Ilov80s
Footballguy
I think he gets a shot at it.Is Martin the bell cow upon return?
I think he gets a shot at it.Is Martin the bell cow upon return?
With Rainey's recent fumble issues I expect Martin to get the majority of the snaps against Pittsburgh. If Martin doesn't perform the split could be more even going forward.I think he gets a shot at it.Is Martin the bell cow upon return?
Doug Martin - RB - Buccaneers
ESPN Bucs reporter Pat Yasinskas expects Doug Martin to get the "bulk of the carries" in Sunday's game at Pittsburgh.
Bobby Rainey lost two fumbles as the Bucs got absolutely pasted by the Falcons last Thursday night. So it's only logical to think Martin will regain his starting job and be the lead dog in a committee. He's a mid-range RB2 in a nice matchup against a beaten down Pittsburgh defense.
Related: Bobby Rainey
Source: ESPN.com
Sep 26 - 11:25 PM
I'm on the fence between Martin and F-Jax. I'm leaning to Jax. I just feel as though I want to see him play before plugging him into the lineup.
For me, I can't see a situation where somebody who drafted Martin should fail to play him this week. Unless you have two of McCoy, Murray, Charles, or Bell in a stone age league without a flex, you've got to put in the muscle hamster. Great match up against Pittsburgh, and who doesn't expect 15-20 touches for him this week?0.5PPR. Debating Martin, Charles and Sproles for my 2nd RB slot. Prefer Charles but the Mon night is a killer (don't own Davis).
I just traded M.Stafford and Chris Ivory away for both D.Martin and Rainey...hoping between one of those 2 i find a RB 2b as i have J.Charles and zac stacy as my 1 and 2cloppbeast said:Just traded Ahmad Bradshaw for Martin, thinking I'd rather have a feature guy than a time share guy. The biggest question for Martin: does he return to his rookie form or remain the runner we've seen the last few games (last season included)? I know a lot of people were encouraged by his performance in the pre-season, so I'm optimistic he'll do well.
Although they don't have best run blocking in Tampa, the Steelers at least don't defend the run particularly well. Definitely play Martin if you have him.
At some point you have to forget the draft and play your best lineup. There are plenty of guys drafted after Martin that could and should be considered over him.I'm on the fence between Martin and F-Jax. I'm leaning to Jax. I just feel as though I want to see him play before plugging him into the lineup.For me, I can't see a situation where somebody who drafted Martin should fail to play him this week. Unless you have two of McCoy, Murray, Charles, or Bell in a stone age league without a flex, you've got to put in the muscle hamster. Great match up against Pittsburgh, and who doesn't expect 15-20 touches for him this week?0.5PPR. Debating Martin, Charles and Sproles for my 2nd RB slot. Prefer Charles but the Mon night is a killer (don't own Davis).
Just my
The draft doesn't have much to do with it; I disagree with the bolded sentence. There's only 4-5 running backs I'd start over Martin this week.At some point you have to forget the draft and play your best lineup. There are plenty of guys drafted after Martin that could and should be considered over him.I'm on the fence between Martin and F-Jax. I'm leaning to Jax. I just feel as though I want to see him play before plugging him into the lineup.For me, I can't see a situation where somebody who drafted Martin should fail to play him this week. Unless you have two of McCoy, Murray, Charles, or Bell in a stone age league without a flex, you've got to put in the muscle hamster. Great match up against Pittsburgh, and who doesn't expect 15-20 touches for him this week?0.5PPR. Debating Martin, Charles and Sproles for my 2nd RB slot. Prefer Charles but the Mon night is a killer (don't own Davis).
