IvanKaramazov
Footballguy
I hate Tyreek Hill, and I would be 100% on his side if he were in Kelce's place here. I think folks are overthinking this.
I like thisI think he should wait for the kid outside the phone store and smash that one too.Sadly he'll probably have to buy the kid a new phone though. Well worth it imo.
Does it matter that Kelce used the same slur at the end of the video?
If the situation was exactly the same, same reaction from me.I wonder how the response to this would be if it were Tyreek Hill or Aaron Rodgers who smashed the phone?
I think Kelce should beat the kid to the punch and file a harassment lawsuit.
Nah.I think Kelce should beat the kid to the punch and file a harassment lawsuit.
After Kelce slurred the kid back now he is going to have to come out with an apology. Things change fast in those situations.
Nah.I think Kelce should beat the kid to the punch and file a harassment lawsuit.
After Kelce slurred the kid back now he is going to have to come out with an apology. Things change fast in those situations.
Doesn't change the kid was following and harassing him.
The article was much more honest, but that is some terrible headline writing there.
Maybe.
Headline From The Athletic:
Jason Kelce slams fan’s phone on ground, exchanges homophobic slurs after insult about Travis dating Taylor Swift.
My bet is Kelce will apologize for something. Just the way is works today.
Yep, clickbait. Like I stated. We may not agree with it, but I would bet Kelce will apologize for something. Kelce is on ESPN, and getting a lot of endorsements, Chunky Soup and others. His agent will say "Apologize and move on be it right or wrong."The article was much more honest, but that is some terrible headline writing there.
Maybe.
Headline From The Athletic:
Jason Kelce slams fan’s phone on ground, exchanges homophobic slurs after insult about Travis dating Taylor Swift.
My bet is Kelce will apologize for something. Just the way is works today.
"Boy, you should lay off the white claws cuz you're drunk.""Kelce how does it feel that your brother is a f****t for dating Taylor Swift?”
How does that even make any sense?
I would have adapted Steve Martin's response to hecklers by saying, "How does that buzz feel from having your first beer?"
If someone had yelled a slur at Jackson about him or his family, absolutely.Great! So Lamar Jackson would get the same attaboys we are seeing for Kelce?That's not realistic. Who a person is and what their history is matters. And it should
Nope
Um they already have a podcast with 2.5; million subscribers lolESPN is Disney as well. That might affect the response from them.
But I doubt anyone at ESPN/Disney is willing to toss away a promising media commodity like Kelce. One could easily see Jason and eventually Travis hosting podcasts and shows etc. Adding Jason to Monday Night Countdown (This is still a thing??) is just a tryout for bigger and better.
Ha, of course they do, what the heck was I thinking.Um they already have a podcast with 2.5; million subscribers lolESPN is Disney as well. That might affect the response from them.
But I doubt anyone at ESPN/Disney is willing to toss away a promising media commodity like Kelce. One could easily see Jason and eventually Travis hosting podcasts and shows etc. Adding Jason to Monday Night Countdown (This is still a thing??) is just a tryout for bigger and better.
I suspect Kelce will make a token public apology, replace the phone, and nothing else will become of this “incident”, other than comedic reference.You left "fire him" off the options
Seriously though, I assume ESPN will do something, although the financial penalty from a suspension will be immaterial compared to the financial windfall he's seeing from overexposure; any loss there will be nothing compared to the civil suit he's likely to see.
I would be shocked if he apologizes.I suspect Kelce will make a token public apology, replace the , and nothing else will become of this “incident”, other than comedic reference.

“I shouldn’t have lost my temper, damaged someone else’s property, and repeated those hateful words. But people need to be respectful of an athlete’s privacy, and understand repercussions are possible in the heat of the moment, when conflict is invited.”I would be shocked if he apologizes.I suspect Kelce will make a token public apology, replace the , and nothing else will become of this “incident”, other than comedic reference.
