What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (7 Viewers)

Date Night:

I am a boring married man, a lover of all things Tina Fey and think Mr. Carell has his moments so I figured I'd give this a try. I am sorry I did. It's worth a couple married chuckles at the beginning, but then spirals into a lame actiony-chase type movie that neither actor is suited for. It's below average and completely misuses two people who I think can be fairly funny. Maybe it's because they didn't have a role in the writing of the movie...

ETA: One of the few funny things in the movie was Mr. Franco as "Taste". He needs to do more comedy movies...
this movie reminded me of the favreau/vaughn flick "made" for whatever reason. not something i want to pay and see. heck, not something i would want to watch via netflix. if it was on cable and i had nothing better to then i might watch it.fey>carell.

 
I would put Seabiscuit at the top of my sports movies list. Seven Oscar nominations, but it was released in 2003 when LOTR was rewarded for the work done in the entire trilogy. Jeff Bridges and Chris Cooper were outstanding and I think Seabiscuit is one of the most underrated dramas ever released. The racing scenes look and sound fantastic on blu-ray too.
I have never had any desire at all to see Seabiscuit but this post is changing my mind.And get prepared for some Krippling; I'm two months behind in here. :goodposting:
Not trying to be harsh here, but Seabiscuit is a total piece of ####.
Really?I think it's an entertaining movie. Not great but definitely enjoyable.It beats the heck out of most PT Anderson's depressing films.
 
Fanboys...wasnt expecting a great comedy, but I had been wanting to see this for like 3 years it seems when I first saw the trailer. None of the 4 main actors are very funny on their own, but they definitely worked as a ensemble. Overall, thought there were some good lines and it had enough laughs to keep me interested. I enjoy the original Star Wars movies as much as the next guy, maybe slightly less actually, but all the Star Wars-related humor was good as well. Im probably just comparing it to this movie because the 1 guy was also in it, but its in that Detroit Rock City ballpark as a comedy for me: not hilariously funny yet still lots of laughs, plenty of situational humor, and an above average storyline for a buddy comedy....7/10
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Watched the first 9 episodes of Modern Family last night. I'm late to the party, but good stuff. Just a step down from the comedy in Arrested Development or Curb Your Enthusiasm.

Feels good to be able to laugh at Ed O'Neil again, he was terrible in his last TV attempt in the piece of poo that was John from Cincinnati.

 
Thief

Another film I waited way too long to see, and kind of fitting viewing it just shortly after The Town. This is an example of a higher concept criminal movie that works. Most crime stories are ultimately morality tales, where in the end the bad guy has to get his for the audience to be satisfied. We are given a chance to identify with these criminals and try to put ourselves in their shoes for a short period of time before we discover what makes them different than us and usually they pay the price. Thief is refreshing because James Caan's character, Frank, is a total bad ###. He doesn't do stupid ####, he doesn't let his guard down, he doesn't make compromises. He proves to us he has what it takes to possibly overcome his situation. Add in the very minor supporting roles of Willie Nelson and Jim Belushi has his criminal cohorts and you have one of my new all time favorite crime movies. Check this out if you haven't got to it in the last 29 years.

Mann's choice of music has pretty much always sucked, the synthesized stuff in this is very grating at times.

4.5/5

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Evil Dead

Flash Gordon

Re-Animator

Blood In, Blood Out: Bound By Honor
Is this really a guilty pleasure movie? I have difficulty putting it in the same group with those other three.
Not sure Id call Evil Dead a guilty pleasure either. Everybody loves that movie.
Ummmmm....one of those movies is a definite All-American Classic... :shrug:
I never liked the original Evil Dead. For me it's Army of Darkness or it's nothing.I do agree that the first three are, on some level, classics and appreciated by a great many people but none of them are held up as examples of excellent film making and are, in many ways, understandably guilty pleasures.

But, to me, BIBO:BBH was a really well done and thoughtful drama. The acting by Damian Chapa was definitely below average, bad even, but I thought the story more than made up for his flaws. I just don't see it in nearly the same category as the other three.

