What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Rachaad White, TB (1 Viewer)

Seems to me like that guy’s whole schtick is to make outlandish claims to stand out. So if a RB goes from like RB30 to RB15, he can still claim that he was higher on that RB than anyone else, he knows how to find the high risers, etc. Nevermind being dead wrong on saying that RB is the best in his class. Who needs credibility when you’ve baited people to noticing you? Anything for those interactions. That’s the prevailing notion it seems.

I’m getting the same vibe as those randos on Twitter that make up reports on players signing with a team, in hopes that it does happen and they can troll the media to say they got the scoop first. Maybe I’m being harsh here but as someone who likes Pacheco and White, that guy can’t possibly believe what he’s selling. I’m not buying it.
After actually checking who it was that said all this, I take it back. I actually really respect Fischer’s scouting reports. I’ve had a chance to look through some over the past couple of years and he ended up being right most of the time. He was skeptic of Terrace Marshall, I ignored it and got burnt. Loved Alec Pierce, and there’s been at least some signs of life there. There’s plenty other examples but those are a few that come to mind. So I’m just baffled at the Rachaad White hype from that video, given his scouting report of White had a much more grounded outlook.
 
Rachaad White rushed 17 times for 39 yards in the Buccaneers’ Week 1 win over the Vikings, adding two receptions for 10 additional yards.

White saw 17 of the Buccaneers’ 24 running back carries in Week 1. His efficiency was low, gaining 2.3 yard per carry behind an subpar offensive line. Without much splash, White still saw 19 total touches, and a touchdown would have made this a good fantasy day. He is a borderline-RB2 for the team’s Week 2 matchup against the Bears.

- Rotoworld
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
Opportunities is one thing. What a player does with them is another. Rachaad White is just not that great of a player. I have him rostered so I hope he proves me wrong, but from what I’ve seen he doesn’t look very elusive and he’s not running through many tackles
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
Opportunities is one thing. What a player does with them is another. Rachaad White is just not that great of a player. I have him rostered so I hope he proves me wrong, but from what I’ve seen he doesn’t look very elusive and he’s not running through many tackles
Next week may be a good sell high on him then, they play Chicago Sunday. I can see 80 yards and a. TD.
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
This is actually great news for Tucker owners, as this will soon be his workload.
Not necessarily. While White's numbers were pedestrian fantasy wise, the coaching staff may be content that the team won a tough game on the road in Minnesota and that White played well enough to move the chains/offense. Often it goes beyond the box scores. That said, if his numbers stay like this and the team is struggling, you'd have to think that White will cede more time to Tucker.
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
This is actually great news for Tucker owners, as this will soon be his workload.
They both looked indecisive and did not create much on their own.

I would imagine the touch breakout will remain the same for the majority of the season.

I hope they both get better. They left a lot of yards out there.
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
Opportunities is one thing. What a player does with them is another. Rachaad White is just not that great of a player. I have him rostered so I hope he proves me wrong, but from what I’ve seen he doesn’t look very elusive and he’s not running through many tackles
EXACTLY.
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
This is actually great news for Tucker owners, as this will soon be his workload.
Not necessarily. While White's numbers were pedestrian fantasy wise, the coaching staff may be content that the team won a tough game on the road in Minnesota and that White played well enough to move the chains/offense. Often it goes beyond the box scores. That said, if his numbers stay like this and the team is struggling, you'd have to think that White will cede more time to Tucker.
I suppose “soon” isn’t the right word. “Eventually” is probably more appropriate, but it could happen sooner than expected if:
1. White fumbles and get benched, Tucker comes in and looks clearly superior.
2. White gets dinged up and misses some time, Tucker comes in and looks clearly superior.

Most seem to agree that White isn’t a special player, and many believe Tucker is, or could be. If White does anything to open the door for Tucker to impress, it would be pretty easy for the coaches to simply pivot to Tucker as the lead RB.
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
This is actually great news for Tucker owners, as this will soon be his workload.
Not necessarily. While White's numbers were pedestrian fantasy wise, the coaching staff may be content that the team won a tough game on the road in Minnesota and that White played well enough to move the chains/offense. Often it goes beyond the box scores. That said, if his numbers stay like this and the team is struggling, you'd have to think that White will cede more time to Tucker.
They won despite his pitiful performance.... nothing to do with white moving chains. You don't move chains at 2 ypc lol
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
This is actually great news for Tucker owners, as this will soon be his workload.
Not necessarily. While White's numbers were pedestrian fantasy wise, the coaching staff may be content that the team won a tough game on the road in Minnesota and that White played well enough to move the chains/offense. Often it goes beyond the box scores. That said, if his numbers stay like this and the team is struggling, you'd have to think that White will cede more time to Tucker.
They won despite his pitiful performance.... nothing to do with white moving chains. You don't move chains at 2 ypc lol

