What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Omarion Hampton, LAC (3 Viewers)

Hayden Winks
the guards were bad, but hampton looks so fast for a big guy. results are coming.
That’s weird since so many in here who seem to have not watched the game said he looked slow.

I agree he looked fast. I’d like to see the OL open some holes for him.
Turns out most of those people a) didn’t watch at all or b) don’t acknowledge the role that blocking plays in the run game
 

Every touch last night. 2nd carry looks like he went right, when he shoulda went left.

If someone can point out which other holes he missed, because from this thread there were apparently SEVERAL, I would be much obliged.
I like a lot in that tape, he's staying north south, following his blocks and it looks like no big runs for loss, maybe he lost a yard or two, on two runs. Lots to build on.

And guys tell you the same thing time and again, the speed of the game is always next level, and no camp or preseason is quite preparing you for it

I'm glad to see him in the passing mix.

And if Herbert is gonna pass like that all year, Hampton is gonna eat.

If you got a owner in panic, take advantage
 
Hayden Winks
the guards were bad, but hampton looks so fast for a big guy. results are coming.
That’s weird since so many in here who seem to have not watched the game said he looked slow.

I agree he looked fast. I’d like to see the OL open some holes for him.
Turns out most of those people a) didn’t watch at all or b) don’t acknowledge the role that blocking plays in the run game

Don't forget c) Najee owners
 
We aren doing this again? Every year there are a few rookies we panic on after a couple games and we are usually wrong. He looked physical and had a lot of burst for his size. He blocked well, caught his passes smoothly. He missed 1 hole, it happens. His biggest mistake was going out of bounds at the half, but I loved on 4th and 1 Harbaugh still trusted him and he delivered.
 
Chiefs are tough to run on, and rewatching every play just now what jumped out most is how little room he had to run. Not stellar blocking……
Agreed.

Raiders next week, if they don't look better vs that run defense, I think mild panic is in order
Raiders run D should be a little improved, no? Koonce is back, and I like their LB corps.

Statistically the Raiders had the #13 run defense last year. That was with Koonce missing the year as you said and Maxx Crosby about a 3rd of the season. Plus they added Carroll and his coaching staff. Not an easy matchup but possibly better than the Chiefs who were ranked 8th in run defense last year.
Yeah, and the Broncos in the division too. That’s potentially 8 brutal matchups (attrition happens, but viewing them all at full strength for this context)

And plays all 3 to start the season. I'm not expecting a lot out of him the next 2 weeks and fully acknowledge that we probably see more Harris.

Was very surprised Najee only saw the two touches last night even after missing nearly all of preseason. Such a big game and they leaned on Hampton almost exclusively and also stayed with him in the 2nd half after the out of bounds mistake are big votes of confidence.
 
Chiefs are tough to run on, and rewatching every play just now what jumped out most is how little room he had to run. Not stellar blocking……
Agreed.

Raiders next week, if they don't look better vs that run defense, I think mild panic is in order
Raiders run D should be a little improved, no? Koonce is back, and I like their LB corps.

Statistically the Raiders had the #13 run defense last year. That was with Koonce missing the year as you said and Maxx Crosby about a 3rd of the season. Plus they added Carroll and his coaching staff. Not an easy matchup but possibly better than the Chiefs who were ranked 8th in run defense last year.
Yeah, and the Broncos in the division too. That’s potentially 8 brutal matchups (attrition happens, but viewing them all at full strength for this context)
8?
 
Just one real game so far, and he ought to improve.

He’s definitely explosive and fast. Vision isn’t great as he missed some opportunities because he failed to change lanes when a seam was created because his blocker couldn’t get leverage to get his guy out of the planned hole. Definitely willing and gives great initial pop on pass protection but needs to keep his feet moving and stay engaged.

He was getting what was blocked for him last night and I didn’t see a lot of creativity. He is a load and falls forward during the tackle. That’s a big plus for him as it pushed his rush totals up significantly in what would have been a bad night otherwise.

Really bad mistake running OB at the end of the half and cost his D giving up a FG because of it. That’s not the coach’s fault as much as some were trying to shift blame way from Hampton. He’s a pro and has played RB for quite a while over his life. He needs to understand game scenarios. At least if he’s going to be better than just good he does.

Some really good aspects. Definitely room for improvement. Let’s see how he progresses.
 
Statistically the Raiders had the #13 run defense last year. That was with Koonce missing the year as you said and Maxx Crosby about a 3rd of the season. Plus they added Carroll and his coaching staff. Not an easy matchup but possibly better than the Chiefs who were ranked 8th in run defense last year.
They have a ton to prove. Every linebacker from last year is gone, and their DT rotation is brand new.

