If Lance isn't ready to play at the NFL level is it really wasting the year?JohnnyU said:If he doesn't get traded and starts week 1, do the 49'ers really want to waste another year of Lance's rookie contract?
If Lance isn't ready to play at the NFL level is it really wasting the year?
I suspect Jimmy wouldn't agitate behind the scenes. but if/when Lance has a couple stinker games, are guys at the tail end of their primes like Kittle and T Williams going to be content playing for the long run when they know the backup is capable of taking them on a deep playoff run? I think it’s more the other guys in the locker room that would be a problem.I mean... It's not ideal. But from everything I've read about Jimmy he's a total pro and seems like the kind of guy that is team first enough to handle being a grossly overpaid backup if sf can't get a package for him they really want. It's not like he's Jay Cutler or something
I agree if Lance isn't ready, but wasting his rookie contract isn't a wise idea either, especially with what they gave up.thecatch said:I suspect Jimmy wouldn't agitate behind the scenes. but if/when Lance has a couple stinker games, are guys at the tail end of their primes like Kittle and T Williams going to be content playing for the long run when they know the backup is capable of taking them on a deep playoff run? I think it’s more the other guys in the locker room that would be a problem.
Right...I'm saying they should cut Jimmy even if they can't trade him. I think Jimmy's presence would be a locker room distraction.I agree if Lance isn't ready, but wasting his rookie contract isn't a wise idea either, especially with what they gave up.
Yeah how will Lance ever match those vaunted playoff stats that Jimmy has put upthecatch said:I suspect Jimmy wouldn't agitate behind the scenes. but if/when Lance has a couple stinker games, are guys at the tail end of their primes like Kittle and T Williams going to be content playing for the long run when they know the backup is capable of taking them on a deep playoff run? I think it’s more the other guys in the locker room that would be a problem.
Uh oh. I might be wrong. He “wants to move on” from SF, per Schefter.The 49ers will pay Deebo.
/topic
Hot Sauce Guy said:Uh oh. I might be wrong. He “wants to move on” from SF, per Schefter.
![]()
Correct. That’s what Schefter is saying. “ESPN's Adam Schefter said Deebo Samuel "wants to move on" from the 49ers.”I didn't see him say that, it read more of an opinion
They really need to lock him down.I still think a deal will get done, but not til after at least one more big WR deal gets done. 49ers want to do be first, Deebo wants to wait to see what AJ Brown or DK's contract looks like IMO.
If he does in fact want out, we will get a nice haul for him.
Also, F him if he wants to leave. I wont be wishing him well with his new team.
These WRs man. Apparently they all want to play for different teams now? Bummed about this. Loved watching him play and thought he’d be good for Lance. Hopefully we get a good return.
As I said in the Deebo topic, deal him to the Jets for a top 10 pick. Take Garrett Wilson. Done deal.
Jets were trying to get a top WR. This seems like a win-win. Plus the Shanny/Saleh connection could facilitate this.
I don’t get the “it’s how he was used that made him a star” talk. Wasn’t he like top 3 in yardage as a pure WR this year before they started using him as a part time RB?
San Francisco can keep him. If we need, we'll take Wilson at four, unless we think we have an EDGE in mind that will be there. No reason to take on Deebo, give him a new contract, and lose first-round picks over it. Now, if we give up a second-round pick, that might be something. But no way on a first. I know it's the San Francisco thread and subsequent things go along with that, but no thank you. Only for a second.As I said in the Deebo topic, deal him to the Jets for a top 10 pick. Take Garrett Wilson. Done deal.
Jets were trying to get a top WR. This seems like a win-win. Plus the Shanny/Saleh connection could facilitate this.
Wilson at 4 would be a terrible pick when they can very likely take him at 10, or trade down and still get him later.San Francisco can keep him. If we need, we'll take Wilson at four, unless we think we have an EDGE in mind that will be there. No reason to take on Deebo, give him a new contract, and lose first-round picks over it. Now, if we give up a second-round pick, that might be something. But no way on a first. I know it's the San Francisco thread and subsequent things go along with that, but no thank you. Only for a second.
