culdeus
Footballguy
35 years in the industry. i know many restaurant owners both here and in europe. i'm in CA, servers make 15.50/hour. livable? not really. and the restaurant model in the US is whack. very little is sourced locally. in CA, i'm selling alaskan halibut. beef from kansas. scallops from japan. etc..and don't forget the raspberries from new zealand in the winter because you gotta have those at all times. in positano italy, food is very reasonably priced for such an expensive area. one main reason is that most things are sourced locally. if i want good pork or lamb, it comes from 100's to 1000's of miles away.What are you using to base this on? Highly doubt half of this is true enough to say they need to pay a buck a quarter an hour.for the restaurants, costs are lower. fewer middle men. rent is cheaper. and the cost of living is lowernot for me. i don't buy the tip creep concept. i've been in the industry for ever. 15% has been the baseline standard the entire time i've been doing it. that's adequate to good service. 20% is for excellent service. above that is people being nice.Seems to me this is where the dreaded "tip creep" issue comes in.this is the way.This has merged with the tipping thread I know. Not sure what can be done about having two threads now on the same topic.
A few years back when I had a conversation about the church crowd not tipping well, I made a decision to go 30% tip. All the time. Don't think about it. Good service or bad. I'll also say I almost always seem to get excellent service.
It's not compensating for my Christian friends, who apparently don't tip well. It's just what I do.
I look at it simply as a cost of eating out. If I can't afford to do 30%, I don't go out.
And in reality, it's not that much given the reality that the minimum I'd tip is 20%. So the question isn't really tipping $30 on a $100 bill. It's spending $10 more than the minimum I would have spent. In the grand scheme of things, it's just not that big a deal.
Second point, is it "right" that the system is such that servers effectively have part of their salary paid by the customers? And shouldn't we force the restaurant to pay the servers? I think you can maybe make the case that yes, that should be the case. I also know plenty of restaurant owners, and it's a brutally tough business with razor-thin margins. It's fun to rant on a message board that they're greedy and raking in money because noobs like me are too dumb to buck the system. That's not my experience with restaurant owners. Most I know work their butts off for little profit.
But even if I didn't empathize with restaurant owners, what am I to practically do about it tonight if I go out to dinner? The system works pretty well for me. The restaurant seems happy to have a customer, and the server I'm assuming is happy with 30%. And I get dinner. And can go on to bigger problems I need to tackle.
$80 tab throwing and extra $4 bucks on the 20% tip to make it $20 really makes a server's day. so $96 or $100 same thing for the 15%ers $92 vs $96 does it really matter to me? nope.
i also have zero issues tipping less if the server is terrible. and there's no guilt on the ridiculous requests from the auto prompters
Soon the 15/20/25 scale becomes 20/25/30 (if its not already) with accompanying confusion and no apparent rationale...and in another 20 years its 30/35/40 and on and on.
I would rather the restaurant owners step up if servers aren't getting paid enough.
Keep it simple and don't make customers constantly work to compensate for a broken business model.
margins are too thin for restaurants to be paying everyone a "living wage" no one would eat out if they passed those cost on to customers. let's do the math on 10 servers. what's livable? 30k, 40, 50? let's do 40K that's 400k a year. the same 10 servers at $10/hour at 40 hours a week(almost none work 40 hours) is 21K so nearly double. and that's just the front of the house. we'd be looking at $50+ burgers
What are the economics that more or less allows no tipping in Europe. Seem to be plenty of restaurants there and no staffing issues.
oh and greed. greed plays a roll for sure
Main takeaway is I tip 20% on a Sysco burger because some Cali restaurant needs to import their pork from south carolina35 years in the industry. i know many restaurant owners both here and in europe. i'm in CA, servers make 15.50/hour. livable? not really. and the restaurant model in the US is whack. very little is sourced locally. in CA, i'm selling alaskan halibut. beef from kansas. scallops from japan. etc..and don't forget the raspberries from new zealand in the winter because you gotta have those at all times. in positano italy, food is very reasonably priced for such an expensive area. one main reason is that most things are sourced locally. if i want good pork or lamb, it comes from 100's to 1000's of miles away.What are you using to base this on? Highly doubt half of this is true enough to say they need to pay a buck a quarter an hour.for the restaurants, costs are lower. fewer middle men. rent is cheaper. and the cost of living is lowernot for me. i don't buy the tip creep concept. i've been in the industry for ever. 15% has been the baseline standard the entire time i've been doing it. that's adequate to good service. 20% is for excellent service. above that is people being nice.Seems to me this is where the dreaded "tip creep" issue comes in.this is the way.This has merged with the tipping thread I know. Not sure what can be done about having two threads now on the same topic.
A few years back when I had a conversation about the church crowd not tipping well, I made a decision to go 30% tip. All the time. Don't think about it. Good service or bad. I'll also say I almost always seem to get excellent service.
It's not compensating for my Christian friends, who apparently don't tip well. It's just what I do.
I look at it simply as a cost of eating out. If I can't afford to do 30%, I don't go out.
And in reality, it's not that much given the reality that the minimum I'd tip is 20%. So the question isn't really tipping $30 on a $100 bill. It's spending $10 more than the minimum I would have spent. In the grand scheme of things, it's just not that big a deal.
Second point, is it "right" that the system is such that servers effectively have part of their salary paid by the customers? And shouldn't we force the restaurant to pay the servers? I think you can maybe make the case that yes, that should be the case. I also know plenty of restaurant owners, and it's a brutally tough business with razor-thin margins. It's fun to rant on a message board that they're greedy and raking in money because noobs like me are too dumb to buck the system. That's not my experience with restaurant owners. Most I know work their butts off for little profit.
But even if I didn't empathize with restaurant owners, what am I to practically do about it tonight if I go out to dinner? The system works pretty well for me. The restaurant seems happy to have a customer, and the server I'm assuming is happy with 30%. And I get dinner. And can go on to bigger problems I need to tackle.
$80 tab throwing and extra $4 bucks on the 20% tip to make it $20 really makes a server's day. so $96 or $100 same thing for the 15%ers $92 vs $96 does it really matter to me? nope.
i also have zero issues tipping less if the server is terrible. and there's no guilt on the ridiculous requests from the auto prompters
Soon the 15/20/25 scale becomes 20/25/30 (if its not already) with accompanying confusion and no apparent rationale...and in another 20 years its 30/35/40 and on and on.
I would rather the restaurant owners step up if servers aren't getting paid enough.
Keep it simple and don't make customers constantly work to compensate for a broken business model.
margins are too thin for restaurants to be paying everyone a "living wage" no one would eat out if they passed those cost on to customers. let's do the math on 10 servers. what's livable? 30k, 40, 50? let's do 40K that's 400k a year. the same 10 servers at $10/hour at 40 hours a week(almost none work 40 hours) is 21K so nearly double. and that's just the front of the house. we'd be looking at $50+ burgers
What are the economics that more or less allows no tipping in Europe. Seem to be plenty of restaurants there and no staffing issues.
oh and greed. greed plays a roll for sure