harrycarey
Footballguy
www.nfldraftcountdown.com has full coverage including weigh-ins and practice reports.. check it out
I would love to be a scout in my retirement!!Awesome dude. Does this guy you know have anything to say about Vernon Davis? Are you trying to become a scout or something? Very interesting and informative read there.
Ahh. I read this:I would love to be a scout in my retirement!!Awesome dude. Does this guy you know have anything to say about Vernon Davis? Are you trying to become a scout or something? Very interesting and informative read there.
- and figured you were trying to learn how to scout or something. Sounds like a pretty awesome connection you have there either way.Btw, I'm making a little fun of my source, but he is a great guy, paid to have an opinion about these things and very kind to report back to me. I was supposed to be there so he could show me the ropes.
Davis is the only one that I've seen any highlight footage of, and I'd feel very confident saying he'll end up being one of the top 11 picks in the draft. I really hope his stock falls and the Bengals have a chance at him late in the first, he seems like an incredible player.Nothing about Vernon Davis because he is a declared underclassman and won't be there.
interesting.Other eyewitness reports I read today had Culter showing a live arm but horrible accuracy.Quarterbacks:There's Jay Cutler, then there's everybody else. The hype is real. He looked superb. None of the others looked like the next level is a reality. Whitehurst was decent, second best, but it was a huge gap from 1 to 2. Hackney, Shockley, Croyle and Robinson looked very bad. So bad he said it made it hard to scout the WRs. He emphasized that this was one short day of practice after the weigh ins, so nothing he saw is a finalized opinion, with this exception-- Michael Robinson should convert to WR tomorrow. He's sure of that.
I can't find any of these eyewitness reports to which you refer. I have found a half dozen reports praising Cutler's day. This is about as much detail as I have found:interesting.Other eyewitness reports I read today had Culter showing a live arm but horrible accuracy.Quarterbacks:
There's Jay Cutler, then there's everybody else. The hype is real. He looked superb. None of the others looked like the next level is a reality. Whitehurst was decent, second best, but it was a huge gap from 1 to 2. Hackney, Shockley, Croyle and Robinson looked very bad. So bad he said it made it hard to scout the WRs. He emphasized that this was one short day of practice after the weigh ins, so nothing he saw is a finalized opinion, with this exception-- Michael Robinson should convert to WR tomorrow. He's sure of that.
QB Jay Cutler is a legit game manager with upside. Had more than enough arm on the 15-20 yard outs and a smooth deep ball. Delivered short and intermediate dump/swings with accuracy. Not alot of wasted motion. Footwork good. Threaded the needle to Klopfenstein on a 25 yard go during 11-on-11's. No real bad mistakes - a very nice practice. Carries himself well and when he walks in the room everyone knows he's there - charisma.
Draft Scout had his performance as inconsistant as far as accuracy was concerned.Though they did highlight his play at QB as head and shoulders above the other guys at the position FWIW..........I can't find any of these eyewitness reports to which you refer. I have found a half dozen reports praising Cutler's day. This is about as much detail as I have found:interesting.Other eyewitness reports I read today had Culter showing a live arm but horrible accuracy.Quarterbacks:
There's Jay Cutler, then there's everybody else. The hype is real. He looked superb. None of the others looked like the next level is a reality. Whitehurst was decent, second best, but it was a huge gap from 1 to 2. Hackney, Shockley, Croyle and Robinson looked very bad. So bad he said it made it hard to scout the WRs. He emphasized that this was one short day of practice after the weigh ins, so nothing he saw is a finalized opinion, with this exception-- Michael Robinson should convert to WR tomorrow. He's sure of that.
QB Jay Cutler is a legit game manager with upside. Had more than enough arm on the 15-20 yard outs and a smooth deep ball. Delivered short and intermediate dump/swings with accuracy. Not alot of wasted motion. Footwork good. Threaded the needle to Klopfenstein on a 25 yard go during 11-on-11's. No real bad mistakes - a very nice practice. Carries himself well and when he walks in the room everyone knows he's there - charisma.
This connection is not an NFL Scout, should I be making the wrong impression. He is a track coach who I have known for a long long time. He was a fine running back in his own right back in the day (early 70s), but he blew his knees out as a college freshman and became a track guy. He consults for these guys every winter. This year I got him all pumped up to go to the Senior Bowl (this is his first) and I had to cancel. He readily admits he will be over exhuberant about a good performer and overly negative about a bad one. I know he has a sharp eye, and will report honestly if not too enthusiastically. Still no email.- and figured you were trying to learn how to scout or something. Sounds like a pretty awesome connection you have there either way.
