SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
This just seems like a guy who should have his own thread.
And yeah (@32:50).
- 4th round pick, not sure I care.
And yeah (@32:50).
- 4th round pick, not sure I care.
Last edited by a moderator:
Can't be that much of a sleeper, he's going early to mid 2ndZyphros said:Love this guy as a sleeper
He's in that same category as Mack to me that people are moving him up too much due to situation. Looks like I'm taking the ones that slide to the 3rd.Can't be that much of a sleeper, he's going early to mid 2nd
Of course it depends on league, but my non PPR has almost all of the RBs done by round 2.He's in that same category as Mack to me that people are moving him up too much due to situation. Looks like I'm taking the ones that slide to the 3rd.
Mack was highly thought of before the draft. He went later than expected, but landed in a good spot. I don't think people are moving him up. Williams is being moved up a lot. I wouldn't spend a 2nd on him personally.He's in that same category as Mack to me that people are moving him up too much due to situation. Looks like I'm taking the ones that slide to the 3rd.
in non-IDP and not superflex leagues .....these guys are not available in the 3rd round.....people like Connor and Joe Williams are. even Wayne Freaking Gallman is going in the 2nd.He's in that same category as Mack to me that people are moving him up too much due to situation. Looks like I'm taking the ones that slide to the 3rd.
I like the strategy. 1.10 might have been a tad early but you pick where you pick.Grabbed him at 1.10 in a non-ppr and followed it up by grabbing Aaron Jones at 2.10
I pick 1.11, and am planning on ''reaching'' for a guy I like.I like the strategy. 1.10 might have been a tad early but you pick where you pick.
exactly but the next tier seems to be a combo of:I pick 1.11, and am planning on ''reaching'' for a guy I like.
After the big 7 (I include OJ Howard), I can make a strong argument against any of the consensus next picks.
Samuel went 27th overall? Joe Williams 54th?I took him at 2.15 16 team ppr idp league. Then got Aaron Jones at 5.03
I feel like I've love my draft
1.10 Njoku.
1.15 Jarrad Davis
2.02 Rueben Foster
2.11 Curtis Samuel
2.14 Adarius Stewart
2.15 Jamaal Williams
3.03 traded for 2 future 2nds
4.06 Joe Williams
4.11 Raekwon McMillan
5.03 Aaron jones
5.12 Donell Pumphrey
5.14 otc deciding between Budda and Kittle
As someone who doesn't play fantasy football anymore but loves the Packers, I approve this message.I like Williams a lot and i think he landed in a good spot, competing against a WR.
Most important thing to consider imo is the other rookie rb they drafted, Aaron Jones.
Williams is a between the tackles bruiser, not wholly one dimensional. Jones, the more modern of the two imo is a little bit of everything with one of the nastiest stiff arms ive ever seen.
I wouldnt feel comfortable owning just one of them before the workloads are known, both are affordable now.
Honestly... I think Aaron Jones is a guy to watch. He is incredibly impressive.Grabbed him at 1.10 in a non-ppr and followed it up by grabbing Aaron Jones at 2.10
Yup. It was expensive but I'm hedging my bets.Honestly... I think Aaron Jones is a guy to watch. He is incredibly impressive.
I know SPARQ isn't everything but the guy was #2 in this RB class
Waldman wrote a 1700 page rookie bible and not ONE mention of this guy?The Packers backfield will be interesting to watch as they also selected Devante Mays in the seventh round:
Now healthy, Devante Mays impressive during Utah State's Pro Day
Three’s Company: Packers Add RB Devante Mays
Breaking down Devante Mays to the Green Bay Packers
Yes. I agreeAaron Joners is a lot better than Williams and I expect him to prove it when given the opportunity.
He has better measurables, but tape says otherwise Williams has much better feet and vision. One of the best in this class. imo.Aaron Jones is a lot better than Williams and I expect him to prove it when given the opportunity.
We've seen this in GB before, Jon Franklin vs Lacy.We've seen this dynamic where two backs get drafted with one well ahead of the other a lot of times now. Seems like the later guy is always the fantasy darling. How did those work out? (actually asking)
I seldom watch youtube videos of players because IMO they don't tell the whole story of a player, only his best moments, but I did sit down and watch 30 minutes of Aaron Jones. He has great feet and vision from what I saw, so if Williams has "much better feet and vision", he is a sure bet to be a HOFer.He has better measurables, but tape says otherwise Williams has much better feet and vision. One of the best in this class. imo.
Because the 5th rounder's feet and vision are Pro Bowl level? Makes sense.JohnnyU said:I seldom watch youtube videos of players because IMO they don't tell the whole story of a player, only his best moments, but I did sit down and watch 30 minutes of Aaron Jones. He has great feet and vision from what I saw, so if Williams has "much better feet and vision", he is a sure bet to be a HOFer.
Obviously duh, because there are only two levels of footwork, not-HOF and HOF.Because the 5th rounder's feet and vision are Pro Bowl level? Makes sense.
