LionOfGosforth
Footballguy
there was no antagomism at all dude, you misunderstood my comment, it's ok no worries.Well you didn't understand my comment at all, but that's ok we can move on.My guess this is hindsight bias, whenever someone says this the gut seems to always be right. Noone ever posts I'm glad I didn't listen to their gut when it's wrong.What was that lesson? Going into the season you had seen Kincaid succeed and he had a much better QB situation. Taking him over Bowers was good process with a bad outcome. But I am not sure what lesson was learned.Could have also had Bowers and took Kincaid instead, lesson learned!
To listen to my own gut and not follow group-think I suppose. I had him higher in my head but followed the herd too much.
Oh no. I got plenty wrong that was nothing to do with anyone else and based on gut feelings. I had Richardson QB3, never mind the consensus of 5 or 6. I also had Hall RB1. Both wrong. Drafted them both based on that. Bowers on the other hand, I had TE5 with Kincaid at 6 or 7. Thanks for the sweeping statement though, helpful stuff.
Well, I understand it didn't add to the discussion that was taking place at all, due to the sweeping generalization made and the slightly antagonistic tone behind it. But sure, moving on. Chase Brown, been great this year.
Then I apologize, play-off stress hitting my reading comprehension