 
I'm trying to think of what my guiltiest pleasure movies would be. How about this: I really liked A Knight's Tale? :thumbup:
I'm kind of the same way about Excalibur. It's John Boorman and he's done some really good work over the years. But I saw this when I was 11 and deeply into D & D. It wasn't exactly influential but watching it makes me feel 11 years old again. Watching it now, as an adult, it is often cringe-worthy but I don't care. I'm pretty powerless to resist its charms. :ptts:

 
Evil Dead

Flash Gordon

Re-Animator

Blood In, Blood Out: Bound By Honor
Is this really a guilty pleasure movie? I have difficulty putting it in the same group with those other three.
Not sure Id call Evil Dead a guilty pleasure either. Everybody loves that movie.
Ummmmm....one of those movies is a definite All-American Classic... :thumbup:
I never liked the original Evil Dead. For me it's Army of Darkness or it's nothing.I do agree that the first three are, on some level, classics and appreciated by a great many people but none of them are held up as examples of excellent film making and are, in many ways, understandably guilty pleasures.

But, to me, BIBO:BBH was a really well done and thoughtful drama. The acting by Damian Chapa was definitely below average, bad even, but I thought the story more than made up for his flaws. I just don't see it in nearly the same category as the other three.
You guys are both cuckoo for coco puffs, Evil Dead 2 is where it's at!
 
I'm trying to think of what my guiltiest pleasure movies would be. How about this: I really liked A Knight's Tale? :lmao:
I'm kind of the same way about Excalibur. It's John Boorman and he's done some really good work over the years. But I saw this when I was 11 and deeply into D & D. It wasn't exactly influential but watching it makes me feel 11 years old again. Watching it now, as an adult, it is often cringe-worthy but I don't care. I'm pretty powerless to resist its charms. :lmao:
Really? I loved this movie. Saw it maybe 5 years ago and still enjoyed it, but perhaps it was the nostalgia (you and I are the same age apparently). What did you find to be cringe worthy? Excalibur also has some real star power that probably holds up better today than it did at the time (Patrick Stewart, Liam Neeson, Gabriel Byrne).

 
You certainly don't need to defend this thread to me. It is my primary movie resource.

I don't consider anyone a movie snob here.
What he saidI'm trying to think of what my guiltiest pleasure movies would be. How about this: I really liked A Knight's Tale? :)
whoa.I'll call your Knight's Tale and raise you The Postman
You guys are such amateurs. I'll see those movies and raise you:Evil Dead

Flash Gordon

Re-Animator

Blood In, Blood Out: Bound By Honor
*cough* Battlefield Earth *cough*
:homer: ;)

 
Ghost Writer(2010) - 4/5. love me some polanski thrillers. eli wallach made an appearance.
I liked it, but for some reason, I don't think I like it as much as I should. Smoothly crafted, though.
:homer: I couldn't get terribly into it despite some great performances and a decent enough story. No idea why, other than again it was watching it on a plane that did it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Started watching Mystery Team last night...I dont think I finished it, probably got halfway through or so, but dont remember since I started watching after about a dozen shots and 3 reebs. Some chuckles but Im not sure I really want to start watching the rest of it or start from the beginning.
:homer: I LOVE this movie. I do think it takes a while to get into it. Will be eagerly making my way through the rest of this thread to see if you finished it.
 
Thief

Another film I waited way too long to see, and kind of fitting viewing it just shortly after The Town. This is an example of a higher concept criminal movie that works. Most crime stories are ultimately morality tales, where in the end the bad guy has to get his for the audience to be satisfied. We are given a chance to identify with these criminals and try to put ourselves in their shoes for a short period of time before we discover what makes them different than us and usually they pay the price. Thief is refreshing because James Caan's character, Frank, is a total bad ###. He doesn't do stupid ####, he doesn't let his guard down, he doesn't make compromises. He proves to us he has what it takes to possibly overcome his situation. Add in the very minor supporting roles of Willie Nelson and Jim Belushi has his criminal cohorts and you have one of my new all time favorite crime movies. Check this out if you haven't got to it in the last 29 years.