Be cautious on your expectations. GB finished third last last season in rushing attempts per game. Granted, they did not have a RB. When they had a talented RB, Lacy, he was fed the ball plenty of times. I hope to see them go back to that. Everyone is looking for this year's Howard, and many are pegging Williams as such. I think no matter what RB GB took he'd be considered a potential Howard pick this season. Just based off of opportunity alone. Probably rightfully soWhen I watch this guy's tape I find myself seeing many of the same things I saw when I watched Jordan Howard's tape this time last year - impressive feet/hips for his size, brushing off arm tackles, always falling forward. Hard to know how he might figure into the passing game.
I'm a fan of this guy and will grab him where I can in my rookie drafts. But I'm doing so with the sense the Packers are developing an offensive scheme this season reminiscent of what the Patriots do - weapons everywhere, opponent-specific game plans, and extreme difficulty predicting who (especially in the backfield) will be featured from game to game.
I believe Jones is a better receiver. Faster also, yes.Williams is on my list of late round / cheap auction guys that have huge ceilings. His competition for work is a 5th round rookie and a WR. On one of the FBG's podcasts Matt Waldman was talking Williams up and said that he would have been the 4th rookie RB in his rankings based on film only. He also didn't think Jones does anything better than Williams except have more speed, but followed it saying Williams was fast enough.
Williams is a chainsaw of a runner, with a strong, muscular body, an appetite for running between the tackles and the balance and strength to rip through tackle attempts at every level of the field. His tape at BYU isn’t flashy, but he’s already an advanced zone runner capable of reading his keys, making a decisive cut and getting up the field. Rarely was he tackled by the first defender, and he almost always fell forward through contact to finish a run. He also shares an athletic profile with Bears running back Jordan Howard.
Thanks for the input. I didn't realize the Packers had such a high rate of rush attempts last season. I don't have any data to offer to support my feelings here, just a gut instinct I guess. It seems McCarthy tries to revise his offense every season and based on the moves this offseason (such as adding two multi-faceted TEs and drafting 3 RBs) I have a suspicion this year's offense will be dynamic in unique and unpredictable ways, ala New England. If that's the case, even if Williams wins the RB1 gig outright I could see games in which Montgomery is featured....or Jones is featured....on no RB is featured.Be cautious on your expectations. GB finished third last last season in rushing attempts per game. Granted, they did not have a RB. When they had a talented RB, Lacy, he was fed the ball plenty of times. I hope to see them go back to that. Everyone is looking for this year's Howard, and many are pegging Williams as such. I think no matter what RB GB took he'd be considered a potential Howard pick this season. Just based off of opportunity alone. Probably rightfully so
A lot of people have made that same comparison. I agree. It translated well for Howard so maybe it will for Williams.Thanks for the input. I didn't realize the Packers had such a high rate of rush attempts last season. I don't have any data to offer to support my feelings here, just a gut instinct I guess. It seems McCarthy tries to revise his offense every season and based on the moves this offseason (such as adding two multi-faceted TEs and drafting 3 RBs) I have a suspicion this year's offense will be dynamic in unique and unpredictable ways, ala New England. If that's the case, even if Williams wins the RB1 gig outright I could see games in which Montgomery is featured....or Jones is featured....on no RB is featured.
Regarding the Howard comps, I didn't mean to suggest I see Williams having the same kind of impact Howard had last season. I would be shocked (pleasantly so, of course) if he did. What I meant was, when I watch his college tape I feel like I'm watching Howard's college tape.
He actually said the Packers were 3rd lowest for RB opportunities, not 3rd highest.Thanks for the input. I didn't realize the Packers had such a high rate of rush attempts last season. I don't have any data to offer to support my feelings here, just a gut instinct I guess. It seems McCarthy tries to revise his offense every season and based on the moves this offseason (such as adding two multi-faceted TEs and drafting 3 RBs) I have a suspicion this year's offense will be dynamic in unique and unpredictable ways, ala New England. If that's the case, even if Williams wins the RB1 gig outright I could see games in which Montgomery is featured....or Jones is featured....on no RB is featured.
Regarding the Howard comps, I didn't mean to suggest I see Williams having the same kind of impact Howard had last season. I would be shocked (pleasantly so, of course) if he did. What I meant was, when I watch his college tape I feel like I'm watching Howard's college tape.
My bad. If anything that feeds into my gut feeling they will be looking to have a more dynamic offense this seasonHe actually said the Packers were 3rd lowest for RB opportunities, not 3rd highest.
No worries. I just wanted to make sure you had the correct information to base your FF decisions on.My bad. If anything that feeds into my gut feeling they will be looking to have a more dynamic offense this season
2011 Draft - new England drafted Shane Vereen at 56 and Stevan Ridley at 73We've seen this dynamic where two backs get drafted with one well ahead of the other a lot of times now. Seems like the later guy is always the fantasy darling. How did those work out? (actually asking)