Im not crying about anything. I’m just discussing this. And I’m talking about the fairness of Thai situation, yes. If you thought I was diacussing something else, I’m sorry I want clearer. I’ve said, several times, that Bell won’t do the things I’ve discussed (other than skip preseason), but I thought it was clear I was talking about hypothetical actions, not ones that were likely or possible.
And the agreement that the OWNERS signed allowed these hypothetical situations I’m discussing to be possible. If your argument is the players agreed to a system where these things (franchise tag, non-guaranteed contracts, etc) can happen, so it’s OK; then you have to say the owners agreed to a system where a player can do these other things, so it’s also OK.
Its interesting that you said what I’m discussing is against the “spirit” of the agreement. I’d argue that signing players to back-loaded contracts that they’ll never see is against the “spirit” of the agreements the players signed.
All that being said, you seem to be getting upset that I’m discussing this. Don’t. It’s not going to happen, and my belief that this system sucks shouldn’t impact you at all. I’m a nobody on a message board, posting my opinion about this topic. It doesn’t matter at all, in the grand scheme of things.