What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Socialism and How it Can Destroy America (2 Viewers)

Look, I'm going to let you all kick-and-spit this one out.

We've got some great debates in various threads about various issues relating or pertaining to this. I'd use them as a vehicle. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, yeah. There's one person whose platform won't read that way -- Biden. That's it. Otherwise, it'll be a mish-mash of nods towards nationalization through regulation or some such rot.

Arguing that Trump is more socialist than these candidates is foolish, and it's not the voting electorate's problem that it can see right through it -- the problem lies in the PSF and its inane debates like this one.
It’s very likely that Biden will be the nominee, and if not him Harris. In either case you’re not going to see the platform you’re anticipating. Why don’t you wait and see what it is before predicting it’s going to be Tom Hayden’s wet dream? 

 
80-90% of Democrats want the Biden plan: strengthening Obamacare with a public option, fighting climate change without a full blown Green New Deal. That’s 80-90% of voters AND 80-90% of Democratic politicians across the board. There is not going to be any socialist party platform. Don’t let the Trump supporters fool you guys into thinking anything differently. 

 
It’s very likely that Biden will be the nominee, and if not him Harris. In either case you’re not going to see the platform you’re anticipating. Why don’t you wait and see what it is before predicting it’s going to be Tom Hayden’s wet dream? 
The current debate dais of the Democratic Party minus one is already Tom Hayden's dream, corporeal in every way. 

 
Saints I love ya man but this thread has nothing to do with Trump.  Your obsession with him is weird.  

Trump has shown with his policies that he doesn't support socialism.
He seems to support some parts of socialism.

Subsidies to farmers (especially to try and make up for his trade war mistakes)...corporate welfare... 

 
I certainly hope so but I don't believe Trump will come up with anything on his own.  Hopefully the Republicans can come up with a way to keep private insurance but also provide insurance to legal Americans in need.
Why have they not come up with anything?  How much longer do they need?

 
He seems to support some parts of socialism.

Subsidies to farmers (especially to try and make up for his trade war mistakes)...corporate welfare... 
I was initially against the trade war because I thought it would harm the market more than it has.  I have changed my opinion and strongly support the trade war now.  China was raping us for so many years and when a deal is reached the long term gain will far exceed the short term pain.

 
80-90% of Democrats want the Biden plan: strengthening Obamacare with a public option, fighting climate change without a full blown Green New Deal. That’s 80-90% of voters AND 80-90% of Democratic politicians across the board. There is not going to be any socialist party platform. Don’t let the Trump supporters fool you guys into thinking anything differently. 
A public option will be painted as a move towards socialism.  So will measures to combat climate change and other items on the platform.  

 
I was initially against the trade war because I thought it would harm the market more than it has.  I have changed my opinion and strongly support the trade war now.  China was raping us for so many years and when a deal is reached the long term gain will far exceed the short term pain.
But, that doesn't make the policy any less Socialistic. Whether the outcome is good or bad, it is a more socialistic policy than not. When will the Republicans start shouting about the Farmer Bailout?

 
I certainly hope so but I don't believe Trump will come up with anything on his own.  Hopefully the Republicans can come up with a way to keep private insurance but also provide insurance to legal Americans in need.
Agreed Trump is just saying this.

What would a provided insurance plan be called or look like? 

 
80-90% of Democrats want the Biden plan: strengthening Obamacare with a public option, fighting climate change without a full blown Green New Deal. That’s 80-90% of voters AND 80-90% of Democratic politicians across the board. There is not going to be any socialist party platform. Don’t let the Trump supporters fool you guys into thinking anything differently. 
But Kamala says he was against busing in the 60’s.

 
Agreed Trump is just saying this.

What would a provided insurance plan be called or look like? 
I am not nearly smart enough to understand the best way to solve this issue.  I like reading the Obamacare failure thread on Mattyl's ideas.  It seems like it will be impossible to keep coverage in pre-existing conditions and also keep rates reasonable without increasing taxes.

 
If I had a nickel for every time the Von Mises Institute said a policy was socialist...

Don't get me wrong. I love the Von Mises Institute, but using them as the arbiter of socialism is not something the members of the center-left and left on this board should hope for. 
Picking and winners and losers for political reasons has an awful lot more to do about the dangers of socialism than national healthcare or cheaper college.  The rest of the industrialized world isn't "destroyed"

 
I was initially against the trade war because I thought it would harm the market more than it has.  I have changed my opinion and strongly support the trade war now.  China was raping us for so many years and when a deal is reached the long term gain will far exceed the short term pain.
And again at what cost?

 
I am not nearly smart enough to understand the best way to solve this issue.  I like reading the Obamacare failure thread on Mattyl's ideas.  It seems like it will be impossible to keep coverage in pre-existing conditions and also keep rates reasonable without increasing taxes.
Were you for Obama making this issue his first thing he wanted to get done? 

 
Picking and winners and losers for political reasons has an awful lot more to do about the dangers of socialism than national healthcare or cheaper college.  The rest of the industrialized world isn't "destroyed"
When you poll individual aspects of “socialist” government programs (like features in ACA) they poll well above 50%, much higher than anything Trump would ever get, across the board. 

 
We have always had a crapton of socialist policies, starting with the Military, Police, Fire and Sanitation. Many of them work just fine. As do many of our crapton of capitalist policies.

 
When one party wants to nationalize an entire industry heretofore not nationalized, socialism is certainly within the realm of discussion topics. 
The rest of the developed world figured this out long ago.  They spend 1/2 what we spend per capital for superior outcomes.   Seems pretty obvious that what we are doing is irrational and suboptimal.

