Juxtatarot
Footballguy
I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
No....as it stands, there's no way I would finish in any respectable time. Though this is getting better. I'm now running a couple days outside and one on the treadmill.I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
Go get a deep tissue/sports massage. Do some yoga.No....as it stands, there's no way I would finish in any respectable time. Though this is getting better. I'm now running a couple days outside and one on the treadmill.I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
Don't approach it like a race against others. Approach it like a race against yourself. Run as fast as you can in trial one, bench mark set, then go beat that time round #2.No....as it stands, there's no way I would finish in any respectable time. Though this is getting better. I'm now running a couple days outside and one on the treadmill.I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
Exactly. The first race is a guaranteed PR.Don't approach it like a race against others. Approach it like a race against yourself. Run as fast as you can in trial one, bench mark set, then go beat that time round #2.No....as it stands, there's no way I would finish in any respectable time. Though this is getting better. I'm now running a couple days outside and one on the treadmill.I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
As a wise runner told me once when I started: there will always be someone faster than you. And also, there will also always be someone slower than you.Exactly. The first race is a guaranteed PR.Don't approach it like a race against others. Approach it like a race against yourself. Run as fast as you can in trial one, bench mark set, then go beat that time round #2.No....as it stands, there's no way I would finish in any respectable time. Though this is getting better. I'm now running a couple days outside and one on the treadmill.I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
Commish, this has you written all over it. Don' let the distance intimidate you, it would be a great run/walk for you at Anne Springs and by July you should be in a lot better shape to take on the distance. Price is right and chances are I'll be there to give you plenty of ####, what's not to like?I think it's a tough one since Commish has been up front about wanting to maintain a casual running experience. The majority of us here are competitive runners so the first response is to go compete to stay motivated. That may not be what he's after.....
If you're feeling the start of a rut, go change it up. Maybe go find some trails that you can run/hike? Even if you can only run a quarter mile at a time and then hike 3 quarters, it'll be a fun change of pace. This time of year, especially, is an awesome time to be in the woods.
Well, I'm still not at a weight that I can think about the competition part. I'm a relatively laid back guy, but when I get to sports or board games even, I get pretty competitive. This has been my downfall in past attempts to giving running a go. I go too fast too quick. I feel like I've psych'd myself out and I now "worry" more than focus on the task at hand. So I read all this stuff in here and wonder if I'll ever get to that sort of running. I know to do it, I have to lose the weight. I'm down about 21 lbs since January, but I have a ways to go yet. I have at least that much plus another 10 that I'd like to lose. Being outside has helped a lot. Those runs seem the quickest, but I'm not recouping as quickly as I was before it seems and that's the tough part for me.I think it's a tough one since Commish has been up front about wanting to maintain a casual running experience. The majority of us here are competitive runners so the first response is to go compete to stay motivated. That may not be what he's after.....
If you're feeling the start of a rut, go change it up. Maybe go find some trails that you can run/hike? Even if you can only run a quarter mile at a time and then hike 3 quarters, it'll be a fun change of pace. This time of year, especially, is an awesome time to be in the woods.
I'm not sure what you'd consider a "respectable time" but the majority of runners at your typical 5K are casual runners, beginners or walkers. You'd be fine. I would recommend you try one. Who knows? Maybe you'd love it and find it motivating.No....as it stands, there's no way I would finish in any respectable time. Though this is getting better. I'm now running a couple days outside and one on the treadmill.I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
I remember feeling a bit intimidated going into my first race...was an 8K. I had never run that far before. I didn't consider myself a "runner" but really just a guy that liked to stay in shape. The day of the race I was really struck by the variety of people that were there. All shapes and ages for sure. That put me at ease and I did fairly well but I do remember getting out kicked by an old man...I'll never forget that.I'm not sure what you'd consider a "respectable time" but the majority of runners at your typical 5K are casual runners, beginners or walkers. You'd be fine. I would recommend you try one. Who knows? Maybe you'd love it and find it motivating.No....as it stands, there's no way I would finish in any respectable time. Though this is getting better. I'm now running a couple days outside and one on the treadmill.I don't recall, have you signed up for any races?Really struggling to stay focused the last week or so. My legs constantly feel tired. I feel like I'm going through the motions at this point <_<
I never ran races the first few years that I started running. In hindsight, I wish I did. It would have been nice to know what some of my beginning paces were to compare against now to see how far I've come.