Lot of new faces.

If I was writing a script where Omarion doesn't do much next week, I wouldn't write that the Raiders D shut down running lanes. I would write that the Raiders new offense put up 21 quick points, and the Chargers had to abandon the run. That seems more likely.
 
The problem is its not the owners in here busting his balls. His owners are the ones defending him.
I have no shares. Yet. I'm hoping Treveyon Henderson has a good game so I can create a package with him for Hampton.
Hmmm I love Hampton but I think Henderson could end up being right on his level. It will be fun to see how the next couple weeks play out for the top 3 backs. Too bad Judkins won't be out there too. At least not yet.
 
I thought he looked okay overall. Showed some nice speed and good pass pro, but created little YAC and very few missed tackles. He looked hesitant a couple of times but have to cut him some slack vs a legit top run stuffing defense.

I wouldn't panic if I had shares since he's a rookie, but I would want to see him create more yards on his own going forward.
 
But everyone in the Najee thread said blocking shouldn't matter for an elite RB? :ponder:

Again, fast RB that can't get much if there's not a gaping hole, and apparently not that high of a football IQ either. That doesn't bode well for his 3 down role...
 
Hmmm I love Hampton but I think Henderson could end up being right on his level. It will be fun to see how the next couple weeks play out for the top 3 backs. Too bad Judkins won't be out there too. At least not yet.
For sure. I just think Hampton is gonna be that 3 down old school rb. I think Henderson is gonna more fun to watch, but less usage. I think they close. You post is giving me hope this it should just take Henderson and change to land Hampton.
 
Hmmm I love Hampton but I think Henderson could end up being right on his level. It will be fun to see how the next couple weeks play out for the top 3 backs. Too bad Judkins won't be out there too. At least not yet.
For sure. I just think Hampton is gonna be that 3 down old school rb. I think Henderson is gonna more fun to watch, but less usage. I think they close. You post is giving me hope this it should just take Henderson and change to land Hampton.
You are probably right that Henderson is more in the Gibbs, Ekeler, Kamara type workload but on the right team that can be fantasy gold. Just like a 3 down workhorse in a bad situation can be pretty boring. I think a lot of the evalu should come down to what you think of Maye and the future of the Pats offense.
 
Interesting point. One thing I do know is the Chargers offense last night looked like a playoff team offense. Even with no success actually running the ball. Great start for them. Just a mental win.
 
Interesting point. One thing I do know is the Chargers offense last night looked like a playoff team offense. Even with no success actually running the ball. Great start for them. Just a mental win.
Agreed. And with the narrative of “they’re going to run run run”, to then come out and let their stud QB sling it around says to not pigeon hole or underestimate this team.

As a raiders fan I can also say that the Chargers uns are 2nd best in the league, bar none, after the classic silver and black unis, of course.
 
I'm not sure, Najee averaged 5/carry. What was Hampton's average?
On his one carry?

Also he got Herbert sacked. Your schtick is stale bro. Get a new schtick.
How did Hampton do? 3.2 per carry with a real threat at QB and WR to take off some pressure? And people were giving Najee crap for 4.0 in Pittsburgh. Just admit Hampton didn't look very good. It's OK, maybe he'll get better. Doubtful though. He has no vision and doesn't change direction all that well.
 
I'm not sure, Najee averaged 5/carry. What was Hampton's average?
On his one carry?

Also he got Herbert sacked. Your schtick is stale bro. Get a new schtick.
How did Hampton do? 3.2 per carry with a real threat at QB and WR to take off some pressure? And people were giving Najee crap for 4.0 in Pittsburgh. Just admit Hampton didn't look very good. It's OK, maybe he'll get better. Doubtful though. He has no vision and doesn't change direction all that well.
It’s 1 game. Broad, sweeping conclusions sound pretty silly. But hey, do your thing.

Weird that you haven’t eaten any crow on the Najee topic after demanding others do if Najee started. Didn’t you predict he’d start and have a 50-50 workload at least? Cmon.
 
I'm not sure, Najee averaged 5/carry. What was Hampton's average?
On his one carry?

Also he got Herbert sacked. Your schtick is stale bro. Get a new schtick.
How did Hampton do? 3.2 per carry with a real threat at QB and WR to take off some pressure? And people were giving Najee crap for 4.0 in Pittsburgh. Just admit Hampton didn't look very good. It's OK, maybe he'll get better. Doubtful though. He has no vision and doesn't change direction all that well.

That was the toughest run defense in the NFL last year (according to Scott Barrett of Fantasy Points—I am honestly unsure of how they're measuring it and I would imagine it's EPA/play) and they hadn't had really any turnover on D besides their secondary.