Nothing fresh, but since he hasn't reported in, I'll share his thoughts from the phone call yesterday.DBs-- There's Tye Hill, then there's everybody else. He said Hill looked phenomenally quick, and very physical. He made a crazy interception on a play where he looked beat and closed in a flash before making an insane catch. He got the loudest oohs and ahs of the day. One scout noted that Hill appeared to bait the QB. Anwar Philips made some nice plays, but the impression was that other DBs would have made the same plays in the same situation. No other DBs separated themselves, but he thought Will Blackmon made everything look easy and looked like a more polished cover man than all but Hill.Thanks Chaos Commish. Any reports on defense?
Thanks...any further updates would be appreciated.Nothing fresh, but since he hasn't reported in, I'll share his thoughts from the phone call yesterday.DBs-- There's Tye Hill, then there's everybody else. He said Hill looked phenomenally quick, and very physical. He made a crazy interception on a play where he looked beat and closed in a flash before making an insane catch. He got the loudest oohs and ahs of the day. One scout noted that Hill appeared to bait the QB. Anwar Philips made some nice plays, but the impression was that other DBs would have made the same plays in the same situation. No other DBs separated themselves, but he thought Will Blackmon made everything look easy and looked like a more polished cover man than all but Hill.Thanks Chaos Commish. Any reports on defense?
LBs-- There's Chad Greenway, then you guessed it, there's everybody else. He wasn't just the biggest LB there, but he was the fastest, the quickest, the strongest at the point of contact, the best in pursuit, and the best in coverage. He was gushing again. After Greenway he singled out D'Qwell Jackson as a leader, very strong, and a coach on the field. He said Jerome Harrison made two nice runs behind Joseph and O'Callaghan and Jackson got fired up and started barking instructions to the DL-- good instructions that the coaches praised. After them he said Spencer Havner made a huge hit and looked excellent in pass coverage. DeMeco Ryans looked no better than the rest of the LBs, who didn't impress him.
DL-- There's Gabe Watson, then there's everybody else. He really talked like this. A lot of sites are reporting how impressive Watson was. I guess he was the star of the first day. He said none of the DEs impressed him (mabye Tapp and Kiwanuka), but the OTs are just all very good. Brodrick Bunkley and Dusty Dvoracek were both very hard to handle on the inside, and he thinks they'll both start as rookies somewhere, but Watson was by far the best player on either D-Line. He did say I am dead wrong about Kiwi's quickness, and I must have saw him playing on a bad ankle he had this year (true, but I saw him healthy in his bowl game too). Kiwi has as a good a first step as any DE there, but needs to shorten his stride and work on his footwork.
I asked him if he could take 7 players to training camp, who would he want.
1. Gabe Watson
2. Jerious Norwood
3. Chad Greenway
4. DeAngelo Williams
5. Marcedes Lewis
6. D'Brickashaw Ferguson
7. Brodrick Bunkley/Dusty Dvoracek
"No Cutler?"
"Number 8."
eta his top 7. He said either Bunkley or Dvoracek, not both, and he listed D'Brick.
So then, is Cutler's rise/hype building due to lack of other/better options or is he really as good as we are all hearing? This list would indicate that it's a lack of other/better options IMO. Or maybe it's just that the other guys are that good.I asked him if he could take 7 players to training camp, who would he want.
1. Gabe Watson
2. Jerious Norwood
3. Chad Greenway
4. DeAngelo Williams
5. Marcedes Lewis
6. D'Brickashaw Ferguson
7. Brodrick Bunkley/Dusty Dvoracek
"No Cutler?"
"Number 8."
eta his top 7. He said either Bunkley or Dvoracek, not both, and he listed D'Brick.
that's oklahoma, btw. im very high on wilson among the WRs in that 10-20 range. He was banged up this year, and overshadowed by mark clayton and co in the previous years. If you look at the performance of mark bradley, mark clayton, and brandon jones this year, its seems too strong to be a coincidence that all 3 were sooners. Jones and Bradley were probably the two rookie WRs that were farthest ahead of schedule before their injuries. Its conjecture, but i have to think that the WR/offensive coaches at oklahoma are doing something right. Wilson has the athleticism, technique, and hands to make it in the NFL. He will be a steal if he lasts til the 2nd day.Travis Wilson-WR-Tulsa.... Under the radar type of player. May surprise everyone. Good, Quick, Hands, Metal. All aspects of game seems huge.
