What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Devonta Freeman, BAL (2 Viewers)

Just went for TY Hilton in one league and for Emmanuel Sanders in another.
The guy getting Freeman just ripped those other dudes off.
I wouldn't even consider either of those guys. Sanders is finished because Manning is finished.

I will also say that if Mike Smith was still coach of this team, Freeman would not have the success he is having. They would still be lining up at the 50 yard line in their goal line formation on 2nd and 10 hoping to get 2 yards to make it 3rd and 8.

 
Deamon said:
cloppbeast said:
He's a sell high if I've ever seen one.
Why? No one is going to give up a Peterson/Charles type player for him. No one expects 3tds/game, but if you own him, ride him as long as you can and you'll probably keep stacking up valuable wins. He's an extremely cheap RB1 at LEAST until coleman is back.
I don't exactly know what you could get for him, but when posters on this thread start comparing him to Tomlinson, makes me think you could get somebody pretty damn good.

Plus, what's the situation when Coleman gets back? Lots of people think Freeman continues to get the lions share, but I'm not so sure. Definitely the starter, but what's the split?
If John Fox was the HC, you can take it to the bank that he would screw #### up by platooning the guy, not ever series but every other play. The guy is too stupid to stay with something that works. I think this coaching staff is smart enough to leave what works alone until it doesn't work. Sure Coleman will get in there but right now as long as Freeman produces in the run and pass game, I can't see these guys changing it.
Because your super-charger gives you a bunch of horse power is not a reason not to upgrade your exhaust.

Freeman is not the entire reason the run game has worked so well the past 2. Consider how Freeman and Coleman performed comparably the first 2 games. With Coleman on the sidelines the recently, Freeman busted it. Great o-line play combined with poor defense. We didn't even see the rookie play in those circumstances. I think the coaches are more smarter enough to figure that out.

 
Just traded Freeman, Coleman, and Demaryius Thomas for Jamaal Charles. Might have overpaid, but I now have AP, Charles and Gurley at RB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
pbandy1 said:
Squintz82 said:
Just traded Freeman, Coleman, and Demaryius Thomas for Jamaal Charles. Might have overpaid, but I now have AP, Charles and Gurley at RB.
jesus. who are your WRs?
Marshall and TY Hilton. RB WR WR FLEX FLEX. I'll be rolling AP, Charles, Gurley, Marshall, and Hilton

 
Could not give him away in one of my dynasty leagues after Coleman was drafted. Glad no one was interested.

 
I was offered K Allen. Nope.

Next week they are home against the Redskins. I would rank him behind Bell, AP, Charles, .........?

 
Be careful, Skins run D is actually pretty good. I'd still think of him as top 10 this week though considering the combination of touches and likely red zone opportunities, along with how good he's been as well.

 
Be careful, Skins run D is actually pretty good. I'd still think of him as top 10 this week though considering the combination of touches and likely red zone opportunities, along with how good he's been as well.
Skins run D is severely overrated. Look at who they've played.

Dolphins (31st)

Rams (23rd, ranked lower without Gurley's game)

Giants (24th)

Eagles (30th)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Be careful, Skins run D is actually pretty good. I'd still think of him as top 10 this week though considering the combination of touches and likely red zone opportunities, along with how good he's been as well.
Skins run D is severely overrated. Look at who they've played.

Dolphins

Rams

Giants

Eagles
Skins run defense has been good for a while; one of the lone bright spots on the team. Given the crapfest last season they still managed to be a top-10 run defense unit, which is kind of amazing given how many plays the opponents were able to run.

Freeman is a must-avoid for me in DFS this week, but if you have him in leagues you gotta play him.

 
Maybe, but they were top half of the league last year in run D too and seem to be pretty improved on defense.

I'm not saying to bench Freeman or anything, IMO he's still a top ten RB play this week. With the workload, targets and goalline carries he probably is against anyone in the league for the time being. I was just cautioning anyone that thinks of the Skins as a joke that their run D is probably their strong point.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Be careful, Skins run D is actually pretty good. I'd still think of him as top 10 this week though considering the combination of touches and likely red zone opportunities, along with how good he's been as well.
Skins run D is severely overrated. Look at who they've played.

Dolphins (31st)

Rams (23rd, ranked lower without Gurley's game)

Giants (24th)

Eagles (30th)
PART of the reason these teams have struggled so much is because they've had to play a good washington run d. I agree they may be overrated at the #2 in the NFL as they are ranked currently though. But they are still top 10 even if you do give them a big downgrade based on matchups.

 
I feel like if I put this guy in all my Fanduel lineups this week, I'm gonna lose money. Which would be typical for me.
well, the only ones I won the last two weeks have had him in there.

