What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Shane Vereen (1 Viewer)

Now I'm 2nd guessing myself. Keenan vs Vereen. I do strongly believe Vereen has the better chance of having a huge game. Keenans been solid but only 2 catches last game and 3 catches the game before. Yes, all but one of them was for a TD, but that's not sustainable. They both have a lot of e's in their name, but Vereen has the slight advantage there.

 
the tape is out on how to stop him.

Im starting Gio, Murray, and flexing Cutler or Fitz over him (who each avg. about 12 FP/game) standard scoring, 1pt/50yd passing

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've concluded, or convinced myself, that he most likely will have a game between what he did vs Denver and vs Houston, but with more receiving and less rushing (because he has now had two straight games with under 5 carries, not just one...) so 10-20 yards rushing, maybe 6 receptions for 60-80 yards, and possibly a TD. So maybe if it's a great day he gets 100 total yards and a TD, or maybe he gets around 20 rushing and 4/60 (12 in PPR). Even if all things are normal (ie as they were before last week) playing at Baltimore is a tough matchup, right now that's my biggest concern vs other bench options that I hope could have a big day.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
the tape is out on how to stop him.

Im starting Gio, Murray, and flexing Cutler or Fitz over him (who each avg. about 12 FP/game) standard scoring, 1pt/50yd passing
By this logic every player would be one and done
This is a just a hunch, but hes not a heavy workload guy. If he was getting a guaranteed 15-20 carries a game...sure. Call it an outlier.

But he makes his living off of wheel routes and check-downs in the flat. If they dedicate a cover LB to him all game (which Miami did with great success), he wont see those 10+ touches, rushing, passing, or otherwise. Not to mention the fact that Gronk is out and dedicating a LB becomes that much easier.

Just not feeling it. Sad, because I would love to put him in there with confidence. I just can't. So... explain again how this logic is flawed? The tape isn't out there on how to stop him?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a copycat league. The tape is out there. I'm staying away but I'm happy he helped me the weeks he did.

 
the tape is out on how to stop him.

Im starting Gio, Murray, and flexing Cutler or Fitz over him (who each avg. about 12 FP/game) standard scoring, 1pt/50yd passing
By this logic every player would be one and done
Some players are able to perform even while being keyed on. Thats what separates the studs from the good players. Vereen simply hasnt proven he is capable of being started on a regular basis while being the focus of the defense. Therefore i think folks need to tread carefully. If you need high upside, then go with him. If you need a safe pick, you may consider another back.

 
the tape is out on how to stop him.

Im starting Gio, Murray, and flexing Cutler or Fitz over him (who each avg. about 12 FP/game) standard scoring, 1pt/50yd passing
By this logic every player would be one and done
Some players are able to perform even while being keyed on. Thats what separates the studs from the good players. Vereen simply hasnt proven he is capable of being started on a regular basis while being the focus of the defense. Therefore i think folks need to tread carefully. If you need high upside, then go with him. If you need a safe pick, you may consider another back.
He was blocking last week. NE was not able to run and threw 55 times, so it's not a matter of Vereen proving anything.

 
the tape is out on how to stop him.

Im starting Gio, Murray, and flexing Cutler or Fitz over him (who each avg. about 12 FP/game) standard scoring, 1pt/50yd passing
By this logic every player would be one and done
Some players are able to perform even while being keyed on. Thats what separates the studs from the good players. Vereen simply hasnt proven he is capable of being started on a regular basis while being the focus of the defense. Therefore i think folks need to tread carefully. If you need high upside, then go with him. If you need a safe pick, you may consider another back.
He was blocking last week. NE was not able to run and threw 55 times, so it's not a matter of Vereen proving anything.
ok. even if its an issue of game plan he hasnt proven hes worth starting as a rb1 or high rb2 in such a game plan. With such a small sample size its just risky.

 
It sounds like Dobson and maybe (?) Thompson will be back for the BAL game.

If so I think that helps, gives Brady more options, opens the field up a little more for Vereen potentially I would hope or expect.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a copycat league. The tape is out there. I'm staying away but I'm happy he helped me the weeks he did.
I should probably cut Drew Brees then. He will never put up good numbers the rest of his career now that the Rams showed other teams how it's done.

Every team knows how to stop great players. The problem is, they don't have the talent to execute.

