jdoggydogg
Footballguy
Do you think the movie sucked as much as I did?I just saw Yes Man. And I loved the concept, that if you open yourself to any possibilities, good things will come to you. So, ask me anything.
Do you think the movie sucked as much as I did?I just saw Yes Man. And I loved the concept, that if you open yourself to any possibilities, good things will come to you. So, ask me anything.
Are you refering to the grateful older neighbor lady?Do you think the movie sucked as much as I did?I just saw Yes Man. And I loved the concept, that if you open yourself to any possibilities, good things will come to you. So, ask me anything.
well, he wasn't a successful comedian.I also find it hard to believe Favreau's character to be a comedian, guy shows absolutely no confidence throughout the film but he has little trouble making jokes in front of crowds? Not to mention his character says nothing (intentionally) funny the whole movie.
Absolutely.TexanFan02 said:Will you engage in twisted sexapades with someone from the interwebs? (I"m in TX, but could travel)I just saw Yes Man. And I loved the concept, that if you open yourself to any possibilities, good things will come to you. So, ask me anything.
Maybe seeing it more than a decade after everyone else meant the hype was too much. Personally, I think it means you need to turn in your man card.Swingers
Finally saw this movie, and didn't like it all that much. Vince Vaughn was great, there were some genuinely funny scenes, but the movie just felt terribly unrealistic.
Some background info on how Vaughn and Favreau became friends would have been nice, made no sense to me that Vaughn, Sue, and all those guys from LA would bother to be friends with Favreau who is completely different than all of them. I also find it hard to believe Favreau's character to be a comedian, guy shows absolutely no confidence throughout the film but he has little trouble making jokes in front of crowds? Not to mention his character says nothing (intentionally) funny the whole movie. Overall the amount of holes in the plot took away from the cool/comedic scenes in the movie for me.

Felt similarly. Good but not great. Felt like it didn't really have much to say beyond playing on current populist rage.Finally saw The Hangover tonight. Thought it was good, laughed a bunch. But the hype was probably too big going in....a bunch of people said it was better than Fletch, Caddyshack, or Real Genius. Not even close. I'd rather watch Wedding Crashers or Old School. Just didn't think Hangover was that clever - but again, it was good and I'm glad I watched it.Up In The Air - It was good. Not sure if I would give it any better then good. I don't know. I could somewhat relate to Cloony's character because I travel a lot for work. I could really related to the airport security scenes. I liked the young girls character... i thought the contrast between Cloony and the young girls character was interesting. tough to explain, but i just left the movie feeling empty... like nothing really happened. the whole 'your job is being replaced by computers' theme seems so overplayed to me it just came across as cliche.
Thats sounds right on, thanks for ruining the movie for me by pointing things out that didnt originally bother me.Swingers
Finally saw this movie, and didn't like it all that much. Vince Vaughn was great, there were some genuinely funny scenes, but the movie just felt terribly unrealistic.
Some background info on how Vaughn and Favreau became friends would have been nice, made no sense to me that Vaughn, Sue, and all those guys from LA would bother to be friends with Favreau who is completely different than all of them. I also find it hard to believe Favreau's character to be a comedian, guy shows absolutely no confidence throughout the film but he has little trouble making jokes in front of crowds? Not to mention his character says nothing (intentionally) funny the whole movie. Overall the amount of holes in the plot took away from the cool/comedic scenes in the movie for me.
Of course delivery is expensive when youre shipping by dinosaur. (Im hilarious when im intoxicated)cosjobs said:I use inetvideo.com to purchase a lot of DVDs. They usually have some amazing prices, if you dig around and look for them. They also have one of the most comprehensive selections I ahve ever seen.On the downside- they are in Canada and shipping can get pretty pricey. But thru 3/22 they are offering free shipping on orders of 50 dollars or more.I found a lot of older/offbeat/interesting British and French miniseries and tv series.My cart included:Babine (Blu-Ray) (Canadian Version) (DVD NEW)Price: $6.99Casino La Serie Complete (Boxset) (DVD NEW)Price: $14.49Ocean's Eleven (HD DVD) (DVD USED)Price: $2.49Passchendaele (Blu-ray) (Canadian Version) (DVD NEW)Price: $6.99Jericho of Scotland Yard - Set 1 (Boxset) (DVD NEW)Price: $12.49Martin Sur la Route (Boxset) (DVD USED)Price: $11.99Prime Suspect 5 (Boxset) (DVD NEW)Price: $12.49Wish Me Luck - Series 1 - Vol.1 - 3 (Boxset) (DVD NEW)Price: $9.49Thriller - The Complete Season One (Boxset) (DVD NEW)Price: $12.49 Sharkwater (Blu-ray) (Canadian Version) (DVD NEW)Price: $6.99Prisoner Cell Block H - Set 2 (Boxset) (DVD NEW)Price: $9.49The Bill - The Complete First Series (Boxset) (DVD NEW)Price: $12.49