Just my
A lot has happened since the draft. Martin was getting tons of praise by the staff at being the number 1 guy, they signed Mankins and all was looking promising. Then game 1 comes and he runs for 9 yards on 9 carries and Rainey has looked good. There were whispers of him getting sat not just for the injury and possibly being healthy for the Thur night game...Suffice it to say, I would love to put him in with confidence as my number 2 back behind Lacy, but I just don't know what to expect. Yhea, the matchup is nice, but are we sure Martin is going to get most of the carries? Will Rainey spell him a bit as he gets his game conditioning back? And what if Martin starts slow and Rainey looks good?I'm on the fence between Martin and F-Jax. I'm leaning to Jax. I just feel as though I want to see him play before plugging him into the lineup.For me, I can't see a situation where somebody who drafted Martin should fail to play him this week. Unless you have two of McCoy, Murray, Charles, or Bell in a stone age league without a flex, you've got to put in the muscle hamster. Great match up against Pittsburgh, and who doesn't expect 15-20 touches for him this week?0.5PPR. Debating Martin, Charles and Sproles for my 2nd RB slot. Prefer Charles but the Mon night is a killer (don't own Davis).
Just my
Rainey only had 12 yards on 4 carries in that same game...so he didnt light it up vs that Car defA lot has happened since the draft. Martin was getting tons of praise by the staff at being the number 1 guy, they signed Mankins and all was looking promising. Then game 1 comes and he runs for 9 yards on 9 carries and Rainey has looked good. There were whispers of him getting sat not just for the injury and possibly being healthy for the Thur night game...Suffice it to say, I would love to put him in with confidence as my number 2 back behind Lacy, but I just don't know what to expect. Yhea, the matchup is nice, but are we sure Martin is going to get most of the carries? Will Rainey spell him a bit as he gets his game conditioning back? And what if Martin starts slow and Rainey looks good?I'm on the fence between Martin and F-Jax. I'm leaning to Jax. I just feel as though I want to see him play before plugging him into the lineup.For me, I can't see a situation where somebody who drafted Martin should fail to play him this week. Unless you have two of McCoy, Murray, Charles, or Bell in a stone age league without a flex, you've got to put in the muscle hamster. Great match up against Pittsburgh, and who doesn't expect 15-20 touches for him this week?0.5PPR. Debating Martin, Charles and Sproles for my 2nd RB slot. Prefer Charles but the Mon night is a killer (don't own Davis).
Just my
See what I'm saying? I just feel I need to see what Tampa is going to do and how they handle him before I just plug him into my lineup. Hopefully, he looks good and is used a lot so I can feel comfortable using him next week and moving forward. Until then, I'm sticking with steady Freddy today.
thats pretty crazy. mccoy, forte, bell, murry, foster, lacy, charles, lamar, donald, jennings, morris, spiller, fjax, bradshaw are no brainers. id add ivory, deangelo, khiry, pierre, asiata, reggie.The draft doesn't have much to do with it; I disagree with the bolded sentence. There's only 4-5 running backs I'd start over Martin this week.At some point you have to forget the draft and play your best lineup. There are plenty of guys drafted after Martin that could and should be considered over him.I'm on the fence between Martin and F-Jax. I'm leaning to Jax. I just feel as though I want to see him play before plugging him into the lineup.For me, I can't see a situation where somebody who drafted Martin should fail to play him this week. Unless you have two of McCoy, Murray, Charles, or Bell in a stone age league without a flex, you've got to put in the muscle hamster. Great match up against Pittsburgh, and who doesn't expect 15-20 touches for him this week?0.5PPR. Debating Martin, Charles and Sproles for my 2nd RB slot. Prefer Charles but the Mon night is a killer (don't own Davis).
