What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (3 Viewers)

Some times I like steak and sometimes I like potato chips.I love them both, but in different ways for different reasons. No doubt steak is better, but I sure do enjoy me some potato chips.
oh, i get that. i like the first season of "justified" and only caught about half of the second season. it's pretty good for what it is.
 
The Tree of Life - Hard to describe this one. I found the style very interesting and was very moved by some of the scenes, especially the ending. It was just a bit too long though.

And dinosaurs? Really?
4/5

how familiar are you with malick's work? if you have seen any of his other films then i think "tree" is consistent with his body of work. he's very much an auteur.
 
The Skin I Live In - I jokingly touched on this one in an earlier post but wanted to give it a little more because I keep thinking about it.

It's Pedro Almodovar's most recent film and I thought it was very interesting and equally disturbing. It starts off in one direction, Banderas plays a doctor/scientist who has designed a new skin for grafting on burn patients. His motivation was his wife who was horribly burned in an auto accident. I really thought that was the entire direction the film was going to take, and that would have been very interesting to me. But then the film takes a dark turn, not that it was a happy film up to that point but the disturbing factor goes from a 4 to a 9. Not gory, not graphic but definitely twisted and dark.

It's not Almodovar's best work. I thought it started off kind of herky-jerky as they forced an early conflict that, while ultimately understandable and necessary, felt inauthentic in its execution. There was also a lull in the middle during an extended flashback that, again while necessary and forgivable because of the payoff, felt like it took a long time to get to the point. However once it got to the point it's kind of a :headexplode: moment.

Overall I am going to call this a good to very good film that is worth watching.

 
The Tree of Life - Hard to describe this one. I found the style very interesting and was very moved by some of the scenes, especially the ending. It was just a bit too long though.

And dinosaurs? Really?
4/5

This is one of those movies that I love - but understand why some people don't like it.
 
The Muppets

Ok, it wasn't perfect. And it felt flimsy at times. But I love the Muppets, and so do the people that made this movie.

Repo Men

Whatever.

 
The Tree of Life - Hard to describe this one. I found the style very interesting and was very moved by some of the scenes, especially the ending. It was just a bit too long though.

And dinosaurs? Really?
4/5
This is one of those movies that I love - but understand why some people don't like it. :goodposting: Not sure I love it but I found it to be captivating and will likely watch it again.
 
The Tree of Life - Hard to describe this one. I found the style very interesting and was very moved by some of the scenes, especially the ending. It was just a bit too long though.

And dinosaurs? Really?
4/5
This is one of those movies that I love - but understand why some people don't like it.
:goodposting: Not sure I love it but I found it to be captivating and will likely watch it again.I wasn't into astronomy as a young man. But these days, I've been really getting into quantum physics and the universe. Tree Of Life has these seemingly pointless shots of nature and the universe that one could just infer as filler. But Malick's asking very powerful emotional questions: what is our place in this vast cosmos? And do our fleeting lives mean anything in comparison?
 
The Tree of Life - Hard to describe this one. I found the style very interesting and was very moved by some of the scenes, especially the ending. It was just a bit too long though.

And dinosaurs? Really?
4/5
This is one of those movies that I love - but understand why some people don't like it.
:goodposting: Not sure I love it but I found it to be captivating and will likely watch it again.
I wasn't into astronomy as a young man. But these days, I've been really getting into quantum physics and the universe. Tree Of Life has these seemingly pointless shots of nature and the universe that one could just infer as filler. But Malick's asking very powerful emotional questions: what is our place in this vast cosmos? And do our fleeting lives mean anything in comparison?As I understand it his next film Voyage of Time is going to take that theme up a notch.
 
The Tree of Life - Hard to describe this one. I found the style very interesting and was very moved by some of the scenes, especially the ending. It was just a bit too long though.

And dinosaurs? Really?
4/5
This is one of those movies that I love - but understand why some people don't like it.
:goodposting: Not sure I love it but I found it to be captivating and will likely watch it again.
I wasn't into astronomy as a young man. But these days, I've been really getting into quantum physics and the universe. Tree Of Life has these seemingly pointless shots of nature and the universe that one could just infer as filler. But Malick's asking very powerful emotional questions: what is our place in this vast cosmos? And do our fleeting lives mean anything in comparison?
As I understand it his next film Voyage of Time is going to take that theme up a notch.Another must-see in the theater. So glad I saw Tree of Life in the theater.
 