Keeping in mind Minn should have a pretty terrible D
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
This is actually great news for Tucker owners, as this will soon be his workload.
Not necessarily. While White's numbers were pedestrian fantasy wise, the coaching staff may be content that the team won a tough game on the road in Minnesota and that White played well enough to move the chains/offense. Often it goes beyond the box scores. That said, if his numbers stay like this and the team is struggling, you'd have to think that White will cede more time to Tucker.
They won despite his pitiful performance.... nothing to do with white moving chains. You don't move chains at 2 ypc lol
Tucker averaged 3. I guess that's better? They both missed holes and created nothing on their own. If Tucker is going to "take over" he'll need to be significantly better.
 
Alex Caruso
Rachaad White is a HUGE Buy Low RB

79% Snap Share
68% of RB Opportunities
55% Route Participation

Elite Role for a RB in Fantasy Football
This is actually great news for Tucker owners, as this will soon be his workload.
Not necessarily. While White's numbers were pedestrian fantasy wise, the coaching staff may be content that the team won a tough game on the road in Minnesota and that White played well enough to move the chains/offense. Often it goes beyond the box scores. That said, if his numbers stay like this and the team is struggling, you'd have to think that White will cede more time to Tucker.
They won despite his pitiful performance.... nothing to do with white moving chains. You don't move chains at 2 ypc lol
Tucker averaged 3. I guess that's better? They both missed holes and created nothing on their own. If Tucker is going to "take over" he'll need to be significantly better.
I hear you but you probably need more then 5 runs to get into a flow.
 
FWIW, PFF rated Rachaad at 69.9 for the game, on the border between average and above average. Consistent with his 66.4 grade for 2022. He doesn't have Tucker's explosiveness as a runner, is he good at receiving or blocking?
 
FWIW, PFF rated Rachaad at 69.9 for the game, on the border between average and above average. Consistent with his 66.4 grade for 2022. He doesn't have Tucker's explosiveness as a runner, is he good at receiving or blocking?
He is an above average receiver and competent blocker. Honestly, the offense will need to become much more efficient if either player is to have any real fantasy value. It's just the first game so you can understand some of the indecision from both of them.
 
I drafted White last year in a contract league, and picked up Tucker late this year. I'm just hoping for some clear direction by the end of the year on which (if either) to hang on to.
 
I have 1 share. I has disappoint. I thought he'd be the beneficiary of ~80 Mayfield dump-offs.
This is what I thought as well. Unless he catches 3-5 passes each week, White will be at best a RB3 without much upside.
I mean, not all in one game, though that would be cool too.

But yeah - 3-5 receptions per week seems like a nice PPR flex player. But I thought he looked a lot better running the ball when given opportunity last year.
 
Funny how we read stats:

Rachaad White. 19 touches 49 yards 0 td

James Cook. 16 touches 63 yards 0 td

One is viewed as, "Oh my it's a matter of time before he is replaced." One is viewed as, "Oh my that's lead RB usage the sky is the limit " Gotta love football. Ha ha
 
Funny how we read stats:

Rachaad White. 19 touches 49 yards 0 td

James Cook. 16 touches 63 yards 0 td

One is viewed as, "Oh my it's a matter of time before he is replaced." One is viewed as, "Oh my that's lead RB usage the sky is the limit " Gotta love football. Ha ha
Some lazy analysis (or trolling) here. Show me one of White's 19 touches where he looked explosive, or even like an above average NFL running back because Cook looked elite on several. Bills win that game if they continue to feed Cook but they got complacent when Rodgers went down and it cost them a W. TB didn't need White to win, and he looked awful. These things don't bode well for the young man's future. Sometimes what you see from a player goes well beyond box score, but if you'd like to play the box score game, you better be running out there to drop Joe Burrow for Baker Mayfield while you're at it.
 
Funny how we read stats:

Rachaad White. 19 touches 49 yards 0 td

James Cook. 16 touches 63 yards 0 td

One is viewed as, "Oh my it's a matter of time before he is replaced." One is viewed as, "Oh my that's lead RB usage the sky is the limit " Gotta love football. Ha ha
Some lazy analysis (or trolling) here. Show me one of White's 19 touches where he looked explosive, or even like an above average NFL running back because Cook looked elite on several. Bills win that game if they continue to feed Cook but they got complacent when Rodgers went down and it cost them a W. TB didn't need White to win, and he looked awful. These things don't bode well for the young man's future. Sometimes what you see from a player goes well beyond box score, but if you'd like to play the box score game, you better be running out there to drop Joe Burrow for Baker Mayfield while you're at it.
Yea agreed. White has looked average at best, and does nothing that gets you excited.