As a lawyer - he is not going to lose a lot of money on a civil case here.any loss there will be nothing compared to the civil suit he's likely to see
ESPN should put out a statement that says they gave Jason a "stern talking to" about interacting with hecklers. In reality, executives will hold a five-minute video call with Jason and tel him to keep a cooler head because, given his profile, everything he does is a reflection of ESPN.I'm interested in what the public thinks ESPN should do.
The article was much more honest, but that is some terrible headline writing there.
Maybe.
Headline From The Athletic:
Jason Kelce slams fan’s phone on ground, exchanges homophobic slurs after insult about Travis dating Taylor Swift.
My bet is Kelce will apologize for something. Just the way is works today.
Not worth getting arrested for. Cuz that’s what would’ve happened if he taught the lil moron a lessonsilly word? maybe to you, but to some of us it’s more than just a silly word.I find it interesting how many posters are saying the person should have been punched in the face over a silly word
I wonder how many times he has done just that.Still, grabbing and smashing the dude's phone makes him look like a tool. If he feels he can't just ignore it, he can easily stop and confront him and the guy would probably be pissing in his pants scared. There's just no need for him to damage property or anything of the sort to put a stop to it and get his point across.
I agree. Kelce could have stopped and glared at the guy. That would have been intimidating enough to shut him up. Kelce is a big guy. Given how much phones cost these days, I don't think Kelce's actions were warranted.I voted no suspension. I don't have a super high opinion of either of the Kelce brothers, but I think professional repercussions should be reserved for much more serious offenses than this. Also, I think it's a bunch of baloney that people think they can with no consequences just harass guys who could obviously beat the crap out of them. Still, grabbing and smashing the dude's phone makes him look like a tool. If he feels he can't just ignore it, he can easily stop and confront him and the guy would probably be pissing in his pants scared. There's just no need for him to damage property or anything of the sort to put a stop to it and get his point across.
what if tswift smashed the phone?!what if the celebrity/athlete that smashed the phone was a much smaller guy than the owner of the phone?

Sure, we don’t know. Maybe he’s been dealing with similar crap for a long time and just snapped. Maybe there was something unrelated really bothering him so he was just in a much more volatile state. Or maybe he flies off the handle often, just usually not this spectacularly. It’s a snippet bereft of context so we’ll always be a bit in the dark.I wonder how many times he has done just that.Still, grabbing and smashing the dude's phone makes him look like a tool. If he feels he can't just ignore it, he can easily stop and confront him and the guy would probably be pissing in his pants scared. There's just no need for him to damage property or anything of the sort to put a stop to it and get his point across.
Condoning actions is one thing. Understanding that people are human, and get tired of turning the other cheek is another.
She could just say "Look What You Made Me Do" and "Shake It Off".what if tswift smashed the phone?!what if the celebrity/athlete that smashed the phone was a much smaller guy than the owner of the phone?![]()
The O in SEO stands for optimization. The acronym is Search Engine Optimization (SEO).The article was much more honest, but that is some terrible headline writing there.
Maybe.
Headline From The Athletic:
Jason Kelce slams fan’s phone on ground, exchanges homophobic slurs after insult about Travis dating Taylor Swift.
My bet is Kelce will apologize for something. Just the way is works today.
This is what happens when SEO optimization rules the world.
Since Joe wants to throw out hypotheticals in here, what if the celebrity/athlete that smashed the phone was a much smaller guy than the owner of the phone?
A poster said, "I'm a big proponent in we need to institute more punches to the mouth." so I asked what he thought ESPN should do if that had been the situation. Sorry if that wasn't clear.If Kelce laid him out, he'd be in trouble with ESPN and the law, and a civil lawsuit.Since Joe wants to throw out hypotheticals in here, what if the celebrity/athlete that smashed the phone was a much smaller guy than the owner of the phone?
A poster said, "I'm a big proponent in we need to institute more punches to the mouth." so I asked what he thought ESPN should do if that had been the situation. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
If Kelce laid him out, he'd be in trouble with ESPN and the law, and a civil lawsuit.Since Joe wants to throw out hypotheticals in here, what if the celebrity/athlete that smashed the phone was a much smaller guy than the owner of the phone?