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs. Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
{{phew}}Yeah- I think I saw part of that Jude Law vehicle (and I just saw Law catching a cab in gym clothes in front of my apt building... much taller/bigger than I expected). And yeah, you're right- it was very Oakland.

 
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
I'm willing to bet $1,000 that he meant Repo Men
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs.

Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
It's okay Floppo. You can owe me.
 
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs. Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
{{phew}}Yeah- I think I saw part of that Jude Law vehicle (and I just saw Law catching a cab in gym clothes in front of my apt building... much taller/bigger than I expected). And yeah, you're right- it was very Oakland.
Oakland?
 
Tomorrow, When the War Began - Mildly entertaining but it took far too long to get to the whole insurgency thing. I think Drifter would call it Twilight in Australia with the Chinese invading. It's a whatever film that could possibly keep one entertained on a Sunday afternoon (I spent a lot of time doing stuff online while the movie was playing). It is also a film that clearly is trying to set up multiple sequels.

What I found galling was that apparently the author of this series of books, John Marsden, doesn't feel the need to give any sort of attribution to Red Dawn whatsoever. Now I haven't seen any interviews with the guy and I don't claim to have done much more research than googling "John Marsden Red Dawn" but he seems to be playing it off as if it is somehow all his own original idea, when he should be putting I TOOK THIS IDEA FROM RED DAWN in big bold red letters in every article relating to this series of books.

 
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs. Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
{{phew}}Yeah- I think I saw part of that Jude Law vehicle (and I just saw Law catching a cab in gym clothes in front of my apt building... much taller/bigger than I expected). And yeah, you're right- it was very Oakland.
Oakland?
Gertrude Stein.
 
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs. Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
{{phew}}Yeah- I think I saw part of that Jude Law vehicle (and I just saw Law catching a cab in gym clothes in front of my apt building... much taller/bigger than I expected). And yeah, you're right- it was very Oakland.
Oakland?
Gertrude Stein.
Potatoes.Seriously, non sequitur or a reference I don't understand?

 
I had an epiphany awhile back about films set in the 60s and 70s that look terrible:

Watching HBO's Cinema Verite - a fantastic movie if you ever get a chance - I thought the movie captured the clothing and the art direction of the time very accurately. And I started to wonder why some movies set in that era look so fake. Two things: 1) Cinema Verite used lenses and filters to slightly desaturate the color so it wasn't artificially bright. 2) Movies that get this right don't just use bright colored clothing with bell bottoms and big collars. They use costumes that actually feel like they've been worn.

 
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs. Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
{{phew}}Yeah- I think I saw part of that Jude Law vehicle (and I just saw Law catching a cab in gym clothes in front of my apt building... much taller/bigger than I expected). And yeah, you're right- it was very Oakland.
Oakland?
Gertrude Stein.
Potatoes.Seriously, non sequitur or a reference I don't understand?
The latter. And you're from out there... tsktsktsk
 
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs. Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
{{phew}}Yeah- I think I saw part of that Jude Law vehicle (and I just saw Law catching a cab in gym clothes in front of my apt building... much taller/bigger than I expected). And yeah, you're right- it was very Oakland.
Oakland?
Gertrude Stein.
Potatoes.Seriously, non sequitur or a reference I don't understand?
The latter. And you're from out there... tsktsktsk
:lmao: you are so cryptic. I'll infer you're making some kind of reference to Oakland being dangerous and leave it at that.
 
'cstu said:
'jdoggydogg said:
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs.

Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
Someone should repo that movie.
I thought it was entertaining enough but the ending really ####ed me off
 
'Chaka said:
Tomorrow, When the War Began - Mildly entertaining but it took far too long to get to the whole insurgency thing. I think Drifter would call it Twilight in Australia with the Chinese invading. It's a whatever film that could possibly keep one entertained on a Sunday afternoon (I spent a lot of time doing stuff online while the movie was playing). It is also a film that clearly is trying to set up multiple sequels.

What I found galling was that apparently the author of this series of books, John Marsden, doesn't feel the need to give any sort of attribution to Red Dawn whatsoever. Now I haven't seen any interviews with the guy and I don't claim to have done much more research than googling "John Marsden Red Dawn" but he seems to be playing it off as if it is somehow all his own original idea, when he should be putting I TOOK THIS IDEA FROM RED DAWN in big bold red letters in every article relating to this series of books.
I went into TWtWB with an open mind and wanting to enjoy it. But it was garbage. It makes Red Dawn look like Seven Samurai
 
Safe

Latest Jason Straitham vehicle. I'm not going to go all gushy over it, but if you have a couple hours to kill on a rainy afternoon and this one starts in 5 minutes when you look at the cineplex marquee, you'll be very pleased. I didn't look at my watch for over an hour and was highly entertained.

