GROOT
Footballguy
You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
Yes. I also saw that he has liked throwing to Evans. Both things can be true.You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
You mean all 8 times? Evans had 4 catches in week 3 and week 4. Seems there's a bit more of a track record last year between VJax and Glennon.Yes. I also saw that he has liked throwing to Evans. Both things can be true.You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
14 targets in those two weeks. My point stands. Doesn't take away from the fact that he also has chemistry with VJax. Evans being out helps VJax in the target department, that's indisputable. Have no idea why that guy and now you are taking issue with a simple fact that doesn't even take away from what you're saying.You mean all 8 times? Evans had 4 catches in week 3 and week 4. Seems there's a bit more of a track record last year between VJax and Glennon.Yes. I also saw that he has liked throwing to Evans. Both things can be true.You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
Not to mention with the incoming of Evans, you would have to think he will consciously start looking for him more and more knowing that he's somebody he (Glennon) can grow up and mature with as 2 young guys developing together.14 targets in those two weeks. My point stands. Doesn't take away from the fact that he also has chemistry with VJax. Evans being out helps VJax in the target department, that's indisputable. Have no idea why that guy and now you are taking issue with a simple fact that doesn't even take away from what you're saying.You mean all 8 times? Evans had 4 catches in week 3 and week 4. Seems there's a bit more of a track record last year between VJax and Glennon.Yes. I also saw that he has liked throwing to Evans. Both things can be true.You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
14 targets. Didn't work too well did it? No track record. M. Evans wishful thinking is strong here.14 targets in those two weeks. My point stands. Doesn't take away from the fact that he also has chemistry with VJax. Evans being out helps VJax in the target department, that's indisputable. Have no idea why that guy and now you are taking issue with a simple fact that doesn't even take away from what you're saying.You mean all 8 times? Evans had 4 catches in week 3 and week 4. Seems there's a bit more of a track record last year between VJax and Glennon.Yes. I also saw that he has liked throwing to Evans. Both things can be true.You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
What the hell are you going on about. My original point had nothing to do with how good or bad Evans is, it was just an offhand comment. And you've turned it into this whole weird tangent.14 targets. Didn't work too well did it? No track record. M. Evans wishful thinking is strong here.14 targets in those two weeks. My point stands. Doesn't take away from the fact that he also has chemistry with VJax. Evans being out helps VJax in the target department, that's indisputable. Have no idea why that guy and now you are taking issue with a simple fact that doesn't even take away from what you're saying.You mean all 8 times? Evans had 4 catches in week 3 and week 4. Seems there's a bit more of a track record last year between VJax and Glennon.Yes. I also saw that he has liked throwing to Evans. Both things can be true.You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
I'm talking about VJAX. He gets targets and catches balls from Glennon and TB wins. Glennon and VJAX are going to Chili's to eat dinner after the game. M.Evans wasn't invited.What the hell are you going on about. My original point had nothing to do with how good or bad Evans is, it was just an offhand comment. And you've turned it into this whole weird tangent.14 targets. Didn't work too well did it? No track record. M. Evans wishful thinking is strong here.14 targets in those two weeks. My point stands. Doesn't take away from the fact that he also has chemistry with VJax. Evans being out helps VJax in the target department, that's indisputable. Have no idea why that guy and now you are taking issue with a simple fact that doesn't even take away from what you're saying.You mean all 8 times? Evans had 4 catches in week 3 and week 4. Seems there's a bit more of a track record last year between VJax and Glennon.Yes. I also saw that he has liked throwing to Evans. Both things can be true.You clearly didn't see the Glennon-VJAX marriage last year did you?True, but Evans is also out which helps, because Glennon likes targeting Evans.It's amazing how Glennon is this much of an upgrade for VJax over McCown.
You crazy bro? Ribs or not, if Jax is playing with Glennon as QB, he's a must start. Even more so with Evans still out.Peak said:Considering benching VJax for Hilton this week. Can TB online hold their own against the Balt front seven?
I don't think he is a must start and the Baltimore D vs TB is a legitimate concern.You crazy bro? Ribs or not, if Jax is playing with Glennon as QB, he's a must start. Even more so with Evans still out.Peak said:Considering benching VJax for Hilton this week. Can TB online hold their own against the Balt front seven?
This is where I am right now. VJax looked good last week. The week before, he missed 50% of his targets. With that said, with no Evans opposite him and a pedestrian running game, I think Balt will look to take VJax out and make them run it. Just a gut feeling right now.I don't think he is a must start and the Baltimore D vs TB is a legitimate concern.You crazy bro? Ribs or not, if Jax is playing with Glennon as QB, he's a must start. Even more so with Evans still out.Peak said:Considering benching VJax for Hilton this week. Can TB online hold their own against the Balt front seven?
I like Jackson this week against the Ravens. I think the Ravens were lucky this past week against the Colts, to have only lose by 7.FWIW Evans practiced on a limited basis yesterday. It's possible he returns this week but I realize that'd be ahead of schedule.