A poster said, "I'm a big proponent in we need to institute more punches to the mouth." so I asked what he thought ESPN should do if that had been the situation. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
However had he done that, I would not think less of him. But yeah, obvious ramifications for that.
was for the "Since Joe wants to throw out hypotheticals in here,". I was replying to a post.I wonder how the response to this would be if it were Tyreek Hill or Aaron Rodgers who smashed the phone?
I agree. Kelce could have stopped and glared at the guy. That would have been intimidating enough to shut him up. Kelce is a big guy. Given how much phones cost these days, I don't think Kelce's actions were warranted.I voted no suspension. I don't have a super high opinion of either of the Kelce brothers, but I think professional repercussions should be reserved for much more serious offenses than this. Also, I think it's a bunch of baloney that people think they can with no consequences just harass guys who could obviously beat the crap out of them. Still, grabbing and smashing the dude's phone makes him look like a tool. If he feels he can't just ignore it, he can easily stop and confront him and the guy would probably be pissing in his pants scared. There's just no need for him to damage property or anything of the sort to put a stop to it and get his point across.
Since Joe wants to throw out hypotheticals in here, what if the celebrity/athlete that smashed the phone was a much smaller guy than the owner of the phone?
Feels like this is getting swept away in the news cycle. It's also subtle when putting a slur back on someone, it can be read several different ways.I realize everyone may not see this distinction or perhaps haven't actually watched the video but there is nuance here in how to Kelce using the slur in that he turned it back on him by using the original slur saying "who's the f__ now" vs. calling a person that slur. Context here matters imo.
It was clear. Didn't you also ask what if it had been Aaron Rodgers or Tyreek Hill that smashed the phone?Since Joe wants to throw out hypotheticals in here, what if the celebrity/athlete that smashed the phone was a much smaller guy than the owner of the phone?
A poster said, "I'm a big proponent in we need to institute more punches to the mouth." so I asked what he thought ESPN should do if that had been the situation. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Really?Feels like this is getting swept away in the news cycle. It's also subtle when putting a slur back on someone, it can be read several different ways.I realize everyone may not see this distinction or perhaps haven't actually watched the video but there is nuance here in how to Kelce using the slur in that he turned it back on him by using the original slur saying "who's the f__ now" vs. calling a person that slur. Context here matters imo.
I heard he called, but the kid didn't answer his phone.I also think that Kelece should reach out and offer to replace the cell phone

You're the lawyer and I'm not so I trust what you say but it seems to me like it would be considered a crime to destroy someones property. I agree with you that if he got a sympathetic jury that not alot would happen and I also agree that there are likely alot of lawyers that wouldn't want to touch this case but am I wrong to assume that Kelce could be held criminally and civilly liable for this?As a lawyer - he is not going to lose a lot of money on a civil case here.any loss there will be nothing compared to the civil suit he's likely to see
Worst case scenario - a jury would award nominal damages of $1.
Really, the gentleman who lost his phone will have a tough time finding a lawyer who wants to take on this case on a contingency fee.
He didn't call him a f__, he asked the question who's the f___ now, after the kid used the slur. Again, it's nuanced but important imo, and if you don't see the difference you may not and I understand. Ideally he wouldn't have used the word at all, but it's different than just screaming the slur back at him.Really?Feels like this is getting swept away in the news cycle. It's also subtle when putting a slur back on someone, it can be read several different ways.I realize everyone may not see this distinction or perhaps haven't actually watched the video but there is nuance here in how to Kelce using the slur in that he turned it back on him by using the original slur saying "who's the f__ now" vs. calling a person that slur. Context here matters imo.
I don’t think it’s more nuanced than someone saying “you’re a jerk”, followed by the response “no, YOU’RE THE jerk”.
What else are you reading into the exchange?