3.4/5 stars

 
'Chaka said:
Tomorrow, When the War Began - Mildly entertaining but it took far too long to get to the whole insurgency thing. I think Drifter would call it Twilight in Australia with the Chinese invading. It's a whatever film that could possibly keep one entertained on a Sunday afternoon (I spent a lot of time doing stuff online while the movie was playing). It is also a film that clearly is trying to set up multiple sequels.

What I found galling was that apparently the author of this series of books, John Marsden, doesn't feel the need to give any sort of attribution to Red Dawn whatsoever. Now I haven't seen any interviews with the guy and I don't claim to have done much more research than googling "John Marsden Red Dawn" but he seems to be playing it off as if it is somehow all his own original idea, when he should be putting I TOOK THIS IDEA FROM RED DAWN in big bold red letters in every article relating to this series of books.
I went into TWtWB with an open mind and wanting to enjoy it. But it was garbage. It makes Red Dawn look like Seven Samurai
In the dictionary under Awesomeness it says:awe-some-ness [áwssəmnes]

Adjective (or something)

1. Kenny "Mother #######" Powers!

2. Red "Mother #######" Dawn!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'Chaka said:
Tomorrow, When the War Began - Mildly entertaining but it took far too long to get to the whole insurgency thing. I think Drifter would call it Twilight in Australia with the Chinese invading. It's a whatever film that could possibly keep one entertained on a Sunday afternoon (I spent a lot of time doing stuff online while the movie was playing). It is also a film that clearly is trying to set up multiple sequels.

What I found galling was that apparently the author of this series of books, John Marsden, doesn't feel the need to give any sort of attribution to Red Dawn whatsoever. Now I haven't seen any interviews with the guy and I don't claim to have done much more research than googling "John Marsden Red Dawn" but he seems to be playing it off as if it is somehow all his own original idea, when he should be putting I TOOK THIS IDEA FROM RED DAWN in big bold red letters in every article relating to this series of books.
I went into TWtWB with an open mind and wanting to enjoy it. But it was garbage. It makes Red Dawn look like Seven Samurai
I enjoyed it. It's an Australian Red Dawn with hot chicks, what's not to like?
 
'jdoggydogg said:
'El Floppo said:
'jdoggydogg said:
Repo Men

Whatever.
Wait just a sec, hoss... is that Repo MEN or Repo MAN? If it's the latter, that "whatever" will force me to say something petty and childish in response.
Dude, Repo Man is a classic wherein any disparaging remarks would lead to fisticuffs. Repo Men is the pedestrian sci fi movie with Jude Law.
{{phew}}Yeah- I think I saw part of that Jude Law vehicle (and I just saw Law catching a cab in gym clothes in front of my apt building... much taller/bigger than I expected). And yeah, you're right- it was very Oakland.
Oakland?
Gertrude Stein.
Potatoes.Seriously, non sequitur or a reference I don't understand?
The latter. And you're from out there... tsktsktsk
:lmao: you are so cryptic. I'll infer you're making some kind of reference to Oakland being dangerous and leave it at that.
Gertrude Stein, the OG.
 
The Tree of Life - Hard to describe this one. I found the style very interesting and was very moved by some of the scenes, especially the ending. It was just a bit too long though.

And dinosaurs? Really?
4/5
This is one of those movies that I love - but understand why some people don't like it.
:goodposting: Not sure I love it but I found it to be captivating and will likely watch it again.
I wasn't into astronomy as a young man. But these days, I've been really getting into quantum physics and the universe. Tree Of Life has these seemingly pointless shots of nature and the universe that one could just infer as filler. But Malick's asking very powerful emotional questions: what is our place in this vast cosmos? And do our fleeting lives mean anything in comparison?
As I understand it his next film Voyage of Time is going to take that theme up a notch.:boner:

 
SafeLatest Jason Straitham vehicle. I'm not going to go all gushy over it, but if you have a couple hours to kill on a rainy afternoon and this one starts in 5 minutes when you look at the cineplex marquee, you'll be very pleased. I didn't look at my watch for over an hour and was highly entertained. 3.4/5 stars
Yep.My review went like this: goofy plot, solid action. What else do you expect from a Statham movie?
 
