Yeah I think most games he won't get 20 touches but 15 to 20 is enough to do some damage in this offenseHm, so that was the most he's been utilized (26 times) all year. Obviously game flow was in his favor.
I'm not sure we should expect the same volume next week but he's still crazy efficient/effective on his touches.
He's getting 15-20 touches a week and is a good bet to score. It's the same committee of old, only now Reid gets to run it 40 times without killing one guy.Seems like he's a strong rb2 even with Charles in there. He's a better thomas jones
Agreed. So what else did we learn today? Here are my take-aways, assumptions, and conclusions.Yeah I think most games he won't get 20 touches but 15 to 20 is enough to do some damage in this offense
You missed where that all pro RB West fits into the equation.Agreed. So what else did we learn today? Here are my take-aways, assumptions, and conclusions.
Charles looks ok. Not bad, not great, but "fine." He demonstrated good vision and patience and I expect he'll get better and increased use every week.
That said, I don't see Ware's touches going down too much. Charles will steal touches from West, not Ware.
In addition, I think we saw that Ware will close out games in which they need to burn clock.
Reid will use both Ware and Charles inside the 5. Those expecting Ware to get ALL goal-line looks are gonna be disappointed. I'm not just talking Poe here (which is clearly an abberation), Charles has the vision and patience to be very effective at the goal line and if Reid was comfortable using him today I don't see why that would change.
My prediction for the near term (i.e. next 2-3 games) is that this wil be 60-40 split favoring Ware (because he'll close out games). Longer term, it's possible we'll see the pro-bowl Charles which could flip the splits to be 60-40 favoring Charles, but that day may never come, we'll see.
Anyone see it differently? Anything I missed?
I don't believe he's part of any equationYou missed where that all pro RB West fits into the equation.
I think he'll look better immediately when playing on a dry field. The loose wet turf today did not favor his quick, shifty style.Charles looks ok. Not bad, not great, but "fine." He demonstrated good vision and patience and I expect he'll get better and increased use every week.
He had a couple nice runs. The oline was killing the raiders all day thoughThat's two games in a row where JC didn't look like the old JC.
He looked good to me and will likely look better once he gets into game shape IMO.That's two games in a row where JC didn't look like the old JC.
That's two games in a row where JC didn't look like the old JC.
Yep, I agree. I was one of the guys who really thought JC would get a primary workload today and I was wrong. I still think he can be the guy but your assessment above is correct, imo. The Chiefs would love to go into the playoffs with a healthy Charles and Ware is certainly studly in this offense.In my opinion--both RB's looked good today. Ware was running really tough and Jamaal had a couple runs where he moved a pile and showed some solid cutting and speed. I think that for me--all today proved was that there is no reason for KC to rush Charles back into a bell cow role. He will slowly but surely look better with time and KC has nothing to gain by just throwing him out there to be beaten up unnecessarily. For those of which thought that today was the day where Charles either gains his bell cow status back--or if today forces the Chiefs hands into giving him bell cow status asap--I think today was a setback for you. While I still think that Charles may end up being the lead back--I think today pushed that back at least 1-2 weeks at the very least. I do think that today showed that Ware could confidently be started as a solid flex option because of his upside alone. The dude seems to put up decent RB2 numbers with anything close to 10-12 touches--and is in the RB1 conversation with anything approaching 20 touches. With that being said--I'd say today was a mild to moderate win for Charles owners--and a moderate to strong win for Ware owners. Both sides can walk away with good stuff to feel good about.
Nope. I'm a Ware owner and saw enough to think Charles will be a factor if he stays healthy. Will get his GL touches as well. RBBC by committee, go with hot hand, enough for both to eat in most weeks.Agreed. So what else did we learn today? Here are my take-aways, assumptions, and conclusions.
Charles looks ok. Not bad, not great, but "fine." He demonstrated good vision and patience and I expect he'll get better and increased use every week.
That said, I don't see Ware's touches going down too much. Charles will steal touches from West, not Ware.
In addition, I think we saw that Ware will close out games in which they need to burn clock.
Reid will use both Ware and Charles inside the 5. Those expecting Ware to get ALL goal-line looks are gonna be disappointed. I'm not just talking Poe here (which is clearly an abberation), Charles has the vision and patience to be very effective at the goal line and if Reid was comfortable using him today I don't see why that would change.
My prediction for the near term (i.e. next 2-3 games) is that this wil be 60-40 split favoring Ware (because he'll close out games). Longer term, it's possible we'll see the pro-bowl Charles which could flip the splits to be 60-40 favoring Charles, but that day may never come, we'll see.
Anyone see it differently? Anything I missed?
Following up, I think it's pretty fair at this point to assume Ware is going to continue getting ~50% of the snaps, making him a reasonable RB2 play, with RB1 upside (when game flow plays his way) against all of the bold above. Ware got 62% of snaps yesterday to Jamaal's 23%.Other than when West and Charles have both been hobbled, Ware has shared ~50% of a committee in terms of snaps, going back to his emergence last year. I predicted that would continue early this year and was chased out of this thread by Ware extremists.
I think this week at least they ease Charles in and he gets no more than the West snaps, while Ware maintains the same role he's had. Against the Raiders that could easily be good for 15+ pts.
Realistically, going forward probably depends on how explosive Charles looks and whether or not Ware's sweaty forearms continue to be an issue. But Jamaal is older and clearly coming off a complicated injury, so it's probably in the Chiefs best interest to limit him if Ware can perform capably in his stead.
