Moonlight
Footballguy
You should have your own show. lolWell if you are going for irony I'd say getting trampled by a pack of zebras.
You should have your own show. lolWell if you are going for irony I'd say getting trampled by a pack of zebras.
Well if you are going for irony I'd say getting trampled by a pack of zebras.
What was the final outcome of the Duke Johnson fumble here? That was funnyit was bad.
if i were the coach, i would've been tossed from the game.
worst call i've ever seen.
Worst call you've ever seen? Did you just start watching football this week, or did you forget calls like the Saints non-interference call or the Redskins recovering the "fumble" when Duke Johnson was standing right there with the football?
I mean, it's rather unclear what the correct call should be. You can recover a fumble, be down by contact, and have someone wrest it out of your hands ... You still get the recovery and possession.What was the final outcome of the Duke Johnson fumble here? That was funnyit was bad.
if i were the coach, i would've been tossed from the game.
worst call i've ever seen.
Worst call you've ever seen? Did you just start watching football this week, or did you forget calls like the Saints non-interference call or the Redskins recovering the "fumble" when Duke Johnson was standing right there with the football?
I don’t believe that cliche applies to the NFL. Maybe the Kardashians, but not the NFL.I don’t believe the NFL is rigged or scripted. However, I do believe it sees bad officiating as a feature, not a bug. All PR is good PR and bad calls generate lots of it, including through threads like this one. So the league has no incentive to fix it in any meaningful way.
Haha, right in front of him. Not a good look.Is it possible that Cooper stepped out of bounds earlier in the play? As that would make him ineligable receiver I believe?
I wish that was the case... No.
HERE'S THE PLAY
The worst part of that play is that you could see he wasn't touched watching it live. You didn't even need a replay. Unreal.Even the first play of SNF game last night was just bad on multiple levels. It was a contested catch and the play wasn't blown dead, so Mooney gets up and runs another 20 yards down field before they blow the whistle. Then after the replay we see the play shouldn't have been stopped. Its like they got the same call wrong twice in one play. No matter how you slice this, its just plain bad officiating.
Agreed. I was yelling at Mooney to start running after the catch. It really wasn't that close.The worst part of that play is that you could see he wasn't touched watching it live. You didn't even need a replay. Unreal.Even the first play of SNF game last night was just bad on multiple levels. It was a contested catch and the play wasn't blown dead, so Mooney gets up and runs another 20 yards down field before they blow the whistle. Then after the replay we see the play shouldn't have been stopped. Its like they got the same call wrong twice in one play. No matter how you slice this, its just plain bad officiating.
I guess you could argue that if this is truly how you feel.....you should bet....especially on the Chiefs....or whoever the other darlings are....The officiating has had me question if the NFL is rigged. I feel like the Chiefs get away with murder, offensive holding on every play (how can you not hold when your QB is darting back and forth and the d-linemen are changing directions). It lead me to believe during Taylor-mania that the NFL is absolutely cashing in on viewership and casual fans rooting for the Chiefs.
I think the NFL has their darlings and I'm not going full-rigged conspiracy theory yet but I no longer bet on games.
The officiating has had me question if the NFL is rigged. I feel like the Chiefs get away with murder, offensive holding on every play (how can you not hold when your QB is darting back and forth and the d-linemen are changing directions). It lead me to believe during Taylor-mania that the NFL is absolutely cashing in on viewership and casual fans rooting for the Chiefs.
I think the NFL has their darlings and I'm not going full-rigged conspiracy theory yet but I no longer bet on games.
The ending of that Chiefs vs Vikings game was truly brutal. A waived off PI for a non catchable ball when it was right there for WR in the field of play. The DB stopped the WR from being able to catch it. Then he takes off his helmet and we watch the ref tell him to put it back on.I guess you could argue that if this is truly how you feel.....you should bet....especially on the Chiefs....or whoever the other darlings are....The officiating has had me question if the NFL is rigged. I feel like the Chiefs get away with murder, offensive holding on every play (how can you not hold when your QB is darting back and forth and the d-linemen are changing directions). It lead me to believe during Taylor-mania that the NFL is absolutely cashing in on viewership and casual fans rooting for the Chiefs.
I think the NFL has their darlings and I'm not going full-rigged conspiracy theory yet but I no longer bet on games.
