/walk
T 2.25 m run
W Rest or run/walk
Th 1.5 m run
F Rest
Sa 2.25 m run
Su 45-60 min walk
5 M Rest or run/walk
Tu 2.5 m run
W Rest or run/walk
Th 2 m run
F Rest
Sa 2.5 m run
Su 50-60 min walk
6 M Rest or run/walk
T 2.75 m run
W Rest or run/walk
Th 2 m run
F Rest
Sa 2.75 m run
Su 55-60 min walk
7 M Rest or run/walk
T 3 m run
W Rest or run/walk
Th 2 m run
F Rest
Sa 3 m run
Su 60 min walk
8 M Rest or run/walk
Tu 3 m run
W Rest or run/walk
Th 2 m run
F Rest
Sa Rest
Su 5-K Race
Vs. the Intermediate 5k program
How to Improve Your 5-K Times
1 M Rest
Tu 3 m run
W 5 x 400
Th 3 m run
F Rest
Sa 3 m run
Su 5 m run
2 M Rest
Tu 3 m run
W 30 min tempo
Th 3 m run
F Rest
Sa 3 m fast
Su 5 m run
3 M Rest
Tu 3 m run
W 6 x 400
Th 3 m run
F Rest
Sa 4 m run
Su 6 m run
4 M Rest
Tu 3 m run
W 35 min tempo
Th 3 m run
F Rest
Sa Rest
Su 5-K Test
5 M Rest
Tu 3 m run
We 7 x 400
Th 3 m run
F Rest
Sa 4 m fast
Su 6 m run
6 M Rest
Tu 3 m run
W 40 min tempo
Th 3 m run
F Rest
Sa 5 m run
Su 7 m run
7 M Rest
Tu 3 m run
W 8 x 400
Th 3 m run
F Rest
Sa 5 m fast
Su 7 m run
8 M Rest
Tu 2 m run
W 30 min tempo
Th 2 m run
F Rest
Sa Rest
Su 5-K Race
If you can do the Intermediate, I'd recommend it, as you'll be more prepared. If you don't quite feel comfortable, you can split the middle between the two, and create your own plan.Thanks. I might just split the difference. 1.5 miles this morning was pretty easy but 3 miles seems a bit more than I can handle right now.We will see on Friday when I do day 2.The plans look great to me. They build mileage slowly, include rest, some speed, and have a taper at the end. Completing either plan will have you more than ready for the raceIf you can do the Intermediate, I'd recommend it, as you'll be more prepared. If you don't quite feel comfortable, you can split the middle between the two, and create your own plan.
Did just the 1.5 miles today with a couple minutes warming up and a couple minutes afterward, I did around 1.9 miles in 20 minutes. Running on a treadmill sucks. But, I am worried that I will be worse outside. Sometimes I just kept going because the treadmill was moving. Running is boring. Even with the tv on.We will see on Friday when I do day 2.
***Training Update***Minor set back, went to NYC over the weekend and drank myself into a stuper while puffing down a couple ciggarettes(I don't smoke). Monday I pushed out 3 miles but was hurting pretty bad. Took Tues and Wed off and got back on the beast of a machine today...I did 5.5 miles in about 50 minutes. I swear when I got to 4 miles I started picturing myself getting home and writing here how far I went. The motivational factor of this thread is starting to help me out. Still a little worried that I am peaking too early and may burn out before I run a race.
(except to smoking. that is Good job getting it done. Running on a treadmill does get better as you get used to it. This thread motivated me to get back into the game, too - Did the treadmill x3 this week (watched Sports Center) for about 30 minutes each. I may brave the cold this weekend for a longer run outside... we'll see. Keep it up, GStrot!Did just the 1.5 miles today with a couple minutes warming up and a couple minutes afterward, I did around 1.9 miles in 20 minutes. Running on a treadmill sucks. But, I am worried that I will be worse outside. Sometimes I just kept going because the treadmill was moving. Running is boring. Even with the tv on.We will see on Friday when I do day 2.
Good job getting it done. Running on a treadmill does get better as you get used to it. This thread motivated me to get back into the game, too - Did the treadmill x3 this week (watched Sports Center) for about 30 minutes each. I may brave the cold this weekend for a longer run outside... we'll see. Keep it up, GStrot!Did just the 1.5 miles today with a couple minutes warming up and a couple minutes afterward, I did around 1.9 miles in 20 minutes. Running on a treadmill sucks. But, I am worried that I will be worse outside. Sometimes I just kept going because the treadmill was moving. Running is boring. Even with the tv on.We will see on Friday when I do day 2.