I don't think the currently successful path you've set up and racing are mutually exclusive.Well, I'm still not at a weight that I can think about the competition part. I'm a relatively laid back guy, but when I get to sports or board games even, I get pretty competitive. This has been my downfall in past attempts to giving running a go. I go too fast too quick. I feel like I've psych'd myself out and I now "worry" more than focus on the task at hand. So I read all this stuff in here and wonder if I'll ever get to that sort of running. I know to do it, I have to lose the weight. I'm down about 21 lbs since January, but I have a ways to go yet. I have at least that much plus another 10 that I'd like to lose. Being outside has helped a lot. Those runs seem the quickest, but I'm not recouping as quickly as I was before it seems and that's the tough part for me.I think it's a tough one since Commish has been up front about wanting to maintain a casual running experience. The majority of us here are competitive runners so the first response is to go compete to stay motivated. That may not be what he's after.....
If you're feeling the start of a rut, go change it up. Maybe go find some trails that you can run/hike? Even if you can only run a quarter mile at a time and then hike 3 quarters, it'll be a fun change of pace. This time of year, especially, is an awesome time to be in the woods.
That was at about mile 45, shortly before going into that Aid Station at 46. Talk about uttering one syllable cuss words....Any of you that are FB friends of his should check out all of them. It epitomizes "gettin after it".Duck, where was this at on the course? Judging from the sun & shadows somewhere around midday? On your way up to aid station #2?I absolutely love that pic ...all the nice people sitting in their fancy homes, watching their big-screen TVs from a comfy sofa and sipping an iced tea, while up above, a warrior is physically and mentally battling beyond his breaking point in an impossibly tough, ultra run. #howisyourlifedefinedNot trying to steal his thunder but Duck's hills are probably a little different than the ones we all typically see. #BADASS
Speaking of 50ks, Mike Wardian just set a world record last night during the Hoka sales meeting. On a treadmil. 2:59:49
So, thank you guys for the continued motivation and for helping me find that site.Hoka One OneWell, I'm still not at a weight that I can think about the competition part. I'm a relatively laid back guy, but when I get to sports or board games even, I get pretty competitive. This has been my downfall in past attempts to giving running a go. I go too fast too quick. I feel like I've psych'd myself out and I now "worry" more than focus on the task at hand. So I read all this stuff in here and wonder if I'll ever get to that sort of running. I know to do it, I have to lose the weight. I'm down about 21 lbs since January, but I have a ways to go yet. I have at least that much plus another 10 that I'd like to lose. Being outside has helped a lot. Those runs seem the quickest, but I'm not recouping as quickly as I was before it seems and that's the tough part for me.I think it's a tough one since Commish has been up front about wanting to maintain a casual running experience. The majority of us here are competitive runners so the first response is to go compete to stay motivated. That may not be what he's after.....
If you're feeling the start of a rut, go change it up. Maybe go find some trails that you can run/hike? Even if you can only run a quarter mile at a time and then hike 3 quarters, it'll be a fun change of pace. This time of year, especially, is an awesome time to be in the woods.
Didn't he just set the record just a few months ago? I guess someone saw all the publicity he got and one upped him?Speaking of 50ks, Mike Wardian just set a world record last night during the Hoka sales meeting. On a treadmil. 2:59:49
I disproved that about 8 years ago at the Tour de Gaps. I finished DFL. Something like 80 started the event and I was the last finisher in 27th place. They were carting people off the course in pickups (bike event) due to the heat. When I finished they were giving two dudes ice baths. This also the event where I learned the spoils and good eats go to the fast people. The slow people get the leftover crumbs.As a wise runner told me once when I started: there will always be someone faster than you. And also, there will also always be someone slower than you.
nice time but what incline?Speaking of 50ks, Mike Wardian just set a world record last night during the Hoka sales meeting. On a treadmil. 2:59:49
53 people were slower than you.I disproved that about 8 years ago at the Tour de Gaps. I finished DFL. Something like 80 started the event and I was the last finisher in 27th place. They were carting people off the course in pickups (bike event) due to the heat. When I finished they were giving two dudes ice baths. This also the event where I learned the spoils and good eats go to the fast people. The slow people get the leftover crumbs.As a wise runner told me once when I started: there will always be someone faster than you. And also, there will also always be someone slower than you.