The Steelers player tackles a QB yesterday and got a roughing the passer penalty. It wasn’t high, it wasn’t low, it wasn’t late. It was basically a perfect hit. I don’t even know what the ref was possibly looking at to call that a penalty.Also, Chris Boswell posted a screen shot of the FG attempt he made from 55 yards when the official flagged Pittsburg for lining up offside. Not only weren't the Steelers lined up offsides, but one of the Jacksonville players was actually lined up offsides.
How can you call a penalty like this when it's obviously not a penally because it didn't happen? It's not like there is anything even up for debate.
Jesus
Yeah. Addressed that in an earlier post. Penalty for a hard, legal hitThe Steelers player tackles a QB yesterday and got a roughing the passer penalty. It wasn’t high, it wasn’t low, it wasn’t late. It was basically a perfect hit. I don’t even know what the ref was possibly looking at to call that a penalty.Also, Chris Boswell posted a screen shot of the FG attempt he made from 55 yards when the official flagged Pittsburg for lining up offside. Not only weren't the Steelers lined up offsides, but one of the Jacksonville players was actually lined up offsides.
How can you call a penalty like this when it's obviously not a penally because it didn't happen? It's not like there is anything even up for debate.
Jesus
His wallet?The Steelers player tackles a QB yesterday and got a roughing the passer penalty. It wasn’t high, it wasn’t low, it wasn’t late. It was basically a perfect hit. I don’t even know what the ref was possibly looking at to call that a penalty.Also, Chris Boswell posted a screen shot of the FG attempt he made from 55 yards when the official flagged Pittsburg for lining up offside. Not only weren't the Steelers lined up offsides, but one of the Jacksonville players was actually lined up offsides.
How can you call a penalty like this when it's obviously not a penally because it didn't happen? It's not like there is anything even up for debate.
Jesus
right....that's what I mean....they get all the calls....all the time...and we all know that....so we should bet on them every time....The ending of that Chiefs vs Vikings game was truly brutal. A waived off PI for a non catchable ball when it was right there for WR in the field of play. The DB stopped the WR from being able to catch it. Then he takes off his helmet and we watch the ref tell him to put it back on.I guess you could argue that if this is truly how you feel.....you should bet....especially on the Chiefs....or whoever the other darlings are....The officiating has had me question if the NFL is rigged. I feel like the Chiefs get away with murder, offensive holding on every play (how can you not hold when your QB is darting back and forth and the d-linemen are changing directions). It lead me to believe during Taylor-mania that the NFL is absolutely cashing in on viewership and casual fans rooting for the Chiefs.
I think the NFL has their darlings and I'm not going full-rigged conspiracy theory yet but I no longer bet on games.
Not to mention that RT was false starting all game and not being called for it.
@Stinkin Ref , what is your thought on this one?Also, Chris Boswell posted a screen shot of the FG attempt he made from 55 yards when the official flagged Pittsburg for lining up offside. Not only weren't the Steelers lined up offsides, but one of the Jacksonville players was actually lined up offsides.
How can you call a penalty like this when it's obviously not a penally because it didn't happen? It's not like there is anything even up for debate.
Jesus
I guess I'd have to see the screenshot....but would really need to see a complete video of the whole play down the line.....as players often have an opportunity to reset/reestablish their position prior to the snap and a screenshot is just capturing one tiny moment...@Stinkin Ref , what is your thought on this one?Also, Chris Boswell posted a screen shot of the FG attempt he made from 55 yards when the official flagged Pittsburg for lining up offside. Not only weren't the Steelers lined up offsides, but one of the Jacksonville players was actually lined up offsides.
How can you call a penalty like this when it's obviously not a penally because it didn't happen? It's not like there is anything even up for debate.
Jesus
Or is sarcasm all you have regarding this topic now?
I guess I'd have to see the screenshot....but would really need to see a complete video of the whole play down the line.....as players often have an opportunity to reset/reestablish their position prior to the snap and a screenshot is just capturing one tiny moment...
eta: did a quick search and think I saw the screenshot mentioned....there does appear to be a PIT helmet in the neutral zone (area above the ball) right next to the snapper....as well as a JAG player helmet.....
Definitely looks like both PIT and JAX lined up in neutral zoneI guess I'd have to see the screenshot....but would really need to see a complete video of the whole play down the line.....as players often have an opportunity to reset/reestablish their position prior to the snap and a screenshot is just capturing one tiny moment...
eta: did a quick search and think I saw the screenshot mentioned....there does appear to be a PIT helmet in the neutral zone (area above the ball) right next to the snapper....as well as a JAG player helmet.....
