What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Le'Veon Bell, FA (8 Viewers)

He looks nothing like Witten out of the backfield. Witten has good hands and runs decent routes but he will not make anyone miss and doesn't punish defenders. Bell does both of those things

 
Chaka said:
Chaka said:
Gotta say that he looked very good again last night. He made people miss in tight spaces, showed speed to get outside and punished people at the end of runs.
And is a beast in all facets of the pass game. Looks like a Witten-type coming out of the backfield.
Is it Witten or Dez Bryant?

You people need to make up your minds.
Cole Beasley IMO

 
As a Spartan fan I have always liked this guy but this year he has looked sick running the ball. He may worth buying now at med/high level as he turns into a top 5 pick soon.

 
As a Spartan fan I have always liked this guy but this year he has looked sick running the ball. He may worth buying now at med/high level as he turns into a top 5 pick soon.
No one will sell him short of high first round value after these first two weeks.

 
Rotoworld:

Le'Veon Bell - RB - Steelers

Le'Veon Bell rushed 21 times for 147 yards in Sunday night's win over the Panthers.

He added two catches for 10 yards. Bell's highlight of the night was an 81-yard run in the third quarter. He was held out of the end-zone for the second straight week, but continues to look like one of the league's most complete backs. Bell has 461 total yards heading into Week 4 against the Bucs. He's locked in as a matchup-proof RB1.

Sep 22 - 12:32 AM
 
I know now isn't necessarily the best time to go buying him, but in dynasty, I could easily see him being the #1 RB soon. He looks the part of a guy that isn't going away and he's 22. I'm going to see what it costs to get him in my dynasty leagues.

 
I know now isn't necessarily the best time to go buying him, but in dynasty, I could easily see him being the #1 RB soon. He looks the part of a guy that isn't going away and he's 22. I'm going to see what it costs to get him in my dynasty leagues.
I own him in one league and would have a pretty hard time selling.

 
He's got the weirdest running style. The way he almost stops behind the line to let the defense commit and see where the hold is going to open up, and then plants and BURSTS into it. It's fun to watch.

Tremendous vision and great burst.

 
I know now isn't necessarily the best time to go buying him, but in dynasty, I could easily see him being the #1 RB soon. He looks the part of a guy that isn't going away and he's 22. I'm going to see what it costs to get him in my dynasty leagues.
Dynasty Bell owner here: My standard answer is 'you don't have enough'.

 
What makes Bell special? His 3.5 ypc last year?

The top 3 RBs in PIT accumulated 341, 317, and 369 carries the past 3 seasons. Let's put the average at 342 and then let's be optimistic and bump that up by say 5% to 360. Then let's say that the top 2 RBs get 90% of that work - that's 324 carries between Bell and Blount.

If Blount gets even 7 carries per game, that's 112 carries, leaving 212 for Bell. Even if Bell is 10% more productive on the ground than last year, that's just over 800 yds rushing - and that's being optimistic.

So yeah, it does make a difference. Blount is a guy with a career 4.7 ypc and in his worst year was still 0.2 ypc better than Bell's ypc last year - and that's for a RB who does almost nothing to make the D respect a threat from him in the passing game. He's hit 5.0 ypc twice in his career, both with over 150 carries.

You think PIT won't use Blount to run the football part time if he proves to be more effective on the ground than the plodding Bell?
Bell would not set a precedent if he improved his rookie efficiency. Isn't a little unfair to compare Bell's rookie ypc to the veteran Blount's?
Why? How would you compare their running abilities if not by using what they have done to date in their NFL careers?And please take note that I gave Bell a 10% increase in his production on the ground, as well adding an increase over the average numbers of carries for PIT, and gave the top two RBs a generous portion. I thought I was being pretty optimistic given that.

Is that not enough in your opinion?
I don't have an issue with your projections, only how you compared the two players. You could give Bell a 20% increase but it wouldn't change your tone in contrasting these two running backs. A veteran who has played behind much better offensive lines should have a higher ypc than a rookie. There's better ways to compare players, especially when one of them only has 1 season of numbers for use.

I went to the joint practice on Wednesday between the Bills and Steelers, paying particular attention to the backs. I don't call myself a professional scout, but I could at least see that Bell has better burst and speed. Certainly Blount has many other attributes contributing to his ability, but I definitely question you at labeling Bell a 'plodder' in this conversation. Each of these runners has their own abilities, but if either one of them is a 'plodder', it's Blount.
To each their own I guess. I've seen plenty of Bell in college and now the NFL. Special is not an adjective that I would use the describe his ability. And again, comparing how RBs perform against NFL Ds seems like a reasonable method to gage their relative abilities, but if you don't believe so then I'm not sure we're going to ever agree. I don't care how great a guy looks, I care about production. Blount has done it with multiple teams even when he started the season as an after thought. Bell was not productive and could not generate running room on his own from what I've seen. If you want to simply dismiss that based upon how they look in practice it's your prerogative.
NICE CALL BRONCO BILLY...PLODDER AND NOT SPECIAL - HUH, YOU DONT SAY..........