I thought Id be chasing on Larry Fitz as well, after the 3 td game, but he has done just fine.

Ride em while they are hot I say!

 
Be careful, Skins run D is actually pretty good. I'd still think of him as top 10 this week though considering the combination of touches and likely red zone opportunities, along with how good he's been as well.
Skins run D is severely overrated. Look at who they've played.

Dolphins (31st)

Rams (23rd, ranked lower without Gurley's game)

Giants (24th)

Eagles (30th)
PART of the reason these teams have struggled so much is because they've had to play a good washington run d. I agree they may be overrated at the #2 in the NFL as they are ranked currently though. But they are still top 10 even if you do give them a big downgrade based on matchups.
No idea how good this run D is. Miami and Philly need asterisks next to them. Miami because they didn't even try. They are padding every teams run D stats. Philly because their OL totally blows. Starting Freeman regardless because he can catch it out of the backfield.

 
I really don't understand all the talk about him losing massive carries to Coleman when he returns. Why mess with success? Freeman is dominating right now. Why not run with it?

Until things change, I would use Coleman to spell Freeman for 8-10 carries, and run Freeman as he has the last 2 weeks.

Yes, he is a sell high guy. But if you drafted him at his ADP or later, you got the steal. Isn't that what a great draft is suppose to do?

I am holding him, and hope to keep rolling with him.

 
Be careful, Skins run D is actually pretty good. I'd still think of him as top 10 this week though considering the combination of touches and likely red zone opportunities, along with how good he's been as well.
is the WAS run D better or worse than the HOU run D?

 
I think FF stats are affecting the way folks are viewing him to some degree. He's a had a really really good 2 game stretch in all respects. But those 6 TDs have folks viewing him like the next Tomlinson, and I don't think that's what he is. If I had him, I'd be looking to cash out honestly. Not that he sucks or has no value going forward - far from it. Good young back on a great team tearing it up. But you can get the world for him right now, and I'd try to do it. Maybe target one of the top WRs in the game from a team that has an RB need.
i have him in redraft and have tried to trade him for the past 2 weeks (before yesterdays game) with 0 bites.

let's see if any offers come my way this week lol
I just offered him, Eifert, and DeVante Parker for AJ Green and DeAngelo Williams. I suspect I will get rejected, but it's a very even swap according to both FBG and our website (CBS.) I should note, this league is not TE-required, so Eifert counts as a WR.
Trade accepted!

 
I think FF stats are affecting the way folks are viewing him to some degree. He's a had a really really good 2 game stretch in all respects. But those 6 TDs have folks viewing him like the next Tomlinson, and I don't think that's what he is. If I had him, I'd be looking to cash out honestly. Not that he sucks or has no value going forward - far from it. Good young back on a great team tearing it up. But you can get the world for him right now, and I'd try to do it. Maybe target one of the top WRs in the game from a team that has an RB need.
i have him in redraft and have tried to trade him for the past 2 weeks (before yesterdays game) with 0 bites.

let's see if any offers come my way this week lol
I just offered him, Eifert, and DeVante Parker for AJ Green and DeAngelo Williams. I suspect I will get rejected, but it's a very even swap according to both FBG and our website (CBS.) I should note, this league is not TE-required, so Eifert counts as a WR.
Trade accepted!
Im not sure of your league rules....but that guy got an RB1, TE1, and WR with upside for a WR1. I like the deal he got.

 
I think FF stats are affecting the way folks are viewing him to some degree. He's a had a really really good 2 game stretch in all respects. But those 6 TDs have folks viewing him like the next Tomlinson, and I don't think that's what he is. If I had him, I'd be looking to cash out honestly. Not that he sucks or has no value going forward - far from it. Good young back on a great team tearing it up. But you can get the world for him right now, and I'd try to do it. Maybe target one of the top WRs in the game from a team that has an RB need.
i have him in redraft and have tried to trade him for the past 2 weeks (before yesterdays game) with 0 bites.

let's see if any offers come my way this week lol
I just offered him, Eifert, and DeVante Parker for AJ Green and DeAngelo Williams. I suspect I will get rejected, but it's a very even swap according to both FBG and our website (CBS.) I should note, this league is not TE-required, so Eifert counts as a WR.
Trade accepted!
Im not sure of your league rules....but that guy got an RB1, TE1, and WR with upside for a WR1. I like the deal he got.
It was a good deal for both of us. His team sucks nards; he was starting McFadden at RB, so he was desperate. Freeman is a huge upgrade for him even splitting carries. From my end, it's not a TE required league so Eifert was a WR3-4 rather than a TE1. I hadn't started him once this year. Parker, I had to drop by Sunday anyway in order to activate Martavis Bryant, so he was a pot sweetener. I have Le'Veon (which is why I wanted DeAngelo as a handcuff) as well as Joseph Randle and Mark Ingram, so I'm pretty solid at RB even without Freeman (no flex.) Now I can roll out Beckham, AJ Green, and either Mike Evans, Martavis Bryant, or John Brown at WR with Bell and either Randle or Ingram at RB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm just got offered him and JBrown for DT, the same EXACT trade I was thinking about offering. Still everything about Freeman screams sell high.