 
The rest of the developed world figured this out long ago.  They spend 1/2 what we spend per capital for superior outcomes.   Seems pretty obvious that what we are doing is irrational and suboptimal.
It's not irrational and sub-optimal depending on what you value. Sub-optimal and irrational are merely descriptions of the steps taken to get to a chosen goal. You're presupposing the goal here and taking it as a given, when in fact the goal might be different to some people.

 
But like I said, there are other threads for either a health care debate or a socialism debate. Better to have them there than in a thread that is incendiary all around, it seems. 

 
Yeah, I can see why you would want to change the subject.
Not really. I sort of have said three times that I didn't want to debate really anything about socialism in this thread.

I have no need to change the subject. Since when did individualized plans become so anathema to consumer consumption of cost? And what of the employer-based model, not to mention the model of group insurance plans paying for all care?

What about MSAs?

What about...?

It seems your caustic mindset just means your mind is made up about this. 

 
I have some questions for clarification purposes. Are the following examples of socialism? 

1. The New Deal? 

2. Social Security? 

3. Food Stamps? 

4. The Great Society? 

5. Medicare? 

6. Medicaid? 

7. Welfare? 

8. Obamacare? 

9. Public education? 

TIA
Bump. Interesting to me that neither @TripItUpnor anyone who agrees with him chose to answer these questions. 

And speaking of TripitUp: if you didn’t want to discuss socialism, what was the point of starting the thread? 

 
Bump. Interesting to me that neither @TripItUpnor anyone who agrees with him chose to answer these questions. 

And speaking of TripitUp: if you didn’t want to discuss socialism, what was the point of starting the thread? 
Settle down fella...I'm watching the new "All or Nothing".   I'll get to this list.

 
Bump. Interesting to me that neither @TripItUpnor anyone who agrees with him chose to answer these questions.
I agree with the premise but it's too inflammatory -- and actually impossible -- to really go into it. A lot of those programs are transition programs from what was once a reliance on private funds and husbandry to a state guarantee of funds paid for by all.  But that's not the problem. It's the format and sort of "Gotcha!" questioning you're undertaking. I mean, asking about sweeping government changes from 1933 like "The New Deal! What is it?" is a dissertation length answer. No, it's a tome-length one.

Nobody can answer your questions because they're progressions from that once formerly in the realm of the private individual into the realm of the public oversight of some form. To the degree they fit the bell of socialism rubric is probably a case-by-case basis and the amount and extent of the movement towards the public.

It's really asking for about ten dissertation length papers, and nobody can do that on a message board. 

 
I have yet to see a proposal from any candidate that can accurately be labeled "socialist".  There isn't a "socialist" government in the socialized world.  I don't even know what is going on in here :confused:   Is this just another example of people using words incorrectly in an effort to fear monger?  We need jon_mx to the white courtesy phone....he said that sort of thing isn't happening today.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree with the premise but it's too inflammatory -- and actually impossible -- to really go into it. A lot of those programs are transition programs from what was once a reliance on private funds and husbandry to a state guarantee of funds paid for by all.  But that's not the problem. It's the format and sort of "Gotcha!" questioning you're undertaking. I mean, asking about sweeping government changes from 1933 like "The New Deal! What is it?" is a dissertation length answer. No, it's a tome-length one.

Nobody can answer your questions because they're progressions from that once formerly in the realm of the private individual into the realm of the public oversight of some form. To the degree they fit the bell of socialism rubric is probably a case-by-case basis and the amount and extent of the movement towards the public.

It's really asking for about ten dissertation length papers, and nobody can do that on a message board. 
It’s not meant to be a gotcha question at all. Socialism is a very broad term. You and I have struggled with it, and all sorts of people struggle. So when somebody starts talking about socialism I want to know what they’re referring to- they may be talking about something very different from what I have in mind. 

I don’t see the need for lengthy answers. If you believe the programs I named are a form of socialism, answer yes. 

 
I have some questions for clarification purposes. Are the following examples of socialism? 

1. The New Deal?   Depends

2. Social Security? No

3. Food Stamps?  Depends

4. The Great Society? Depends 

5. Medicare? No

6. Medicaid? No

7. Welfare? Depends  (on extent)

8. Obamacare? Yes

9. Public education? Depends (on extent)

TIA
Almost all of these depend on one's definition/interpretation of socialism.  The above are my interpretations.

so·cial·ism

noun

a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

synonyms:leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism; More

policy or practice based on the political and economic theory of socialism.

synonyms:leftism, Fabianism, syndicalism, consumer socialism, utopian socialism, welfarism;More

(in Marxist theory) a transitional social state between the overthrow of capitalism and the realization of Communism.

 
80-90% of Democrats want the Biden plan: strengthening Obamacare with a public option, fighting climate change without a full blown Green New Deal. That’s 80-90% of voters AND 80-90% of Democratic politicians across the board. There is not going to be any socialist party platform. Don’t let the Trump supporters fool you guys into thinking anything differently. 
The Green-Deal has lost some steam after we found out what it was really about.  I said before though I don`t make enough money so any kind of federal help count me in. My wife has a significant amount of college debt and she does not work so I am hoping for that to be absolved eventually.

 
I have some questions for clarification purposes. Are the following examples of socialism? 

1. The New Deal?   Depends

2. Social Security? No

3. Food Stamps?  Depends

4. The Great Society? Depends 

5. Medicare? No

6. Medicaid? No

7. Welfare? Depends  (on extent)

8. Obamacare? Yes

9. Public education? Depends (on extent)

TIA
None of those things are a yes to your socialism criteria except Obamacare.

:lol:  come on

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top