I can't say I disliked it, although some of the visuals are very disturbing and the end reveal was hard to watch.Shutter Island- nice visuals of course, but sadly I knew the story in the first frame... exactly the same as Twinkle Twinkle Killer Kane, a movie I saw as a kid that I remember liking (Stacey Keach). Really liked Di Caprio in this along with Ruffalo. Even knowing the story, or at least the "story", I still enjoyed it.
The Fourth Kind
I really wanted to like this, but it was complete crap. Possibly the worst I've seen from 2009, and yes I've seen Paul Blart: Mall Cop. Nothing more annoying than the "real" scenes and the "re-inacted" scenes overlapping and echoing each other in dialogue. Probably the only time I've ever been tempted to turn my surround sound off.
I jumped a couple times, but it was just gimmicks that got me.
Junk, junk, junk.
0/5
*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***");document.close();

You must have bashed it earlier in the thread? Sorry I missed out on that. I hated Reality Bites when it came out. Not only is it pretentious but the whole thing is about Gen Xers rising above selling out to the "man", yet that's exactly what that movie did - Sell out to try and bait stupid Gen Xers into thinking it was deep and had meaning.The Chumscrubber
I must say this first: Camilla Belle is about the most beautiful female I've ever seen in a movie. Stunning
And I thought that Reality Bites would be the most pretentious movie I'd see all year. This fine cast (Ralph Fiennnes, Glenn Close, and a lovely Carrie-Anne Moss) is wasted on this self-important junk.
Exactly. The Chumscrubber was similar in that the movie is really high on itself.You must have bashed it earlier in the thread? Sorry I missed out on that. I hated Reality Bites when it came out. Not only is it pretentious but the whole thing is about Gen Xers rising above selling out to the "man", yet that's exactly what that movie did - Sell out to try and bait stupid Gen Xers into thinking it was deep and had meaning.The Chumscrubber
I must say this first: Camilla Belle is about the most beautiful female I've ever seen in a movie. Stunning
And I thought that Reality Bites would be the most pretentious movie I'd see all year. This fine cast (Ralph Fiennnes, Glenn Close, and a lovely Carrie-Anne Moss) is wasted on this self-important junk.
why? obviousness? lady's man? macho-energy? (why'd it have to be eddie?) (only need to answer the first two there)I can't say I disliked it, although some of the visuals are very disturbing and the end reveal was hard to watch.Shutter Island- nice visuals of course, but sadly I knew the story in the first frame... exactly the same as Twinkle Twinkle Killer Kane, a movie I saw as a kid that I remember liking (Stacey Keach). Really liked Di Caprio in this along with Ruffalo. Even knowing the story, or at least the "story", I still enjoyed it.
I really enjoyed Chumscrubber, but I didn't get that vibe from it.I think I described it as a Donnie Darko/American Beauty/Alpha Dog mishmash. I could see how people would get that vibe from 2 of the three of those movies too.Exactly. The Chumscrubber was similar in that the movie is really high on itself.You must have bashed it earlier in the thread? Sorry I missed out on that. I hated Reality Bites when it came out. Not only is it pretentious but the whole thing is about Gen Xers rising above selling out to the "man", yet that's exactly what that movie did - Sell out to try and bait stupid Gen Xers into thinking it was deep and had meaning.The Chumscrubber
I must say this first: Camilla Belle is about the most beautiful female I've ever seen in a movie. Stunning
And I thought that Reality Bites would be the most pretentious movie I'd see all year. This fine cast (Ralph Fiennnes, Glenn Close, and a lovely Carrie-Anne Moss) is wasted on this self-important junk.
I didn't care to write a lot about Reality Bites, although a bunch of us ripped it about 200 posts earlier in this thread. Here's what I said:You must have bashed it earlier in the thread? Sorry I missed out on that. I hated Reality Bites when it came out. Not only is it pretentious but the whole thing is about Gen Xers rising above selling out to the "man", yet that's exactly what that movie did - Sell out to try and bait stupid Gen Xers into thinking it was deep and had meaning.The Chumscrubber
I must say this first: Camilla Belle is about the most beautiful female I've ever seen in a movie. Stunning
And I thought that Reality Bites would be the most pretentious movie I'd see all year. This fine cast (Ralph Fiennnes, Glenn Close, and a lovely Carrie-Anne Moss) is wasted on this self-important junk.
Wow. I'd never seen this before. I'm only half way through this movie, but what a bunch of pretentious nonsense. And all the pop culture references? It's like the writer was being sponsored by 1,000 corporations and needed to inject at least one product into the script every 60 seconds.