Wilson is mocked to the Jets at four in enough mocks to where it is plausible. I've seen him mocked there several times. How will the receivers shake out? Will there be a few in the top ten? I don't really know for sure, but I've seen enough of the mocks to know that you might have to be in the top ten if you want your preference of receiver.Wilson at 4 would be a terrible pick when they can very likely take him at 10, or trade down and still get him later.
I’ve also seen an awful lot of mocks, and something like 70% of the ones I’ve looked at have the Jets taking a safety at 4, which I also think would be a terrible pick.Wilson is mocked to the Jets at four in enough mocks to where it is plausible. I've seen him mocked there several times. How will the receivers shake out? Will there be a few in the top ten? I don't really know for sure, but I've seen enough of the mocks to know that you might have to be in the top ten if you want your preference of receiver.
That's pretty much kaput in all the ones I've seen in the past week or two. Actually, that's been kaput since the combine. I never see the Jets taking Hamilton or Pitre or any of those guys.I’ve also seen an awful lot of mocks, and something like 70% of the ones I’ve looked at have the Jets taking a safety at 4, which I also think would be a terrible pick.
From the local angle, you’re close but not quite on point.The Jets have a lot of needs. Paying a half-RB who doesn't want to play RB anymore is a disaster if they do it. Don't. That's what this squabble is all about. Usage.
He doesn't want to be a running back, apparently. That's my first guess, and others have opined the same; though one said with Lance maybe Deebo felt he was being phased out and didn't want to be. That strikes me as odd, though. These guys know what's up with running backs, second and third contracts, and longevity.
If they keep sending him on sweeps that body won't handle it for a full year, even though he's jacked. You just can't take hits running at that speed (it gets up to like a special teams head of steam into the secondary) all the time. It doesn't work.
That's what I think the quibbling is about. He was very effective and seemingly efficient as a receiver in the beginning of the year last year, not only for fantasy purposes but also NFL standards. It seems like he wants that role (a receiver almost exclusively) going forward.
Maybe not, appears this season would not accrue if he held out per the new CBAFrom what I'm hearing, SF has zero interest in trading him.
He could hold out and not play this season and walk away an unrestricted free agent going into 2023 and we'd get nothing for him.
But do we risk that scenario playing out? Is Deebo even considering that if he doesn't get traded? Would he risk sitting out a year, ala LeVeon Bell?
What a mess
if this is the issue then for the first time today I think i would side with him here. there was an article this past season about guys like he and Cordarelle re: how different it is to be hit by DB's instead of LB's through a season. i hate that these players are not honoring their contracts like many of you stated over the board today, but this feels a little different from this angle.I don’t get the “it’s how he was used that made him a star” talk. Wasn’t he like top 3 in yardage as a pure WR this year before they started using him as a part time RB? I don’t blame him for not wanting to do that, if that’s what his actual issue is. It would certainly shorten his career if he keeps getting 7-10 carries a game.
The 49ers will likely get deeper at RB, and won’t need to run him as much.
But yeah - make no mistake, the quibble is that the 49ers do not want to make him the highest paid non-QB in the league.
You can sit him and have nothing but distraction with basicly a rookie QB under the centre.I'd tell him, play or sit and dont get paid. You're under contract. Sick of these whiners.
Sounds like Miami, Tampa, Houston or Dallas may be on speed dial.Jeff Darlington said Deebo told him he wants out of Sam Francisco. He said he wants to keep the reasons private for now, but he just wants out and wants to play somewhere else.
I wonder if this is fixable.
Edit: Schefter said it could be that he just wants out of California and closer to home in South Carolina. Also, state income taxes might be a factor.
Let me pull out the MoP tea leaves for everyone...Lombardi on twitter:
The clear mystery to solve: What exactly upset Samuel to bring us to this point? Because therein likely lies the best way to potentially fix the rift.