30% finishers? Ouch.I disproved that about 8 years ago at the Tour de Gaps. I finished DFL. Something like 80 started the event and I was the last finisher in 27th place. They were carting people off the course in pickups (bike event) due to the heat. When I finished they were giving two dudes ice baths. This also the event where I learned the spoils and good eats go to the fast people. The slow people get the leftover crumbs.As a wise runner told me once when I started: there will always be someone faster than you. And also, there will also always be someone slower than you.
http://www.mapmyride.com/routes/view/372649630% finishers? Ouch.I disproved that about 8 years ago at the Tour de Gaps. I finished DFL. Something like 80 started the event and I was the last finisher in 27th place. They were carting people off the course in pickups (bike event) due to the heat. When I finished they were giving two dudes ice baths. This also the event where I learned the spoils and good eats go to the fast people. The slow people get the leftover crumbs.As a wise runner told me once when I started: there will always be someone faster than you. And also, there will also always be someone slower than you.
I think he might have just broken his own record. The dude is just a machine, nobody races as often as he does at that level.Didn't he just set the record just a few months ago? I guess someone saw all the publicity he got and one upped him?Speaking of 50ks, Mike Wardian just set a world record last night during the Hoka sales meeting. On a treadmil. 2:59:49
Giving it another shot today. I'm at a point where I feel no real obligation to buy from these people. They don't seem to be the reliable sort. If they aren't open, I'm going all the way over to ballantyne. I feel like I'm teetering here.Hoka One OneWell, I'm still not at a weight that I can think about the competition part. I'm a relatively laid back guy, but when I get to sports or board games even, I get pretty competitive. This has been my downfall in past attempts to giving running a go. I go too fast too quick. I feel like I've psych'd myself out and I now "worry" more than focus on the task at hand. So I read all this stuff in here and wonder if I'll ever get to that sort of running. I know to do it, I have to lose the weight. I'm down about 21 lbs since January, but I have a ways to go yet. I have at least that much plus another 10 that I'd like to lose. Being outside has helped a lot. Those runs seem the quickest, but I'm not recouping as quickly as I was before it seems and that's the tough part for me.I think it's a tough one since Commish has been up front about wanting to maintain a casual running experience. The majority of us here are competitive runners so the first response is to go compete to stay motivated. That may not be what he's after.....
If you're feeling the start of a rut, go change it up. Maybe go find some trails that you can run/hike? Even if you can only run a quarter mile at a time and then hike 3 quarters, it'll be a fun change of pace. This time of year, especially, is an awesome time to be in the woods.
Hang 10 - I'm not recalling if you've raced a HM, and if so, what the time was. Using Steve's detailed analysis of the HM-to-marathon conversion, you would need to be able to run a HM at about 87-88 minutes. That converts to a potential sub-3:10 marathon, which you'd currently need for Boston. Actually, the way the past two years have gone, you'd need to be sub-3:09. The conversion used was 2.15, which is a high-end (optimistic) assumption. A 2.20 conversion calls for an 86 minute HM. So that's the math behind your effort. So again, where are you at in terms of HMs?I'm tentatively planning a marathon for mid November. I ran 150 miles last month. At this point I've got no idea what plan to use. Any thoughts on getting me to Boston.
TIA
![]()
I saw this come up in another forum as well and did an analysis to debunk this rule. I have been convinced for years that this only applies to the truely elite or truely sub-elite that are extremely slow-twitched, or just people who sandbagged their HMs.