BAL is allowing the 6th most PPG to WRs in PPR. I mean, they've given up some rather nice stat lines to WRs this year..
A.J Green - 6/131/1
A. Brown - 7/90/0
M. Austin - 6/51/1
A. Hawkins - 7/87/0
T. Gabriel - 2/81/0
K. Benjamin - 5/76/1
J. Cotchery - 5/80/0
T.Y Hilton - 9/90/0
R. Wayne - 7/77/0
I'm specifically looking at Green, Austin and Benjamin and their TDs. They're the corresponding big dude, red zone threats of their teams and they've each found the end zone.
You crazy bro? Ribs or not, if Jax is playing with Glennon as QB, he's a must start.Peak said:Considering benching VJax for Hilton this week.
Glad I went with my gut and started Hilton tonite!You crazy bro? Ribs or not, if Jax is playing with Glennon as QB, he's a must start.Peak said:Considering benching VJax for Hilton this week.
Yeah you are. Good job.Glad I went with my gut and started Hilton tonite!You crazy bro? Ribs or not, if Jax is playing with Glennon as QB, he's a must start.Peak said:Considering benching VJax for Hilton this week.
I don't know what to make of this. Some might argue he could end up in a FFB black hole like the Jets. Some might argue he's already in a FFB black hole with Tampa.Report: Bucs fielding calls about trading WR Vincent Jackson
The Buccaneers are receiving a "ton of calls" about trades regarding veteran wide receiver Vincent Jackson, according to NFL.com National Insider Ian Rapoport. The Bucs like Jackson as a player, but the team is willing to consider everything.
Jackson has totaled 25 catches for 344 yards and two touchdowns through six games. The Bucs are on a bye Week 7.
NE is the most likely since Brady is at the end of his and VJax would step in as the #1 WR opposite LaFell.I don't know what to make of this. Some might argue he could end up in a FFB black hole like the Jets. Some might argue he's already in a FFB black hole with Tampa.Report: Bucs fielding calls about trading WR Vincent Jackson
The Buccaneers are receiving a "ton of calls" about trades regarding veteran wide receiver Vincent Jackson, according to NFL.com National Insider Ian Rapoport. The Bucs like Jackson as a player, but the team is willing to consider everything.
Jackson has totaled 25 catches for 344 yards and two touchdowns through six games. The Bucs are on a bye Week 7.
What places make sense for him to go? Seattle? Carolina? Who needs a #1 WR (or maybe he could be a 1A/1B somewhere)?
Any trade to anywhere would be a great ff boost to VJAX owners. The Tampa situation is as bad as it gets, even playing for the Jets would be way better.NE is the most likely since Brady is at the end of his and VJax would step in as the #1 WR opposite LaFell.I don't know what to make of this. Some might argue he could end up in a FFB black hole like the Jets. Some might argue he's already in a FFB black hole with Tampa.Report: Bucs fielding calls about trading WR Vincent Jackson
The Buccaneers are receiving a "ton of calls" about trades regarding veteran wide receiver Vincent Jackson, according to NFL.com National Insider Ian Rapoport. The Bucs like Jackson as a player, but the team is willing to consider everything.
Jackson has totaled 25 catches for 344 yards and two touchdowns through six games. The Bucs are on a bye Week 7.
What places make sense for him to go? Seattle? Carolina? Who needs a #1 WR (or maybe he could be a 1A/1B somewhere)?
The problem (and the reason for optimism) is it took 35 targets to get those 15 receptions (43% catch rate). So it's nice that he's getting thrown at a ton but it sucks that they haven't been able to convert targets to receptions at a significantly higher rate.Jackson has 15 receptions and 242 yards in Glennon's 3 starts. Stop it.
Haha, no. You do not want to see VJax traded at this point. TB has been one of the most pass happy teams ever since Glennon took over (~40 attempts per game) and VJax has performed like a WR2 in that time span with obvious room for improvement. A trade now would kill his value.Any trade to anywhere would be a great ff boost to VJAX owners. The Tampa situation is as bad as it gets, even playing for the Jets would be way better.NE is the most likely since Brady is at the end of his and VJax would step in as the #1 WR opposite LaFell.I don't know what to make of this. Some might argue he could end up in a FFB black hole like the Jets. Some might argue he's already in a FFB black hole with Tampa.Report: Bucs fielding calls about trading WR Vincent Jackson
The Buccaneers are receiving a "ton of calls" about trades regarding veteran wide receiver Vincent Jackson, according to NFL.com National Insider Ian Rapoport. The Bucs like Jackson as a player, but the team is willing to consider everything.
Jackson has totaled 25 catches for 344 yards and two touchdowns through six games. The Bucs are on a bye Week 7.
What places make sense for him to go? Seattle? Carolina? Who needs a #1 WR (or maybe he could be a 1A/1B somewhere)?