 
Hmm just got offered him and JBrown for DT, the same EXACT trade I was thinking about offering. Still everything about Freeman screams sell high.
Trade the #1 RB in fantasy through 4 weeks at your own risk.
I don't get this strategy either. I'd rather ride the guy and if he flounders, no big deal. If you trade him and he becomes the next Priest Holmes, you end up kicking yourself in the ###.

 
I was trying to package him and Gore for L.Bell. Had to withdraw the trade for this week at least as I have Ivory on a bye and not much else at RB. Owner was thinking about it though.

 
Back to Back 30 Point games since 2000:
Brian Westbrook 2008
Clinton Portis 2003
DeAngelo Williams 2008
Deuce McAllister 2003
LaDainian Tomlinson 2003, 2006
Larry Johnson 2005
Le'Veon Bell 2014
Marshall Faulk* 2000, 2001
Mike Anderson 2000
Priest Holmes 2003. 2004
Ricky Williams 2000, 2002
Steven Jackson 2006
Since year 2000, RBs with Multiple 30+ points in a Season:

Adrian Peterson 2007, 2012
Ahman Green 2003
Arian Foster 2010, 2011
Brian Westbrook 2007, 2008
Chris Johnson 2009
Clinton Portis 2002, 2003
Darren McFadden 2010
DeAngelo Williams 2008
Deuce McAllister 2002, 2003
Devonta Freeman 2015
Eddie George 2000
Edgerrin James 2000
Fred Taylor 2000
Jamal Lewis 2003
LaDainian Tomlinson 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007
Larry Johnson 2005, 2006
Le'Veon Bell 2014
Marshall Faulk* 2000, 2001
Matt Forte 2010
Maurice Jones-Drew 2009
Michael Turner 2008
Mike Anderson 2000
Peyton Hillis 2010
Priest Holmes 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004
Ricky Williams 2000, 2002
Rudi Johnson 2003
Shaun Alexander 2001, 2004, 2005
Steven Jackson 2006, 2008
Tiki Barber 2005
Warrick Dunn 2000


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm just got offered him and JBrown for DT, the same EXACT trade I was thinking about offering. Still everything about Freeman screams sell high.
Trade the #1 RB in fantasy through 4 weeks at your own risk.
I don't get this strategy either. I'd rather ride the guy and if he flounders, no big deal. If you trade him and he becomes the next Priest Holmes, you end up kicking yourself in the ###.
And if he goes back to his old self while the guy you could have traded for him does well, you end up kicking yourself in the ###.

 
humpback said:
lod01 said:
ImTheScientist said:
shadyridr said:
Hmm just got offered him and JBrown for DT, the same EXACT trade I was thinking about offering. Still everything about Freeman screams sell high.
Trade the #1 RB in fantasy through 4 weeks at your own risk.
I don't get this strategy either. I'd rather ride the guy and if he flounders, no big deal. If you trade him and he becomes the next Priest Holmes, you end up kicking yourself in the ###.
And if he goes back to his old self while the guy you could have traded for him does well, you end up kicking yourself in the ###.
What's his normal self? 1 Year in as a backup is enough to say he will never be more?

2014:

65 Attempts - 248 yards - 1 TD

30 of 37 reception - 225 yards - 1 TD

Hope you are not a CMike follower at all....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm only willing to trade him at rediculous cost at this point. Say L. Murray/WR 2. Otherwise, I'll ride him until he regressed to his norm, which I'm very confident will happen in the nest several weeks.

 
My guess work from here on out

Freeman- 17-20 rushes 80-100 yards, 4-5 recepts, 20-25 yards, 0.7 td's per game

Coleman- 6-7 rushes 30-45 yards, 1 recept 2-3 yards 0.2 td's

 
humpback said:
lod01 said:
ImTheScientist said:
shadyridr said:
Hmm just got offered him and JBrown for DT, the same EXACT trade I was thinking about offering. Still everything about Freeman screams sell high.
Trade the #1 RB in fantasy through 4 weeks at your own risk.
I don't get this strategy either. I'd rather ride the guy and if he flounders, no big deal. If you trade him and he becomes the next Priest Holmes, you end up kicking yourself in the ###.
And if he goes back to his old self while the guy you could have traded for him does well, you end up kicking yourself in the ###.
What's his normal self? 1 Year in as a backup is enough to say he will never be more?

