Concocting complicated fairy tales may offer some comfort for you now, but I find them particularly offensive in the face of the extent and severity of the known facts of this investigation. Continuing to play the "what if" game underscores the seriousness in my opinion. Your original point is better served with a simple "we don't know" rather than a fictional narrative used as an example of what might have been. If you're stewing, I think it might have something more to do with the idea that you know just how hollow the framework on which you decided to hang the night in question really is.
Again. You don't know me. All you know is I'm a Steeler fan and from that you make some sort of assumption about my motive. There is no 'hollow framework' because I am not trying to make the case to exonerate him. I am trying to make the case that it is foolhardy to dismiss ANY number of options of what may have happened. If you are so naive to think that a 20 year old woman is incapable of taking advantage of a compromised athlete, fine, but I think that's a pretty narrow world view. If I were pushing the argument that I thought it impossible that a self-consumed egotistical horndog professional athlete were incapable of sexually assaulting a young woman (which I am not) I would expect to be called out on it. The point of the narrative was to create AN EXTREME example and demonstrate that even THAT, as extreme as it is, exists within the realm of possibility as to what WE (you and I and the rest of the dorks on this messageboard) actually KNOW. If we establish that THAT EXTREME EXAMPLE could have happened (no matter how unlikely) then everything between IT on one side to everything the accuser said as being 100% true on the other side exists as a possibility. Ruling ANY of it out WITHOUT further evidence is absolutely irresponsible.
I know that there is almost 0% chance that B.R. is the victim in this scenario, and the buzzwords and callousness of the language you chose to paint the scenario with are the sort of muckraking that I would expect not from a fan, but from one of the lawyers who will attempt to spin this around and blame the victim.Take a look at what you wrote again:
shaking their tails, Some more dna gathering.
In the world of extreme examples, the situation you came up with is overwrought and, frankly, offensive. This isn't to say that he's already been found
guilty, but that if the situation is not the worst case scenario the truth will be found in the gray area that is assent.