Cook was an ankle tackle away from a long TD run, and bad luck on a pass where it hit the defenders helmet otherwise he would have scored there too on a 40 TD reception
 
its week one and they dont really play in preseason games anymore, a lot of players didnt look that great ...relax people
 
Funny how we read stats:

Rachaad White. 19 touches 49 yards 0 td

James Cook. 16 touches 63 yards 0 td

One is viewed as, "Oh my it's a matter of time before he is replaced." One is viewed as, "Oh my that's lead RB usage the sky is the limit " Gotta love football. Ha ha
White left a ton of yardage on the field. Cook avg 4 ypc against a super-elite defense. I don’t get the comparison at all.
 
Funny how we read stats:

Rachaad White. 19 touches 49 yards 0 td

James Cook. 16 touches 63 yards 0 td

One is viewed as, "Oh my it's a matter of time before he is replaced." One is viewed as, "Oh my that's lead RB usage the sky is the limit " Gotta love football. Ha ha
Some lazy analysis (or trolling) here. Show me one of White's 19 touches where he looked explosive, or even like an above average NFL running back because Cook looked elite on several. Bills win that game if they continue to feed Cook but they got complacent when Rodgers went down and it cost them a W. TB didn't need White to win, and he looked awful. These things don't bode well for the young man's future. Sometimes what you see from a player goes well beyond box score, but if you'd like to play the box score game, you better be running out there to drop Joe Burrow for Baker Mayfield while you're at it.
Been awhile since I've been called lazy so that's cool. Ha ha. I wasn't making this Old Testament passage where a flood is coming so we better build arks. I was simply pointing out the fine line between being viewed as super awesome and super bad. Sorry for wasting your time. Please block if unable to move forward.
 
Funny how we read stats:

Rachaad White. 19 touches 49 yards 0 td

James Cook. 16 touches 63 yards 0 td

One is viewed as, "Oh my it's a matter of time before he is replaced." One is viewed as, "Oh my that's lead RB usage the sky is the limit " Gotta love football. Ha ha
Some lazy analysis (or trolling) here. Show me one of White's 19 touches where he looked explosive, or even like an above average NFL running back because Cook looked elite on several. Bills win that game if they continue to feed Cook but they got complacent when Rodgers went down and it cost them a W. TB didn't need White to win, and he looked awful. These things don't bode well for the young man's future. Sometimes what you see from a player goes well beyond box score, but if you'd like to play the box score game, you better be running out there to drop Joe Burrow for Baker Mayfield while you're at it.
Been awhile since I've been called lazy so that's cool. Ha ha. I wasn't making this Old Testament passage where a flood is coming so we better build arks. I was simply pointing out the fine line between being viewed as super awesome and super bad. Sorry for wasting your time. Please block if unable to move forward.
Sorry, didn't mean to offend you. Box scores in a vacuum are almost irrelevant to player evaluation, that was my only point. It's not even a fine line when it comes to seeing the difference between Cook and White, it's glaringly obvious who the player with a higher ceiling is. Apologies for making it personal, I didn't intend to.
 
Funny how we read stats:

Rachaad White. 19 touches 49 yards 0 td

James Cook. 16 touches 63 yards 0 td

One is viewed as, "Oh my it's a matter of time before he is replaced." One is viewed as, "Oh my that's lead RB usage the sky is the limit " Gotta love football. Ha ha
Some lazy analysis (or trolling) here. Show me one of White's 19 touches where he looked explosive, or even like an above average NFL running back because Cook looked elite on several. Bills win that game if they continue to feed Cook but they got complacent when Rodgers went down and it cost them a W. TB didn't need White to win, and he looked awful. These things don't bode well for the young man's future. Sometimes what you see from a player goes well beyond box score, but if you'd like to play the box score game, you better be running out there to drop Joe Burrow for Baker Mayfield while you're at it.
Been awhile since I've been called lazy so that's cool. Ha ha. I wasn't making this Old Testament passage where a flood is coming so we better build arks. I was simply pointing out the fine line between being viewed as super awesome and super bad. Sorry for wasting your time. Please block if unable to move forward.
Sorry, didn't mean to offend you. Box scores in a vacuum are almost irrelevant to player evaluation, that was my only point. It's not even a fine line when it comes to seeing the difference between Cook and White, it's glaringly obvious who the player with a higher ceiling is. Apologies for making it personal, I didn't intend to.
All good buddy.
 