Nowhere to go but up.Chaka said:The problem (and the reason for optimism) is it took 35 targets to get those 15 receptions (43% catch rate). So it's nice that he's getting thrown at a ton but it sucks that they haven't been able to convert targets to receptions at a significantly higher rate.Grahamburn said:Jackson has 15 receptions and 242 yards in Glennon's 3 starts. Stop it.
Or stay flat...or go down. Other then that I agree.Nowhere to go but up.Chaka said:The problem (and the reason for optimism) is it took 35 targets to get those 15 receptions (43% catch rate). So it's nice that he's getting thrown at a ton but it sucks that they haven't been able to convert targets to receptions at a significantly higher rate.Grahamburn said:Jackson has 15 receptions and 242 yards in Glennon's 3 starts. Stop it.
At least we're on the same page.Or stay flat...or go down. Other then that I agree.Nowhere to go but up.Chaka said:The problem (and the reason for optimism) is it took 35 targets to get those 15 receptions (43% catch rate). So it's nice that he's getting thrown at a ton but it sucks that they haven't been able to convert targets to receptions at a significantly higher rate.Grahamburn said:Jackson has 15 receptions and 242 yards in Glennon's 3 starts. Stop it.
More trade talks today on NFL network. My two biggest worries: 1. They sit him because they have a deal in place. And 2. I sit him because I'm worried about No. 1, and they showcase him so they can trade him for more.Sounds like he playing today
No trade will be a boon to his value right now in redraft. He's a WR2 with WR1 upside. He's always finished as a high-end WR2 by season's end. Does anyone actually believe a trade right now would boost his value to no-brainer WR1 status? I'd personally be pretty bummed if he got moved.RW thinks philly would be a boon to his value. I dont agree
I don't think he would be active if a deal is in place so you would know to sit him. I would start him as you normally wouldMore trade talks today on NFL network. My two biggest worries: 1. They sit him because they have a deal in place. And 2. I sit him because I'm worried about No. 1, and they showcase him so they can trade him for more.Sounds like he playing today
i think NE would boost his value to WR1. Thats about itNo trade will be a boon to his value right now in redraft. He's a WR2 with WR1 upside. He's always finished as a high-end WR2 by season's end. Does anyone actually believe a trade right now would boost his value to no-brainer WR1 status? I'd personally be pretty bummed if he got moved.RW thinks philly would be a boon to his value. I dont agree
I don't think he'd go to a WR1 in New England. Too many different weapons there and Tommy will spread the ball around. He won't instantly be the main focal point of the offense, Tom's still going to throw the ball to Vereen, Gronk, Edelman, Lafell, etc.i think NE would boost his value to WR1. Thats about itNo trade will be a boon to his value right now in redraft. He's a WR2 with WR1 upside. He's always finished as a high-end WR2 by season's end. Does anyone actually believe a trade right now would boost his value to no-brainer WR1 status? I'd personally be pretty bummed if he got moved.RW thinks philly would be a boon to his value. I dont agree
The reason he's not in SD now is that they didn't want to pay him $10M a year. They aren't going to give up a draft pick to do that now.NE probably wants him but Belichik isn't going to overpay for him. I would think a 4th rounder would be fair compensation.
San Diego should also be looking to bring him back.
I agree. Brady would love himi think NE would boost his value to WR1. Thats about itNo trade will be a boon to his value right now in redraft. He's a WR2 with WR1 upside. He's always finished as a high-end WR2 by season's end. Does anyone actually believe a trade right now would boost his value to no-brainer WR1 status? I'd personally be pretty bummed if he got moved.RW thinks philly would be a boon to his value. I dont agree
I doubt he goes back to SD. Besides Moss and a few others, it's not common to go back to your former team unless it's to retire. I don't think SD is in desperate need of WR's either...The reason he's not in SD now is that they didn't want to pay him $10M a year. They aren't going to give up a draft pick to do that now.NE probably wants him but Belichik isn't going to overpay for him. I would think a 4th rounder would be fair compensation.
San Diego should also be looking to bring him back.
Edit: I see he has a very low salary this year (840k) so he wouldn't cost much now and just a little guaranteed money left. Not as crazy as I first thought.
The reason he's not in SD now is that they didn't want to pay him $10M a year A.J. Smith is a stubborn mule who tried to screw Jackson using a loophole rather than pay him what he was worth.
Isn't floyd always hurt? But given that, I don't see San Diego bringing him back. They have effective catchers and green has room to be more involved.The only way SD would be interested in VJax is if Floyd was injured. Floyd is doing a great VJax impression right now for Rivers; they are content.
Agree with one possible exception; despite the QB situation Minnesota may improve his value. He would likely (eta possibly? maybe?) be able to step right into Norv's offense and produce.No trade will be a boon to his value right now in redraft. He's a WR2 with WR1 upside. He's always finished as a high-end WR2 by season's end. Does anyone actually believe a trade right now would boost his value to no-brainer WR1 status? I'd personally be pretty bummed if he got moved.RW thinks philly would be a boon to his value. I dont agree