'Chaka said:
Tomorrow, When the War Began - Mildly entertaining but it took far too long to get to the whole insurgency thing. I think Drifter would call it Twilight in Australia with the Chinese invading. It's a whatever film that could possibly keep one entertained on a Sunday afternoon (I spent a lot of time doing stuff online while the movie was playing). It is also a film that clearly is trying to set up multiple sequels.

What I found galling was that apparently the author of this series of books, John Marsden, doesn't feel the need to give any sort of attribution to Red Dawn whatsoever. Now I haven't seen any interviews with the guy and I don't claim to have done much more research than googling "John Marsden Red Dawn" but he seems to be playing it off as if it is somehow all his own original idea, when he should be putting I TOOK THIS IDEA FROM RED DAWN in big bold red letters in every article relating to this series of books.
I went into TWtWB with an open mind and wanting to enjoy it. But it was garbage. It makes Red Dawn look like Seven Samurai
In the dictionary under Awesomeness it says:awe-some-ness [áwssəmnes]

Adjective (or something)

1. Kenny "Mother #######" Powers!

2. Red "Mother #######" Dawn!
You ####ing know it!!!! :banned:

 
SafeLatest Jason Straitham vehicle. I'm not going to go all gushy over it, but if you have a couple hours to kill on a rainy afternoon and this one starts in 5 minutes when you look at the cineplex marquee, you'll be very pleased. I didn't look at my watch for over an hour and was highly entertained. 3.4/5 stars
Yep.My review went like this: goofy plot, solid action. What else do you expect from a Statham movie?
I thought The Mechanic was very solid. I also think Ben Foster is unheralded though, so maybe thats part of it.Besides that, every preview of Statham movies looks like someone avoiding a Transporter, hoping to get Cranked, and being Safe in the end..Kudos to Statham, he caught on late and has a small window to be that action guy, but most of his movies are meh meaningless action garbage.
 
Sound of Noise

A band of musical terrorist perform capers using the backdrop of the crime scenes as a canvas for their street musical performances. Tre' bizzare for a premise and I like me some bizarre. But this one work me out after an hour and I left early. I really liked what they were trying to do here, but they were unable to pull it off for me.

first 20 min - 4 stars

second 20 min 2.5 stars

an hour in - left the theater

2.8/5 stars for the overall overly ambitious effort
What an odd film this was. Like you, I really enjoyed the first bit of the movie, although I loved pretty well the entire first half up til the end of the second performance. After that the movie became more focused on the plot of the cop, of which made no sense to me whatsoever, and what little music performances left were terrible. The film has a 88% fresh score on rottentomatoes so I tried reading some of the reviews to find out what the hell was going on plot wise in the last 40 odd minutes of the film but no critic even brings it up which befuddles me immensely. I'd say first 50 minutes - excellent

second 50 minutes - Dreadful

 
SafeLatest Jason Straitham vehicle. I'm not going to go all gushy over it, but if you have a couple hours to kill on a rainy afternoon and this one starts in 5 minutes when you look at the cineplex marquee, you'll be very pleased. I didn't look at my watch for over an hour and was highly entertained. 3.4/5 stars
Yep.My review went like this: goofy plot, solid action. What else do you expect from a Statham movie?
I thought The Mechanic was very solid. I also think Ben Foster is unheralded though, so maybe thats part of it.Besides that, every preview of Statham movies looks like someone avoiding a Transporter, hoping to get Cranked, and being Safe in the end..Kudos to Statham, he caught on late and has a small window to be that action guy, but most of his movies are meh meaningless action garbage.
It'd be fun to see Statham in an action movie with a good script.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
Grr. Went to see The Raid. Except Alamo Drafthouse had screwed up their webpage and it wasn't playing at 10:20 pm, when they said it was. It had played at 10:55 am. Which begs the question, who is watching Korean ultraviolence at 10:55 am? Not me. Instead, watched The Avengers. Massive Meh. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good either. And I'm being kind because I was drunk.
:goodposting: I don't get the circlejerk reaction The Avengers is getting. How exactly is it different than any other super hero movie besides there being multiple heros in it? That sorta novelty is cool enough, but it doesn't explain the massive love the film is getting. I will say the CGI was pretty stellar throughout though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
'TexanFan02 said:
Grr. Went to see The Raid. Except Alamo Drafthouse had screwed up their webpage and it wasn't playing at 10:20 pm, when they said it was. It had played at 10:55 am. Which begs the question, who is watching Korean ultraviolence at 10:55 am? Not me. Instead, watched The Avengers. Massive Meh. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good either. And I'm being kind because I was drunk.
:goodposting: I don't get the circlejerk reaction The Avengers is getting. How exactly is it different than any other super hero movie besides there being multiple heros in it? That sorta novelty is cool enough, but it doesn't explain the massive love the film is getting. I will say the CGI was pretty stellar throughout though.
One would expect goof effects. The script in Avengers is better than most comic book movies.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
Grr. Went to see The Raid. Except Alamo Drafthouse had screwed up their webpage and it wasn't playing at 10:20 pm, when they said it was. It had played at 10:55 am. Which begs the question, who is watching Korean ultraviolence at 10:55 am? Not me. Instead, watched The Avengers. Massive Meh. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good either. And I'm being kind because I was drunk.
:goodposting: I don't get the circlejerk reaction The Avengers is getting. How exactly is it different than any other super hero movie besides there being multiple heros in it? That sorta novelty is cool enough, but it doesn't explain the massive love the film is getting. I will say the CGI was pretty stellar throughout though.
That's easy - the script and the humor. For my $, this is the best in this Marvel series. What really impressed me was Joss' ability to have 6 Avengers in a movie, still give all of them their own arc and stay true to their individual characteristics, and give all of them their "moment". There are a couple knocks I have on it - namely weak villain, and the aliens at the end were kinda lame as well. If you are a huge Iron Man fan, I could see not loving it. While he had his moments, it seemed like Stark was purposely toned down to allow for the others to get theirs too.