Mann's choice of music has pretty much always sucked, the synthesized stuff in this is very grating at times.

4.5/5
Disagree about his music- I think it usually works great, as he taps into a zeitgeisty element of sub-popular music. Problem is- he's got a knack for picking music that, although cool in the moment, ties itself to that moment and isn't so timeless. That Jean Michel Jarre soundtrack for Thief is exhibit A. Manhunter soundtrack (which I love) is exhibit B.eta: point I was trying to make- his music choice usually ends up being sometimes cringey dated.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
American Movie -

Been pimping this doc for a bit now. Decided to watch it again while I wait for my next shipment of movies in the mail. Love this movie. It's about a guy in WI trying to make a couple of low-budget movies. Great cast of characters that makes this movie funny as hell. I am laughing every time his buddy (Mike, I think?) is on screen - he's a combo of Silent Bob and Spiccoli.
:thumbup: Big fan.
Me too. :thumbup: And :shock: that anyone could hate Clerks.

 
I'm trying to think of what my guiltiest pleasure movies would be. How about this: I really liked A Knight's Tale? :thumbup:
I'm kind of the same way about Excalibur. It's John Boorman and he's done some really good work over the years. But I saw this when I was 11 and deeply into D & D. It wasn't exactly influential but watching it makes me feel 11 years old again. Watching it now, as an adult, it is often cringe-worthy but I don't care. I'm pretty powerless to resist its charms. :thumbup:
holy mofo. I think I wrote taht exact thought just now... or at least thunk it. except much less well. And I was able to resist it's charms upon a recent a viewing :3rdleveldispellillusionspell:
 
Man Bites Dog:

This is a movie that combines society's fascination with celebrity with our love of all things 'reality' in a sardonic and sickly captivating way.

The basic premise has a documentary film crew being allowed to follow around a serial killer as he perpetuates his craft while the crew itself slowly crosses the line from presenting facts to becoming a part of the story. All the while the killer spews his philosophical views on life, architecture, art, other races and cultures and how to properly dispose of the evidence of his trade.

Although this film is labeled a dark comedy it is really a film that will stick with you for a while after viewing. It's not so much that it will make you feel like you need to take a bath as it is one that will make you shake your head and ask WTF as you sit up in the middle of the night re-living some of Benoit's exploits. It's sort of a Clockwork Orange for a more modern age I would say.
Interesting. Adding to queue overflow list.
 
Date Night:

I am a boring married man, a lover of all things Tina Fey and think Mr. Carell has his moments so I figured I'd give this a try. I am sorry I did. It's worth a couple married chuckles at the beginning, but then spirals into a lame actiony-chase type movie that neither actor is suited for. It's below average and completely misuses two people who I think can be fairly funny. Maybe it's because they didn't have a role in the writing of the movie...
I have heard that Marky Mark has the funniest part in the movie. That's never a good thing.
The scene(s) he was in were alright, but it was more to do with Tina's reaction to him than Marky himself. As I added late above, Franco was one of the funnier things for me.
I think the funniest scene is their traditional date at the neighborhood restaurant where they make fun of people together (the outtakes of the scene are even funnier). Fey and Carell ad libbing and goofing on people is funny. Fey and Carell running away from the mob isn't.
 
I don't know why it didn't sink in until now, but the movie had another big thing working against it for me - voice over. I was getting used to Liotta's narration and then his wife starting piping up. :lmao: I know it might be silly, but for the most it will start ruining a movie for me when you tell me what's going on.
I've been on a one-woman crusade against voiceovers for years. Welcome! Nothing ruins a movie for me more easily.
 