 
And I believe the weather is supposed to be unseasonally warm on Sunday as well. In the mid 60's I believe

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's a copycat league. The tape is out there. I'm staying away but I'm happy he helped me the weeks he did.
the tape is out on how to stop him.

Im starting Gio, Murray, and flexing Cutler or Fitz over him (who each avg. about 12 FP/game) standard scoring, 1pt/50yd passing
Jamaal Charles's tape is out on how to beat the Raiders for 5 TD's.

Ryan Mathews should be able to get 175 yards/5TDs and I have Woodhead down for a Knile Davis-like 50 yards and a score.

 
Now I'm 2nd guessing myself. Keenan vs Vereen. I do strongly believe Vereen has the better chance of having a huge game. Keenans been solid but only 2 catches last game and 3 catches the game before. Yes, all but one of them was for a TD, but that's not sustainable. They both have a lot of e's in their name, but Vereen has the slight advantage there.
This is why I'm still going with Alshon Jeffrey over Keenan; the TDs have been there but 4 TDs on 5 receptions over the past two games? Just can't count on that kind of ratio.

 
Now I'm 2nd guessing myself. Keenan vs Vereen. I do strongly believe Vereen has the better chance of having a huge game. Keenans been solid but only 2 catches last game and 3 catches the game before. Yes, all but one of them was for a TD, but that's not sustainable. They both have a lot of e's in their name, but Vereen has the slight advantage there.
This is why I'm still going with Alshon Jeffrey over Keenan; the TDs have been there but 4 TDs on 5 receptions over the past two games? Just can't count on that kind of ratio.
Yeah, it would totally suck if he had a game like he had three weeks ago, where he had 8/106 without a TD. Or the week before where he was 9/124 without a TD.

Or in other words, over the last four weeks he's 22/318/4. Which is #5 in the league over that time span. Over that same time span Vereen is the #15 RB.

Alshon Jeffrey is probably a better play than Allen, but Vereen is not.

 
What's the confidence level in vereen today? I play in a .5ppr and he's played in 6 games posting scores of 16.5, 8, 10, 14, 22.5, and 3. Been solid as hell besides last week. Are people really selling on him cause 1 bad game out of 6? Seems to me to be an outlier and he will be around 10 points again and maybe more. People saying the book is out on how to stop him are crazy. Now the only thing that would really muck things up would be the Pats not using him. ... but they almost have to use him to win today don't you think?

 
What's the confidence level in vereen today? I play in a .5ppr and he's played in 6 games posting scores of 16.5, 8, 10, 14, 22.5, and 3. Been solid as hell besides last week. Are people really selling on him cause 1 bad game out of 6? Seems to me to be an outlier and he will be around 10 points again and maybe more. People saying the book is out on how to stop him are crazy. Now the only thing that would really muck things up would be the Pats not using him. ... but they almost have to use him to win today don't you think?
I would be mildly confident in him. I have him in a 0.5PPR as well and would think high single digits likely. If he consistently got more carries, I'd be very confident. For me, I'm rolling with Morris. Would probably start Mathews over him as well.
 
What's the confidence level in vereen today? I play in a .5ppr and he's played in 6 games posting scores of 16.5, 8, 10, 14, 22.5, and 3. Been solid as hell besides last week. Are people really selling on him cause 1 bad game out of 6? Seems to me to be an outlier and he will be around 10 points again and maybe more. People saying the book is out on how to stop him are crazy. Now the only thing that would really muck things up would be the Pats not using him. ... but they almost have to use him to win today don't you think?
I would be mildly confident in him. I have him in a 0.5PPR as well and would think high single digits likely. If he consistently got more carries, I'd be very confident. For me, I'm rolling with Morris. Would probably start Mathews over him as well.
Timing is everything. If he had the 3 pt game 2 weeks ago, he would be a must start. My only other options today are rainey and todman. If mjd is out I am playing todman for sure. If not it's rainey and vereen. Debating rainey vs vereen...tempted to go todman and rainey but rainey had been so up and down

 
What's the confidence level in vereen today? I play in a .5ppr and he's played in 6 games posting scores of 16.5, 8, 10, 14, 22.5, and 3. Been solid as hell besides last week. Are people really selling on him cause 1 bad game out of 6? Seems to me to be an outlier and he will be around 10 points again and maybe more. People saying the book is out on how to stop him are crazy. Now the only thing that would really muck things up would be the Pats not using him. ... but they almost have to use him to win today don't you think?
Definitely a lack of projections with all the speculating going on. There's no baseline. Outside of Todman there aren't a lot of automatic matchups for RB2/WR3/flex options this week.

