I find the pass pro argument for running backs -- when the difference in ability with the ball in their hands is so evident -- to be too simplistic. Stevenson has been better in pass pro, there's no doubt. No argument there. But instead of just looking at pass pro as "good vs. bad", I think we need to look at the true impact one player is having versus another. Since Henderson started seeing more snaps in Week 10, he and Stevenson, per PFF, have the exact same number of pass pro reps. Henderson has allowed 1 sacks to Stevenson's 0, and he's given up 4 additional pressures. (I used that timeframe because he's gotten better in pass pro since the beginning of the season, and this is when he was getting full-time reps.) Is one pressure per game worth the delta in rushing performance and big-play ability? And why do we ignore the fact that Stevenson has had ball security issues? To me, Henderson has just been the better overall player. Not even saying it has to be all his. Just crazy to me that he's being out-snapped and seeing fewer rush attempts at this point in the season.