Cam Akers told The Athletic's Jourdan Rodrigue that he is "100 percent" in minicamp.
More importantly, Rodrigue notes that she expects Akers "to be worked into the passing game at an even higher volume than he was previously." Coming off a torn Achilles, Akers was cover-your-eyes bad in the playoffs. But he had almost no rehab or lead time on that, and it might be that he winds up a bit of a bargain this year as the bad taste of last year's carries lingers in our eyeballs.
SOURCE: The Athletic
Jun 21, 2022, 4:27 PM ET
Well he was LAR’s RB1 in the playoffs after coming back sooner than expected from injury. So I would say yes.he is listed as LAR RB1, is that legit?
Gilbert Manzano @GManzano24
Cam Akers has been impressive. Definitely the lead back
According to The Athletic's Jourdan Rodrigue, Cam Akers and Darrell Henderson "split first-team reps pretty evenly" at Rams camp.
"I would place a safer bet on Akers’ emergence long term as the lead, but a lot of that is based on Henderson’s health history," writes Rodrigue. "Both running backs look sharp in the passing game, where I expect their usage to increase." Akers is currently being drafted as the RB19 at Underdog whereas Henderson is all the way down at RB42. Many are expecting Akers to return to that 20-plus touches per game player he was prior to his Achilles' blowout, but he looked bad in the playoffs last year, and there's definite risk in banking on that return to 2020 form. He's still just 23, however. The Rams could open the season with a two-back tandem, but coach Sean McVay tends to always gravitate toward having a defined lead dog. Akers remains the best bet for that job, but Henderson can't be written off.
RELATED:
SOURCE: The Athletic
Aug 12, 2022, 11:09 AM ET
CAM AKERS RB, LOS ANGELES RAMS
Rams coach Sean McVay said that both Cam Akers and Darrell Henderson are dealing with "soft tissue" injuries and are being held out of practice.
While McVay didn't make either injury sound major, those are not words you want to hear about someone you might potentially draft in a fantasy league. Neither will return until they can be "full speed" in team drills. It's probably too little to go moving players down draft boards for with plenty of recovery time before the season, but if you're trying to break a tie on your board, well, soft-tissue injuries aren't always minor.
RELATED:
SOURCE: Jourdan Rodrigue on Twitter
Aug 15, 2022, 4:45 PM ET
I only have a couple shares of Akers but in both cases I had/have Sony Michel, obviously doesn't matter anymore but for a second there I had the handcuff. I'm not real big on handcuffing in general and a lot of owners aren't either. I pretty much only play FFPC where rosters are short. That said I do think Akers/Henderson is one worth having. I imagine most Henderson owners would sell him for a ham sandwich at this point.I wonder how many have Akers/Henderson handcuffed. I'll bet it's a surprisingly low number.
Rams coach Sean McVay said Cam Akers "wasn't able to" get a full-speed workout in "quite yet."
Akers has been sidelined with a soft tissue injury that isn't considered serious, but the longer it lingers on, the worse this gets for his Week 1 availability. In contrast, Darrell Henderson was able to go through a full-speed workout and looks to have taken a step ahead of Akers in his recovery from a different soft-tissue injury.
SOURCE: Sarah Barshop on Twitter
Aug 28, 2022, 6:05 PM ET
Went on the 2/3 turn tonight as the 2.12 in one of my leagues, was a little shocked.
In CBSSports, he was ranked #21. In ESPN, #10. That's standard scoring as of last Wednesday. In my draft this past Saturday, he was RB #25 in a 14 team league. That team had Henry at 1.02, so worth the risk that late.Went on the 2/3 turn tonight as the 2.12 in one of my leagues, was a little shocked.
He went in the 8th round in our (10-team 15 round draft).Went on the 2/3 turn tonight as the 2.12 in one of my leagues, was a little shocked.
Agree. Should be far better value there than him.
Cam Akers returned to practice Monday.
Akers has been dealing with an undisclosed soft tissue injury. Reports have indicated that the issue isn't serious, but Akers has been out of practice for two weeks. The third-year running back will be brought up to full speed slowly, but his return should put him on track to play in Week 1. The bigger concern for Akers is his split with Darrell Henderson, who has garnered positive reviews from Sean McVay in training camp. If the two are sharing LA's backfield, it will be hard for Akers to post anything better than RB2 fantasy numbers.
RELATED:
SOURCE: Gilbert Manzano on Twitter
reports are that he's unable to do anything but one-cut runs, and always on the non-injured, non torn Achilles' foot. I cannot think of a bigger bust to come down the turnpike than Cam Akers. Well, maybe CMC what with his 10 games played out of the last 30 games..eesh. There has never been a RB to recover from an Achilles' to return to anything even close to what he was before the injury. D'onta Foreman? yeah took him like 4 years to do so. Marlon Mack? lol. yeah OK.