I'm not sure I understand your post.why? obviousness? lady's man? macho-energy? (why'd it have to be eddie?) (only need to answer the first two there)I can't say I disliked it, although some of the visuals are very disturbing and the end reveal was hard to watch.Shutter Island- nice visuals of course, but sadly I knew the story in the first frame... exactly the same as Twinkle Twinkle Killer Kane, a movie I saw as a kid that I remember liking (Stacey Keach). Really liked Di Caprio in this along with Ruffalo. Even knowing the story, or at least the "story", I still enjoyed it.
Chumscubber had some interesting bits, for sure. But its open content for the parental characters was unabashed pandering.I really enjoyed Chumscrubber, but I didn't get that vibe from it.I think I described it as a Donnie Darko/American Beauty/Alpha Dog mishmash. I could see how people would get that vibe from 2 of the three of those movies too.Exactly. The Chumscrubber was similar in that the movie is really high on itself.You must have bashed it earlier in the thread? Sorry I missed out on that. I hated Reality Bites when it came out. Not only is it pretentious but the whole thing is about Gen Xers rising above selling out to the "man", yet that's exactly what that movie did - Sell out to try and bait stupid Gen Xers into thinking it was deep and had meaning.The Chumscrubber
I must say this first: Camilla Belle is about the most beautiful female I've ever seen in a movie. Stunning
And I thought that Reality Bites would be the most pretentious movie I'd see all year. This fine cast (Ralph Fiennnes, Glenn Close, and a lovely Carrie-Anne Moss) is wasted on this self-important junk.
Sorry... lapsed into Barfly.Why was the end reveal hard to watch? ... oof. I think I know why.I'm not sure I understand your post.why? obviousness? lady's man? macho-energy? (why'd it have to be eddie?) (only need to answer the first two there)I can't say I disliked it, although some of the visuals are very disturbing and the end reveal was hard to watch.Shutter Island- nice visuals of course, but sadly I knew the story in the first frame... exactly the same as Twinkle Twinkle Killer Kane, a movie I saw as a kid that I remember liking (Stacey Keach). Really liked Di Caprio in this along with Ruffalo. Even knowing the story, or at least the "story", I still enjoyed it.
I watched this in theaters, and continue you to rent it every couple of years because I remember it being way better than it actually is.So I've been disappointed by this movie probably 4 or 5 times now.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.
Sorry... lapsed into Barfly.Why was the end reveal hard to watch? ... oof. I think I know why.I'm not sure I understand your post.why? obviousness? lady's man? macho-energy? (why'd it have to be eddie?) (only need to answer the first two there)I can't say I disliked it, although some of the visuals are very disturbing and the end reveal was hard to watch.Shutter Island- nice visuals of course, but sadly I knew the story in the first frame... exactly the same as Twinkle Twinkle Killer Kane, a movie I saw as a kid that I remember liking (Stacey Keach). Really liked Di Caprio in this along with Ruffalo. Even knowing the story, or at least the "story", I still enjoyed it.
I watched this in theaters, and continue you to rent it every couple of years because I remember it being way better than it actually is.So I've been disappointed by this movie probably 4 or 5 times now.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.
The last time must have been before Butler's rise to fame because I don't remember him in it.

and what the kid did to his motherPeter, that was very naughty

How would you compare it to Pump Up the Volume?Pirate Radio - Started out really slow. For the fist half hour or hour I was thinking... oh man... another dud. But it was an interesting setting, and the characters kept my attention. About half way through I started really liking it... and by the end I liked it even more. Looking back I think they were giving good character development in the first half and getting me 'invested' in the characters, something often lost in movies these days. Then they took that foundation and built on it.
As the plot moved further along it slowly built to the end and I really liked it. I'll tell you what, even if you don't like the movie it's difficult not to, at a minimum, enjoy the soundtrack and just wathing a re-creation of that era. I don't even particularly care for the music that came out of the 'British Invasion' but this movie made me appreciate the time / era much more. The retro styles the chicks wore were hot too.
It was unique, it was fun, it was an interesting (based on a true) story, good characters... I highly approve.
I remember enjoying this. But perhaps I was suffering from some kind of mental trauma at the time.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.
I remember enjoying this. But perhaps I was suffering from some kind of mental trauma at the time.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.