Check out his stats from last season when Clayton, Bradley, and Jones were still there with Wilson - Wilson was the #2 guy in that group.that's oklahoma, btw. im very high on wilson among the WRs in that 10-20 range. He was banged up this year, and overshadowed by mark clayton and co in the previous years. If you look at the performance of mark bradley, mark clayton, and brandon jones this year, its seems too strong to be a coincidence that all 3 were sooners. Jones and Bradley were probably the two rookie WRs that were farthest ahead of schedule before their injuries. Its conjecture, but i have to think that the WR/offensive coaches at oklahoma are doing something right. Wilson has the athleticism, technique, and hands to make it in the NFL. He will be a steal if he lasts til the 2nd day.Travis Wilson-WR-Tulsa.... Under the radar type of player. May surprise everyone. Good, Quick, Hands, Metal. All aspects of game seems huge.
The only mention of Hudson that I know of is he missed the weigh in.TJ Williams just received high praise for explosion and finishing in run blocking, but he got smoked in pass blocking by Thomas Howard.Can you give me an update on how a the of NC State players are doing?
Manny Lawson – DE
TJ Williams – TE
Marcus Hudson – DB
TIA
Like I said, he's gushing over 4 of those guys. Part of that has to be because three of them have not been given their due this year (Watson, Norwood, Lewis). Then DeAngelo and D'Brick are not disappointing. I think the answer is a little of both. I just watched a good piece of practice (espn coverage which is pretty worthless) and the QBs looked pretty bad trying to throw a 15 yard out to an uncovered WR. In 9 on 7s Cutler did look sharp and the others didn't, but this was a very small sample of observations, and the passes he made were very simple. Fwiw, I've been very high on Cutler all year, but I was more comfortable with him when he was a little under the radar (QB3 rounds 2-3). The Cutler hype smells fishy, but you know what? He could be the best QB in this class.So then, is Cutler's rise/hype building due to lack of other/better options or is he really as good as we are all hearing? This list would indicate that it's a lack of other/better options IMO. Or maybe it's just that the other guys are that good.I asked him if he could take 7 players to training camp, who would he want.
1. Gabe Watson
2. Jerious Norwood
3. Chad Greenway
4. DeAngelo Williams
5. Marcedes Lewis
6. D'Brickashaw Ferguson
7. Brodrick Bunkley/Dusty Dvoracek
"No Cutler?"
"Number 8."
eta his top 7. He said either Bunkley or Dvoracek, not both, and he listed D'Brick.
im thinking soon lawson will be thought of as more of a 3-4 OLB, 4-3 SLB type.The only mention of Hudson that I know of is he missed the weigh in.TJ Williams just received high praise for explosion and finishing in run blocking, but he got smoked in pass blocking by Thomas Howard.Can you give me an update on how a the of NC State players are doing?
Manny Lawson – DE
TJ Williams – TE
Marcus Hudson – DB
TIA
Lawson had a tough day yesterday against solid OTs, but he is supposedley one of the most impressive physical specimans there.
Not much help, and I've been very interested in Lawson.
Agreed, but I think the conversion could upgrade him substantially like it did for Ware. Lawson has some awesome measureables.im thinking soon lawson will be thought of as more of a 3-4 OLB, 4-3 SLB type.The only mention of Hudson that I know of is he missed the weigh in.TJ Williams just received high praise for explosion and finishing in run blocking, but he got smoked in pass blocking by Thomas Howard.Can you give me an update on how a the of NC State players are doing?
Manny Lawson – DE
TJ Williams – TE
Marcus Hudson – DB
TIA
Lawson had a tough day yesterday against solid OTs, but he is supposedley one of the most impressive physical specimans there.
Not much help, and I've been very interested in Lawson.
The above is wrong, sorry. I don't know who Watson blew up before Lutui crushed him, but I know it wasn't Jean-Gilles. He's on the other team. I got a nice report on all four practices finally, but it's in need formatting and editing, and it isn't much different from NFL DraftCountdown's coverage. The praise is stronger and the criticism a little harsher.Another observation from tv coverage. I was keen to watch Gabe Watson because of the praise he received yesterday. Well, he blew up another play and the offensive coaches jumped all over Max Jean-Gilles. They were really in his face. On the very next play, Watson shifted to the left and lined up opposite Lutui who crushed him. Watson was as good as pancaked. Hmmm... I'm thinking Jean-Gilles is just too sluggish, and Lutui is so athletic because he is a lot smaller than USC claimed all year. He went from 6-5 370 to 6-3 and a half and 330. I think that's a good thing for Deuce.
In my experience, this happens quite a bit. What you really need to do if you want a true picture is watch as much of the practice shows and then the game yourself and look for some of the things that everyone mentioned about a prospect. Once you see for yourself what is happening, you'll learn to trust the opinions of the sources that matched your observations. It's good to hear divergent opinions, but after a year or two of scouring the net for this stuff and then seeing who ends up being more correct, you'll narrow down the sources you trust.