This is Henderson's backfield plain and simple. Akers will come out and look like he's running in mud - just like last season. McVay is coy about his injuries ala Bellichick, but make no doubt about it, Henderson is THE RB to own here. it's so painfully obvious that the Rams will use DH as their go to guy here. Oh, and factor in Stafford's ailing elbow, and this team screams run run run all over it. Short dumps to the RBs. Stafford won't last the season his elbow is doomed. Then a no name backup takes over. Enter the strong Rams running game, led by DH.
He had about 800 total yards and 8 TDs before he got injured midway through the season. I’d have to check his game logs, but I remember him having a pretty great season to start.Henderson but he wasn't very good last year outside of maybe a game or two
reports are that he's unable to do anything but one-cut runs, and always on the non-injured, non torn Achilles' foot. I cannot think of a bigger bust to come down the turnpike than Cam Akers. Well, maybe CMC what with his 10 games played out of the last 30 games..eesh. There has never been a RB to recover from an Achilles' to return to anything even close to what he was before the injury. D'onta Foreman? yeah took him like 4 years to do so. Marlon Mack? lol. yeah OK.
This is Henderson's backfield plain and simple. Akers will come out and look like he's running in mud - just like last season. McVay is coy about his injuries ala Bellichick, but make no doubt about it, Henderson is THE RB to own here. it's so painfully obvious that the Rams will use DH as their go to guy here. Oh, and factor in Stafford's ailing elbow, and this team screams run run run all over it. Short dumps to the RBs. Stafford won't last the season his elbow is doomed. Then a no name backup takes over. Enter the strong Rams running game, led by DH.
This may be the case, but I can't believe LA wouldn't have made a move at RB. There is no way they would enter the year with one decent RB in Henderson considering his injury history. Its basically why they drafted Akers in the first place.reports are that he's unable to do anything but one-cut runs, and always on the non-injured, non torn Achilles' foot. I cannot think of a bigger bust to come down the turnpike than Cam Akers. Well, maybe CMC what with his 10 games played out of the last 30 games..eesh. There has never been a RB to recover from an Achilles' to return to anything even close to what he was before the injury. D'onta Foreman? yeah took him like 4 years to do so. Marlon Mack? lol. yeah OK.
This is Henderson's backfield plain and simple. Akers will come out and look like he's running in mud - just like last season. McVay is coy about his injuries ala Bellichick, but make no doubt about it, Henderson is THE RB to own here. it's so painfully obvious that the Rams will use DH as their go to guy here. Oh, and factor in Stafford's ailing elbow, and this team screams run run run all over it. Short dumps to the RBs. Stafford won't last the season his elbow is doomed. Then a no name backup takes over. Enter the strong Rams running game, led by DH.
Source?reports are that he's unable to do anything but one-cut runs, and always on the non-injured, non torn Achilles' foot.
- NobodySource?reports are that he's unable to do anything but one-cut runs, and always on the non-injured, non torn Achilles' foot.
There are a lot of reasons, like wanting to see where their young, talented RB was physically in mini-camp & TC before making a rash move. They have the luxury to do that because they know there is a very good chance that they can get someone of Michel's caliber today for the vet minimum. Or specifically Michel seeing as he was released yesterday.Why didn't the Rams draft a RB? Why didn't they ry to keep Michel? Or finally, why not make a trade here late before the season starts and bring in somebody like a Kareem Hunt?
He also barely touched the ball the 2nd Half of the seasonHe had about 800 total yards and 8 TDs before he got injured midway through the season. I’d have to check his game logs, but I remember him having a pretty great season to start.Henderson but he wasn't very good last year outside of maybe a game or two
If they sign Michel then it will be time to worry about Akers’ ability to start the season healthy.This may be the case, but I can't believe LA wouldn't have made a move at RB. There is no way they would enter the year with one decent RB in Henderson considering his injury history. Its basically why they drafted Akers in the first place.reports are that he's unable to do anything but one-cut runs, and always on the non-injured, non torn Achilles' foot. I cannot think of a bigger bust to come down the turnpike than Cam Akers. Well, maybe CMC what with his 10 games played out of the last 30 games..eesh. There has never been a RB to recover from an Achilles' to return to anything even close to what he was before the injury. D'onta Foreman? yeah took him like 4 years to do so. Marlon Mack? lol. yeah OK.