2014:

65 Attempts - 248 yards - 1 TD

30 of 37 reception - 225 yards - 1 TD

Hope you are not a CMike follower at all....
Where did I say he will never be more? Just giving the other side of the coin- of course there is potential downside in not selling him high.

His old self was JAG, including in the two games to start this season. I happen to think the O-line deserves a ton of credit for his recent FF performance, and it's entirely possible that he regresses substantially when Coleman returns and/or the O-line regresses. I own him in redraft so I hope not, but time will tell.

 
Could not give him away in one of my dynasty leagues after Coleman was drafted. Glad no one was interested.
Tell me about it. No response from listing him in my trade bait and I even offered him to the Coleman owner for a 2016 2nd and his response was "I am not interested in RB handcuffs."

 
The fear is that the coaches watched both Freeman and Coleman for several weeks. The coaches decided Coleman was the better RB and got the starting job week 1. So what do the coaches think now? That's the key.

I definitely think he eats into Freeman's carries and in the next few weeks maybe even to 50-50.

 
The fear is that the coaches watched both Freeman and Coleman for several weeks. The coaches decided Coleman was the better RB and got the starting job week 1. So what do the coaches think now? That's the key.

I definitely think he eats into Freeman's carries and in the next few weeks maybe even to 50-50.
Thats NOT the case. Freeman and Coleman were both injured for the majority of the preseason. Coleman came back the last week and did well, Freeman didn't come back. They then gave Coleman the nod week 1. Freeman was just getting healthy and back into shape week 2 when Coleman went out.

Had both been healthy all preseason there is no telling what would have happened. Freeman has now taken the job.

 
The fear is that the coaches watched both Freeman and Coleman for several weeks. The coaches decided Coleman was the better RB and got the starting job week 1. So what do the coaches think now? That's the key.

I definitely think he eats into Freeman's carries and in the next few weeks maybe even to 50-50.
No they didnt. Coleman only got the top of thew depth chart at the very last moment (Sept 8th) because Freeman couldn't practice/play in preseason. That only lasted a couple weeks.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The fear is that the coaches watched both Freeman and Coleman for several weeks. The coaches decided Coleman was the better RB and got the starting job week 1. So what do the coaches think now? That's the key.

I definitely think he eats into Freeman's carries and in the next few weeks maybe even to 50-50.
oof
 
The fear is that the coaches watched both Freeman and Coleman for several weeks. The coaches decided Coleman was the better RB and got the starting job week 1. So what do the coaches think now? That's the key.

I definitely think he eats into Freeman's carries and in the next few weeks maybe even to 50-50.
Thats NOT the case. Freeman and Coleman were both injured for the majority of the preseason. Coleman came back the last week and did well, Freeman didn't come back. They then gave Coleman the nod week 1. Freeman was just getting healthy and back into shape week 2 when Coleman went out.

Had both been healthy all preseason there is no telling what would have happened. Freeman has now taken the job.
Freeman and Coleman both returned to practice on Monday, August 17th, a full month before the 1st game. Freeman was fully healthy and in shape for that game. Coleman outplaying him had nothing to do with Freeman working himself back into shape or still being injured. Because of Freeman's success the last two weeks, they likely aren't going to rush Coleman back before the ribs are healed.

 
The fear is that the coaches watched both Freeman and Coleman for several weeks. The coaches decided Coleman was the better RB and got the starting job week 1. So what do the coaches think now? That's the key.

I definitely think he eats into Freeman's carries and in the next few weeks maybe even to 50-50.
Thats NOT the case. Freeman and Coleman were both injured for the majority of the preseason. Coleman came back the last week and did well, Freeman didn't come back. They then gave Coleman the nod week 1. Freeman was just getting healthy and back into shape week 2 when Coleman went out.

Had both been healthy all preseason there is no telling what would have happened. Freeman has now taken the job.
Freeman and Coleman both returned to practice on Monday, August 17th, a full month before the 1st game. Freeman was fully healthy and in shape for that game. Coleman outplaying him had nothing to do with Freeman working himself back into shape or still being injured. Because of Freeman's success the last two weeks, they likely aren't going to rush Coleman back before the ribs are healed.
:no:

On Aug 22 the coach said he was close to returning. On the 17th they merely rejoined practice. He was standing, not participating.

http://www.rotoworld.com/recent/nfl/9423/devonta-freeman

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top