I'm trying to think of what my guiltiest pleasure movies would be. How about this: I really liked A Knight's Tale? :lmao:
I'm kind of the same way about Excalibur. It's John Boorman and he's done some really good work over the years. But I saw this when I was 11 and deeply into D & D. It wasn't exactly influential but watching it makes me feel 11 years old again. Watching it now, as an adult, it is often cringe-worthy but I don't care. I'm pretty powerless to resist its charms. :lmao:
Really? I loved this movie. Saw it maybe 5 years ago and still enjoyed it, but perhaps it was the nostalgia (you and I are the same age apparently). What did you find to be cringe worthy? Excalibur also has some real star power that probably holds up better today than it did at the time (Patrick Stewart, Liam Neeson, Gabriel Byrne).
The acting is pretty awful across the board. Patrick, Gabriel, and Liam are only minor offenders here because of their smallish roles. Nigel Terry is pretty bad though and that's a problem for someone playing Arthur. Nicol Williamson is great and really kind of steals the show. Mirren is fine in a minor role. I actually kind of like Paul Geoffrey as Percival. It looks good despite being pretty dated. The acting is just too hammy even though the roles lend themselves to that. Maybe I want it to be more true to the tales themselves and would have liked it to be longer?

 
The mere inclusion of voiceover does not disqualify a film from greatness.
No it doesn't. Some of my favorite movies have it - Fight Club, American Beauty, Shawshank, etc.. However, I think when it is used too much it comes off as lazy writing/film making. I just thought Goodfellas used it too much and definitely didn't need any from the wife. Got to the level of distraction for me when I was watching it last night.
Wow, I'm amazed at the pages of voiceover debate.Only 14 pages until I'm caught up!
 
I don't know why it didn't sink in until now, but the movie had another big thing working against it for me - voice over. I was getting used to Liotta's narration and then his wife starting piping up. :shrug: I know it might be silly, but for the most it will start ruining a movie for me when you tell me what's going on.
I've been on a one-woman crusade against voiceovers for years. Welcome! Nothing ruins a movie for me more easily.
I've seen quite a bit of this in this thread regarding voiceovers. I dunno what the big deal is, I never even gave much thought to them (never actually). Doesn't bother me, nor am I a fan of it. If it's there, it's there, it is what it is. Not a big deal to me. :lmao:Kinda like a laugh track during sitcoms. Don't care either way, and don't really understand why people would have issues with it, one way or the other.
 
Thief

Another film I waited way too long to see, and kind of fitting viewing it just shortly after The Town. This is an example of a higher concept criminal movie that works. Most crime stories are ultimately morality tales, where in the end the bad guy has to get his for the audience to be satisfied. We are given a chance to identify with these criminals and try to put ourselves in their shoes for a short period of time before we discover what makes them different than us and usually they pay the price. Thief is refreshing because James Caan's character, Frank, is a total bad ###. He doesn't do stupid ####, he doesn't let his guard down, he doesn't make compromises. He proves to us he has what it takes to possibly overcome his situation. Add in the very minor supporting roles of Willie Nelson and Jim Belushi has his criminal cohorts and you have one of my new all time favorite crime movies. Check this out if you haven't got to it in the last 29 years.

Mann's choice of music has pretty much always sucked, the synthesized stuff in this is very grating at times.

4.5/5
Disagree about his music- I think it usually works great, as he taps into a zeitgeisty element of sub-popular music. Problem is- he's got a knack for picking music that, although cool in the moment, ties itself to that moment and isn't so timeless. That Jean Michel Jarre soundtrack for Thief is exhibit A. Manhunter soundtrack (which I love) is exhibit B.eta: point I was trying to make- his music choice usually ends up being sometimes cringey dated.
It's been a while since I seen Manhunter but I remember kind of liking that, at least it was menacing. Thief was made before I was even born. My comment mainly stemmed from hating the recent Miami Vice soundtrack.
 