This is Henderson's backfield plain and simple. Akers will come out and look like he's running in mud - just like last season. McVay is coy about his injuries ala Bellichick, but make no doubt about it, Henderson is THE RB to own here. it's so painfully obvious that the Rams will use DH as their go to guy here. Oh, and factor in Stafford's ailing elbow, and this team screams run run run all over it. Short dumps to the RBs. Stafford won't last the season his elbow is doomed. Then a no name backup takes over. Enter the strong Rams running game, led by DH.
It’s almost verbatim from a video that I saw on YouTube. Having trouble finding it at the moment.- NobodySource?reports are that he's unable to do anything but one-cut runs, and always on the non-injured, non torn Achilles' foot.
That seems like a pretty smart football move given all of Akers, hendo, and Williams have had issues this offseason. I wouldn't really consider that move an indication of Akers availability.If they sign Michel then it will be time to worry about Akers’ ability to start the season healthy.This may be the case, but I can't believe LA wouldn't have made a move at RB. There is no way they would enter the year with one decent RB in Henderson considering his injury history. Its basically why they drafted Akers in the first place.reports are that he's unable to do anything but one-cut runs, and always on the non-injured, non torn Achilles' foot. I cannot think of a bigger bust to come down the turnpike than Cam Akers. Well, maybe CMC what with his 10 games played out of the last 30 games..eesh. There has never been a RB to recover from an Achilles' to return to anything even close to what he was before the injury. D'onta Foreman? yeah took him like 4 years to do so. Marlon Mack? lol. yeah OK.
This is Henderson's backfield plain and simple. Akers will come out and look like he's running in mud - just like last season. McVay is coy about his injuries ala Bellichick, but make no doubt about it, Henderson is THE RB to own here. it's so painfully obvious that the Rams will use DH as their go to guy here. Oh, and factor in Stafford's ailing elbow, and this team screams run run run all over it. Short dumps to the RBs. Stafford won't last the season his elbow is doomed. Then a no name backup takes over. Enter the strong Rams running game, led by DH.
Here's a video from January where Akers was cutting plenty of times off his right leg. And he practiced fully yesterday, which ain't happening if he can only cut on one leg (cue zoolander: "I CAN cut left!")It’s almost verbatim from a video that I saw on YouTube. Having trouble finding it at the moment.
Nice, I like the stack. Huge payday if one goes down, and if they're both healthy, they should give you at least FLEX value there. If they both go down is the only way taking both of them blows up in your face.Well my drunk *** got both of them as my RB 3 / Flex so we shall see. I do like the idea of my Flex being a 3rd down type back on a good team.
I'm terrified of this happening. I hope Michel left the Rams on really bad terms and that him and McVay are mortal enemies.If they sign Michel then it will be time to worry about Akers’ ability to start the season healthy.
Isn't that who Henderson already is?I got a feeling Akers is going to turn into one of those habitual "my knee has a boo boo" kind of guys.
Meanwhile, Henderson is getting undervalued due to what Akers COULD be.
I think you're selling Henderson short; he's also had ankle, thigh, rib and thumb injuries, so much better than Akers at getting injured IMO.Isn't that who Henderson already is?I got a feeling Akers is going to turn into one of those habitual "my knee has a boo boo" kind of guys.
Meanwhile, Henderson is getting undervalued due to what Akers COULD be.
Isn't that who Henderson already is?I got a feeling Akers is going to turn into one of those habitual "my knee has a boo boo" kind of guys.
Meanwhile, Henderson is getting undervalued due to what Akers COULD be.
Henderson is not that guy. If akers is terrible I'd look at Williams.
No, Henderson is valued correctly for a dude softer than warm butter.Meanwhile, Henderson is getting undervalued due to what Akers COULD be.
No, Henderson is valued correctly for a dude softer than butter.Meanwhile, Henderson is getting undervalued due to what Akers COULD be.
I had him last season & had to watch plodding Sony friggin “cut by the dolphins” Michel take his job. It was painful.
Henderson isn’t going to be a jackpot if Akers goes down.
I didn’t draft Akers.No, Henderson is valued correctly for a dude softer than butter.Meanwhile, Henderson is getting undervalued due to what Akers COULD be.
I had him last season & had to watch plodding Sony friggin “cut by the dolphins” Michel take his job. It was painful.
Henderson isn’t going to be a jackpot if Akers goes down.
No way. Akers ADP is 3.10 for a guy with an Achilles injury that we know a RB has never come back to be productive from. Henderson who may be the Week 1 starter in a VERY GOOD offense, is going at 10.03.