Just my
You didnt list Rainey???? I thought hes the starter and Doug was being traded?cvnpoka said:thats pretty crazy. mccoy, forte, bell, murry, foster, lacy, charles, lamar, donald, jennings, morris, spiller, fjax, bradshaw are no brainers. id add ivory, deangelo, khiry, pierre, asiata, reggie.cloppbeast said:The draft doesn't have much to do with it; I disagree with the bolded sentence. There's only 4-5 running backs I'd start over Martin this week.ratbast said:At some point you have to forget the draft and play your best lineup. There are plenty of guys drafted after Martin that could and should be considered over him.cloppbeast said:Silver & Black said:I'm on the fence between Martin and F-Jax. I'm leaning to Jax. I just feel as though I want to see him play before plugging him into the lineup.For me, I can't see a situation where somebody who drafted Martin should fail to play him this week. Unless you have two of McCoy, Murray, Charles, or Bell in a stone age league without a flex, you've got to put in the muscle hamster. Great match up against Pittsburgh, and who doesn't expect 15-20 touches for him this week?Andrew74 said:0.5PPR. Debating Martin, Charles and Sproles for my 2nd RB slot. Prefer Charles but the Mon night is a killer (don't own Davis).
Just my
looking at your list, I change my answer to 8: mccoy, forte, bell, foster, charles, morris, jennings, and maybe donald brown.cvnpoka said:thats pretty crazy. mccoy, forte, bell, murry, foster, lacy, charles, lamar, donald, jennings, morris, spiller, fjax, bradshaw are no brainers. id add ivory, deangelo, khiry, pierre, asiata, reggie.cloppbeast said:The draft doesn't have much to do with it; I disagree with the bolded sentence. There's only 4-5 running backs I'd start over Martin this week.ratbast said:At some point you have to forget the draft and play your best lineup. There are plenty of guys drafted after Martin that could and should be considered over him.cloppbeast said:Silver & Black said:I'm on the fence between Martin and F-Jax. I'm leaning to Jax. I just feel as though I want to see him play before plugging him into the lineup.For me, I can't see a situation where somebody who drafted Martin should fail to play him this week. Unless you have two of McCoy, Murray, Charles, or Bell in a stone age league without a flex, you've got to put in the muscle hamster. Great match up against Pittsburgh, and who doesn't expect 15-20 touches for him this week?Andrew74 said:0.5PPR. Debating Martin, Charles and Sproles for my 2nd RB slot. Prefer Charles but the Mon night is a killer (don't own Davis).
Just my
Rainey's YPC in just his starts is in the ~3.7 range if I recall.cstu said:NAME POS YRs RSH RSHYD YD/RSH FD RSHTD TARG REC RECYD YD/REC FD RECTD FANT PT1 Bobby Rainey rb 2013--2014 174 729 4.1897 32 5 28 23 129 5.6087 8 2 127.80002 Doug Martin rb 2013--2014 136 465 3.4191 16 1 26 13 73 5.6154 1 0 59.8000
Was hoping for 50 yards. Lowering expectations.dickey moe said:Pretty much.The General said:Starting him with zero confidence.
yikes. kelvin is a top 10 every week wr.Acrobat7 said:Starting him with confidence (oh, well...) over Kelvin Benjamin in my flex.
Well, it's not PPR, PIT isn't really good against the run and CB Jimmy Smith was said to be one-on-one with Benjamin. Was going back and forth with it andwent with Martin.yikes. kelvin is a top 10 every week wr.Acrobat7 said:Starting him with confidence (oh, well...) over Kelvin Benjamin in my flex.
Because Rainey is the 3rd down backmost important drive and he isnt out there. still 8 min to go.
That doesn't explain why he's in on 1st and 2nd downs on this drive.Because Rainey is the 3rd down backmost important drive and he isnt out there. still 8 min to go.
its not the 2 minute drill. theres still plenty of time to run the normal offense.Because Rainey is the 3rd down backmost important drive and he isnt out there. still 8 min to go.
It's Tampa. They will throw it because they're behind and they will not pretend to do otherwise.That doesn't explain why he's in on 1st and 2nd downs on this drive.Because Rainey is the 3rd down backmost important drive and he isnt out there. still 8 min to go.
Tedford wasn't calling plays today, the quarterbacks coach took over the responsibilities. I thought he slung it a little too much, but of course they still put up a bunch of points and won the game, so I really have no room to talk. Still, when Tedford returns, I would think they run it a little bit more.The offensive coaching in Tampa is a mess today. Pathetic. All the delay of games, obviously with the new coaches they are still figuring out a few things.