I don't think this is a top comic book movie overall - I still think stuff like the new Batmans, Spidey 2, a couple of the Xmen, and Watchmen were better. However, I thought it was a damn good movie and liked how the juggling act was pulled off. I was little nervous after how much I disliked Thor, but I had a blast with this movie.

 
'TexanFan02 said:
Grr. Went to see The Raid. Except Alamo Drafthouse had screwed up their webpage and it wasn't playing at 10:20 pm, when they said it was. It had played at 10:55 am. Which begs the question, who is watching Korean ultraviolence at 10:55 am? Not me. Instead, watched The Avengers. Massive Meh. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good either. And I'm being kind because I was drunk.
where you going by the Austin Chronicle schedule? They mess up late evening and late morning showtimes a lot.
 
'TexanFan02 said:
Grr. Went to see The Raid. Except Alamo Drafthouse had screwed up their webpage and it wasn't playing at 10:20 pm, when they said it was. It had played at 10:55 am. Which begs the question, who is watching Korean ultraviolence at 10:55 am? Not me. Instead, watched The Avengers. Massive Meh. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good either. And I'm being kind because I was drunk.
:goodposting: I don't get the circlejerk reaction The Avengers is getting. How exactly is it different than any other super hero movie besides there being multiple heros in it? That sorta novelty is cool enough, but it doesn't explain the massive love the film is getting. I will say the CGI was pretty stellar throughout though.
This girl I work with who is a waste of space went to the midnight showing on opening night, and was loudly proclaiming it was "the greatest movie she had ever seen" right outside my office, before she went to take a nap at her desk. :wall:
 
The Descendants - I really liked the story and think it was a well done film and is worth watching for sure. However I did have some trouble with the acting. I think Clooney has become typecast and if he isn't playing the uber-slick playboy it can be difficult to find him convincing. He wasn't bad, in fact I think he did a good job (not best actor good, but good) but I found that a lot of the time I actively noticed that I was watching Clooney play a type rather than be a type (does that make sense?).

The older daughter was also a weak point as she really wasn't a defined character, she was more like a place holder whose actions were dictated to fit whatever Clooney's character needed her to be. That description sounds like a girl just being a good daughter but we are introduced to her character as being a drinking and drug using incorrigible girl who had to be sent to boarding school. But IMO that theme was dropped and never really touched upon again.

Still very interesting premise and worth watching.

 
'KarmaPolice said:
'Time Kibitzer said:
'TexanFan02 said:
Grr. Went to see The Raid. Except Alamo Drafthouse had screwed up their webpage and it wasn't playing at 10:20 pm, when they said it was. It had played at 10:55 am. Which begs the question, who is watching Korean ultraviolence at 10:55 am? Not me. Instead, watched The Avengers. Massive Meh. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good either. And I'm being kind because I was drunk.
:goodposting: I don't get the circlejerk reaction The Avengers is getting. How exactly is it different than any other super hero movie besides there being multiple heros in it? That sorta novelty is cool enough, but it doesn't explain the massive love the film is getting. I will say the CGI was pretty stellar throughout though.
That's easy - the script and the humor. For my $, this is the best in this Marvel series. What really impressed me was Joss' ability to have 6 Avengers in a movie, still give all of them their own arc and stay true to their individual characteristics, and give all of them their "moment". There are a couple knocks I have on it - namely weak villain, and the aliens at the end were kinda lame as well. If you are a huge Iron Man fan, I could see not loving it. While he had his moments, it seemed like Stark was purposely toned down to allow for the others to get theirs too.