Nice call Cloppbeast!!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PLODDER AND NOT SPECIAL - HUH, YOU DONT SAY..........

Nice call Cloppbeast!!!
NICE CALL BRONCO BILLY...
Those guys were not wrong about last year. He looked totally different when he had that extra weight on.

He improved...........and nobody saw him improving this much did they?? Did they?????

 
PLODDER AND NOT SPECIAL - HUH, YOU DONT SAY..........

Nice call Cloppbeast!!!

NICE CALL BRONCO BILLY...
Those guys were not wrong about last year. He looked totally different when he had that extra weight on.

He improved...........and nobody saw him improving this much did they?? Did they?????
Cloppbeast did - read his comments below that disagree with Bronco Billy...I went to the joint practice on Wednesday between the Bills and Steelers, paying particular attention to the backs. I don't call myself a professional scout, but I could at least see that Bell has better burst and speed. Certainly Blount has many other attributes contributing to his ability, but I definitely question you at labeling Bell a 'plodder' in this conversation. Each of these runners has their own abilities, but if either one of them is a 'plodder', it's Blount.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PLODDER AND NOT SPECIAL - HUH, YOU DONT SAY..........

Nice call Cloppbeast!!!

NICE CALL BRONCO BILLY...
Those guys were not wrong about last year. He looked totally different when he had that extra weight on.

He improved...........and nobody saw him improving this much did they?? Did they?????
Cloppbeast did - read his comments below that disagree with Bronco Billy...I went to the joint practice on Wednesday between the Bills and Steelers, paying particular attention to the backs. I don't call myself a professional scout, but I could at least see that Bell has better burst and speed. Certainly Blount has many other attributes contributing to his ability, but I definitely question you at labeling Bell a 'plodder' in this conversation. Each of these runners has their own abilities, but if either one of them is a 'plodder', it's Blount.
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes.

I would like to hear from Bronco Billy on this thread, though.

 
PLODDER AND NOT SPECIAL - HUH, YOU DONT SAY..........

Nice call Cloppbeast!!!

NICE CALL BRONCO BILLY...
Those guys were not wrong about last year. He looked totally different when he had that extra weight on.

He improved...........and nobody saw him improving this much did they?? Did they?????
Cloppbeast did - read his comments below that disagree with Bronco Billy...I went to the joint practice on Wednesday between the Bills and Steelers, paying particular attention to the backs. I don't call myself a professional scout, but I could at least see that Bell has better burst and speed. Certainly Blount has many other attributes contributing to his ability, but I definitely question you at labeling Bell a 'plodder' in this conversation. Each of these runners has their own abilities, but if either one of them is a 'plodder', it's Blount.
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes.

I would like to hear from Bronco Billy on this thread, though.
That 20 lb weight loss looks like it is making a huge difference. This is a completely different RB than we saw last year and in his career at Mich St. Still early - I remember eating crow on being down on Josh McDaniels as a HC and publicly owning it after he started 6-0 with DEN, and we all saw how that turned out. But right now Bell looks great and if he continues is a top RB.

On a side note, it looks like I've added a stalker to my list. Brewtown following me around in multiple threads. :lol:

 
I think 75 percent of it was the foot injury last year. Not being injured helped him lose the weight and not having to worry about a foot injury makes it easier to play the game.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That 20 lb weight loss looks like it is making a huge difference. This is a completely different RB than we saw last year and in his career at Mich St. Still early - I remember eating crow on being down on Josh McDaniels as a HC and publicly owning it after he started 6-0 with DEN, and we all saw how that turned out. But right now Bell looks great and if he continues is a top RB.On a side note, it looks like I've added a stalker to my list. Brewtown following me around in multiple threads. :lol:
Good man, BB.

I don't think they have virtual restraining orders, although it's a good idea. That could be a new feature Footballguys could add to the SP in the off season.

 
That 20 lb weight loss looks like it is making a huge difference.
I read an article, probably Faust posted in this thread, about Tomlin telling Bell he'd need to lose some weight before the Steelers even drafted him. It looks to be paying off big time, as he hasn't lost any power but has gained a lot in acceleration.

 
I watched some of his runs last weekend. In one play he had a nice hole to get through the front seven. I thought he would be chased down right away, but held his own trying to pull away and I think he got 50-60 yards. I think his weight loss has greatly improved his game. I was surprised because he always seemed overweight and slower.