I also came up with a simple but slightly more realistic conversation ratio - just divide your full-marathon by half-marathon. (or multiply your HM by 2.15-2.20, see results below)
Group 1: The fastest marathoners ever:
Haile Gebrselassie - 58:55 / 2:03:59 (2.104)
Geoff Mutai - 58:58 / 2:03:02*/2:04:15 (2.086 / 2.107, *Boston 2012, not WR eligible)
Patrick Makau - 58:52 / 2:03:38 (2.100)
Wilson Kipsang - 58:59 / 2:03:23 (2.092)
Group 2: The fastest American marathoners currently:
Meb keflezighi - 61:00 / 2:09:08 (2.117) Never really ran a fast course or time trial type race at his prime.
Dathan Ritzenhein - 60:00 / 2:07:47 (2.130)
Ryan Hall - 59:43 / 2:04:53*/2:06:17 (2.091 / 2.115)
Abdi Abdirahman - 61:07 / 2:08:56 (2.110)
Group 3: A bunch of 2:20-2:40 friends/rivals:
1) 65:45 / 2:21:30 (2.152)
2) 68:57 / 2:29:54 (2.174)
3) 69:01 / 2:27:30 (2.138)
4) 70:54 / 2:31:00 (2.130)
5) 71:30 / 2:31:00 (2.111)
6) 75:30 / 2:44 (2.172)
7) 78:30 / 2:48:30 (2.146)
Group 4: A few samples from this thread:
1) Juxt - 86 / 3:06 (2.16)
2) Gruecd -87:01 / 2:59:48 (2.07) *Sandbagged the half for sure*
3) Ned -92:53 / 3:31:20 (2.38) *Marathon was a bad day*87:10 / 3:09:02 (2.17)
4) Tri - 91:32 / 3:33:29 (2.33)
5) Worrie - 1:42 / 4:02 (2.37)
I think a few things I am seeing is that the ratio is impacted a lot by overall training mileage, and whether you were destined to be a marathoner in the first place. I do believe that most people with sufficient training and optimal pacing can get their ratio down to the 2.15-2.25 range. (unfortunately that converts to about 13.5-22.5 min for the average 90-min half guy). I think most of you have BQs in the 3:15-3:20 range, so you should be able to get there within another marathon-specific cycle or two.. (talking mainly about Ned/Tri).
Ran two halfs last year in 89 minutes. The quality of my training leading up to these races definitely lacking though. The first one I was coming of a bad case of runners knee after my 50K and the second one, I ran with basically no speed or tempo work because I was worried about aggravating my arrhythmia.Hang 10 - I'm not recalling if you've raced a HM, and if so, what the time was. Using Steve's detailed analysis of the HM-to-marathon conversion, you would need to be able to run a HM at about 87-88 minutes. That converts to a potential sub-3:10 marathon, which you'd currently need for Boston. Actually, the way the past two years have gone, you'd need to be sub-3:09. The conversion used was 2.15, which is a high-end (optimistic) assumption. A 2.20 conversion calls for an 86 minute HM. So that's the math behind your effort. So again, where are you at in terms of HMs?I'm tentatively planning a marathon for mid November. I ran 150 miles last month. At this point I've got no idea what plan to use. Any thoughts on getting me to Boston.
TIA
![]()
That profile looks hard, but not stupid, everyone drops out hard. Pack in a suck index of 160 and it, well, sucks.http://www.mapmyride.com/routes/view/372649630% finishers? Ouch.I disproved that about 8 years ago at the Tour de Gaps. I finished DFL. Something like 80 started the event and I was the last finisher in 27th place. They were carting people off the course in pickups (bike event) due to the heat. When I finished they were giving two dudes ice baths. This also the event where I learned the spoils and good eats go to the fast people. The slow people get the leftover crumbs.As a wise runner told me once when I started: there will always be someone faster than you. And also, there will also always be someone slower than you.
I had 100+ degrees on my bike computer. Probably 95 degrees in the shade on a typical humid August day. Ride started around 10am as I recall. I used to love the heat. About a 1/2 from the top of the second big climb I got off the bike and sat for 5 minutes. Probably a touch of heat exhaustion/stroke. I've never been able to handle the heat since then. I was riding well back then and in the lead group until I got shed towards the top of the the first climb. Even after the sit I was probably in the top half. Did lose any many more spots, attrition whittled any everyone behind me.