This wasn't the game to base any conclusions upon or say anything definitive about this kid. I had Henderson and Judkins (I've rethought that but it was what I believed in early August) ranked ahead of Hampton, so I'm not a Hampton hawk or backer. It's just that it's probably unwise to draw any conclusions from this. The kid had an 80% snap share and Harbaugh was speaking glowingly of him. I have no idea how Najee will work in and really don't care, but last night was not a dispositive test of the kid's future in the NFL.
 
I'm not sure, Najee averaged 5/carry. What was Hampton's average?
On his one carry?

Also he got Herbert sacked. Your schtick is stale bro. Get a new schtick.
How did Hampton do? 3.2 per carry with a real threat at QB and WR to take off some pressure? And people were giving Najee crap for 4.0 in Pittsburgh. Just admit Hampton didn't look very good. It's OK, maybe he'll get better. Doubtful though. He has no vision and doesn't change direction all that well.

That was the toughest run defense in the NFL last year (according to Scott Barrett of Fantasy Points—I am honestly unsure of how they're measuring it and I would imagine it's EPA/play) and they hadn't had really any turnover on D besides their secondary.

This wasn't the game to base any conclusions upon or say anything definitive about this kid. I had Henderson and Judkins (I've rethought that but it was what I believed in early August) ranked ahead of Hampton, so I'm not a Hampton hawk or backer. It's just that it's probably unwise to draw any conclusions from this. The kid had an 80% snap share and Harbaugh was speaking glowingly of him. I have no idea how Najee will work in and really don't care, but last night was not a dispositive test of the kid's future in the NFL.
Of course no conclusions can be drawn, it's one game. That said, it's one data point, his first real NFL datapoint, and it didn't make him look great. It's also a datapoint that starts to confirm the negative traits many saw in predraft evaluations of the guy. Let's see where next week's datapoint falls.
 
Of course no conclusions can be drawn, it's one game.
You’ve done nothing but draw conclusions. You made several sweeping generalizations in here already. Cmon.
3.2/carry on 15 carries in his first game. Fact.

Ceded pass protection to Najee. Fact.

Made one of the most bone-headed mistakes a RB can make at the end of a half. Fact.

Draw whatever conclusion you want.
 
but last night was not a dispositive test of the kid's future in the NFL.
Reasonable people would agree.
:suds:

And yeah - KC’s LBs fly to the ball. Tranquil, Bolton, & Chanel are all excellent against the run. Add in Chris Jones & Karlaftis to the mix, it’s a brutal team to run on.

I’ll elaborate on my position.

Yes, Chiefs are a tough assignment and it’s only one game. And I don’t even care much about the boxscore or production. I’m not looking to make sweeping conclusions about what he will or won’t due in the league based on however last night went one way or the other.

What I AM interested in is getting a sense of the player now that he’s in a pro uniform. It’s a more familiar setting to my eyeballs and the first chance to just get to know him.

Am very picky it comes to RBs and how I invest in them, for redraft and especially dynasty. Here we have a highly productive college player, with a good size and speed on paper. And a first round pick, so that’s a great start.

What am I looking for? I want to know what his calling card is. What’s going to differentiate him at this level. I’m looking for how he can get into the top tier or two because otherwise, he’s not someone I’m interested in.

And last night I didn’t see anything that leaped out at me. Couple nice runs, sure. Good enough pass pro, yeah. Decent speed, yep. Runs hard too.

Basically I saw a lot of C+/B- across the board. Nothing wrong with that but I’d rather see him pop in some category or another, even at the expense of a deficiency elsewhere.

It’s one game and I have no shares of him, so take it FWIW. But I just saw more of what I saw in him as a prospect, which is why I don’t have any shares. It’s fair if someone were to call that confirmation bias but I’m trying to be honest with myself, not win an argument. Don’t have any flags planted on him anyway.

I just didn’t see anything special. Maybe it will come, but I was looking for traits, not results. He kinda reminds me of Brian Robinson.
 
I thought he looked okay overall. Showed some nice speed and good pass pro, but created little YAC and very few missed tackles. He looked hesitant a couple of times but have to cut him some slack vs a legit top run stuffing defense.

I wouldn't panic if I had shares since he's a rookie, but I would want to see him create more yards on his own going forward.
he has decent speed/burst, but you won't see him break many tackles--overrrated player
 
but last night was not a dispositive test of the kid's future in the NFL.
Reasonable people would agree.
:suds:

And yeah - KC’s LBs fly to the ball. Tranquil, Bolton, & Chanel are all excellent against the run. Add in Chris Jones & Karlaftis to the mix, it’s a brutal team to run on.