How to reconcile White leaving so many yards on the field (nextgen stats) and his decent week 1 PFF grade of 69.9? Were his blocking and pass receiving elite? He only caught 2 passes. The BUCS probably give Tucker more chances on 1st and 2nd down at some point. I hate to have 2 RBs from the Bucs on my team.
 
How to reconcile White leaving so many yards on the field (nextgen stats) and his decent week 1 PFF grade of 69.9? Were his blocking and pass receiving elite? He only caught 2 passes. The BUCS probably give Tucker more chances on 1st and 2nd down at some point. I hate to have 2 RBs from the Bucs on my team.
Good question - that's where metrics can be deceptive. All that really matters is what the coaches see/think - unfortunately, we haven't heard anything from them.
 
How to reconcile White leaving so many yards on the field (nextgen stats) and his decent week 1 PFF grade of 69.9? Were his blocking and pass receiving elite? He only caught 2 passes. The BUCS probably give Tucker more chances on 1st and 2nd down at some point. I hate to have 2 RBs from the Bucs on my team.
Good question - that's where metrics can be deceptive. All that really matters is what the coaches see/think - unfortunately, we haven't heard anything from them.
To be fair it's hard to not see 2.0 ypc.
 
How to reconcile White leaving so many yards on the field (nextgen stats) and his decent week 1 PFF grade of 69.9? Were his blocking and pass receiving elite? He only caught 2 passes. The BUCS probably give Tucker more chances on 1st and 2nd down at some point. I hate to have 2 RBs from the Bucs on my team.
Imo he’s a really good blocker which is where Tucker has to improve to get him.
 
How to reconcile White leaving so many yards on the field (nextgen stats) and his decent week 1 PFF grade of 69.9? Were his blocking and pass receiving elite? He only caught 2 passes. The BUCS probably give Tucker more chances on 1st and 2nd down at some point. I hate to have 2 RBs from the Bucs on my team.

When in doubt, PFF is wrong.
 
Rachaad still may not be the most efficient RB out there, but is getting volume, doing the job and, perhaps most importantly, the team is winning. Tucker may get his share at some point, but doesn't seem to be a big threat to White at this point.
 
Man he is so so so slow to the hole but he did look better yesterday. He had our whole room of Bucs fans screaming RUN on one play in the 4th yesterday. It was almost like he stopped.

Good game though.
 
2 ypc (again), a lost fumble, a safety. I know Tucker has looked like far from a world-beater so far, but give him a few more shots already.
 
You'll never know what you get- volatile flex going foward but I think he's gotten a tough shake so far. At New Orleans is brutal as well
 
You could have put Bo Jackson back there last night and it would not have mattered.
Yeah, that's the game I saw too. Mayfield was under siege as well, they just couldn't get Philly blocked up front. I happened to see the Green Bay game, after Carr went down the Packers took over. I agree with Tampa, but if Carr is out White could be a volume play. Just saying, the Saints didn't look the same, including their defense.
 
What are people's expectations on him? I recently traded for him (help fill the void of Chubb getting injured) due to the amount of volume this guy has been seeing, which I love, but I'm kind of having buyers remorse. I haven't had to start White yet due to bye week, and his schedule seems to be getting a little easier but Vaughn got some touches the last game, not sure if that was due to the game being in hand vs Saints. Would love to continue to see the goal line carries, 14-18 carries and 2-4 receptions.
 
What are people's expectations on him? I recently traded for him (help fill the void of Chubb getting injured) due to the amount of volume this guy has been seeing, which I love, but I'm kind of having buyers remorse. I haven't had to start White yet due to bye week, and his schedule seems to be getting a little easier but Vaughn got some touches the last game, not sure if that was due to the game being in hand vs Saints. Would love to continue to see the goal line carries, 14-18 carries and 2-4 receptions.
He has no competition so he dominates touches , its what he does with those touches thats the issue , as a starter on an NFL team hes a 3rd tier RB and thats stretching it a bit.

Hes just an average talent getting volume. Hes on my bench as a bye fill in or replace an injured RB i normally use . Hes started wk 1 & 2 for me , he did great wk 2 ill admit, but not much since, thankfully i was waiting for Breece Hall to get up to speed which he has.
 
He's a pretty inefficient RB - even the numbers last year bore that out. Seems to be below average in the running game, but solid in the passing game and a good blocker, so that will keep him on the field a ton.

In dynasty leagues, I think he's a big time sell as I see him very easily being replaced next year (if not this).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top