 
I know now isn't necessarily the best time to go buying him, but in dynasty, I could easily see him being the #1 RB soon. He looks the part of a guy that isn't going away and he's 22. I'm going to see what it costs to get him in my dynasty leagues.
Dynasty Bell owner here: My standard answer is 'you don't have enough'.
Yeah. I traded Charles for a few rookie picks last year, when I knew I'd get Bell with one of them. I regretted that trade a bit after seeing Charles last year, but that time has passed. Don't think there's much that I'd trade for him now.

 
Those guys were not wrong about last year. He looked totally different when he had that extra weight on.

He improved...........and nobody saw him improving this much did they?? Did they?????
People keep saying that Bell looks like a completely different back. He doesn't. He looks like exactly the same back, just a tenth of a second faster. You know that amazing vision he has? Fully on display last season. That ridiculous patience? Fully on display last season. Everything that Bell does that makes him so special is stuff he was doing last year. He's just now a little bit quicker after he does it.

As for who could have seen this coming... he was the youngest back in the league last year, missed much of offseason activities to injury, and wasn't 100% healthy when he returned. I don't know of anyone who expected him to get so much faster, but some of us expected him to take a big step forward. I compared him to Ricky Williams and Matt Forte as guys who had low efficiency numbers as rookies and then long, productive fantasy careers. Cian Fahey was pounding the drum for him all year last year. I wrote last year how much better Bell was than his efficiency stats suggested. And, as was mentioned, he was my #3 dynasty RB before the season kicked off.

This isn't me trying to thump my chest. I just think it's important to counteract the "there's no way we could have possibly known Le'Veon Bell was actually any good!" story that seems to be gaining steam. We could and should have realized that Le'Veon Bell was a good RB, regardless of what his ypc was. Not this good- true outlier seasons are outliers for a reason, and even the drivers of the Chris Johnson hype train weren't expecting 2,000 yards from him in year 2. But there was a lot of reason to be high on Le'Veon Bell even before we saw him play a regular season snap this year.

We used to know that YPC was not the be-all, end-all of RB analysis, but I think Trent Richardson scarred us and made us forget.

 
And let's just end the stupid ### 3.5 argument:

Emmitt Smith 3.9

Walter Peyton 3.7

LT 3.6

Ricky Williams 3.5

I don't point blank tell people to dismiss an argument often but in this case judging him on his rookie YPC is dead wrong.
Add Le'Veon Bell to that list?

 
People keep saying that Bell looks like a completely different back. He doesn't. He looks like exactly the same back, just a tenth of a second faster. You know that amazing vision he has? Fully on display last season. That ridiculous patience? Fully on display last season. Everything that Bell does that makes him so special is stuff he was doing last year. He's just now a little bit quicker after he does it.
This a million times and a lot of people were saying that a long time ago...

 
You know that amazing vision he has?
His vision easily makes his best asset. The zone blocking scheme fits this offensive line and Bell way better, as he has the ability to choose his hole, thus setting up defenders.

I'm not really sure how often Todd Haley called zone last season, although I read articles that he got away from it after the first few games last season. I haven't watched all the games this year, but it seems the Steelers have committed to zone blocking. The addition of Mike Muncheck as offensive line coach goes understated, as he's one of the best in the league. I'm sure he's taught their smaller quicker linemen how to execute the scheme much better.

 
PLODDER AND NOT SPECIAL - HUH, YOU DONT SAY..........

Nice call Cloppbeast!!!

NICE CALL BRONCO BILLY...
Those guys were not wrong about last year. He looked totally different when he had that extra weight on.

He improved...........and nobody saw him improving this much did they?? Did they?????
Cloppbeast did - read his comments below that disagree with Bronco Billy...I went to the joint practice on Wednesday between the Bills and Steelers, paying particular attention to the backs. I don't call myself a professional scout, but I could at least see that Bell has better burst and speed. Certainly Blount has many other attributes contributing to his ability, but I definitely question you at labeling Bell a 'plodder' in this conversation. Each of these runners has their own abilities, but if either one of them is a 'plodder', it's Blount.
Even a blind squirrel finds a nut sometimes.

I would like to hear from Bronco Billy on this thread, though.
That 20 lb weight loss looks like it is making a huge difference. This is a completely different RB than we saw last year and in his career at Mich St. Still early - I remember eating crow on being down on Josh McDaniels as a HC and publicly owning it after he started 6-0 with DEN, and we all saw how that turned out. But right now Bell looks great and if he continues is a top RB.

On a side note, it looks like I've added a stalker to my list. Brewtown following me around in multiple threads. :lol:
You could see he had quick feet last season, even with the extra weight - the rest of his body just caught up now. I never thought of him as a plodder last season, and saw improvement as his health improved, but he certainly looks far better this season.

 
That 20 lb weight loss looks like it is making a huge difference. This is a completely different RB than we saw last year and in his career at Mich St. Still early - I remember eating crow on being down on Josh McDaniels as a HC and publicly owning it after he started 6-0 with DEN, and we all saw how that turned out. But right now Bell looks great and if he continues is a top RB.