I’ll elaborate on my position.

Yes, Chiefs are a tough assignment and it’s only one game. And I don’t even care much about the boxscore or production. I’m not looking to make sweeping conclusions about what he will or won’t due in the league based on however last night went one way or the other.

What I AM interested in is getting a sense of the player now that he’s in a pro uniform. It’s a more familiar setting to my eyeballs and the first chance to just get to know him.

Am very picky it comes to RBs and how I invest in them, for redraft and especially dynasty. Here we have a highly productive college player, with a good size and speed on paper. And a first round pick, so that’s a great start.

What am I looking for? I want to know what his calling card is. What’s going to differentiate him at this level. I’m looking for how he can get into the top tier or two because otherwise, he’s not someone I’m interested in.

And last night I didn’t see anything that leaped out at me. Couple nice runs, sure. Good enough pass pro, yeah. Decent speed, yep. Runs hard too.

Basically I saw a lot of C+/B- across the board. Nothing wrong with that but I’d rather see him pop in some category or another, even at the expense of a deficiency elsewhere.

It’s one game and I have no shares of him, so take it FWIW. But I just saw more of what I saw in him as a prospect, which is why I don’t have any shares. It’s fair if someone were to call that confirmation bias but I’m trying to be honest with myself, not win an argument. Don’t have any flags planted on him anyway.

I just didn’t see anything special. Maybe it will come, but I was looking for traits, not results. He kinda reminds me of Brian Robinson.
best post I've seen yet about last night's performance
 
What am I looking for? I want to know what his calling card is.

Couple nice runs, sure. Good enough pass pro, yeah. Decent speed, yep. Runs hard too.
These are all excellent traits that bode well for a 1st game from a RB against a brutal opponent in a road game in Brazil.

If there’s reason to be optimistic about a young RB in his 1st game; I’d think you just listed 4 very good reasons.

Also I’d suggest that perhaps the team opens the playbook for him more and more as they develop trust in him. Maybe then you’ll see those signature plays or calling cards. Personally I want to see him in space on screens.
 
Last edited:
What am I looking for? I want to know what his calling card is.

Couple nice runs, sure. Good enough pass pro, yeah. Decent speed, yep. Runs hard too.
These are all excellent traits that bode well for a 1st game from a RB against a brutal opponent in a road game in Brazil.

If there’s reason to be optimistic about a young RB in his 1st game; I’d think you just listed 4 very good reasons.

Also I’d suggest that perhaps the team opens the playbook for him
Lee and more as they develop trust in him. Maybe then you’ll see those signature plays or calling cards. Personally I want to see him in space on screens.

I’d call them important tasks that I want a running back I’m going to invest in be excellent at. I saw a lot of “fine/decent/meh”. Not excellence. I’ve rewatched his game highlights several times and end up in the same place. It’s a tiny sample. He’s in a good environment. Shrug.
 
I’d call them important tasks that I want a running back I’m going to invest in be excellent at. I saw a lot of “fine/decent/meh”. Not excellence. I’ve rewatched his game highlights several times and end up in the same place. It’s a tiny sample. He’s in a good environment. Shrug.
Yep - totally fair assessment. I’m not rah rah Hampton based on what I agree was a fair to midland performance.

But like you I try to look for signs of competence at the pro level. I like his burst. I like that he didn’t go down easy (the one run for a 1st where it looked like a loss that he turned into a gain of 2-3) - that was what I want to see from someone touted as a power back.

As mentioned above, I’d like to see him as a check-down - those are bread & butter PPR touches, and also get him into space with the ball, which the Chargers just didn’t have in their gameplan last night.

That said, it was an interesting gameplan - Chargers came out and punched the chiefs in the mouth by going pass-heavy, maybe as an adjustment to the playoff game they got their butts kicked in by this same team.

I suspect with a larger sample size we’ll see more/better from Hampton. And if we don’t, I’ll be right here to call him out alongside you.

I have a couple redraft shares, but none in dynasty.
 
Last edited:
Ps - the other fortunate/unfortunate thing was the Chargers never had a goal to go opportunity. They had a RZ touch IIRC and he took it 4-5 yards, but all of their TDs were passing.

I say unfortunate because I’d like to see him at the stripe.

I say fortunate because I had Herbert going for my best dynasty roster and love the 39.5 points.
:wub:
 
Scott Barrett
People are really panicking over Omarion Hampton?

Rookie making his NFL debut gets a...