Another observation I made early this year was that Ware beat up on #### defenses last year and the real test would be weeks 2-4 this year (Hou, NYJ, Pit). He averaged just over 8 PPG in those games in my 0.5 PPR league.
That said the schedule eases up tremendously going forward (Oak, NO, Ind, Jax, Car, TB, Den, Atl, Oak, Ten, Den). IF he maintains ~50% of the snaps, other than in the three games against Den/Ten, I see him as a very viable RB2. Granted, the last two Ten/Den games are in the fantasy playoffs so there is that.
Can't wait to hear the rationale on this...Big home favorite against a D that just got bullied by J. Stewart, who runs a lot like Ware.Ware is averaging 5.2ypc on the season. The only team that has been able to hold Ware under 5.5ypc so far this year has been NYJ and he still put up a respectable line vs. them (20/75/0). He was also, in my opinion, robbed of a TD (and subsequent yardage) in that game but I digress..
Against softer defensive fronts I feel really confident that he will produce. On the docket are NO and IND.
NO is currently giving up a the most ppg to RBs and this is mostly due to the fact that they've given up the most TDs (11). There also giving up a healthy 4.4ypc.
The line has opened with KC -7 so I doubt Ware sees the kind of volume he did last week. Still considering the match-up I feel pretty confident expecting something like 14/70/1 and 3/30/0. Clearly there is upside for more, specifically in the TD department, but I also want to be careful not to weigh last week too heavily.
Also, the snap/utilization breakdown between Ware/Charles thus far..
Ware - 72%, 18 and 62%, 26
Charles - 13%, 3 and 23%, 11
I'm personally assuming that this will move closer to 1:1 in both the snap/utilization department as the season progresses.
Especially if you are a Zeke owner.If you own either they are must plays at home vs. NO anyway. No need to debate until week 8.
Does anyone know what the snap count and touches looked like by quarter? Seemed like Ware got disproportionately more work later on.Ware is averaging 5.2ypc on the season. The only team that has been able to hold Ware under 5.5ypc so far this year has been NYJ and he still put up a respectable line vs. them (20/75/0). He was also, in my opinion, robbed of a TD (and subsequent yardage) in that game but I digress..
Against softer defensive fronts I feel really confident that he will produce. On the docket are NO and IND.
NO is currently giving up a the most ppg to RBs and this is mostly due to the fact that they've given up the most TDs (11). There also giving up a healthy 4.4ypc.
The line has opened with KC -7 so I doubt Ware sees the kind of volume he did last week. Still considering the match-up I feel pretty confident expecting something like 14/70/1 and 3/30/0. Clearly there is upside for more, specifically in the TD department, but I also want to be careful not to weigh last week too heavily.
Also, the snap/utilization breakdown between Ware/Charles thus far..
Ware - 72%, 18 and 62%, 26
Charles - 13%, 3 and 23%, 11
I'm personally assuming that this will move closer to 1:1 in both the snap/utilization department as the season progresses.
I don't but I suspect any increased work load he got was due to the fact that the Chiefs were up by a good margin and they were trying to run out the clock on a sloppy field. No reason to use Charles in that situation and risk potential re-injury. So it's hard to say whether the late usage is an indicator of how they will be used going forward, or just a matter of how the game played out and the field conditions.Does anyone know what the snap count and touches looked like by quarter? Seemed like Ware got disproportionately more work later on.
I don't but I suspect any increased work load he got was due to the fact that the Chiefs were up by a good margin and they were trying to run out the clock on a sloppy field. No reason to use Charles in that situation and risk potential re-injury. So it's hard to say whether the late usage is an indicator of how they will be used going forward, or just a matter of how the game played out and the field conditions.
I read it completely incorrectly at first and thought NO was -7Can't wait to hear the rationale on this...Big home favorite against a D that just got bullied by J. Stewart, who runs a lot like Ware.
I would think they'd keep Ware. They just signed him to a cheap contract, he's playing great and he's just turning 25 next month.Any chance their starting to showcase Ware for trade possibilities...Which team(s) going forward might be tempted.?
New England
Raiders
Ravens
Redskins
Vikings
In a couple of weeks the Chiefs might feel secure with Charles/ West going forward.
And week 8 is at Indy who just got torched by L. Miller.If you own either they are must plays at home vs. NO anyway. No need to debate until week 8.
No. The Chiefs may want to win their division or something crazy like that.Any chance their starting to showcase Ware for trade possibilities...Which team(s) going forward might be tempted.?
Looking ahead I'm leaning towards starting both over Gordon at Denver.And week 8 is at Indy who just got torched by L. Miller.
Right, the Chiefs would likely want to see what they got in Ware this season not to trade him but so they can determine if they want to move on from Charles and go with Ware as their main back next season.I would think they'd keep Ware. They just signed him to a cheap contract, he's playing great and he's just turning 25 next month.
for those worried about Ware's fumbilitis, I also think him getting so many touches more accurately reflect what the coaches think of him...I don't but I suspect any increased work load he got was due to the fact that the Chiefs were up by a good margin and they were trying to run out the clock on a sloppy field. No reason to use Charles in that situation and risk potential re-injury. So it's hard to say whether the late usage is an indicator of how they will be used going forward, or just a matter of how the game played out and the field conditions.
No way they're trading Ware and keeping an injury prone 30 year old back like Charles. Ware is their stud RB for the next five years. This'll be Charles' last year in Kansas City.jimmy b said:Any chance their starting to showcase Ware for trade possibilities...Which team(s) going forward might be tempted.?
New England
Raiders
Ravens
Redskins
Vikings
In a couple of weeks the Chiefs might feel secure with Charles/ West going forward.