This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
I think they'll more likely go the trade route, but trades aren't easy to come by.
Other rookies have also fallen out of favor (Sony, Penny). He'll slide to mid to late first.
Honestly, I'd take Kerryon before him. I think they'll have similar value a year from now (Blout will be 32 and a free agent). Guice can't do anything to improve his value out for a year. The bonus is what you'll get from Johnson this year.
Last year's Murray was a replacement level talent (which is why I'm nervous for Henry, how could he not unset him?). IMO some combination of Perine and a healthy Thompson can be as valuable as Murray. Aside from being a bit more unpredictable with Murray in the backfield, I don't see the upside to signing him but who knows what happens.
The team doctors. They are just speculating until they do a MRI, they don't have x-ray vision. They do some tests on the knee and see.
If I am any of those teams, I am offering guys up left and right asking for a 4th to 6th round pick. If I am the Skins I am waiting them all out, unless it is a guy under contract after this year.
No, I'm worked up over the lack of the word think.
Who cares? You are nit picking the hell out of this and the 18 hours it took to get the correct diagnose changed nothing.
I asked a simple question.
For a guy that italicizes words to prove some sort of point (of which you were wrong) you sure do have thin skin.
If this happened it'd say more about Thompson's health than the Guice injury. I don't know what AA brings to the table that Thompson doesn't already provide.
We aren't talking about magic football "experts" we are talking about people you indeed would expect expertise from. As in not declaring an injury "not serious" before they know it isn't serious.
Good idea,wrong ex-Bengal. Thompson fills a Gio role already. Ironically the guy they should price check on they faced last night. Hill makes more sense. This is why I don't understand why Hill signed the contract he did when he did.
So in the middle of a game the team doctor runs some tests on his knee and tells the coach or whoever. I think it is just sprain, we should get a MRI to confirm. He will probably be ready by week 2 of the regular season. Coach gets asked a couple hours later after the game how serious it is and he says the doctors said it was just a sprain we will have a precautionary MRI tomorrow.
Thinking of the answer to this leads me to want to say this might be the most overrated top half of first round dynasty draft in memory.
I would not say they did anything wrong but I just listened to Dr. Chao on Sirius and he said he'd never personally been in a situation where he or a medical staff he worked with was not able to identify an ACL injury immediately with a physical exam. 100% accuracy with physical exam is what he is saying. He added that for all we know the teams medical staff could have told them they thought it was an ACL and they decided to just put the MCL story out but that does not seem plausible.
No kidding. I have the 1.02 and I'm probably STILL taking Guice. It helps I have the 1.01 and Kamara, but still. There's just no one else I want there.
Everyone would have to be out of the league in like 3 years to make it worse than the Trent Richardson draft.
That's what is crazy is on most of my teams I'd still take him at 2 as well. Like your team it helps that I'm generally deep at RB on those teams but when I sat and tried to think of who I'd take over him I drew a giant blank. If I felt like I needed a RB that would not be the case on those teams but as is I'd rather just wait a year on him.
I remember the top 7 being thought as strong. Richardson, Martin, Blackmon, Floyd, Luck, RG3, and Wilson
no, I just think its hilarious and really telling when someone goes back hours or days just to say I told you so. the vast majority of anything any of us say is likely to be incorrect. but some people love popping into threads to say told you so. I'm not one of those guys.
honestly, the acl is extremely difficult to properly diagnose right on the sideline. anterior drawer and lachman test are not accurate because the hamstrings tend to bind up, making it seem like the acl is intact (hamstrings kind of do the same job as the acl to over simplify it). false negatives are terribly common. I dont know why they even do those tests anymore. chances are even if you do get a positive test, itll be negative immediately after as the hamstrings realize the mobility issue and contract to stabilize.