At best it was a ticky-tacky call on a penalty that is rarely called against an offensive lineman. It really hurt but again there are going be bad calls from time to time. Good teams overcome them and well, the Steelers aren't a very good team right now.
the yellow line in the picture on the left means very little....in the one on the right it represents the nose of the football.....the neutral zone is more than just the nose of the football....it is the entire length of the football...and in some shots you can clearly see a PIT helmet in the neutral zone as well as a JAG....adding the yellow line here in these pictures is deceiving and done with an agenda....Definitely looks like both PIT and JAX lined up in neutral zoneI guess I'd have to see the screenshot....but would really need to see a complete video of the whole play down the line.....as players often have an opportunity to reset/reestablish their position prior to the snap and a screenshot is just capturing one tiny moment...
eta: did a quick search and think I saw the screenshot mentioned....there does appear to be a PIT helmet in the neutral zone (area above the ball) right next to the snapper....as well as a JAG player helmet.....
At best it was a ticky-tacky call on a penalty that is rarely called against an offensive lineman. It really hurt but again there are going be bad calls from time to time. Good teams overcome them and well, the Steelers aren't a very good team right now.
So should have been offsetting, but wasn't. The odd thing is the ref missed the more obvious of the two.the yellow line in the picture on the left means very little....in the one on the right it represents the nose of the football.....the neutral zone is more than just the nose of the football....it is the entire length of the football...and in some shots you can clearly see a PIT helmet in the neutral zone as well as a JAG....adding the yellow line here in these pictures is deceiving and done with an agenda....Definitely looks like both PIT and JAX lined up in neutral zoneI guess I'd have to see the screenshot....but would really need to see a complete video of the whole play down the line.....as players often have an opportunity to reset/reestablish their position prior to the snap and a screenshot is just capturing one tiny moment...
eta: did a quick search and think I saw the screenshot mentioned....there does appear to be a PIT helmet in the neutral zone (area above the ball) right next to the snapper....as well as a JAG player helmet.....
At best it was a ticky-tacky call on a penalty that is rarely called against an offensive lineman. It really hurt but again there are going be bad calls from time to time. Good teams overcome them and well, the Steelers aren't a very good team right now.
Upside down Crucifixions on Monday Night Football during halftime would be a ratings bonanzaI woke up still fuming mad today.
My Browns won. Watson looked good. The defense looked great. The victory was sound.... But alas, my brain is still stewing about one of the worst reffing calls I have seen in some time. No, it was ticky-tacky stuff... It wasn't a simple hold that was missed, or a PI that wasn't... No, this was grievous.
You may (or may not) have seen the 1st of 2 Watson to Cooper TDs yester.... Oh, wait... No. you didn't. Why? Because a linesman decided that Cooper went out of bounds on a gorgeous pitch down the sideline and blew the play dead. A 40-50+yd TD (I'm going off memory) blown dead after about 20yds.
Ok, so?
So Cooper was not only IN bounds, he was in bounds by... And I wish I was exaggerating, but the announcers, dumbfounded themselves, also said it... "by at least a foot". No, not the width of a foot. TWELVE INCHES PLUS.
In your opinion, how should an error like this be punished in the NFL?
ETA: HERE'S THE PLAY - The whistle was blown about 1 sec after he made the catch. In-effing-credible.
Notice the referee at the top of the screen leaning to her left to see beyond the Jag lined up in the neutral zone. She wasn't looking down the neutral zone line which made her view appear more like the RG helmet was offsides.the yellow line in the picture on the left means very little....in the one on the right it represents the nose of the football.....the neutral zone is more than just the nose of the football....it is the entire length of the football...and in some shots you can clearly see a PIT helmet in the neutral zone as well as a JAG....adding the yellow line here in these pictures is deceiving and done with an agenda....Definitely looks like both PIT and JAX lined up in neutral zoneI guess I'd have to see the screenshot....but would really need to see a complete video of the whole play down the line.....as players often have an opportunity to reset/reestablish their position prior to the snap and a screenshot is just capturing one tiny moment...
eta: did a quick search and think I saw the screenshot mentioned....there does appear to be a PIT helmet in the neutral zone (area above the ball) right next to the snapper....as well as a JAG player helmet.....
At best it was a ticky-tacky call on a penalty that is rarely called against an offensive lineman. It really hurt but again there are going be bad calls from time to time. Good teams overcome them and well, the Steelers aren't a very good team right now.