I would put Seabiscuit at the top of my sports movies list. Seven Oscar nominations, but it was released in 2003 when LOTR was rewarded for the work done in the entire trilogy. Jeff Bridges and Chris Cooper were outstanding and I think Seabiscuit is one of the most underrated dramas ever released. The racing scenes look and sound fantastic on blu-ray too.
I have never had any desire at all to see Seabiscuit but this post is changing my mind.And get prepared for some Krippling; I'm two months behind in here. :shrug:
Not trying to be harsh here, but Seabiscuit is a total piece of ####.
you are incorrect sir
 
holy mofo. I think I wrote taht exact thought just now... or at least thunk it. except much less well. And I was able to resist it's charms upon a recent a viewing :3rdleveldispellillusionspell:
Boorman is a good director too. He's made other films that I absolutely loved like "Hope & Glory", "Hell in the Pacific", "Point Blank", "The General" and "Deliverance". He's a step below Ridley Scott in the directors of his clique. that said, he's less obvious than Scott is.
 
Haven't had a TV, or even time to watch one, since the fire- but caught a couple of movies a couple of weekends ago while staying at a friend's place.

I work with a woman named Zac (sic) and always call her name out ala Roberto Benigni from Down By Law (Jarmusch). Seeing it again, I think for the first time since seeing it originally in the theaters, reminded me of how much I loved it- Jarmusch frames each scene so beautifully from a visual standpoint, it's easy to get past a pretty flimsy plot. Seriously- it's almost as if he story-boarded each shot and then filled in a plot afterwards… fantastic use of black and white too. Really loved the final scene- mash-up of Robert (bob) Frost poem and a little bit of the final scene from the Third Man (another fave) with Waits and Lurie walking off down divergent roads. John Lurie carries over his early 80s Lower East Side hip-cat routine from Stranger than Paradise and Tom Waits does his lovable loser act with Benigni hamming it up (surprise). Probably my favorite of Jarmusch's movies. Great sound-track/score too.

I still love, love, love Tati's Mr Hulot's Holiday. He was able to create and flesh out characters with almost only sound affects and body language more fully than most recent movies do with dialogue and plot. The dining room door alone probably had more depth than most Michael Bay characters. Hulot is one of my all-time favorite comic characters and this is one of my favorite comedies… I'm fumbling with words to describe my love for this one…
Down by Law is my favorite of Jarmusch's movies, and that's saying something.**See me for the full list, in order.

 
Started watching Mystery Team last night...I dont think I finished it, probably got halfway through or so, but dont remember since I started watching after about a dozen shots and 3 reebs. Some chuckles but Im not sure I really want to start watching the rest of it or start from the beginning.
:shrug: I LOVE this movie. I do think it takes a while to get into it. Will be eagerly making my way through the rest of this thread to see if you finished it.
Mystery Team

Glad a fellow FBG recommended this recently. A very funny film once it grew on me a bit. I've never really seen anything I can compare it to, maybe the Coen's Ladykillers. Imagine a 3 man team of super detectives at the age of 7, that just forgot to grow up. Now they are 18 and surrounded by adult situations as they take on their big case. Clever, stupid, and genuinely funny. The characters are so naive that it tiptoes the line of being a spoof at times.

4.5/5

Again, if this style of awkward, naive, spoof comedy doesn't work for you, you're really going to hate this.
:lmao:
 
I think it was Jdog that recommended it originally, but big thumbs up for "Ghost Writer" with Pierce Brosnan and Obi-Wan. Crisp little mystery/thriller that I really enjoyed about the ghost writer of the autobiography of a former Prime Minister (fictious, but meant to be Tony Blair).

Always good to find a little gem out there.

ETA: read that after I wrote it, and it's hard to imagine a story about a ghost writer to be all that gripping...but it is.
I know I already commented that I only found this movie OK, but it did have one of my favorite lines ever, delivered by :thumbup: Tom Wilkinson :wub:
 
Watched Following on Netflix instant last night. It's one of Christopher Nolan's early efforts.

Really good budget flick, IMO, full of Nolan quirks like fractured narrative, high suspense, near omniscient villains. Check it out.
Oooooo. Sweet. This is already way up high in my queue :thumbup:
I loved this movie when I saw it years ago, but wonder if it held up. Eagerly anticipating the jdogg review.
 