I don't think this is a top comic book movie overall - I still think stuff like the new Batmans, Spidey 2, a couple of the Xmen, and Watchmen were better. However, I thought it was a damn good movie and liked how the juggling act was pulled off. I was little nervous after how much I disliked Thor, but I had a blast with this movie.
Granted, I avoid watching superhero movies whenever I can, but don't most of them have humor interspersed throughout? I chuckled a few times in the movie, nothing really out of the ordinary for a superhero movie I thought. As for the script, I thought it went very fast over anything that was complicated, such as Iron Man/Captain America fixing the propeller, and it hit most of the superhero cliches which bored me greatly. Would have been nice to see some character die or something, cause really there was no drama during Iron Man's big space scene at the end knowing he wasn't going to die. I've been meaning to catch the Watchmen, but I completely agree the Avengers falls way short of meeting any of the Nolan Batman's as far as quality goes; reading the Avengers thread though that doesn't seem to be a uncommon thought.

 
'Time Kibitzer said:
'TexanFan02 said:
Grr. Went to see The Raid. Except Alamo Drafthouse had screwed up their webpage and it wasn't playing at 10:20 pm, when they said it was. It had played at 10:55 am. Which begs the question, who is watching Korean ultraviolence at 10:55 am? Not me. Instead, watched The Avengers. Massive Meh. It wasn't terrible, but it wasn't good either. And I'm being kind because I was drunk.
:goodposting: I don't get the circlejerk reaction The Avengers is getting. How exactly is it different than any other super hero movie besides there being multiple heros in it? That sorta novelty is cool enough, but it doesn't explain the massive love the film is getting. I will say the CGI was pretty stellar throughout though.
This girl I work with who is a waste of space went to the midnight showing on opening night, and was loudly proclaiming it was "the greatest movie she had ever seen" right outside my office, before she went to take a nap at her desk. :wall:
The AvengersI really liked this movie. Its the best of the Marvel brand and I was a really big fan of Iron Man (both, but esp. the first).A real roller coaster ride here. As in thrilling , not as in up and down. All the characters were fleshed out somewhat and true to the original Marvel characterizations. I laughed out loud a number of times. The dialogue was crisp and clever and it had some of the most ambitious and seamless cgi ever.Hating this movie is like hating the Beatles. 4.3/5
 
So I woke up thinking about Yi-Yi (even though I haven't seen it since the theater) and what a fantastic movie it was.

The beauty of having a terrible memory is that I get to watch a film like that again and it's almost like watching it for the first time. I have to track it down and sneak it by the wife.
I have it on DVD. I don't think I've watched the DVD, but I just like knowing it's close by.
 
Chronicle

Not a bad flick. Ends quickly

Contraband. Good movie. Kinda drags at the end

Cabin in the woods. The hype was right. This one is a fun watch. Only thing I didn't like was there were no scary scenes

Battleship. Interesting beginning. It was early and I fell asleep about 45 minutes in. I will rematch it though

 
The Road. Intrigued.

My link

"The Road tells the story of a twelve-year-old cold case that is reopened when three teenagers vanish while traversing an infamous and abandoned road. As investigators try to find leads to the whereabouts of the missing teens, they also unearth the road's gruesome past that spans two decades - a history of abduction, crimes and murders."

83% on RT.

 
The Hunter

William Dafoe is sent to Tasmania to hunt and kill a presumed extinct Tasmanian tiger by a large corporation hoping to profit from patenting its genetics. Nice set and art direction, pretty solid supporting cast, but a sophomoric story and horrible ending. Halfway through I was thinking it may end up being pretty good, but not really. Not at all.

2.1/5 stars
Ended up seeing this today and I liked it a lot. I thought Dafoe and the children were excellent, and the Aussie locals were all solid. I disagree with you in regard to both the story and the ending. I thought the story was great; it didn't tie all the knots together but it tied all the needed ones and a bit of ambiguity and mystery made for a better film (as it usually does imo). I also thought the ending was very well done, don't understand the dislike there. I'd give it a 4 or 4.5/5 myself, making it pretty comfortably in my top 10 films of 2011.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top