I thought it would be a straight forward ride, ended up being one of the toughest.
If you are diligent with training and stay healthy, I think a BQ is certainly obtainable for you.Ran two halfs last year in 89 minutes. The quality of my training leading up to these races definitely lacking though. The first one I was coming of a bad case of runners knee after my 50K and the second one, I ran with basically no speed or tempo work because I was worried about aggravating my arrhythmia.Hang 10 - I'm not recalling if you've raced a HM, and if so, what the time was. Using Steve's detailed analysis of the HM-to-marathon conversion, you would need to be able to run a HM at about 87-88 minutes. That converts to a potential sub-3:10 marathon, which you'd currently need for Boston. Actually, the way the past two years have gone, you'd need to be sub-3:09. The conversion used was 2.15, which is a high-end (optimistic) assumption. A 2.20 conversion calls for an 86 minute HM. So that's the math behind your effort. So again, where are you at in terms of HMs?I'm tentatively planning a marathon for mid November. I ran 150 miles last month. At this point I've got no idea what plan to use. Any thoughts on getting me to Boston.
TIA
![]()
I've definitely been better at races in the 5K - 10K range the past couple years. My speed and fitness have been pretty good but I think my cardio has been lacking. I know that has to improve this year to have a real shot at a BQ.
Awesome.Well, damn. My first recovery run after the 50K felt great. Quads got a little crispy at the end, but my energy felt awesome. 5mi @ 8:53/136
Feeling really motivated about getting going on my training cycle for the Via Marathon in Sept.![]()
I agree that it's obtainable. Hang 10, you might run another HM or two as a reality check/confidence builder regarding 87-88 minutes. Even then, the challenge will be converting that into a comparable marathon. That consists of both pursuing the appropriate training as well as building marathon experience ...and staying healthy ...and having a good race day. But again, it's achievable!If you are diligent with training and stay healthy, I think a BQ is certainly obtainable for you.Ran two halfs last year in 89 minutes. The quality of my training leading up to these races definitely lacking though. The first one I was coming of a bad case of runners knee after my 50K and the second one, I ran with basically no speed or tempo work because I was worried about aggravating my arrhythmia.Hang 10 - I'm not recalling if you've raced a HM, and if so, what the time was. Using Steve's detailed analysis of the HM-to-marathon conversion, you would need to be able to run a HM at about 87-88 minutes. That converts to a potential sub-3:10 marathon, which you'd currently need for Boston. Actually, the way the past two years have gone, you'd need to be sub-3:09. The conversion used was 2.15, which is a high-end (optimistic) assumption. A 2.20 conversion calls for an 86 minute HM. So that's the math behind your effort. So again, where are you at in terms of HMs?I'm tentatively planning a marathon for mid November. I ran 150 miles last month. At this point I've got no idea what plan to use. Any thoughts on getting me to Boston.
I've definitely been better at races in the 5K - 10K range the past couple years. My speed and fitness have been pretty good but I think my cardio has been lacking. I know that has to improve this year to have a real shot at a BQ.
It's ON!!!!!!! Mission accomplished. Just walking in these things I could tell they would be nothing but a benefit. Excited to give them a whirl. Wasn't a big fan of the price tag, but I paid it anyway. Didn't want to face the wrath of my FFA brethren!!Giving it another shot today. I'm at a point where I feel no real obligation to buy from these people. They don't seem to be the reliable sort. If they aren't open, I'm going all the way over to ballantyne. I feel like I'm teetering here.Hoka One OneWell, I'm still not at a weight that I can think about the competition part. I'm a relatively laid back guy, but when I get to sports or board games even, I get pretty competitive. This has been my downfall in past attempts to giving running a go. I go too fast too quick. I feel like I've psych'd myself out and I now "worry" more than focus on the task at hand. So I read all this stuff in here and wonder if I'll ever get to that sort of running. I know to do it, I have to lose the weight. I'm down about 21 lbs since January, but I have a ways to go yet. I have at least that much plus another 10 that I'd like to lose. Being outside has helped a lot. Those runs seem the quickest, but I'm not recouping as quickly as I was before it seems and that's the tough part for me.I think it's a tough one since Commish has been up front about wanting to maintain a casual running experience. The majority of us here are competitive runners so the first response is to go compete to stay motivated. That may not be what he's after.....