Before Sunrise:

Watched this one again last night, and it still works for me. I don't watch a ton of romance movies, but seems like the genre is saturated with movies were romance = having to stay with somebody for life and have babies. Refreshing when you see a movie about people who connect for one night, and that's basically the end of it. Some parts drag a little, but for the most part I like the dialogue and a lot of the stories/commentaries on life they had. I believe this made it in my top 100 movies, and easily one of my favorites of the genre.
Did you see Before Sunset? Was worried about being disappointed with the sequel so many years later, but I wasn't. It was a smart, dialogue-driven movie like the first.
 
tonight I watched the sequel and put in Before Sunset.

I remember seeing it when it first came out and not liking it as much. That was the only time I had seen this until now. I will say that my opinion has changed a bit, and ended up liking this one more than the original. I guess being a married 34 year old with a 4 year old son really made me connect with this movie and Ethan's character this time around. I would think this is a movie that would hit home with anybody who say every once in a while "what if". I think more people than not have that one person that might have gotten away or we wonder what would happen if you crossed paths with them again, etc..

Can't say enough good things about either of these movies. Tells a lot when a movie is so interesting even though it is 90mins of following 2 people around while they talk.
Ignore previous post.
 
Seven Samurai

A great cinematic achievement, but it can be kind of a chore to watch. It seems like the longest film ever made even though it's only 3 1/2 hours. Great story though and I love the way the battle strategy is planned and staged. Too many Samurai, 5 would have been easier to keep track of. Possibly one of the most satisfying endings in film history and rock solid all the way through. Cinematography is unparalleled, you could take any shot in this film and frame it. Really wish it would have ended with the line "Once again, we survive." Chilling.

5/5
i know this is a kind of blasphemy but i don't much care for "7S". i am comfortable with older films and certainly kirosawa's work. this film just didn't do much of anything for me.
:shock: :no: That baby is keeping you up too much. Get some sleep and get back to us on this. One of the best movies ever made.

:shock: :jawdrop:

 
Watched Yojimbo for the first time last night. Finally, Last Man Standing makes a little more sense to me. The nameless main character probably one of my top 3 coolest cats in film history in the company of to Jef Costello from Le Samourai and Fight Club's Tyler Durden.

4.5/5
I suppose it goes without saying, but I loved this movie. The framing was exquisite. He would position the actors perfectly in the frame for dramatic effect. If I were teaching a film class and had to explain mise-en-scene, I would select stills from this movie.
 
watched "wendy & lucy" there other night. oof. michelle williams plays a down-on-her-luck type trying to get to Alaska and gets stuck in OR. she also loses her dog and tries to find it. the end. i have the patience to indulge slow moving films that focus on character development. this is not a film that i felt rewarded for watching.
:yes: This seemed right up my alley. It wasn't.
 
OK, so last night I watched The Bridge in part so that El Floppo (or maybe it was Sweet J) would have someone with whom to talk about it.

This movie really pissed me off.

What should/could have been an interesting documentary about why people are attracted to the Golden Gate Bridge as a suicide locale, or why the bridge isn't protected from such attempts, or how the people who fish these folks out of the water deal with their jobs, or simply an in-depth look at suicide and mental illness, was instead what appeared to be just a way to appeal to the basest and most prurient instincts we might have. Don't get me wrong--the documentary was compelling and kept me completely rapt, but I felt like there was no good reason that it should have been made. It was a horribly superficial look at mental illness, meant only to titillate. And watching people hurl themselves off a bridge is...well, I certainly shouldn't have watched this right before bed.

I also thought there was some very questionable musical selections--parts that were a bit too upbeat for the situation, or in some cases simply too earnest.

The cinematography of the bridge and juxtaposition of tourist and happy folks enjoying it with those who choose to end their lives there were very well done.