I thought 10-20 rushing, 60-80 receiving, 5-6 catches, seemed reasonable. I just don't see a lot TDs in this game, but I would expect Brady maybe gets 2 and if so then Vereen has as good a shot as anyone to grab one.

 
Are you guys a little worried that the Ravens will mimic what the MIA Defense did to shut him down last week?

 
What's the confidence level in vereen today? I play in a .5ppr and he's played in 6 games posting scores of 16.5, 8, 10, 14, 22.5, and 3. Been solid as hell besides last week. Are people really selling on him cause 1 bad game out of 6? Seems to me to be an outlier and he will be around 10 points again and maybe more. People saying the book is out on how to stop him are crazy. Now the only thing that would really muck things up would be the Pats not using him. ... but they almost have to use him to win today don't you think?
Definitely a lack of projections with all the speculating going on. There's no baseline. Outside of Todman there aren't a lot of automatic matchups for RB2/WR3/flex options this week.

I thought 10-20 rushing, 60-80 receiving, 5-6 catches, seemed reasonable. I just don't see a lot TDs in this game, but I would expect Brady maybe gets 2 and if so then Vereen has as good a shot as anyone to grab one.
Sounds like todman is anything but automatic now

 
Are you guys a little worried that the Ravens will mimic what the MIA Defense did to shut him down last week?
I'm not, but I do think Baltimore is a very good defense at home, and there could be crummy weather, all for making it a pretty low scoring, hard fought affair.

I'm mindful though of not reaching and trying to make a great start out of several options when there aren't great matchups out there this week, vs having a major piece in one of the best offenses in football, which is why I drafted him eons ago now in the first place.

Some comments from FBG Tefertiller in the AC forum on Vereen:

Vereen (very close for me between he and FJax with Lewis under center)
I like him to rebound this week in a tough matchup
Vereen over Jordy
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you guys a little worried that the Ravens will mimic what the MIA Defense did to shut him down last week?
That's the only fear. It's pretty clear that he's a top 5 option in any type of PPR league if they don't game plan to shut him down. I think it's pretty clear that the Ravens will try to do that since he's the biggest threat on that offense right now. The only question is if BB is smart enough to find new ways of using him and getting him the ball.

I still can't get myself to pull the trigger and start him over Keenan Allen, but I'm real close.

 
It's a copycat league. The tape is out there. I'm staying away but I'm happy he helped me the weeks he did.
put most of your effort into stopping Vereen and let the 2 slot guys eat you up... doesn't sound like a good plan.

I think Vereen does better than he did last week but I'm not sure I'm going to bench CJ over him; CJ has been good fo an avg of 15 or so a week.

 
Benching him for Giovanni. Think they will be close in production (PPR) but Gio has more upside. Ravens will mimic Dolphins tactics until BB shows a way to exploit it.

 
I think I'm back on the Vereen bus with the MJD/Todman news. Still with less confidence than a couple of weeks ago.

 
With Ridley back in good graces and Blount getting carries, I think the opportunities are fewer for Vereen than they were two+ weeks ago. That factors into it for me.

And as much as I love Vereen, his great game two weeks ago was largely due to one drive. Can't quite say it's an anomaly but haven't seen him factored in such a way since. Game situation seems to dictate Vereen's use (defense against, score, etc.).

Feel better with CJ and Gio. Could be wrong.

 
I'm going to say something rosy with rose colored glasses on - since Bal is no. 2 vs RB's, and given that Vereen is much more of a receiving back, I think we may see the Pats trying to move the chains with throwing to Vereen much more than we did vs the Phins. He's a receiver, he needs targets, maybe he gets them today.

 
Screw it. I'll go with him. I'm starting Keenan in another league, so I'll bench him in this one in favor of Vereen. Spread out my risk.

 
There's our man! TD!

If you watched the games last week, like many in this thread said, then you know Vereen was in a lot, but Brady just couldn't get him the ball and he was also held in to block a lot.

He caught the same pass this week that was thrown to him last week (incomplete) on the opposite side.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top