you weren't. it's a cool movieI remember enjoying this. But perhaps I was suffering from some kind of mental trauma at the time.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.
I had very low expectations going in, but I was entertained.you weren't. it's a cool movieI remember enjoying this. But perhaps I was suffering from some kind of mental trauma at the time.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.
I thought it was good mindless fun. Bale was not very well known back then and Butler was yet to be really discovered. I too try to keep my expectations for movies like this low...they are much more enjoyable that wayI had very low expectations going in, but I was entertained.you weren't. it's a cool movieI remember enjoying this. But perhaps I was suffering from some kind of mental trauma at the time.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.
the CGI for the dragons is very well done.I thought it was good mindless fun. Bale was not very well known back then and Butler was yet to be really discovered.I had very low expectations going in, but I was entertained.you weren't. it's a cool movieI remember enjoying this. But perhaps I was suffering from some kind of mental trauma at the time.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.
I was entertained.I thought it was good mindless fun. Bale was not very well known back then and Butler was yet to be really discovered. I too try to keep my expectations for movies like this low...they are much more enjoyable that wayI had very low expectations going in, but I was entertained.you weren't. it's a cool movieI remember enjoying this. But perhaps I was suffering from some kind of mental trauma at the time.Watched Reign Of Fire over the weekend.
Never got around too watching it before now... and wish I could erase the "before now" from this sentence.
This movie was hideous... with three actors who have played great roles in movies that I've really enjoyed (Matthew McConahey(sp), Christian Bale, and Gerard Butler) I really thought that it would be enough to make it (at the very least) watch able. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
Giant fail on what seemed like a pretty cool idea for a script.

I'm pretty sure I saw Pump up the Volume, but I don't remember it so I had to go back and read what it was about. I just read the plot on IMDB to remember. It looks to me like Pump up the Volume was quite dramatic. I guess Priate Radio is somewhat dramatic, but it is definitely much more fun then Pump up the Volume. Pirate Radio was more like the documentary of an awesome party on a boat. Pump up the Volume souns more like a drama about HS teens growing up and dealing with it. There wasn't really any serious drama that I can recall in Pirate Radio.The only real 'dramatic' plot line in Pirate Radio was very minimal, and was dealt with lightly. It was closer to a british Animal House out to sea then Pump up the Volume.How would you compare it to Pump Up the Volume?Pirate Radio - Started out really slow. For the fist half hour or hour I was thinking... oh man... another dud. But it was an interesting setting, and the characters kept my attention. About half way through I started really liking it... and by the end I liked it even more. Looking back I think they were giving good character development in the first half and getting me 'invested' in the characters, something often lost in movies these days. Then they took that foundation and built on it.
As the plot moved further along it slowly built to the end and I really liked it. I'll tell you what, even if you don't like the movie it's difficult not to, at a minimum, enjoy the soundtrack and just wathing a re-creation of that era. I don't even particularly care for the music that came out of the 'British Invasion' but this movie made me appreciate the time / era much more. The retro styles the chicks wore were hot too.
It was unique, it was fun, it was an interesting (based on a true) story, good characters... I highly approve.
I saw the original european version (swedish or norwegian I think) and it was very good, possibly more subtle than the US version. However it was so intense I really ahve no desire to watch the US adaptation.Just got done watching Brothers:
This movie might be the anti-Hurt Locker. Brothers is all about attempting to explore the damage left behind back home when a husband/father gets shipped to war and comes back. Predictable plot of Toby getting shipped out, shot down and presumed dead. Enter Jake (his brother) who's been in his shadow to fall for his wife and his family. Toby comes back after being tortured and broken down to commit a terrible act. Drama ensues. The ending was blah, but it packed enough emotional punch to tell others to give it a try. I think some of the characters were miscast, notably Portman, but overall the acting was decent. I dare anybody with kids not to be moved by the job the oldest daughter did.
While I accused Hurt Locker of being too much one way, I think this movie did too much with the emotional side and it seemed like they were trying to beat you over the head with the impact these people feel on their lives. Both movies were average, so it might be worth seeing another type of war movie if you dug the Hurt Locker.