Can't recommend this to anyone unless you just like watching horribly troubled people kill themselves. 1/5
I actually liked that it didn't get too much more than a lay-perspective into the mental illness. Certainly couldve gone further in depth into bi-polar disorder (the leitmotif of those killing themselves), but he seemed to make a conscious decision to just keep with the families and their perspectives, which is a more personal, less clinical approach. But I hear ya on feeling like it was an avenue that could/should've been explored, considering that leitmotif.

I think the director made the movie as a response to an article about how easy it is to jump from there, and how it has become a suicide mecca, of sorts (IIRC, it was a New Yorker article). IIRC, he started the project as a protest effort to try and get the fence built, and then it turned into what it became.
That's what he talked about in the bonus features. Evidently there was an article in the NYT about how they want some sort of suicide net around the bridge and it was his intent to go there to capture what was going on there and get info and the film seemed to morph into something else.

I understand your's and Krista's beef with the direction/editing and how they focused on Gene and made it feel like some thriller or something like that. My take is this: they started filming, actually caught people in the act. IMO it would have been more offensive if they just did that and didn't at least attempt to get these people's stories or who they were. I would bet that in a couple cases it was just a perfect storm of family willing to talk to them about it/how much footage they had of the person. The people who talked were definately at peace with what happened or at least at an acceptance level with it, hence why they talked I would think. Others (I would probably be in this mind set) would probably be pissed that these people caught their loved one's death on camera and they were the last to see them alive and not me. I think I read they captured 23/24 deaths that year, but only a handful of people would talk to them (for obvious reasons).

I think the movie would have been improved if they talked a little about why they were doing this or if they were taking any steps to prevent these deaths (I talked a little in the above post about this). As it was I could see how people would be pissed and think is was just them sensationalizing a couple deaths for no reason other than morbid voyeurism or just to make a buck.
Oh. Ignore previous post.(I really shouldn't get so far behind in this thread.)

 
Heaven Can Wait

Continuing my list of classic films I've missed. Oy. Awful. Couldn't even get past the first 20 minutes. I don't know what was worse, the plot or Julie Christie's haircut.
That's a shame. It probably doesn't hold up well but I remember that it was pretty funny and I have seen worse from an outrageous plot point of view. Also Charles Grodin is fantastic, as usual.
:lmao: I don't want to see it again, because I think of it as one of my favorite movies of all time, and I don't want that spoiled.
 
Heaven Can Wait

Continuing my list of classic films I've missed. Oy. Awful. Couldn't even get past the first 20 minutes. I don't know what was worse, the plot or Julie Christie's haircut.
That's a shame. It probably doesn't hold up well but I remember that it was pretty funny and I have seen worse from an outrageous plot point of view. Also Charles Grodin is fantastic, as usual.
Grodin is money, I agree.
I saw this in the theaters as a kid and LOVED it. Hate to think of it as yet another one that doesn't hold up to adult/modern scrutiny.
I'm certain I would have felt differently had I seen it as a child. Kind of like The Jerk. That doesn't hold up well.
Oh now you're just trying to hurt me.
 
I'm certain I would have felt differently had I seen it as a child. Kind of like The Jerk. That doesn't hold up well.
Please stop.
The Jerk, Caddyshack, Airplane!, etc. These are iconic movies from my childhood that I adore. But when I see them now they just aren't funny anymore.
You'll smoke a turd in Hell for that, blasphemer!
:lmao: All except Caddyshack, which has too many long scenes involving the kid and his girlfriend and her possible pregnancy. :yawn:
 
You certainly don't need to defend this thread to me. It is my primary movie resource.

I don't consider anyone a movie snob here.
What he said
Although I have to admit that while I love her taste in movies (thanks again for turning me on to Waking Life) just once I would like to see krista break off a post telling us how much she loved Weekend At Bernie's II.
I'm trying to think of what my guiltiest pleasure movies would be. How about this: I really liked A Knight's Tale? :lmao:
whoa.I'll call your Knight's Tale and raise you The Postman
Oh crap, I actually liked that one, too. :yawn:
 
Date Night:

I am a boring married man, a lover of all things Tina Fey and think Mr. Carell has his moments so I figured I'd give this a try. I am sorry I did. It's worth a couple married chuckles at the beginning, but then spirals into a lame actiony-chase type movie that neither actor is suited for. It's below average and completely misuses two people who I think can be fairly funny. Maybe it's because they didn't have a role in the writing of the movie...