I know, I know. But when I'm drunk...Off to the gym. Going to do 3 miles today. It may be more if I get a burst like I did on Wed.***Training Update***Minor set back, went to NYC over the weekend and drank myself into a stuper while puffing down a couple ciggarettes(I don't smoke). Monday I pushed out 3 miles but was hurting pretty bad. Took Tues and Wed off and got back on the beast of a machine today...I did 5.5 miles in about 50 minutes. I swear when I got to 4 miles I started picturing myself getting home and writing here how far I went. The motivational factor of this thread is starting to help me out. Still a little worried that I am peaking too early and may burn out before I run a race.(except to smoking. that is
)
Same thing on Sunday. 2.0 miles in 25 minutes or so. 1.5 miles of running at around 6.5 miles per hour and some walking on either end to warm up and cool down. Running still sucks but at least on Sundays I can turn the tv up loud because everyone is awake unlike during the week when I am working on my Marlene Matlin lip reading skills. Wednesday I up the ante to 1.75 miles (then 1.5 on Friday then 1.75 on Sunday).Did just the 1.5 miles today with a couple minutes warming up and a couple minutes afterward, I did around 1.9 miles in 20 minutes. Running on a treadmill sucks. But, I am worried that I will be worse outside. Sometimes I just kept going because the treadmill was moving. Running is boring. Even with the tv on.We will see on Friday when I do day 2.
Try wireless headphones. Do you vary the speeds at all when you're on the treadmill? Maybe start out at 6 MPH, then bump it up to 6.2, 6.5, 6.7, 6.5, 6.2, 6.0 for about three minutes each or whatever feels comfortable. The idea is just to get some variety and to give you something to think about while you're on the treadmill, without making huge jumps in speed. By starting and finishing a little slower, you can usually warm up and cool down for slightly less time, too.Same thing on Sunday. 2.0 miles in 25 minutes or so. 1.5 miles of running at around 6.5 miles per hour and some walking on either end to warm up and cool down. Running still sucks but at least on Sundays I can turn the tv up loud because everyone is awake unlike during the week when I am working on my Marlene Matlin lip reading skills. Wednesday I up the ante to 1.75 miles (then 1.5 on Friday then 1.75 on Sunday).Did just the 1.5 miles today with a couple minutes warming up and a couple minutes afterward, I did around 1.9 miles in 20 minutes. Running on a treadmill sucks. But, I am worried that I will be worse outside. Sometimes I just kept going because the treadmill was moving. Running is boring. Even with the tv on.We will see on Friday when I do day 2.
That's why you need to get outside and find a group to run with. It can be VERY motivating to run behind a cute chick in tiny running shorts, or beside a busty chick in a spring-loaded sportsbra (assuming you have good peripheral vision).Did just the 1.5 miles today with a couple minutes warming up and a couple minutes afterward, I did around 1.9 miles in 20 minutes. Running on a treadmill sucks. But, I am worried that I will be worse outside. Sometimes I just kept going because the treadmill was moving. Running is boring. Even with the tv on.

Many treadmills have programs with varied speed and incline built in - I used to avoid them, but now they add a nice bit of challenge and variety for my runs. I think they give you a much better workout and help prepare you for running outside better that just flat 6.0 (or whatever) treadmill runs. Braved the outdoors in Chicago on Saturday and did 6 miles in the 14 degree weather. I had to walk a few times since I'm just getting back into it after 4 months off, but it felt good to hit that mileage again. Of course, my balaclava was pretty iced up by the time I was done, but I hardly noticed it while I was running. (Needless to say, Roarin, there are no "cute chicks in tiny running shorts" around here in February!!)Do you vary the speeds at all when you're on the treadmill? Maybe start out at 6 MPH, then bump it up to 6.2, 6.5, 6.7, 6.5, 6.2, 6.0 for about three minutes each or whatever feels comfortable. The idea is just to get some variety and to give you something to think about while you're on the treadmill, without making huge jumps in speed. By starting and finishing a little slower, you can usually warm up and cool down for slightly less time, too.