On a side note, it looks like I've added a stalker to my list. Brewtown following me around in multiple threads. :lol:
Good man, BB.

I don't think they have virtual restraining orders, although it's a good idea. That could be a new feature Footballguys could add to the SP in the off season.
No big deal. Everyone is wrong plenty enough in FF. The unpredictability is what makes it so much fun. Still will wait to see how the entire season pans out but so far he looks great and Blount is no threat.

The only thing that bothers me about owning it, and I'm guessing why some don't, are the sore winners. Seriously, act like you've been right a few times in the past and remember the times you were wrong.

 
Lots of big questions that needed to be answered in the off season look to have been answered.

If he proves to be durable while playing at this level with the same workload he's as valuable as virtually any dynasty asset out there given his age and the positional value of 3 down backs.

 
Rotoworld:

Ben Roethlisberger took some of the blame for Le'Veon Bell's meager 15 carries in Week 5.

Roethlisberger audibled to pass plays a lot against the Jaguars -- especially in the red zone. "That's me calling plays, feeling like we have the advantage in the pass game down there, so I called passes," Big Ben said. "And I don't regret any of it." Expect Bell to get fed a much heavier workload this week against a Browns defense that is ranked 29th against the run.

Source: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

Oct 9 - 10:37 AM
 
Pittsburgh has been passing a ton inside the 10. They've runs 24 plays down there and Bell has only had 4 rushes compared to 18 passes (2 rushes for Blount).

It's no wonder they're struggling down there. You have to wonder what these teams are thinking sometimes. Pittsburgh and, earlier in the year, Dallas with two of the best RBs in the league and all they do is pass inside the 10 and wonder why they keep settling for FGs. Meanwhile teams like the Vikings are pounding Matt Asiata down there and getting rewarded. Matt Asiata!

Pittsburgh has run 24 plays inside the 10, with 18 of them being passes, and scored 5 TDs

Minnesota has run 17 plays inside the 10, with 7 of them being passes, and scored 7 TDs

Dallas got it figured out and started running the ball down there, so hopefully Pitt will as well.

 
Pittsburgh has been passing a ton inside the 10. They've runs 24 plays down there and Bell has only had 4 rushes compared to 18 passes (2 rushes for Blount).

It's no wonder they're struggling down there. You have to wonder what these teams are thinking sometimes. Pittsburgh and, earlier in the year, Dallas with two of the best RBs in the league and all they do is pass inside the 10 and wonder why they keep settling for FGs. Meanwhile teams like the Vikings are pounding Matt Asiata down there and getting rewarded. Matt Asiata!

Pittsburgh has run 24 plays inside the 10, with 18 of them being passes, and scored 5 TDs

Minnesota has run 17 plays inside the 10, with 7 of them being passes, and scored 7 TDs

Dallas got it figured out and started running the ball down there, so hopefully Pitt will as well.
Big Ben doesn't regret any of it.

 
Rotoworld:

Le'Veon Bell rushed 18 times for 82 yards in the Steelers' Week 6 loss to the Browns, adding four catches for 23 yards.

The 100-yard effort was Bell's sixth in six games, and gives him 793 yards from scrimmage. Foolishly, Bell lost a goal-line carry to LeGarrette Blount, who proceeded to gain his usual one yard on a 3rd-and-3 from the Browns' three-yard line. The Steelers settled for a field goal. Rather amazingly, Bell hasn't scored since Week 1, but his touchdown rate should start catching up to his yardage in the very near future.


Oct 12 - 5:39 PM
 
Pretty sure it's playcalling down inside the 10-15 yd line. Pitt starts spreading it out with no back or Blount with Bell out wide many times from what I've seen.

Bell may have to break off 20yd+ runs/catches for TD's this year unfortunately.

I would like to punch Haley in the face. He should raffle a chance off for charity.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He is Tiki Barber once Brandon Jacobs came to the Giants. He is going probably 2000 total yards a season, but have between 5 and 8 touchdowns.

 
Pretty sure it's playcalling down inside the 10-15 yd line. Pitt starts spreading it out with no back or Blount with Bell out wide many times from what I've seen.

Bell may have to break off 20yd+ runs/catches for TD's this year unfortunately.

I would like to punch Haley in the face. He should raffle a chance off for charity.
As a Steelers/Le'Veon fan, I've wanted to punch Haley in the face since he got there..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This guy is becoming a waste of roster space ... 1 F****** TD this season.

He might be the most overrated player in FF right now ... I've been losing close games all year because my so called stud RB hasnt had a TD in 6 weeks.

Points total for me

20.13 (week 1 he had a TD)

11.47 (ran for 147 yards)

8.13 (Crap)

7.87 (Crap)

7.27 (Crap)

7.0 (Crap)

I expect 10-20 pts a game not this crap

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top