Good advice from each. You need to determine if the person relaying the information is a writer or talent evaluator with a background in the game, which is to say they played or coached at some level and have a deep understanding of football. Also, how current are they with the game. Gil Brandt helped revolutionize scouting and build the Cowboys franchise. However, Gil has lost a step so to speak.I agree with Construx. This is not rare. I saw two reports in direct contradiction with each other about Martin Nance - one said he only runs at one speed, the other that he showed a great second gear to get separation. Another thing to remember is that its impossible to see every play of a particular player unless you are scouting only a few players. These writers are covering the whole practice and not seeing everything. Its very possible that the players could have displayed their good qualities when writer 1 was watching, and bad qualities when writer 2 was watching.
It's amazing to me how year in year out actual production on the field gets so cavalierly tossed out the window in favor of 40 times in shorts and a week's worth of drills. Still makes for good reading though.One thought I had on Hagan was that he had a real solid year in actual games. He can't be consistently this bad in the whole practice.
Bueaty is in the eye of the beholder. Even scouts see things differently. For example, yesterday, Chris Speilman said Shockley looked real good and he was surprised by what he saw.Always remember you need to weigh all the scouts opinions togther and look for yourself as well. This why there's always good late round picks out there because some scouts are influenced before they ever see a guy play in person.interesting.Other eyewitness reports I read today had Culter showing a live arm but horrible accuracy.Quarterbacks:
There's Jay Cutler, then there's everybody else. The hype is real. He looked superb. None of the others looked like the next level is a reality. Whitehurst was decent, second best, but it was a huge gap from 1 to 2. Hackney, Shockley, Croyle and Robinson looked very bad. So bad he said it made it hard to scout the WRs. He emphasized that this was one short day of practice after the weigh ins, so nothing he saw is a finalized opinion, with this exception-- Michael Robinson should convert to WR tomorrow. He's sure of that.
I agree with what you are saying to a point, however I have a word of caution. One great thing about the Senior Bowl is that NFL staffs are coaching the players (Titans - North, 49ers - South) and you get to see how these college players interact with the training and teaching methods of real NFL coaches. So if I see something about a player not reacting well to certain things, I do note it. For example, I've read one or two places (including Chaos Commish's guy in a post above) that Hank Baskett is not taking to the coaching he's getting. That's a red flag. He may have dominated in games all year in college, but like every college player, he has things he needs to work on. If he doesn't react well to NFL-level teaching and "scolding", things aren't going to go too well when Bill Parcells calls him "she". This is especially true in my opinion of players at lesser known NFL producing schools, like say New Mexico.It's amazing to me how year in year out actual production on the field gets so cavalierly tossed out the window in favor of 40 times in shorts and a week's worth of drills. Still makes for good reading though.One thought I had on Hagan was that he had a real solid year in actual games. He can't be consistently this bad in the whole practice.
Kamerion Wimbley is making a name for himself at the expense of Marcus McNeill. As soon as Scott was replaced my McNeiil, Wimbley had two sacks. He and Haralson are not far behind Lawson. Wimbley is almost as impressive physically. I cannot wait to see them go after D'Brick and Colledge. In this case the game will be important, because it's hard to tell which team has the better pass rushers without seeing them matched up against the lineman. I'm not convinced Kiwi and Hali are better pass rushers than Lawson and Wimbley, although they are stronger in run support.
Excellent point. And before I forget, a big thumbs up to Jester, Chaos Commish, Bloom et al for helping us all put together the "big picture" on the draft. Well done, lads!I agree with what you are saying to a point, however I have a word of caution. One great thing about the Senior Bowl is that NFL staffs are coaching the players (Titans - North, 49ers - South) and you get to see how these college players interact with the training and teaching methods of real NFL coaches. So if I see something about a player not reacting well to certain things, I do note it. For example, I've read one or two places (including Chaos Commish's guy in a post above) that Hank Baskett is not taking to the coaching he's getting. That's a red flag. He may have dominated in games all year in college, but like every college player, he has things he needs to work on. If he doesn't react well to NFL-level teaching and "scolding", things aren't going to go too well when Bill Parcells calls him "she". This is especially true in my opinion of players at lesser known NFL producing schools, like say New Mexico.It's amazing to me how year in year out actual production on the field gets so cavalierly tossed out the window in favor of 40 times in shorts and a week's worth of drills. Still makes for good reading though.One thought I had on Hagan was that he had a real solid year in actual games. He can't be consistently this bad in the whole practice.
He looks *really* good. Nobody's beating him, and he's owning everyone that they're showing.OT D'Brickshaw Ferguson, Virginia
That's the opposite of what we've heard earlier in this thread.Kiper chimed in with some thoughts...
People with questions to answer
DT Dusty Dvoracek, Oklahoma