Tedford hasn't called plays all year, and he won't be back this season. It's hard to argue against the play calling when they weren't able to have success running the ball. The situation stinks right now, and I'm not seeing much reason for optimism that it's going to improve.Tedford wasn't calling plays today, the quarterbacks coach took over the responsibilities. I thought he slung it a little too much, but of course they still put up a bunch of points and won the game, so I really have no room to talk. Still, when Tedford returns, I would think they run it a little bit more.The offensive coaching in Tampa is a mess today. Pathetic. All the delay of games, obviously with the new coaches they are still figuring out a few things.
I definitely wasn't impressed with Martin in this game, but he also surprisingly didn't have much running room either. Fortunately it seemed like he got the majority of the work over Rainey except in the hurry up offense.
Doug Martin - RB - Buccaneers
The Bucs coaches reportedly still think Doug Martin is way ahead of the other running backs.
We're not exactly sure why the Bucs coaches would think this. Martin has been a liability in pass protection and is averaging just 3.37 YPC over his last eight games. That includes an ugly 2.13 YPC on his 23 carries this year. Even if we can project 15 touches for Martin against the Saints Sunday, he's a weak RB2 bet.
Related: Bobby Rainey
Source: ESPN.com
Oct 3 - 8:00 PM
Didn't realize Rainey write's for Rotoworld.Rotoworld:
Doug Martin - RB - Buccaneers
The Bucs coaches reportedly still think Doug Martin is way ahead of the other running backs.
We're not exactly sure why the Bucs coaches would think this. Martin has been a liability in pass protection and is averaging just 3.37 YPC over his last eight games. That includes an ugly 2.13 YPC on his 23 carries this year. Even if we can project 15 touches for Martin against the Saints Sunday, he's a weak RB2 bet.
Related: Bobby Rainey
Source: ESPN.com
Oct 3 - 8:00 PM
Martin had been getting a lot of work that drive, I think he actually came out for a blow the play before the TD and the Bucs ended up running a tempo snap.so rainey is the red zone back too?
Definitely have to drop him this week.Approaching droppable status in 12 teamers and smaller. Pretty much useless even with majority of carries.
Doug Martin rushed for 45 yards on 14 carries in the Bucs' Week 5 loss to the Saints.
He caught three passes for an additional 29 yards. Martin also had a 32-yard catch-and-run called back on an illegal formation penalty. Running room was hard to come by early, but Martin found some holes as the game went on. He out-touched Bobby Rainey 17-9, but Rainey is the one who found the end zone from nine yards away in the second half. Martin will remain a mid-to-low RB2 next week at home against the Ravens.
Oct 5 - 5:13 PM
I don't own Martin in any league and have loaded up on Rainey where ever I can. I think it's a matter of time either until he gets injured again, fumbles, misses a block, continues to be ineffective. Rainey has his warts too but is so much more electric when he has the balls in his hands...the problem with were the fumbles. I think Rainey is a must own because I think it's a cheap upside play.I'm interested in how he looked yesterday, from someone who watched the game.
Early on he had 11 yards on 8 carries or something along those lines, but in the game thread someone posted he actually looked pretty good (making something out of nothing). He ended with his best total yard output of the year even with a long catch and run called back, but didn't get that TD. I did see on the next drive he was in once they got into the red zone. On the drive that Rainey got the TD, was he pulled when they got close, or was he taking a breather?
I've seen people talk about dropping him which I think is nuts. With the dearth of startable RBs in the league, I'm actually very encouraged by the last two weeks. Should I be? Rainey may have gotten that TD, but was out-touched almost 2 to 1 and didn't look any better running the ball (at least according to YPC). TB seems to be getting better and I know he was in once they got into the red zone on at least one occasion. Seems to me the arrow is pointing up on this guy, not down.
Am I off base?