ETA: One of the few funny things in the movie was Mr. Franco as "Taste". He needs to do more comedy movies...
Like A Serious Man, I tried to watch this on a plane recently. Couldn't get more than 25 minutes in. How could they possibly make such a horrible movie with two such funny people?!?!
 
You certainly don't need to defend this thread to me. It is my primary movie resource.

I don't consider anyone a movie snob here.
What he said
Although I have to admit that while I love her taste in movies (thanks again for turning me on to Waking Life) just once I would like to see krista break off a post telling us how much she loved Weekend At Bernie's II.
I'm trying to think of what my guiltiest pleasure movies would be. How about this: I really liked A Knight's Tale? :bag:
Dude, you are such a liar. There's gotta be something worse. Release your inner guilt.
Bring It On

?
 
I came back into the thread because I realized I was way behind again, and I had actually seen some good and not-so-good movies lately to report on. Most of them have been well-discussed already, including those I hated (A Serious Man, Date Night), those I was meh on (The Ghost Writer and The Lovely Bones, and having read the book I expected and understood the voiceover in the latter), and those I thought were great (Precious, which falls into the category of "great movies I kind of wish I hadn't seen", and The Hurt Locker, which I seem to appreciate much more than people in this thread).

Two I'm sure were discussed in the pages I missed earlier in the year, both of which fall into the category of "best movies I've seen in ages", were Waltz with Bashir and Trouble the Water. Run, don't walk, to see both of these if you haven't. Though I wouldn't recommend watching them back-to-back as I did, unless you're looking to slit your wrists. :)

 
I came back into the thread because I realized I was way behind again, and I had actually seen some good and not-so-good movies lately to report on. Most of them have been well-discussed already, including those I hated (A Serious Man, Date Night), those I was meh on (The Ghost Writer and The Lovely Bones, and having read the book I expected and understood the voiceover in the latter), and those I thought were great (Precious, which falls into the category of "great movies I kind of wish I hadn't seen", and The Hurt Locker, which I seem to appreciate much more than people in this thread).

Two I'm sure were discussed in the pages I missed earlier in the year, both of which fall into the category of "best movies I've seen in ages", were Waltz with Bashir and Trouble the Water. Run, don't walk, to see both of these if you haven't. Though I wouldn't recommend watching them back-to-back as I did, unless you're looking to slit your wrists. :shrug:
Waltz with Bashir is a fascinating movie.Is Trouble the Water preachy? It looks preachy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I came back into the thread because I realized I was way behind again, and I had actually seen some good and not-so-good movies lately to report on. Most of them have been well-discussed already, including those I hated (A Serious Man, Date Night), those I was meh on (The Ghost Writer and The Lovely Bones, and having read the book I expected and understood the voiceover in the latter), and those I thought were great (Precious, which falls into the category of "great movies I kind of wish I hadn't seen", and The Hurt Locker, which I seem to appreciate much more than people in this thread).

Two I'm sure were discussed in the pages I missed earlier in the year, both of which fall into the category of "best movies I've seen in ages", were Waltz with Bashir and Trouble the Water. Run, don't walk, to see both of these if you haven't. Though I wouldn't recommend watching them back-to-back as I did, unless you're looking to slit your wrists. :(
Waltz with Bashir is a fascinating movie.Is Trouble the Water preachy? It looks preachy.
Definitely not preachy. One or two requisite cuts to George Bush or "Brownie" saying something stupid, but very minimal. Very real. You're really rooting for these people but can't really figure out if you "like" them (or at least some of them) or not. Not nearly as preachy as When the Levees Broke, which I loved anyway. Trouble the Water is better. No tied up happy ending, but somewhat hopeful at least.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top