Kiddnets
Footballguy
This - boring and the refs are clueless how to call it. Time to go.Not sure whether it should be banned...but that's when I stopped watching the game. 4 or 5 of those in a row is just not football IMO.
This - boring and the refs are clueless how to call it. Time to go.Not sure whether it should be banned...but that's when I stopped watching the game. 4 or 5 of those in a row is just not football IMO.
Bush push was 20 years ago.Old man rant:
It’s not just the tush push. I think any play where there’s a pile of players and the ball carrier is pushed forward, the play should be blown dead right there.
Except the Bush push. The hell with ND.
It's been talked about repeatedly in recent weeks and I think this is why other teams haven't been able to run it successfully. When others (Bills comes to mind) have tried, it looks disjointed and I'm guessing it's because the guards aren't moving until after the ball is snapped. That split second is everything in a play that relies entirely on leverage and gaining the low ground.Not sure if in the past they didn't show it, but they also clearly showed the offensive lineman moving early.Four tush pushes in a row last night, I almost broke my TV. What an awful play.
Think changed around 2005, credit to the Eagles for taking advantage of a play that seemed to have been forgotten with the resources they had and spending time on figuring out how to exploit the rules to their advantage, nothing really wrong with that but the play as things stand is bad for the league, and it's now time for it to be shot into the sun.It's been talked about repeatedly in recent weeks and I think this is why other teams haven't been able to run it successfully. When others (Bills comes to mind) have tried, it looks disjointed and I'm guessing it's because the guards aren't moving until after the ball is snapped. That split second is everything in a play that relies entirely on leverage and gaining the low ground.Not sure if in the past they didn't show it, but they also clearly showed the offensive lineman moving early.Four tush pushes in a row last night, I almost broke my TV. What an awful play.
Not sure when or why they changed the rule to allow pushing the ball carrier, but anytime you change a rule you can bet all loopholes or advantages are being explored.
Yup exactly where I’m at.Forget how I voted but last night swayed me to “ban it” side.
Yeah, I compare this to the neutral zone trap in hockey. As a Devils fan, part of me always thought the rest of the league's fans just wanted it gone because the Devils were so good at it. Any other team could do it if they wanted, and if they wanted to stop it, then figure out a way to beat it! But it obviously wasn't a popular thing for the aesthetics of the game, so the NHL changed some rules to make it less effective while not explicitly banning it. Seems like they made the right move and the NFL is in a pretty analogous situation here.I think banning a play is bad precedent. That said, I think there are solid arguments to take the play out of the game. If the league simply brought back the rule of making it illegal to aid the runner I think it would make the play much less effective, ultimately taking the play out of the game.
Except, of course, there already is a rule regarding aiding the runner.I think banning a play is bad precedent. That said, I think there are solid arguments to take the play out of the game. If the league simply brought back the rule of making it illegal to aid the runner I think it would make the play much less effective, ultimately taking the play out of the game.
Correction, in 2005 the NFL lifted the ban on pushing runners.Except, of course, there already is a rule regarding aiding the runner.I think banning a play is bad precedent. That said, I think there are solid arguments to take the play out of the game. If the league simply brought back the rule of making it illegal to aid the runner I think it would make the play much less effective, ultimately taking the play out of the game.![]()
You don’t like penalties? Stop the illegal play.I'm tired of getting pushed in the tush with this non story.
You don't like it? Stop them. Put your balls on the block, eat more pasta, do more squats, do what you gotta do, but stop sniveling and STOP IT WITH YOR DEE FENCE.
I haven’t missed it. I call it out frequently — Detroit is one of the teams that does it most often. It’s far more dangerous in open field than it is at the goalline IMO.Correction, in 2005 the NFL lifted the ban on pushing runners.Except, of course, there already is a rule regarding aiding the runner.I think banning a play is bad precedent. That said, I think there are solid arguments to take the play out of the game. If the league simply brought back the rule of making it illegal to aid the runner I think it would make the play much less effective, ultimately taking the play out of the game.![]()
How have you missed all the olinemen pushing a RB down field. There are numerous instances of this every game, or so it seems.
This might be the best alternative sports example I've seen on this play in another sport; really surprised I haven't seen or heard it till now. A legal play/strategy that is almost exclusively used/perfected by one team that gives them a particular advantage you can measure is statistically dominant compared to other teams usage of similar plays/strategies AND also is widely complained about by fans as being ugly/boring/ruining game flow. Wow, props to you on this one.Yeah, I compare this to the neutral zone trap in hockey. As a Devils fan, part of me always thought the rest of the league's fans just wanted it gone because the Devils were so good at it. Any other team could do it if they wanted, and if they wanted to stop it, then figure out a way to beat it! But it obviously wasn't a popular thing for the aesthetics of the game, so the NHL changed some rules to make it less effective while not explicitly banning it. Seems like they made the right move and the NFL is in a pretty analogous situation here.I think banning a play is bad precedent. That said, I think there are solid arguments to take the play out of the game. If the league simply brought back the rule of making it illegal to aid the runner I think it would make the play much less effective, ultimately taking the play out of the game.
Totally remember that feeling. Then a few years later came the Kovalchuk contract, which was technically within the rules and just a bit more extreme than what other teams were already doing, but the Devils got fined and lost draft picks for it for attempting to circumvent the salary cap (Come to think of it, another potential analogy with today's Eagles and the contract structures they've been using with guys like Hurts...) But somehow you don't care as much that it seems the league is against your team when they're winning championships.This might be the best alternative sports example I've seen on this play in another sport; really surprised I haven't seen or heard it till now. A legal play/strategy that is almost exclusively used/perfected by one team that gives them a particular advantage you can measure is statistically dominant compared to other teams usage of similar plays/strategies AND also is widely complained about by fans as being ugly/boring/ruining game flow. Wow, props to you on this one.Yeah, I compare this to the neutral zone trap in hockey. As a Devils fan, part of me always thought the rest of the league's fans just wanted it gone because the Devils were so good at it. Any other team could do it if they wanted, and if they wanted to stop it, then figure out a way to beat it! But it obviously wasn't a popular thing for the aesthetics of the game, so the NHL changed some rules to make it less effective while not explicitly banning it. Seems like they made the right move and the NFL is in a pretty analogous situation here.I think banning a play is bad precedent. That said, I think there are solid arguments to take the play out of the game. If the league simply brought back the rule of making it illegal to aid the runner I think it would make the play much less effective, ultimately taking the play out of the game.
I remember my Devil's fan friends as the time being incredibly pissy because not only did they lift the ban on two line passes (and start calling a ton of obstruction penalties in the neutral zone) to kill the zone trap on them; but this was the same time they created the goalie trap zone rules for behind the net which everyone immediately nicknamed the Martin Brodeur rule bc it was 100% aimed at killing him handling dump offs into the corners like an ace lol. Talk about feeling like the entire league is out to get you...