Sorry but you're wrong and groupthink is wrong on this one. Have fun with your RB with a torn achilles who had his first "full speed" workout of the offseason on Monday. You can take the guy in the timeshare with a torn achilles in the late 3rd / early 4th if you want, but I'd rather take his counterpart with the higher YPC and pass catching role 6 rounds later, who hasn't torn his achilles
I didn’t draft Akers.No, Henderson is valued correctly for a dude softer than butter.Meanwhile, Henderson is getting undervalued due to what Akers COULD be.
I had him last season & had to watch plodding Sony friggin “cut by the dolphins” Michel take his job. It was painful.
Henderson isn’t going to be a jackpot if Akers goes down.
No way. Akers ADP is 3.10 for a guy with an Achilles injury that we know a RB has never come back to be productive from. Henderson who may be the Week 1 starter in a VERY GOOD offense, is going at 10.03.
Sorry but you're wrong and groupthink is wrong on this one. Have fun with your RB with a torn achilles who had his first "full speed" workout of the offseason on Monday. You can take the guy in the timeshare with a torn achilles in the late 3rd / early 4th if you want, but I'd rather take his counterpart with the higher YPC and pass catching role 6 rounds later, who hasn't torn his achilles
Who am I supposed to “have fun” with? I’m not high on either this year.
I just know Henderson’s track record. Good luck.
There’s good reason Henderson is being drafted in the 10th.I didn’t draft Akers.No, Henderson is valued correctly for a dude softer than butter.Meanwhile, Henderson is getting undervalued due to what Akers COULD be.
I had him last season & had to watch plodding Sony friggin “cut by the dolphins” Michel take his job. It was painful.
Henderson isn’t going to be a jackpot if Akers goes down.
No way. Akers ADP is 3.10 for a guy with an Achilles injury that we know a RB has never come back to be productive from. Henderson who may be the Week 1 starter in a VERY GOOD offense, is going at 10.03.
Sorry but you're wrong and groupthink is wrong on this one. Have fun with your RB with a torn achilles who had his first "full speed" workout of the offseason on Monday. You can take the guy in the timeshare with a torn achilles in the late 3rd / early 4th if you want, but I'd rather take his counterpart with the higher YPC and pass catching role 6 rounds later, who hasn't torn his achilles
Who am I supposed to “have fun” with? I’m not high on either this year.
I just know Henderson’s track record. Good luck.
Versus Akers track record? Versus the track record of no RB ever coming back to form after tearing an Achilles? Coming back "into form" for Akers would be 4.2 YPC. I don't care who you own, if you're arguing against Henderson in favor of a guy who averaged less yards per carry prior to tearing his Achilles, it's just a wrong argument to have.
I get that Henderson is not the beacon of health but he has in fact, never torn his Achilles and has outproduced in every metric that is meaningful to FF players. If I had to choose between the guy who tore his Achilles vs the guy who hasn't and the talent is approximately the same, I know who I'm taking. Maybe you don't remember Marlon Mack? Marlon Mack looked like the NEXT GUY at RB. Then he tore his Achilles and can't make the TEXANS ROSTER a team forecasted to win 5 or less games.
We can agree to disagree. This is just a situation where the numbers are clear about RBs who tear their Achilles. There's no exception to the rule, it's a death knell for that position. I don't expect the guy who averaged 4.2YPC prior to tearing his Achilles to be the guy who bucks the trend.
You’re simply incorrect here. Henderson is never going to be a feature back.
I’m not comparing him to Akers who, (as already mentioned) is not someone I’m high on at all.
Nut rather in a vacuum. Henderson is the 3rd down back - and if something happens to Akers, it’ll be next man up between the tackles. Likely Funk or Williams.
Sometimes the FF experts who rank players are correct. Sometimes ADP is a good indicator of a player’s value.
So no, I won’t “agree to disagree”, but I will agree to revisit this around week 12 to see how Henderson’s production is going. That’s a bit less passive aggressive.
And yet here you are, discussing it further.I already told you. I'm not discussing this further. If your options are a RB who tore his Achilles versus one who hasn't, you take the one that hasn't. If you disagree, I'm sorry but you're wrong and I won't waste my time having the discussion.
And yet here you are, discussing it further.I already told you. I'm not discussing this further. If your options are a RB who tore his Achilles versus one who hasn't, you take the one that hasn't. If you disagree, I'm sorry but you're wrong and I won't waste my time having the discussion.
That’s ok. You can have the last word. I’ve set a reminder to bump this in week 12. Good luck with Henderson.
You’d probably also include something like this to make one final point “If your options are a RB who tore his Achilles versus one who hasn't, you take the one that hasn't. If you disagree, I'm sorry but you're wrong and I won't waste my time having the discussion.”Explaining I'm not going to discuss isn't discussion, champ. If I was discussing it further