If you're feeling the start of a rut, go change it up. Maybe go find some trails that you can run/hike? Even if you can only run a quarter mile at a time and then hike 3 quarters, it'll be a fun change of pace. This time of year, especially, is an awesome time to be in the woods.
My brain rejected it. Forcefully.I am still trying to process the "7:03 pace/139 avg. HR), that has me at 76% of max at that pace."
Oh yeah? I got 3:01 / mile at 133bpm.My brain rejected it. Forcefully.I am still trying to process the "7:03 pace/139 avg. HR), that has me at 76% of max at that pace."
juxt is an animal.Wait, wait, wait ...you're running 7:03's "easy" (indicated by HR) and your marathon goal is 6:52? An eleven second differential? If that 7:03 is correct, then it seems you should be lowering that marathon goal!As far as training goes, there was one big takeaway for me from my 5K last weekend. When I crossed the finish line, my HR was up to 182. That's about what my max has been in the past but my heart rate has been so low recently and I've had such a hard time getting into the 170s during training. I had some concerns that my new monitor was reading correctly. Reaching my max (or very close) again makes me think that it's indeed accurate.
So, using that 182 as my max and analyzing a run last night (8.25 miles/7:03 pace/139 avg. HR), that has me at 76% of max at that pace. McMillan states easy runs should be around 75%, so that puts me in a good place to start marathon training since my marathon goal pace is 6:52.
That's what I was thinking. If his easy pace is 7 flat than he's sandbanging all his races.Wait, wait, wait ...you're running 7:03's "easy" (indicated by HR) and your marathon goal is 6:52? An eleven second differential? If that 7:03 is correct, then it seems you should be lowering that marathon goal!As far as training goes, there was one big takeaway for me from my 5K last weekend. When I crossed the finish line, my HR was up to 182. That's about what my max has been in the past but my heart rate has been so low recently and I've had such a hard time getting into the 170s during training. I had some concerns that my new monitor was reading correctly. Reaching my max (or very close) again makes me think that it's indeed accurate.
So, using that 182 as my max and analyzing a run last night (8.25 miles/7:03 pace/139 avg. HR), that has me at 76% of max at that pace. McMillan states easy runs should be around 75%, so that puts me in a good place to start marathon training since my marathon goal pace is 6:52.
Anyone?Question about aerobic training...
So, my target is to stay under 150 BPM. Is it better to run faster at 149 or slower at a 140? Does it make a difference?
My perceived effort seems worse than what my heart rate predicts. For that run, I wouldn't say it was difficult but it was certainly on the harder edge of easy. It was also 50 degrees and I took Sunday and Monday off (and ran just 5 mile Tuesday) so I was reasonably well rested and conditions were favorable. As summer kicks in and I'm increasing my weekly mileage, I assume my heart rate will go back up some.That's what I was thinking. If his easy pace is 7 flat than he's sandbanging all his races.Wait, wait, wait ...you're running 7:03's "easy" (indicated by HR) and your marathon goal is 6:52? An eleven second differential? If that 7:03 is correct, then it seems you should be lowering that marathon goal!As far as training goes, there was one big takeaway for me from my 5K last weekend. When I crossed the finish line, my HR was up to 182. That's about what my max has been in the past but my heart rate has been so low recently and I've had such a hard time getting into the 170s during training. I had some concerns that my new monitor was reading correctly. Reaching my max (or very close) again makes me think that it's indeed accurate.
So, using that 182 as my max and analyzing a run last night (8.25 miles/7:03 pace/139 avg. HR), that has me at 76% of max at that pace. McMillan states easy runs should be around 75%, so that puts me in a good place to start marathon training since my marathon goal pace is 6:52.