+ 80.6% snap share (~RB2)
+ 53.7% route share (~RB7)
+ 89.5% of the backfield touches (~RB1)

Efficiency was whatever against Kansas City's league-best run defense, but this is sick usage on what should be a top-7 offense

@FantasyPtsData
 
I’d call them important tasks that I want a running back I’m going to invest in be excellent at. I saw a lot of “fine/decent/meh”. Not excellence. I’ve rewatched his game highlights several times and end up in the same place. It’s a tiny sample. He’s in a good environment. Shrug.
Yep - totally fair assessment. I’m not rah rah Hampton based on what I agree was a fair to midland performance.

But like you I try to look for signs of competence at the pro level. I like his burst. I like that he didn’t go down easy (the one run for a 1st where it looked like a loss that he turned into a gain of 2-3) - that was what I want to see from someone touted as a power back.

As mentioned above, I’d like to see him as a check-down - those are bread & butter PPR touches, and also get him into space with the ball, which the Chargers just didn’t have in their gameplan last night.

That said, it was an interesting gameplan - Chargers came out and punched the chiefs in the mouth by going pass-heavy, maybe as an adjustment to the playoff game they got their butts kicked in by this same team.

I suspect with a larger sample size we’ll see more/better from Hampton. And if we don’t, I’ll be right here to call him out alongside you.

I have a couple redraft shares, not none in dynasty.

Yeah ball in space seems like a great chance for him to shine. That didn’t happen a lot last night. It’s a long season, I’m sure their game plan will shift around.

The stuff we did see him do last night is like table stakes to me for a 1st round RB. It’d be a disaster if he didn’t do them adequately and I just assumed he’d clear that bar. I want to see the special. Show me the special.

I think back to first impressions of Bijan, Gibbs, Barkley, CMC, Fournette (probably Jeanty, saw the flash in preseason)…other 1st round backs that popped at first sight for me. I didn’t see that. Saw more a Richardson, Gordon, Etienne, Jacobs, Najee type. Some of those succeeded more than others but none are overly exciting or elite. Jacobs has still been pretty valuable though.

Will see. It’s a good offense and he’s going to be involved a lot.
 
Hampton 15 carries
Harris 1 carry

Hampton is the starter, period
He looked good on some runs, other times he didn't have much room to run inside
He's going to have bigger days and Herbert won't always throw for 300+/3TDs

I would be optimistic if I had Hampton, looks like the Bolts are going to win a bunch of games and that means running out the clock in he 2nd Half
(y)
 
Hampton 15 carries
Harris 1 carry

Hampton is the starter, period
He looked good on some runs, other times he didn't have much room to run inside
He's going to have bigger days and Herbert won't always throw for 300+/3TDs

I would be optimistic if I had Hampton, looks like the Bolts are going to win a bunch of games and that means running out the clock in he 2nd Half
(y)
I thought he looked fine. Didn't expect much against the Chiefs run D. As HSG pointed out, no goal line opportunities which obviously won't be the case all season.

Glad to see him get a couple check downs in the 2nd half as well.
 
Jacobs has still been pretty valuable though.
I was gonna say - if he gives people Jacobs level returns in that offense folks will be awfully pleased.

I have Jacobs on a win-now roster and last year he was just so consistent and so consistently good. That GB offense was significantly more run heavy than what we saw from LAC last night. And for as much as LAC threw, chiefs are pretty disciplined when it comes to pass coverage - I don’t remember a single DPI from the Chiefs, so no cheap goal to go’s.

I think as we see more of a sample size we’ll be better suited to making a real evaluation of Hampton. For now the distribution of touches was impressive.
 
Jacobs has still been pretty valuable though.
I was gonna say - if he gives people Jacobs level returns in that offense folks will be awfully pleased.

I have Jacobs on a win-now roster and last year he was just so consistent and so consistently good. That GB offense was significantly more run heavy than what we saw from LAC last night. And for as much as LAC threw, chiefs are pretty disciplined when it comes to pass coverage - I don’t remember a single DPI from the Chiefs, so no cheap goal to go’s.

I think as we see more of a sample size we’ll be better suited to making a real evaluation of Hampton. For now the distribution of touches was impressive.

Yeah Jacob’s the high end outcome of that group for sure.

I don’t think last nights run/pass split is a fluke. The first 4 games of the Chargers season last year, Herbert averaged just under 23 pass attempts per game. Then they had a bye. From week 6 on, his average attempts jumped to just under 32 per game. Last night he put it up 34 times.

It seems like Harbs made a conscious choice to put the team in Herbert’s hands and I don’t expect that to change. What could change is Najee getting more of the load which of course would come at Hampton’s expense. Bright side as you pointed out was there wasn’t much if any goal line work to be had.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top