I called this the worst call in NFL history and stand by it.textbook fumble right fellas
Guess you're not old enough to remember the "tuck rule" in a New England blizzard.I called this the worst call in NFL history and stand by it.textbook fumble right fellas
Fail Mary anyone?Guess you're not old enough to remember the "tuck rule" in a New England blizzard.I called this the worst call in NFL history and stand by it.textbook fumble right fellas
doesn't really matter if a ref was leaning or anything (agreed its not a good look and not great mechanics)....the fact is the shot down the line shows that both teams had someone in the neutral zone and technically it should have been a penalty on both teams and offset, meaning the play should be done again...unfortunately they missed this one and only got it half right...and that put one team at a disadvantage....not good...Notice the referee at the top of the screen leaning to her left to see beyond the Jag lined up in the neutral zone. She wasn't looking down the neutral zone line which made her view appear more like the RG helmet was offsides.the yellow line in the picture on the left means very little....in the one on the right it represents the nose of the football.....the neutral zone is more than just the nose of the football....it is the entire length of the football...and in some shots you can clearly see a PIT helmet in the neutral zone as well as a JAG....adding the yellow line here in these pictures is deceiving and done with an agenda....Definitely looks like both PIT and JAX lined up in neutral zoneI guess I'd have to see the screenshot....but would really need to see a complete video of the whole play down the line.....as players often have an opportunity to reset/reestablish their position prior to the snap and a screenshot is just capturing one tiny moment...
eta: did a quick search and think I saw the screenshot mentioned....there does appear to be a PIT helmet in the neutral zone (area above the ball) right next to the snapper....as well as a JAG player helmet.....
At best it was a ticky-tacky call on a penalty that is rarely called against an offensive lineman. It really hurt but again there are going be bad calls from time to time. Good teams overcome them and well, the Steelers aren't a very good team right now.
As for the guard helmet being in the neutral zone, that's common and not called when the helmet is behind the center. The crack down on that infraction is for the tush push play, not kicking extra points or FG.
The Cleveland game, I thought was worse officiating. 2nd half, the refs tried real heard to get the Browns a win. Team just kept finding a way to lose despite the help.
Considering the number of people who would have to be "in on it" with zero leaks, week after week after week, I'd say Santa's existence is more likely than the NFL being fixed, massaged, or otherwise compromised. I understand we live in an era where anything we don't like gets labeled "rigged," but that doesn't make it true.Sports entertainment.
Do you guys still believe in Santa? The games aren’t flat out fixed but they’re massaged.
If you haven’t figured this out in watching 40 years of sports I don’t know what to tell you.
I'm old enough to remember the Jets over the Colt's in SB3.Guess you're not old enough to remember the "tuck rule" in a New England blizzard.I called this the worst call in NFL history and stand by it.textbook fumble right fellas
I just am getting around to seeing some of the afternoon highlights, this referee shouldn't be able to take an NFL field as referee for the rest of the season at least.Patriots quarterback Mac Jones took the snap and dropped back to pass. Before he could get the ball out in time, Commanders defensive end K.J. Henry came around the edge and got Jones for what he thought was the first sack of his career.
"I don’t see the call," FOX commentator Jonathan Vilma said as the broadcast showed the replay of the controversial play. "Mac Jones has the ball in his hands, and he takes him down for a sack."
The NFL world kept an eye on the games on Sunday and it was shocked by the call.
"KJ Henry of Washington just got a personal foul for just playing football. Unbelievable. He tackles Mac Jones - while Mac has the ball - and causes the fumble. Normal tackle. I’m watching this game with former Patriot @devinmccourty & he agrees this is a terrible call. Unreal," NBC Sports’ Matthew Berry
I was going to create a thread. Totally agree. The main one is the nonsense body weight rule. The whole spirit of that rule was to stop defenders from lifting the QB and then basically "body slamming" and purposely landing in them, we all know what it looks like. Half of these are just tackles where the defender has no choice. Now that all QBs are 6'3 arm tackling doesn't work....so annoyingSooooooo sick and tired of b.s. roughing the passer calls each and every week, each and every game.
Unwatchable.
I was going to create a thread. Totally agree. The main one is the nonsense body weight rule. The whole spirit of that rule was to stop defenders from lifting the QB and then basically "body slamming" and purposely landing in them, we all know what it looks like. Half of these are just tackles where the defender has no choice. Now that all QBs are 6'3 arm tackling doesn't work....so annoyingSooooooo sick and tired of b.s. roughing the passer calls each and every week, each and every game.
Unwatchable.